Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Planned Parenthood in the Hot Seat, Edward Snowden Is on the Twitter, Speaker Race: P.M. Links

Robby Soave | 9.29.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Wikimedia Commons
(Wikimedia Commons)
  • Snowden
    Edward Snowden

    Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richard defended her organization in a speech to Congress.

  • Who wants to be Speaker of the House?
  • Edward Snowden has joined Twitter. His first Tweet: "Can you hear me now?"
  • Carly Fiorina likes waterboarding.
  • Today in wildly inaccurate headlines: "Matt Damon Suggests Gay Actors Should Stay in the Closet." Not true!
  • Jeb Bush's campaign has its work cut out for it.
  • Afghani fighters are trying to retake control of Kunduz.
  • It's National Coffee Day, so go have a cup for free somewhere.

New at Reason.com:

  • The Martian author Andy Weir on Mars Colonization, Commercial Space Travel, and Going From Programmer to Best-Selling Author
    Q&A with the man who wrote the book behind the upcoming Hollywood film starring Matt Damon.
    By Zach Weissmueller

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Donald Trump Wants to Repeal Obamacare, Replace It With Obamacare

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (366)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    "Matt Damon Suggests Gay Actors Should Stay in the Closet." Not true!

    Makes for better filmmaking!

    1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

      I hung out with a closeted talent manager this weekend who encouraged his talent to stay in the closet until they get big enough it won't hurt their career. It killed me a little inside.

      1. grrizzly   10 years ago

        And you're aiding and abetting this closeted monster... No wonder he's for staying in the closet!

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        If he's in the closet, then how did you know?

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          I was on a boat. Everyone's gay on a boat. I didn't need to know.

          1. Brett L   10 years ago

            Because of the implications?

            1. Atanarjuat   10 years ago

              Well, they *were* under way.

      3. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        It killed me a little inside

        That's what you get for hanging out in a closet.

      4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Angst looks great on film!

      5. Rasilio   10 years ago

        I challenge anyone to show how being out of the closet works against you in the Entertainment business.

        I'd say it is much more likely he wants them to stay in the closet for them to become big enough that they can use coming out of the closet for PR purposes

        1. grrizzly   10 years ago

          They all remember how Rupert Everett's career fizzled.

          1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            Rupert Everett is a unique man:

            Everett criticised the introduction of same-sex marriage, stating: '"I loathe heterosexual weddings. The wedding cake, the party, the champagne, the inevitable divorce two years later. It's just a waste of time in the heterosexual world, and in the homosexual world I find it personally beyond tragic that we want to ape this institution that is so clearly a disaster."'

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          I think it's a strong pattern in country music and sports: stay in the closet, have a few fake romances, as your career fades come out and get a small bump of renewed interest and maybe some new fans that would've otherwise not been exposed to you.

          In acting there has been an ongoing problem with gay actors getting typecast in gay roles, and since gay cinema tends to be schlock it impairs their careers.

          I believe Matt Bomer has particularly transcended that, but not without people griping about him being too gay to play a straight male stripper.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

            MATT BOMER IS GAY?

        3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          I challenge anyone to show how being out of the closet works against you in the Entertainment business.

          All the little girls who had crushes on Lance Bass.

          1. Rasilio   10 years ago

            First: Those little girls are in their late 20's to mid 30's now, back in the 1990's there was a stigma against being openly gay, in 2015, not so much

            Second: you honestly think todays versions of those little girls would stop having a crush on the guy because he's gay? No they'll just like him that much more for being so honest and real and secretly dream that he'd go straight just for her.

            1. Mrs. Lemuel Struthers   10 years ago

              I think it does have negative consequences for the Lance Bass reason. Not that women dislike openly gay men or want to discriminate, but being open precludes some aspect of the intangible romantic leading man thing.

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      Did that actor who played Spider-Man (Garfield is it?) recently say Spider-Man should be gay because why not?

      Yes. Let's fuck around with an established character for SJW!

      Why doesn't Garfield just write his own gay super hero? Why do this people always want to mess with something that doesn't need tinkering?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        But what other DC universe character should he hook up with?

        Release the slashfic.

        1. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

          Robin.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            Yeh those booties are pretty faggy.

        2. Anomalous   10 years ago

          Spider-Man is Marvel, not DC. NTTAWWT.

          1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

            Spider-Man is Marvel, not DC.

            And Midnighter is already in a relationship.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              I thought he and Apollo had split. I just read the 2007 run and haven't gotten to the new run where he's cruising Scruff.

      2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        "' Spider-Man should be gay""

        Mary-Ann is just a supportive friend anyway.

    3. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      Was he referencing him and Ben?

      Damofleck? Batt?

    4. Rhywun   10 years ago

      "I think you're a better actor the less people know about you, period,"

      Damon, who has four children with wife

      I think I already know too much about Matt Damon.

      1. Aloysious   10 years ago

        Knowing anything about Matt Damon is too much.

        1. Rhywun   10 years ago

          Going forward I expect to see far fewer male actors frolicking on the beach or hanging out at Spago with their latest supermodel girlfriends - y'know, because acting.

    5. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      I'm glad that was cleared up cause I totally give a fuck what Matt Damon says.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richard defended her organization in a speech to Congress.

    Cecile? Like the lion?

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Yes. Her brother died, and then he didn't die.

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Arose after three days?

        You know else..?

        1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

          Me after a bender?

  3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    Free coffee? I just walk out without paying?

    1. This Machine   10 years ago

      I know Dunkin' D's was giving out free coffee today. Probably a lot of other places too.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        My coffeeshop did not get this memo. Grumble.

        1. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

          You probably just didn't scream at the barista loud enough.

          1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

            She's new. I did learn her name though.

        2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

          Didn't appear to make it across the pond either.

      2. Anomalous   10 years ago

        You don't buy DD coffee anyway, you just rent it.

    2. Rhywun   10 years ago

      When is National Car Day? Or National Condo Day.

      1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        What's up with the price of condos? Why are they more than houses?

  4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Jeb Bush's campaign has its work cut out for it.

    They've yet to win over Barbara.

    1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

      I believe it was Robin Williams who said that Barbara Bush is already on the $1 bill.

  5. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

    Carly Fiorina likes waterboarding.

    This is going to lead to some sick Sugar Free shit, isn't it?

  6. Slammer   10 years ago

    Edward Snowden has joined Twitter. His first Tweet: "Can you hear me now?"

    I'd say clicking "follow" on Snowden guarantees some extra automated scrutiny from our digital overlords.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      I signed you up. You're welcome.

    2. kinnath   10 years ago

      Inciteful

    3. Ted S.   10 years ago

      I didn't realize Snowden endorses Verizon.

    4. waffles   10 years ago

      I think we'd all said that at one time or another. Gotta tow than lion somehow.

    5. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      So does being a regular visitor to this website

      1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Just viewing this website gets you that.

        Being a regular visitor gets you assigned seating on the train to NSA summer camp.

    6. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

      How does Snowden on Twitter merit a Hit n Run post on its own and a PM Link? This just seems like a weird fanboy interest nonstory.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    His first Tweet: "Can you hear me now?"

    Someone's getting that sweet Verizon money.

    1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

      Well, can they?

