Usda

PRIME Act Would Steer Meat Processing in the Right Direction

A great new bi-partisan House bill would wrest control over intrastate meat slaughter from the USDA.

|

Late last week, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) introduced a bill that would dramatically re-shape the way many animals are slaughtered for food in this country. The PRIME Act, which has several co-sponsors, including Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and Reps. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), Scott Garrett (R-N.J.), Jared Huffman (D-Calif.), and Jared Polis (D-Colo.), would give states the option of setting their own rules for processing meat that's sold inside state borders. That's a power Congress took from the states and handed to the USDA in 1967.

This is an issue that interests—and concerns—me greatly. I moderated a panel on reducing legal barriers to entry for livestock farmers and ranchers at Harvard Law School last year. As I also wrote here last year, in the wake of a food-safety scandal that forced the USDA to (rightly) close a California slaughterhouse, local slaughter options are few and far between for many farmers around the country.

The lack of USDA-approved processing plants forces farmers and ranchers of all sizes and types to funnel their cattle to one of a limited number of typically far-off USDA slaughterhouses. That regulatory stranglehold on meat processing has real-world consequences, because only meat processed at these USDA-approved slaughterhouses may be sold commercially in the United States. What's more, when a food-safety violation is found at one of these facilities, the USDA can order meat from all sources—regardless of its safety—to be destroyed. That was the case in the California example I discussed in my column.

As I also noted, a growing demand across the country for increased food choices, such as local, grass-fed beef, is being suppressed by the dearth of USDA-approved slaughterhouses. While it's true that meat currently may be processed at "custom" facilities that are not certified by the USDA, the sale of such meat is severely restricted.

So just what is the PRIME Act, and why do we need it? As Rep. Massie told me by phone this week, the bill is intended "to enable local farmers to sell their products to local consumers without all of the red tape and expense [posed by] the federal government."

In place of that red tape, the simply worded, three-page PRIME Act would let states set their own standards.

Rep. Massie, who with his family raises cattle on his Kentucky farm, knows the impact of USDA processing rules better than most.

"I'm a beef farmer myself," he tells me, "and when I take my animals to be processed, I drive past a custom facility three miles from my house and travel three hours to a USDA facility." This is common. In talking with farmers and ranchers, it's a story I hear time and again.

As Rep. Massie explains, the facility certification process is expensive and challenging. Something as trivial as the diameter of a drainpipe in a concrete floor can make or break a certification application.

"The current custom-slaughter system doesn't help farmers to succeed," Rep. Massie says. As he tells me, the current system that allows farmers to sell beef that wasn't processed at a USDA-certified facilities also creates several senseless hurdles for the small farmer and his buyers. First, Rep. Massie notes, the rules force farmers to sell off ownership shares in a live cow, rather than, say, selling the steaks and roasts from the cow. Typically, that means a consumer must buy a share of at least 100 pounds, even if they just want to buy a pound of hamburger. It also means consumers can't choose to buy, for example, only steaks or only roasts. They're bound to buy steaks and roasts, liver and ground beef. And they almost certainly are forced to buy the meat frozen, rather than fresh, as—speaking from experience—it's near impossible to eat 100 pounds of fresh meat in a sitting.

This, Rep. Massie tells me, is "how the rules keep consumers from buying what they want from farmers."

Not surprisingly, the PRIME Act is resonating with farmers and advocates across the country.

One person who sees the possibilities of the PRIME Act is Wyoming State Rep. Tyler Lindholm (R). I interviewed Rep. Lindholm earlier this year after he helped secure passage of Wyoming's groundbreaking Food Freedom Act, which deregulated many food transactions on farms in the state, save those pertaining to most meat, as that still falls under the USDA's authority.

"Needless to say, there's quite a few of us in Wyoming that will be watching this bill closely and doing as much as we can to ensure its passage," Rep. Lindholm told me by email this week.

"Not only will this legislation fill in the gaps for Wyoming's Food Freedom Act," he says, referring to the continuing involvement of the USDA in intrastate meat processing, "but it will open the door to opportunities for [a]griculture producers that they haven't had in decades."

