Paul Ryan Borrows a Mitt Romney Power Play in House Speaker Race
Did Ryan take a page out of Romney's playbook from the Bain and Company turnaround?


Rep. Paul Ryan's name has been bandied about as a candidate to replace John Boehner as House Speaker. Politico took a peek behind the curtain and found that the former vice presidential candidate and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee might be interested in the gig, but only on his own terms:
There's one remote scenario, people close to him say, in which Ryan would consider abandoning his long-laid career plans and go for the speakership: if he was the true consensus choice of the party. That means no opposition, no sniping, no acceding to demands in exchange for support.
Republicans—including the hard-liners who pushed out John Boehner and convinced Rep. Kevin McCarthy to drop his bid for speaker—would need to show they're prepared to follow Ryan.
Romney has publicly said Ryan would be great at the job and that he should rethink his reluctance, but perhaps he's giving Ryan some advice on the side? Because Ryan's terms sound awfully familiar. Here's Romney's own account of his return to Bain's consulting operation, from Hugh Hewitt's book, A Mormon in the White House:
"I met with the partners and said, 'Look, I'm willing to leave Bain Capital and become the chief executive officer [at Bain Consulting]…but there are a couple of conditions and you know what the conditions [are]. One is: You have to unanimously want it because if someone wants a different path, be my guest. Number two, you have to agree to stay. Barring some very unusual event, you have to agree to stay for at least a year to get us back on track."
Romney wound up delivered one of the most spectacular turnarounds in business history, rescuing Bain & Company from dire straits. Could Ryan do the same for the GOP?
Related: Paul Ryan is going to be Mitt Romney for Halloween. Not even kidding.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Related: Paul Ryan is going to be Mitt Romney for Halloween. Not even kidding."
What a trip. I was going to go as Paul Ryan disguised as Mitt Romney!
I guess I'll have to rethink that and perhaps go as Obama disguised as Bush.
Which means I'm going as Obama.
RAY CYST
Follow my feed: https://twitter.com/raycyst
If Ryan's going to stage a Bain Capital turnaround in the House, does that mean cutting positions and trimming back the overhead?
Maybe a bunch of government assets will get sold off? I've always wanted an aircraft carrier.
Parcel out the National Mall to condo developers. It's not as though the monuments mean anything anymore.
Washington Monument Luxury Highrises.
Are highrises allowed in DC? I remember often on IMDB Goofs/Trivia for a TV show with scenes in DC, buildings of 10+ floors are considered 'goof' because some zoning about maximum height.
You are not allowed to have a building over ten stories high in DC. Originally this was because the city did not want to spend the money to buy fire trucks that could deal with buildings over ten stories being on fire. Now it is because it preserves the 'character' of the city.
Zoning laws in the Paul Ryan era of fiscal solvency? Are you some sort of commie?
Dunno, is DC zoning one of those weird "Congress involves itself in municipal duties" areas that having DC as non-state entity entails?
I'll pass on putting a TARP supporter in the speaker position.
Uh, it's not up to you, you maple-sucking puck-slapping hoser.
Not that the average U.S.-ian gets a say in who the speaker is, but Canucks REALLY don't get a say.
Wait, that's not the position that's up for a vote in 4 days? What's going on here?
He wants to be one of you so bad. Why can you take a million Guatexicans a year, but not him? Please?
I'll let him come if he enlists in the Marines first.
Do Marines take non-citizens from outside US?
And if not, WTF is wrong with you people? One of best parts of being an Empire is having foreign units semi-integrated into your military. Get on creating Foreign Legion, or hire some Ghurkas and Sikhs. At the very least, your parades will look better!
I thinks there's a residency requirement. It is a path to citizenship, though.
It's easier for some nationals than for others - Filipinos, for example.
But our foreign legion would look like this:
http://static3.demotix.com/sit.....445065.jpg
Fuck. I tried really hard to not add "like Sikhs but with sombrerors" and now you go ruin it.
We should have started with divisions of German legionnaires after WW2. Force them all to adopt the Pickelhaube again. It would have been glorious.
Pickelhaube is awesome. But forget that - I suggest Lauri Torni Battalion as a first all-foreign unit in US Army. Because given how much time US military has spent training for combat in deserts and such, I'm expecting next major surprise commitment to be in some kind of frozen hellhole, and you want Finns for that.
Because unaccompanied minors aren't allowed to immigrate.
Don't Canucks have their big Robot vs Pretty Boy vs Beardo election to worry about?
He has a big heart that cares about many things.
How much of another person's vital essence do you have to be filled with in order to actually transform into that person?
Dunno. Wanna find out?
*waggles eyebrows*
Don't do it! It's a trap!
He'll do butt stuff to you and then deny you his essence!
He'll do butt stuff to you and then deny you his essence!
IOW, he'll pullout, unlike Obama?
STEVE SMITH GOING TO FIND ANSWER, ONE DAY.
Move aside every commentariat Star Trek discussion, we have a new leader in the "dorkiest thing ever" contest.
This doesn't even remotely hold a candle to speaking Klingon.
Or to saying "hold a candle to".
Maybe it would be cooler if you could translate into Klingon for me.
pagh, weQ 'uch
it's exactly the same, except for the part where Ryan is representing the bankrupt party that needs rescuing in the negotiations, not the reformers.
in reality it's closer to the Dodgeball strategy.
Paul Ryan is just another establishment tool. He should quit while he's ahead and do sleepovers on the USS Wisconsin with Romney.
Two douches that never served and are ready to send everyone but themselves off to war.
Nooo not the Wisconsin, that's like 3 blocks from my office. Why do you hate me?
Ok, ok. Maybe we'll just give them a toy Battleship they can use in the tub.