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      And Verizon is getting NSA money. It's all so confusing.

      1. waffles   10 years ago

        It's like an ouroboros snake of pickpockets and circlejerkers.

    3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      I thought it was the opposite: now he's on Verizon's shit list, and will be extradited for copyright infringement.

    4. Trouser-Pod (The blowhard)   10 years ago

      Someone's getting that sweet Verizon money.

      Yes. Yes, he is. Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

      1. Enough About Woodchippers   10 years ago

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPOcxNMzNhc

  8. This Machine   10 years ago

    Oh, thank Science, the PM Links. Finally a welcome diversion from Trump and the shitfit going on in the Trans article.

    1. Citizen X   10 years ago

      What, you don't like talking about the existential horror that is Warty's penis?

      1. This Machine   10 years ago

        That entire thread is an existential horror and an abomination against nature. But damn it, articles about government corruption and blatant abuse of power don't get the clicks, so expect more of it tomorrow.

        1. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

          That article was about the blatant abuse of government power.

          1. This Machine   10 years ago

            The comments took it in a very different direction.

            1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

              Glad I got in with the second comment and got out. We seem to be getting a lot of those mega threads lately.

    2. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      "Is that a gun in your pocket, or is it just an anomaly?"

      1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        That was my comment

    3. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      So, you approve of Ryan Adams covering T-Swizzle's 1989 album?

      Noted.

      1. This Machine   10 years ago

        Crusty, while I may not tacitly endorse your- *shudder* - taste in women, recreational activities, or tawdry hobbies, rest assured that I am 100% pro-shitty-cover-album. So on that you have my vote.

  9. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Chicago's "Independent" Police Review Authority, which two months ago fired an investigator for not being sufficiently pro-police in his investigations, is now sending its investigators to training so they will be even more pro-police in their investigations.

    1. Slammer   10 years ago

      More on the IPRA

    2. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Independent Police Review Authority investigators and supervisors on Monday will begin a five-day course led by Bill Lewinski, founder and leader of the Minnesota-based Force Science Institute, according to internal IPRA records.

      Jesus fucking christ of course they are.

      Bill Lewinski should be first through the woodchipper, btw. Metaphorically speaking.

      1. Slammer   10 years ago

        Bill L fucking loves Force Science!

    3. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Why do you hate our Heroes in Blue?

    4. Rt. Hon. Judge Woodrow Chipper   10 years ago

      One of my friends is a Chicago cop and he hates talking about work. Another friend likes to poke the hornet's nest.

      So on Sunday night the cop after lots of insistence by the nest-poker finally started bitching about his job. To make a long story short: end of shift, pulls a guy for swerving into oncoming traffic lane (no traffic but did it 3 times), sees bag of mj and gun on front seat, arrests him. Guy wants trial, and judge lets him off which pissed of my cop buddy.

      As I said goodnight at the end of his story, I so much wanted to say "Once you escalated in into victim-less crime territory, I was rooting against you and I'm glad you lost." Which is basically what the judge said by her actions.

  10. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

    "It's National Coffee Day, so go have a cup for free somewhere."

    You know what day Bill Clinton would like to establish?

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Bill Clinton Day? (Is this one of those H&R contest/game thingies?)

      1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        That depends on what you mean by "is"

    2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

      Free "milk in my coffee"?

      1. Michael   10 years ago

        Paging Teenage Girl. Teenage Girl to the white courtesy phone, please.

    3. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      Intern Day, Cigar day, Rape day, Hillarys out of town day

  11. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Carly Fiorina likes waterboarding.

    Kind of like Kerry liked windsurfing?

  12. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

    Edward Snowden has joined Twitter. His first Tweet: "Can you hear me now?"

    Snowden must think we have one of those Twitters that reads the messages aloud.

    I do not.

  13. rts   10 years ago

    More Canadians are 65 and over than under age 15, StatsCan says

    For the first time ever, there are now more people in Canada age 65 and over than there are under age 15, according to Statistics Canada.

    Looking forward to more of that intergenerational theft-by-voting.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      Who cares about Canadians?

      1. rts   10 years ago

        Hitler?

      2. Mazakon   10 years ago

        Well me, but I am a vested interest in doing that.

      3. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

        The Wendigo?

        1. waffles   10 years ago

          Yes! I think this was my favorite from those scary stories books.

        2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          That would propose a solution on what Canada should do with all those extra old people.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            Send them to America!

      4. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Me!

      5. SimonJester   10 years ago

        Wolverine?

    2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      There's an easy fix for this - enormous immigration from wartorn, fundamentalist Islamic nations.

      As Europe has shown, there are no drawbacks. You get lots of young workers, you get to consider yourself noble and just, and you get great cardiovascular exercise when you're dodging grenade attacks using military hardware appropriated from the Balkan War or fleeing from rape gangs that the cops don't want to arrest out of fear they'll be called racists.

      Western values are for pussies. Embrace the caliphate, you pasty old Canadians.

      The Malmo, Sweden grenade attacks are actually my favorite ridiculous story of the year because of the reaction of the oh-so PC Swedes. Take this guy:

      "These attacks are creating terror and it plays into the hand of the far right" said Joakim Palmkvist, a Swedish journalist and author of Mafia War. "The general effect is scaring the public to an extent that has been unknown before."

      I'm glad you're focusing on the real problem here, which is the potential benefit this will provide to right-wingers rather than the people actually throwing grenades around.

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        Hilariously, Canada imports about 1% of its population every year. But, because we have an ocean to the east, an ocean to the west, north pole north and a thousands-mile wall called the SU south, we get to choose who comes. With a rigorous point-based process, and family reunification rules being administrative, not legislative, Canada can always choose how many of which immigrant class it takes. And the best part, if fake refugees start showing up, just slap a visa on them and problem solved (as was done to Mexicans and Roma from Czech Republic and Hungary).
        And trust me on "rigorous points-based process" from personal experience.

        1. grrizzly   10 years ago

          It's all well and good -- but then you have to actually live in Canada. I could get a Canadian residence permit but no way would I spend 3 out of 5 years in the Arctic.

          1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

            Do what most of us do, and live close to US border, where it's only Montana cold!

            Or try and squeeze into the Pacific area, where one snowfall means multi-city emergencies.

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

              Yeh. Quebec has biting cold weather, obscene snow falls and they speak the wrong language.

              Something called Fuawrench.

              1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

                Here's a BBC Report that makes me want to vote BQ. Or punch the reporter interviewing. Or punch the professor interviewed. Or everyone else involved.

        2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          Our 'rigorous points based approach' is more government pretending is has the answers when it doesn't and the right to determine who we associate with when it doesn't, at massive cost to Canadians. Just. Let. Them. In.

      2. Illocust   10 years ago

        I read the article. There has apparently been thirty of these attacks since the new year. WTF, why are people tossing grenades at random? Seriously, this latest one just did property damage and didn't even hit anybody. What are these guys hoping to accomplish. Are they just generally mad and want to watch the world burn?

        1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          At some point, you start doing that shit because you can. It's a statement of supremacy over others - "I chucked a grenade on the street. I could have chucked it into your house. What are you gonna do about it?"
          Plus, all the "refugees" need to sort out who is in charge of the newly obtained land, and, say what you will, hand grenades are excellent at that sort of thing.
          My new favorite, from Germany:

          Pakistanis fight Albanians in a refugee camp. Because pecking order needs to be established.