"Congress gave USDA jurisdiction over intrastate meat commerce in 1967 and the results have been a disaster," says Pete Kennedy of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, in an email to me this week. "The local slaughterhouse infrastructure around the country has been decimated in the last 48 years. Passage of the PRIME Act will bring back the community abattoir and lead to a more prosperous local food system."

The PRIME Act isn't the first time Reps. Massie and Pingree have teamed up on a great food bill. In March 2014, the pair co-sponsored a pair of bills that would have legalized many sales of raw milk that are currently banned. Those bills, which I wrote about at the time, were "intended 'to improve consumer food choices and to protect local farmers from federal interference.'" Neither bill passed, but their introduction established an important precedent for crafting bi-partisan food freedom legislation, a precedent that is reflected in the PRIME Act.

Given the visibility of this new bill, its bi-partisan appeal, and its growing number of co-sponsors, I'm optimistic the PRIME Act might just become law. Its passage would be an enormous victory for small farmers and consumers around the country.

Advertisement

NEXT: Watch Peter Suderman on MSNBC's Up With Steve Kornacki

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. And as we know, President Obama has a long history of loosening the iron grip of federal government. No way he’d veto this if it managed to even get to his desk.

    1. Bernie Sandres says you only need one one meat ccutting plant for every one. It worked so well in the USSR.

  2. You meant a law passed by congrees concentrated business in the hands of a few large companies? Well fuck me running.

  3. This should be a boon for the consumer, as well as the producer. Beef tends to lose about 15% of its weight just getting onto and off of a truck. Shorter distances to slaughterhouses will cut costs. Increased competition between slaughterhouses will cut costs and likely improve quality as well as choice.

    It’s not often that we get good regulatory news out of Washington. Thanks Baylen.

    1. It isn’t news yet, just rumor.

      Let’s wait and see.

      Also, since it is food day, I woke up dreaming of Eggs Benedict. Just finished whipping up my best Hollandaise ever and scarfed it all down. Bacon, toasted and buttered english muffin with an over easy egg on it and drowning in sauce. Yum.

      1. Man, that sounds so good. I work Saturdays, so my breakfast is a microwaved breakfast burrito.

    2. It makes too much sense to become law. I tangled with bureaucratic stupidity while working in the aerospace industry. The EPA fined the company where I worked millions for excessive release of VOC vapors. They calculated the amount of VOC’s in use to arrive at a figure for the amount of vapors being released. The company spent a couple of million building vapor recovery systems.
      The EPA changed the rule, the next time they fined us for the amount of VOC’s on the property,
      including VOC’s in sealed containers. You can’t beat the government.
      Most of that companies manufacturing is now done overseas.

  4. It will probably need to survive a presidential veto. Federal jobs would be lost not to mention a big piece of federal control. That won’t appeal to the statist regime in the White House.

  5. You know who else operated slaughterhouses?

    1. Jimmy Dean?

    2. Upton SInclair’s boss?

  6. I’ve been buying local grass-fed beef for 15 years in three states, California, Washington, and Colorado, and I’ve never had a problem finding a small local rancher with access to a licensed and inspected slaughter house. I’m skeptical of relinquishing federal control over food to states because of the recent debate over GMO labeling. Polis (an anti-vaxxer) and Pingree support state-level food labeling laws, so it’s no wonder they want local standards for slaughterhouses.

    This is not productive or necessary.

    1. Sounds awesome for Arkansas. Cattle farmers would probably still go to standing butcher houses because you’re talking about a couple grand investment per head. But a lot of us raise farm hogs and home butcher and sell them as it is. It would just be nice to not have to worry about the USDA catching wind of it.

      Basically it just sounds bad for you because you live in a blue state.

  7. Of course, this also raises the question of why it’s so difficult and expensive to get the FDA certification. If the FDA were competent at their jobs, some dweeb with a clipboard could handle this as quickly as a typical building inspector examining code compliance on a construction site.

    -jcr

    1. If your local building inspector takes a month to inspect your job site you go to your city council representative and get the inspector fired.

      Federal FDA? That’s Congress. Good luck.

  8. Give me cheap beef or give me venison.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.