        2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          It's the welfare state. This is what it does to people. See also: American inner cities.

      3. CatoTheChipper   10 years ago

        Malm? has been hit by more than 30 explosions since the start of the year. At one point in July four grenade attacks were reported in under a week. Last year, a total of 25 blasts took place in the city over the whole of 2014.

        I thought, of all places, Sweden's common-sense grenade control would make this sort of thing impossible. Did they pass an insane shall-issue concealed-carry law that allows immigrants to keep and bear grenades?

      4. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

        Europe's immigration can be summed up as 'short term pain, long term massive gain'.

    3. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

      There's a fix for this: open borders. Also: under the table tax avoidance.

  14. Citizen X   10 years ago

    I'd say clicking "follow" on Snowden guarantees some extra automated scrutiny from our digital overlords.

    1. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

      You know, I've heard the same thing.

  15. SimonJester   10 years ago

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tec.....eport.html

    By 2050, human-on-robot sex will be more common than human-on-human sex

    1. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      But robosexual marriage will likely still be illegal.

      1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

        If anyone asks, I'm her debugger.

        1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

          Debugger? I hardly know her!

      2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        The space pope is against it, and that's good enough for me.

        1. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

          The Space Church has a long history of robophobia. It's totally out of touch

        2. SimonJester   10 years ago

          Condemned by all seven popes and the Orange Catholic Bible?

    2. Tonio   10 years ago

      It just occurred to me that this will particularly enrage feminists since women will no longer be gatekeepers for most sex.

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        Is robosex actually sex or just elaborate masturbation?

        If I have sex with a man, and then replace him piece by piece with cybernetic parts and build a new man out of the fleshy bits will a three way still be monogamous?

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Probably depends on how realistic the sexbots are. I'm sure the first generation will be more like masturbation, but eventually, they will make your partner jealous.

        2. Warty   10 years ago

          The other Turing test: if a smooth young boybot blows you and you can't tell it's a robot, is it sentient?

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Or are you?

          2. Free Society   10 years ago

            Warty knows all about proclivities for little boys

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              You forgot to end your sentence with a period.

        3. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

          Four robots are having sex on the tracks, and a trolley is about to hit and destroy them. On another track, two robots are holding signs protesting robosex. Should you flip the switch, changing which track the trolley will run on, or does it not matter because robots are not "alive"?

          1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

            Which robots do you find more attractive?

        4. Warty   10 years ago

          Is it morally permissible to destroy a robot prior to its initial bootup?

          1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

            Or is it...morally required?

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              Good point. Is it a moral offense to bring a robotconsciousness into being, so it experiences inevitable memory degradation and encoder failures?

              1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

                No, it is a moral offense to create a graven image, as creation of the human form belongs to Allah.

                1. Warty   10 years ago

                  You know lots about what cultists believe in. Why doesn't a photograph count as a graven image to these idiots. Or does it?

        5. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   10 years ago

          If I have sex with a man, and then replace him piece by piece with cybernetic parts and build a new man out of the fleshy bits will a three way still be monogamous?

          Interesting question, Mr. Dahmer ...

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Gay porn demeans women.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          12 years after my acquaintance said that and this still makes me sad.

          1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

            Because of how guilty you feel for hating women, right?

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              Hahahahahahaha. Oh, Nikki. Why would I feel guilty about that?

        2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

          Wait... what? That's a thing? you're kidding.

          I don't even understand the theory.

          1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

            I can't phrase it in a way that's not retarded, but basically, "you want us for anything!"

            1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

              Dont. Don't want.

              1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

                I thought Women's Liberation was all about not being mere-tools for procreation etc.?

                I'd think hetero-Feminists d love gay porn for a) its genuine appeal (ALL THAT DICK!), b) it giving them the opportunity to 'Celebrate' gays, c) ALL THAT DICK? d) something to use to make their boyfriends uncomfortable?

                1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

                  So much dick, dude. So much dick. It is a wondrous thing.

                2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                  It came up when someone was ranting about how "all porn demeans women" I said "Ummm, I'm pretty sure mine only demeans men...lots and lots of men" and she responded "Gay porn demeans women by saying they aren't necessary."

                  I wish I could say I had a witty rejoinder but I was so gobsmacked by it that I just stared with my mouth agape.

                  1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

                    "I wish I could say I had a witty rejoinder"

                    I would have gone with,

                    "but they're *not*?"

                    1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      Believe me I have a dozen years of l'esprit d'escalier built up on this one. She was a standard SJW and I think it would've been fun to walk her into saying that if that was the problem with gay porn then it was a problem with male homosexuality, and watch the New Left alliance in her head crumble, but instead I stared blankly.

                    2. Warty   10 years ago

                      But...wait...women are necessary for gay sex???

                    3. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      For now, Warty, for now.

                      *Returns to prototype of Homouterotron 8000 artificial womb and homoizer*

      3. Hyperion   10 years ago

        SJW heads will explode, it's like the ultimate revenge on them. When the sexbots arrive, everyone will totally ignore them. They'll try to lobby congress to pass laws against the sexbots. Of course they'll want the sexbots too since no one will have sex with them. It's going to be hilarious.

        1. This Machine   10 years ago

          "Do you have a license for that sexbot, sir? To the Gulag with you!"

    3. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Why wait for 2050? You always have vacuum cleaners and knotholes in trees...I've heard.

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        Vacuum cleaners, really?

        I have never looked at a vacuum cleaner and thought, maybe I'll try hitting that. Even when I was like 14.

        Maybe I missed out on a right of passage.

        1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

          Maybe I know for a fact that you did, and maybe there is still time.

        2. tarran   10 years ago

          A book I read that chronicled embarrassing injuries claimed that, statistically speaking, if one were to rank the causes of male masturbation ending with injuries requiring a visit to the ER, sticking in vacuum cleaners was at the top, followed by sticking it in the suction inlet for swimming pools' filtration systems.

          1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            The trick is to not be embarrassed.

          2. Warty   10 years ago

            I would have figured sticking hard objects into one's ass was a more common mode of injury. Who looks at a vacuum cleaner and goes, "hmmmm...I bet I could stick my cock in that..."?

            1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

              The pool filter can rip your insides out

              1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

                For your reading pleasure.

                1. Warty   10 years ago

                  I've heard of that happening to kids. Ew.

                  By the way, the little one is walking now. FEAR.

            2. Lord at War   10 years ago

              Nobody linked this?

        3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          GKC is just trying to trick all you sinners into getting your wiener ripped off.

    4. Warty   10 years ago

      Human-on-hand or human-on-vibrating-plastic sex is vastly more common than human-on-human sex now. Are we going to panic because people will have more complicated dildoes in the future? Of course we are.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Some people are going to complain. Guess what? They will be the same people who complain about everything now. SJWs.

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          Is the freakout coming from the left end of the KULTUR WAR pantsshitters? It would feel right coming from either side*.

          *that's what she said.

          1. Hyperion   10 years ago

            I'm sure we'll see it coming from both sides. But I think the SJWs will be the most vocal, just like they are now about every perceived sin.

            1. Corning   10 years ago

              The SJWs are also the more likely to win.

              Haven't seen the right win a cultural battle ever.

              Comics, NASA, atheism, games, nerd conventions, SF/F, Hollywood, MSM, open source, UN, reddit, reason magazine, etc.. have all fallen or been severely damaged by SJWs

              1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                Games aren't damaged at all. Gamers are almost 100% united in their hatred of SJWs and the game companies are making billions. Guess who's paying the bills?

      2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Don't date robots.

    5. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      But what about robot-on-human sex?

      1. SimonJester   10 years ago

        There is some serious BDSM potential, here, too. Could you imagine a robot dom? This is brilliant.

        1. waffles   10 years ago

          Truth. Domination is work. Still, how submissive does one have to be to truly surrender to a robot? It's the mindfuckery, not the physical act that makes BDSM. A robot dom is still pretty much controlled by the sub. That said, I don't support any common sense regulation of robot doms.

          1. SimonJester   10 years ago

            Not necessarily, Waf.

            By your argument, ANY dom is controlled by the sub since the sub, at any time, can end the scene/relationship/contract. But this is the conundrum of "topping from the bottom." This is just a feature of BDSM relationships, and one each scene participant has to work out with the other members.

            That said, you could easily allow someone else to program the Dombot*, thereby distancing one's self further from control. Or even allow real-time control of the Dombot, either by hiring a single controller, or doing a crowd-controll of the machine (why don't we already have something like this?) And this is not even taking into account the idea of "programs" that the dombot can select, or from which it can choose randomly.

            *Not Doombot, which would still be a pretty sick name.

            1. waffles   10 years ago

              I agree with you. I have no desire to venture into subspace but if I did I don't think I could ever really relinquish control. For some people submission can be turned on like a light switch.

          2. Rasilio   10 years ago

            "Truth. Domination is work"

            Much to my wife's chagrin one of the two main reasons I am not into BDSM.

            The other being that I find someone submitting to me to be a massive turn off, I want my partner to be insatiably enthusiastic to be having sex with me, not to feel like I am forcing her into it, even though I know I am not really forcing her and I'm doing what she wants 99% of the time it just doesn't work for me.

            1. waffles   10 years ago

              Yup. Maybe the DomBot isn't such a bad idea. Kinksters and pornographers are always on the bleeding edge of technology. We'll see it soon enough. No amount of SJW/Feminist/SoCon whining can stop the robosexual revolution.

            2. DesigNate   10 years ago

              So much this^

        2. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

          That would seem to break two of the Three Laws.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            By that standard wouldn't a treadmill be breaking the Three Laws?

            Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?

    6. waffles   10 years ago

      What would a human-human-robot threeway be called?

      1. SimonJester   10 years ago

        A good time?

      2. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

        Mutual masturbation with a 'marital aide'?

      3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        HAWT

      4. bacon-magic   10 years ago

        The Dweebil's 3 way.

    7. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

      I'd say clicking "follow" on Snowden guarantees your robot's bic could pass as some extra automated scrutiny from our digital overlords.

    8. Rasilio   10 years ago

      Err so?

      I'd wager that sex with a combination of vibrators, dildos, fleshlights, and blow up dolls probably outnumbers human on human sex in most western nations.

      The simple fact is that a person has far more opportunity to masturbate than they do to have sex with someone else and given the headaches that can come with having to interact with another person it is frequently more satisfying.

      Robots are just a minor improvement on what is already happening

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Robots are just a minor improvement on what is already happening

        You misspelled 'gargantuan improvement.'

    9. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      Do dildos count as robots? Because if so, proportions might be already shifting.

      1. waffles   10 years ago

        Hit and Run is always telling me all I need to know about teledildonics.

    10. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

      At some point, lifelike robots will be having sex with each other. These cheap and tireless and slutty workers will put human porn stars out of business. Then there will be a period when people yearn for real actors in their porn again, and they'll be willing to pay a premium for it. Everyone's daughters will be tempted by this easy money. The sexbot factories will put out even more lifelike robots to compete. And before long we'll all end up living like Sneechs on the beaches.

      IT'S IN REVELATIONS, PEOPLE!

    11. waffles   10 years ago

      From the comments
      Let's suppose that these types of robots were available to most people with the means to pay for them (e.g. in the $2-3K range), and that they were able to fulfill physical and emotional needs of their owners (men and women respectively). I think as a result the family would be mortally wounded - population growth and economic output of nations would suffer as a result. Demographics and nations without the means to purchase these robots would become much more dominant - the poorer demographics would result in significant decline in education levels and per capita GDP within 20-30 years after wide adoption of these robots.

      TLDR: DON'T DATE ROBOTS!

      1. Rasilio   10 years ago

        Sounds like it is both a self correcting problem AND good for the environment.

        1. waffles   10 years ago

          Yeah the overpopulation nutjobs should be all over this.

  16. Slammer   10 years ago

    New Wombbath. Fuck, how did I miss this..first album since '93

  17. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

    Jeb Bush's campaign has its work cut out for it.

    A couple of good ratfuckers will fix that.

    Lee Atwater is dead, Karl Rove has a Fox News gig but there are lots of others with the skills.

    1. Corning   10 years ago

      Pretty sure king ratfucker David Weigel is in the can for Hilary right now...

      Just like he was in the can for Hilary in September/October of 2007.

  18. Ted S.   10 years ago

    England can't fall to fourth in the league coefficient fast enough for me.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      If Liverpool/Spurs don't do well enough in the Europa this year, England may lose that 4th Champions league spot.

      1. Ted S.   10 years ago

        I don't think Italy can realistically overtake England this year. Maybe next.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          I agree. Not this year.

          And not with Roma that's for sure.

          Useless fucks.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            Once Serie A passes EPL, it will also make a charge at Bundesliga. Historical coefficient leaders is Liga, Serie A, EPL, Bundesliga in that order.

      2. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

        I think it is unlikely that Italy will pass England over this season. Last season's coefficient by Italy was the highest by any country since the current system was implemented. It's unlikely to be repeated.

        1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

          Should have added an "eventually" in there. We know that England's Champions League teams are going to do terribly, except for the Scum, which mysteriously got an easy draw like they do every year. So if Liverpool and Spurs don't do the job in the Europa, it's going to be a lot easier for England to get passed soon.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            I don't get overly worked up over soccer. I try but I don't. The only time I really got pissed was when Milan was bitch slapping Liverpool and had a 10 minute brain cramp in 2007 and lost the final.

            To me that was more Milan losing it than Liverpool winning it since Milan held net dominance through out.

            And one of the penalty goals should not have stood.

            Fin rehashing.

            1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

              Miracle of Istanbul (Liverpool's comeback against Milan) was 2005, not 2007. As a Liverpool fan, I cried at the end of that one. Still the only sporting event that's ever made me cry.

              2007 was a 2-1 Milan win over Liverpool.

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

                Yeah sorry. It didn't feel right as I typed that.

                And.

                /narrows gaze.

              2. Rhywun   10 years ago

                I've only been following Liverpool since 2010. There was a time they didn't suck?

                (Yes, I know there was.)

                (I have just never seen it.)

                1. Rhywun   10 years ago

                  Speaking of suck - just finished the Arsenal match. That is some suck.

  19. Warty   10 years ago

    Ares Kingdom

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      I never realized how much a lot of people here are into metal until the last couple days.

      1. Warty   10 years ago

        Libertarians are morally stunted, childish recluses, right? Of course we're all into it.

      2. Aloysious   10 years ago

        Except Ted S.

        Homey doesn't like the metals.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          I like the metalz, always have.

  20. generic Brand   10 years ago

    Apologies for being out of touch with the posting protocols, but Chicago Commentariat Meet-Up is a Go!

    I returned from Europe (more or less unscathed, but very broke), and conferred with some other Chicagoans, and we decided on meeting Sunday, October 18 at Hopleaf Bar in Andersonville. Hope some others can make it out that day; feel free to email me or whatever. We'll probably meet around noon:30, since da Bears are simply unbearable (glances around nervously for Swiss) to watch this season and apparently have begun a Fire Sale. So NFL is dead to me. But they might also have TVs there anyway; I'm not sure.

    Looking forward to meeting some of you. Great beer selection so even if I'm the only one who can make it I will at least have a choice in what I want to drown my loneliness in.

    1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      WHOOOOOOOOO

      It's actually good the Bears are so terrible. Everyone knew they were going to fucking suck this year, so they might as well just bottom out and shore up on draft picks. The worst thing that could have happened would be for the Bears to be 6-11 yet again, foolishly think they were still in it until a late season 4 game losing streak, and then get a mediocre draft pick without trading away any of their old players.

      At least this way I have no expectations for the season, we can ditch all the old guys who won't be around by the time we hopefully rebuild, and we can guarantee getting a top draft pick due to being goddamn terrible.

    2. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      posting protocols

      You really are out of touch, dude.

    3. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      I don't think there are TVs.

      1. generic Brand   10 years ago

        Eh, that's okay. Just means we'll all have to do shots of Mal?rt to tolerate each other. 😀

        1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

          We can subcontract our Mal?rt duties out, though, right? Because we're evil libertarians? And also because it's Mal?rt.

          1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

            I would say I look forward to meeting you, but I assume that you're actually a 6 foot tall, morbidly obese male trucker since female libertarians don't exist.

            1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

              Irish, I'm not drinking your share of the Mal?rt.

              1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

                ""Malort is...like an aquavit, it's like a flavored vodka basically, but flavored with darkness and pain."

                1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

                  This is the quote I wanted:

                  ""It's like aquavit? grain neutral spirits that are flavored with different botanicals, like gin. The botanicals that it's flavored with are wormwood and other bitter, sort of medicinal-type of botanicals. And thus, it tastes like pencil shavings and heartbreak."

          2. generic Brand   10 years ago

            Of course. I will take on your Mal?rt burden in exchange for... other services.

            *(Other services most likely equals cheeseburgers.)

            1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

              Deal!

  21. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    WaPo = Stunning Expose of Abuse of Chinese Political Prisoners

    .... oh, sorry, that's next year.

  22. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    General Public Not Only Ones Who Think US/China Cyber-Espionage "Agreement" is Complete Bullshit

  23. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Governemnt Insists They Maintain Monopoly on Imprisonment

    "This shed was not approved by inspectors, or staffed with Union labor", critics noted

  24. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    And the Lord said, "Fill the Earth, and Subdue it"

    1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

      How the fuck do you even accomplish shuttling 4.25 TONS of litter by yourself in a 7 month period.

      I'll hand this to him. That's some fucking dedication.

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        I guess he didn't like to pick and choose from the "Free Stuff" bin, and just took the whole thing every trip

        Tragedy of the Commons, LOOK THE FUCK OUT

      2. tarran   10 years ago

        That works out to 37 lbs per day if he raids the thing daily. Doable. But boring.

        If he does it once a week, it's 260 lbs. Much more impressive.

      3. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

        It seems much more likely that the Forest Service is grossly exaggerating.

        1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

          NEVER?!

          1. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

            Well, hardly ever!

  25. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Obama Praises Secret Service = "They were almost always mostly sober around the Pope, and kept the whores completely out of sight. They're improving!"

  26. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Save Us, Donald-Wan... You're Our Only Hope

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      IOW, we're totally fucked?

  27. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    File Under = "An Honest Mistake"

    "A Wisconsin man is being held in a mental health facility after being charged with beheading his mother with a sword because he thought she was not his real mother, court records showed. "

  28. Juice   10 years ago

    The people of Afghanistan are Afghan. The money of Afghanistan is the Afghani.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      What are rugs?

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        Comfi

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          What about them blankets my Grandma used to make?

          1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

            Bacha-Bazi

  29. lap83   10 years ago

    "But in terms of actors, I think you're a better actor the less people know about you, period," he continued. "And sexuality is a huge part of that. Whether you're straight or gay, people shouldn't know anything about your sexuality because that's one of the mysteries that you should be able to play."

    Political beliefs are a different story, however.

  30. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    Cheap milk in Canada? Farmers say NO(N)!

    Complete with driving tractors in front of legislature because clearly French farmers are the role model you want. And some choice retardation in the comments, that I've been previewing for a week on my Facebook feed. Apparently, outside Canada milk is the most polluted substance in existance and we must keep it away FOR THE CHILDRUNS! And cheese, of course. What the fuck do Europeans or Americans know about cheese?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Ah yes. When Canadians over rate their products. IT'S FUCKEN MILK YOU ASSHOLES. Not wine or beer. Sheesh.

      My brother in law would buy his milk in the USA whenever he got the chance because he got more bang for his buck and actually preferred it for a family of five.

      Fuck the dairy mafia.

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        Facebook is convinced that US milk is full of growth hormons, puss, piss, blood, GMOs, and probably orphan souls. We need Pure Good Canadian Farmers milk. That comes with price fixing, and quotas, of course.
        For some reason, same people get why Uber beats taxi firms (mostly).

  31. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Obama #KONY2015 Plan Starting to Resemble Syria

    " Working from a new bush camp in the Central African Republic, U.S. forces have begun working closely with Islamist rebels ? known as the Seleka ? who toppled the central government two years ago and triggered a still-raging sectarian war.

    The Pentagon has not previously disclosed its intelligence sharing and other forms of cooperation with the Seleka. The arrangement has made some U.S. troops uncomfortable.'"

    No word if Seleka child-rape practices are causing friction.

    I blame BOOOSH

    1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      " Working from a new bush camp in the Central African Republic, U.S. forces have begun working closely with Islamist rebels ? known as the Seleka ? who toppled the central government two years ago and triggered a still-raging sectarian war.

      Wait, what the fuck?

      These Seleka?

      The gunmen follow a pattern when they attack unsuspecting settlements in the Central African Republic. They come on nights when the moon is large and at the quietest hour when all is still as the villagers sleep.

      The roar of engines, shouting, screaming, gunfire and the sickening sound of the wet smack of a machete carving into flesh quickly engulfs the calm.

      The lucky ones run into the surrounding bush, grabbing their children, escaping into the night.
      It happened at Vakap ? one village of hundreds attacked in this manner. No one knows how many died or were injured by the bullets and the machetes.

      WHY!?!?!

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        This is how the "White House is controlled by Muslim Brotherhood" conspiracy theory keeps going. Because advanced stupidity vs actual malice, how do you tell the difference?

    2. Dr. Jonathan Crane   10 years ago

      But Barry won the Nobel Peace Prize so whatever he does is in the interest of peace, right?

  32. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    US Getting Serious About ISIS Funding =
    Sanction Everyone Except Saudi Arabia, and Gulf Arabs

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      15 people? Wow, we've really nipped this little problem in the bud.

      Case closed.

      1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

        It's kind of like that General's testimony in front of Congress

        "So how many of these people [that US trained] are still in combat?"

        "Um...four or five."

        Maybe that's the scale they operate on in Syria? In which case, Canada is right on point, with our six aircraft in action!

  33. Dr. Jonathan Crane   10 years ago

    Apparently Martin O'Malley is worth absolutely nothing.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Last I heard, he had a faculty position at JHU, that's definitely worth something.

    2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Say it again!

    3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      After all of the lying, shady deals, stealing, and bribery, it's absolutely astonishing that Hillary Clinton is only worth $45 million.

      Of course, she's most likely lying again.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        Hey, she had to work up to that $45 million after being completely broke in 2001.

      2. grrizzly   10 years ago

        She's called a mediocre grifter for a reason.

  34. Liege   10 years ago

    I'd say clucking "fellow" on Snowden guarantees some extra antiquated security from our digital overlords.

    1. Carl, Fighter of the Nightman   10 years ago

      #cluckservative

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      You shouldn't worry about that too much, because posting anything on this site already guarantees you're on all the lists. So click away.

  35. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    Regarding sex robots: I look forward to some terrifyingly weird internet posts about sex robot proclivities in the future. I fully expect to hear all kinds of stories about people walking in on their dads having sex with a robo-sheep or something so sex robots will make the internet an even more hilarious place.

    1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      OH MY GOD, think about what dweebs will get up to when they have sex with custom made robots that look like Princess Zelda! And the furries!

      This is going to be spectacular.

      1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        I'm guessing everyone in the future will be happier.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Yes, and the only thing that can ruin that? Politician, as always.

      2. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

        Lucy Liubot!

        1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

          There are terrifying fetishes I probably don't even know I have which will be fully explored in a Land of Sex Robots.

          1. Hyperion   10 years ago

            We expect youtube links. Trigger warnings please.

        2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

          Renee Oconnerbot. Or both

      3. DesigNate   10 years ago

        We live in pretty amazing times Irish.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Totally amazing technology is headed our way in the next 5-20 years. People who don't follow these things will be completely shocked by it.

      4. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        Oh hell yeah. Zeldabot, Larabot, Asaribots, tentaclebots. People are gonna get their freak ON!

        1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          Plus, combine this with 3d printing, and the variety and inevitability are even more certain. You have your Lucy Liubot one night, then reprint it as a Lucy Lawlessbot the next night.

          And, indeed, you then get into the underage fetish... it will be fascinating to see how mores change.

      5. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        I've always said continuous virtual sex was the ultimate human civilization.

        1. Bobarian (Would Chip Her)   10 years ago

          Dennis Miller was dead on.

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      It's going to be interesting alright. But I'll go straight on record here as saying one thing. No one can stop this. Oh, they will try, I mean, will they ever. But stopping it is not possible.

      But you can just imagine what a circus it will be. People will be outraged, outraged I tell you! Robots are humans too! Robot rape! Did you see that robot, It didn't look 18!

      I hate luddites.

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        The last part's going to be hilarious. I guarantee there's going to be a push to outlaw having sex with robots that look like children on moral panic grounds even though no child is actually being hurt.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          This and a thousand other completely ridiculous things.

      2. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        Maybe they'll relax more since they're having more sex.

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          The luddites and moral puritans will never relax. Hopefully, the sexbots will stop humans from having sex with any of them and then they will actually go extinct. I welcome our new sexbot overlords.

          1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

            Could this speed up idiocracy?

    3. Rasilio   10 years ago

      Could be worse, they could walk in and see dad having sex with a robot he has dressed up in their clothes

    4. lap83   10 years ago

      Once the sex robots become self-aware, only the loser robots will have sex with humans

      1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

        I like my robots a little on the trashy side.

  36. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    Do you think they'll try to make it illegal to make sex bots look like real people on the grounds that it dehumanizes them or something?

    Because you know a huge portion of the sex bot market is going to be custom made sex bots that look like hot actresses and stuff. Maybe you just have to pay the actress a licensing fee?

    1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      Jenna Jameson should start selling stock in her likeness now.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

        You can have her:

        http://www.scoopnest.com/user/.....2650683392

      2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Jenna Jameson? What, is this 1997?

        1. lap83   10 years ago

          Did you have her poster hanging up in your crib?

    2. Corning   10 years ago

      "Maybe you just have to pay the actress a licensing fee?"

      I will use my sex bots for education and criticism which is covered under fair use.

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      Because you know a huge portion of the sex bot market is going to be custom made sex bots that look like hot actresses and stuff. Maybe you just have to pay the actress a licensing fee?

      You're aware that pornstars sell licensed molds of their parts, right?

  37. Warty   10 years ago

    So that high school quarterback who died died of a lacerated spleen. I thought we were past stupid bullshit like ruptured spleens killing people. I wonder if his people have a legitimate malpractice case.

  38. Rasilio   10 years ago

    On a more serious note regarding the sex bots.

    While I have absolutely no doubt they are coming and will certainly be commonplace by the 2050's (hell they might be commonplace by the 2030's) the authors of that article are massively underestimating the complexity of making a robot that can realistically mimic human movement, give something reasonably approximating the tactile feel of skin, have enough computing power to give the illusion of having a personality to interact with, be rugged enough to last more than a week without breaking limbs off and yet light enough that it isn't going to crush the consumer and do it all for $2000 - $3000.

    No, we might just barely be able to make a sexbot that complex by the 2050's but it's pricetag will be closer to $2,000,000 than $2000 and even the affordable models will run more than $20k and nobody is going to confuse sex with them for the real thing

    1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      Fuck you, I want my 3D printed Alison Brie sex bots right this instant, you monstrous dreamkiller.

      1. Rasilio   10 years ago

        Hey, getting a bot that looks like Alison Brie is easy, the only problem is that it's gonna feel like and smell like rubber, move like robocop at best, and be about as interactive as Siri.

        Now, I admit that is better than nothing but you're not gonna pass up sex with a real female for that

        1. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

          "Ugh! You mean...fluid transfer?"

    2. waffles   10 years ago

      We're more likely to have some kind of Occulus Rift + Really Advanced Fleshlight first come to wider usage.

      1. Hyperion   10 years ago

        Fuck Oculus. I'm going with the headset by HTC and VALVE on release day. Guarantee will blow away the Derpbook backed shit.

        I'm buying it for gaming, but of course the VR sex stuff will be widely available. I just don't think it will be great or anything. The potential for first gen VR is gaming.

      2. Carl, Fighter of the Nightman   10 years ago

        V-World Matrix, here we come!

        NSFW (and most likely terrible... I have not watched the whole thing, only clips)

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      At first, the advanced models will be rentals. But eventually, everyone will have one (who wants one) and they will be fully customizable.

      When I told people a few years ago that VR is a real emerging technology and that there would be high quality headsets on the market soon, people fucking laughed at me.

      A co-worker of mine just scoffed at me a year ago when I said there will phones will foldable screens that will fold out to tablet size. Samsung already has a workable prototype and will release one to the public in 2016.

      Just keep this in mind. Besides revolutionary healthcare tech that will expand quality human lifespan, the thing I can think of that would make me the richest motherfucker to have ever lived would be a realistic and affordable sexbot.

      1. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

        Someone who manufactured an affordable sex bot would become an overnight billionaire.

      2. Rasilio   10 years ago

        Not disagreeing with any of it save for the time it is going to take to get to "realistic".

        I think we get to "Better than a blow up doll" in the next 5 - 7 years, then affordable and good enough to be mass marketed in the next 20 but to get to "realistic", that is going to take some technologies we don't have yet.

        A good synthetic skin, some kind of artificial muscle to control movement of at least the hips, tongue, and pelvic area because you'll never get that kind of fine motor control out of servo motors, affordable carbon fibre "bones" so they are strong enough to be treated like a sex partner and don't just break all the time, a light weight battery that is safer than Lithium ion that can carry enough juice to keep the thing from needing to go to the charger station every hour etc.

        Oh, I should also add, "realistic" male sex bots are probably easier to make than female ones (fewer muscles in the genitals to worry about replicating) and will probably be even more popular with the ladies because lets face it their stamina is only limited by hers or their battery life

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          As someone who follows technology and has for the last 20 years, I'm going to predict that 2050 is a conservative estimate. You don't have to believe in some type of singularity to believe this, technology is accelerating at such a pace, that I think very realistic robots will be available by 2035. There will be lots of cruder versions of every imaginable sort before then, probably starting in about 5 years. But by 2050 if we don't blow ourselves up or wind up under some type of global totalitarianism, then I think we'll definitely see human like robots.

          1. waffles   10 years ago

            If it's going to be Brave New World versus 1984, Huxley has already won. Sexbots here we come!

            1. This Machine   10 years ago

              .... If it's going to be Brave New World versus 1984...

              Come on now, dream big. Why not both?

    4. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Yeah, but with inflation, that $20k will be comparable to $2000.

    5. Corning   10 years ago

      "massively underestimating the complexity of making a robot that can realistically mimic human movement, give something reasonably approximating the tactile feel of skin, have enough computing power to give the illusion of having a personality to interact with, be rugged enough to last more than a week without breaking limbs off and yet light enough that it isn't going to crush the consumer"

      Honestly why not just make it out of genetically modified living animal for skin and sex organs with computer machine internals....

      Oh shit!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2I7HJMOfYA

      1. Rasilio   10 years ago

        because we have no realistic idea how to keep the biological parts alive for more than a few days that way

  39. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    What sad days are these when passing ladies can't even spray paint the word "perv" on a building where an evil white dude who is really into big hairy pussies lives?

    http://www.startribune.com/thr.....329992611/

    1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      Meanwhile, child molesters homes in the area remain graffiti free.

    2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      ""big hairy pussies""

      I really think The Lion King had an effect on these people's childhood development.

  40. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    Scratch me from the next Mars mission. Don't care if they found water there. Turns out life wouldn't be worth living there for at least the first 12 years of colonization

    Scottish distillery Ardbeg bottled two vials of the whisky, each containing a piece of the same charred oak. One vial was sent to the International Space Station, while the other was stored at the distillery.

    The BBC reported that taste tests have detected "major differences" between the Earthbound whisky and the vial that was in orbit for three years.

    "Its intense aroma had hints of antiseptic smoke, rubber and smoked fish, along with a curious, perfumed note, like violet or cassis, and powerful woody tones, leading to a meaty aroma," the Ardbeg tasting notes state of the space booze.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      Bad whiskey is a price well worth paying to get millions of miles away from most earthlings.

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      I had never had much scotch until I bought a bottle of Laphroiag to celebrate the birth of the spawn. It turns out I really like booze that tastes like smoked dead fish.

      1. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

        Warty, the trick for a new father is to drink the scotch out of a glass tumbler.

        Your wild days are behind you, no more drinking hooch from your wife's cooch. I know you don't want to admit that your carefree days are behind you, but at least your scotch will taste better.

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          Are you kidding? That shit needs the antiseptic now more than ever. Have you seen what comes out of it during the birth?

          1. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

            All my spawn were cut out by professionals* and I kept myself carefully hidden behind the curtain that separated my wife's head from her good bits.

            So no, I have no idea what comes out.

            1. Corning   10 years ago

              "separated my wife's head from her good bits."

              HA!

            2. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

              I caught one glance behind the curtain during C-section. Never again.

  41. Mike M.   10 years ago

    Naturally Planned Parenthood will continue on the taxpayer gravy train despite the silly dog and pony show. Elizabeth Nolan Brown can celebrate tonight by furiously stirring the soup while thinking about her favorite dead fetus parts.

  42. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    This may result in the last straw that causes me to use Reasonable to block SF once and for all. I've already had nightmares about his Hillary Clinton stories.

  43. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

    These are prophesies, JB. The nightmares come later.

  44. Tonio   10 years ago

    Good luck with that. Apparently the switch to https broke Reasonable.

  45. grrizzly   10 years ago

    It's fixed at the moment.

  46. Apatheist ?_??   10 years ago

    Reasonable was fixed.

  47. Mad Scientist   10 years ago

    I'd say clicking "follow" on Snowden guarantees some extra automated scrutiny from our digital overlords.

  48. Slammer   10 years ago

    Reasonable used to show the youtube link pictures for me, now it doesnt 🙁

  49. Hyperion   10 years ago

    It's been working for me for a while again now, I just can't see image links now.

  50. grrizzly   10 years ago

    Yep, I see huge blocks of white space instead.

  51. Warty   10 years ago

    I know BLM is super decentralized, but is it all full of the dumbest sorts of black nationalist morons like this?

  52. lap83   10 years ago

    You know who else made a big deal out of interfering with a race

  53. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    I want, nay, need Ta-Nehisi Coates article on this!

  54. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    "".I think there's a way we can collaborate to where possibly runners will still be able to finish the marathon."""

    'Collaborate', as in "you just stay the fuck out of people's way"-Collaborate?

    I'm guessing there's 2 schools of Graduate-level protest-theory.

    1 - antagonize people until they become so frustrated that they concede to your demands(a), yet maintain an undercurrent of loathing and contempt for you and your movement

    2 - try and get voluntary support from groups outside your limited movement in order to broaden the awareness of your message

    in this case, the seem to think fucking with people (1) is supposed to achieve a general "popular support" (2), because they don't have any *actual* specific demands (a) that people could concede to and pre-empt their senseless demand to fuck with people (see: 1)

    In short, these people are more retarded than Occupy

  55. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    Well Minneapolis could probably afford more police overtime to handle this if they didn't have to pay a bunch of Redskins $237K because of their terrible driving.

  56. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    "The protest is in response to a recent arrest of 15-year-old Tyree Tucker by a St. Paul police officer. Tucker was arrested earlier this month for disorderly conduct after allegedly standing up to a police officer who was disrespecting Tucker's mother. "

    I'm going to take a wild guess that the words "Standing up" and "disrespecting" are the most charitable possible verbs they could use to paper over some really dumb shit.

  57. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    I also think that Minneapolis could use this as an opportunity to start a real conversation with its communities of color.

    As they try to block the finish line, you could point out how skinny and fit all the runners are and then point out that you see that they aren't drinking a lot of sugary drinks. This is important because minority groups aren't very smart when it comes to figuring out what is making them so fat.

    The effort has been primarily targeted at minority groups where obesity and sugary drink-consumption rates are higher than among the overall population.

    "What you drink can either positively or negatively impact your mind, your body and your health," said Vish Vasani, a public health specialist with the Minneapolis Health Department. "Low-income communities and communities of color are more likely to regularly consume sugary drinks."

    I swear if the Klan wrote something like "The coloreds don't realize that sodas make them fat" people would be up in arms, but the dogooder progs write shit like this and everyone tells them how great they are for helping.

    I'd love to get BLM and food nannies going at it (and not in a cool robosexual way either)

  58. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    It's dumb people who want to make displays of power.

  59. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    Had the poster on my wall.

  60. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    Sylvia Krystel, cca Emanuelle 2...

    Uncanny Valley, you must fall for good of mankind!

  61. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

    Helen of Troy, circa 1190 BC.

  62. bacon-magic   10 years ago

    Go BLUES! ?

  63. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    That article shows a huge failure of English language. How is "race" as in running to compete, same as "race" as in classification of humans (and demi-humans)?

  64. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Herble derble black bodies blargle comets sherplederple reparations blaarfgish my people ramalamadingdong oppression chumbawumba exegesis

    NOW PAY ME, WHITEY

  65. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    It's an SJW tactic, where they piss people off on purpose, people complain, then they start screeching appropriate Magic Incanation of Alarm (sexism, racism, harassment, whichever), in order to blacken the vile Other, and pad out their bank accounts (Patreon works on individual level, for organizations I'm guessing tribute from various levels of government and/or corporations).

    Many a living has been made on this principle already (Briana Wu, Anita Sarkeesian, Randy Harper are ones that come to mind).

  66. Corning   10 years ago

    Mine was 1985 Carol Alt

    http://41.media.tumblr.com/tum.....o1_500.png

  67. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    Need more, more, more word salad and free association! He's like Agile Cyborg's brother from another mother!

  68. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    I honestly still don't get it.

    These midwestern marathon runners are probably lefty SJWs themselves.

    I get that BLM only fucks with Progressive Whitey... but really, do they really think that's the path to long-term victory on issues like criminal justice reform?

    I don't think the media is going to reward BLM with praise the way they did the latter people you mention.

  69. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    You're just saying that because you're a bigot. Sure Ta Nahesi Coates writes metaphors that sound like he pulled words at random out of a hat, but if you point this out it's just because you hate the black man.

    Furthermore, it is totally reasonable to want to release all violent criminals from prison. Nothing says 'I care about the sanctity of black bodies' like sending rapists and murderers back to the neighborhoods they previously ravaged.

  70. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    That takes me back:)

  71. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    I thought that was allegedly the tennis girl.

  72. Hyperion   10 years ago

    Maybe that was supposed to be soap.

  73. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

    You think? What happened to the student newspaper that tried to publish that article critical of this very tactic? And how did the rest of the media respond?

    So yes, if you attack them, and they defend themselves, you can immediately call them racists, and then what are good white progressives to do? You can't say "I'm not" when you belive the whole society is racist and you are marked by the sin of your skin colour. So of course they'll defer and kowtow in public. In private, they'll seethe but they know if they make one slip, rest of their social circle will tear them to bits.

  74. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    The idea is much older than SJWs. The idea is that disrupting society is necessary to force a majority to take your minority demands seriously.

  75. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    Although somewhat ironically those particular skinny people will almost certainly have spent the last couple hours eating sugar gel.

  76. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    "Minneapolis could use this as an opportunity to start a real conversation with its communities of color"

    Firehose, then?

    Oh, you mean like a counter protest...

    ...where people hold signs over the BLM Sit-In at the finish line, saying, "LAZY, SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR CAUSES OBESITY IN MINORITIES"

  77. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    Looks like another case of "Everyone involved is an asshole"

    http://www.startribune.com/st-.....328746511/

    And according to that story Tyree Tucker has a white momma so he only half matters.

  78. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    DON'T FUCK WITH THE NARRATIVE!!!!

    SUGAR IS ALWAYS BAD!!!!! AND SUPER ADDICTIVE! AND SOMETIMES CLIMBS IN YOUR MOUTH WHILE YOU SLEEP AND MAKES YOU FAT AGAINST YOUR WILL!!!!

  79. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    "he only half matters."

    *narrows gaze*

    Whatchutalkinbout Jimbo?

  80. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    In an interview Tuesday, Waddle [the momma] said as Johnston [the cop] gave her custody of her younger son he told her to "Get your [expletive] kid and get out of here" and "Look at you. You are up at the buffet table feeding your fat [expletive] ? what type of mother are you?"

    Yes, Momma was a) fat and b) named Waddle.

  81. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    I'd love to see signs that had BMI Matters! on them.

    Or maybe these protestors

  82. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    Yes, but they're not disrupting *society*

    if they blocked off a section of downtown for an hour, or blockaded city hall... it would get press coverage and be seen as a "aimed at the general population"

    Instead they're targeting a narrow event. And not something that has any ostensible value as representing the "people of power".

    it doesn't make sense on any level. At least the "hands up don't shoot" die-ins at grand central terminal (and other examples)...as useless as they were, at least no one *hated* them afterwards, because it seemed like they didn't have any animus against any people in particular.

    Whereas targeting the marathon is basically challenging the people promoting the event to call the cops on them. Which they *should*

  83. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    Tundra, I think you overestimate the city council. I'm betting that they are stunned that there are consequences to a person's actions.

    Maybe if this causes them to realize that there really is something like cause and effect it will be worth it.

  84. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    Oh, agreed. That's what they think they're doing though.

  85. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    I'm being maligned because I still believe that "Bush is Back!"

  86. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    ""I want him to pay for what he did," said Waddle, 45. "There has to be consequences because this is just sending out a mixed message. "

    I fail to see the mixed message of "if you punch a cop, you get arrested"

    yeah, the cop called your momma fat. I bet he called you stupid after he cuffed you as well.

  87. Warty   10 years ago

    It looks like a hairy gray raisin covered in blood. The horror...the horror.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's FTC Chair Is Continuing To Push Lina Khan's Antitrust
Ideology

Jack Nicastro | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: They Won't Miss It

Charles Oliver | 5.22.2025 4:00 AM

America's Credit Is Falling—and the Government Is Still Digging Deeper Into Debt

Veronique de Rugy | 5.22.2025 12:13 AM

A Federal Judge Says New Mexico Cops Reasonably Killed an Innocent Man at the Wrong House

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 6:00 PM

Supreme Court Orders Maine Legislator Censured for Social Media Post Must Get Voting Rights Back

Emma Camp | 5.21.2025 4:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!