Stephen Reed, the Mayor Who Believed Unrestrained Government Spending Can Revive Troubled Cities, May Be Heading to Prison
Harrisburg's former "mayor for life" is indicted on corruption charges.
When Stephen Reed was the mayor of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, he took more than one taxpayer-funded jaunt to the Western states to troll flea markets and antique stores in search of historical memorabilia. Reed spent city money on a painting shot through by Calamity Jane, Virgil Earp's watch, a Vampire Hunter's Set, and a stuffed buffalo. These items—many of them of questionable authenticity—were intended to become part of the permanent collection of a new Wild West museum in Harrisburg—one of five new cultural institutions that Reed hoped to personally create in Pennsylvania's capital city.
"Much as Washington, D.C. draws millions of people to the city each year with its many museums, or New York City, that's what Steve Reed's vision for Harrisburg was," Reed's longtime communication director Randy King told me in a 2012 interview.
On Tuesday, Reed was indicted on 499 criminal charges, including theft, corruption, bribery, stealing property, and tampering with physical evidence.
"This is one of the most disturbing cases of public corruption this office has investigated," Pennsylvania Attorney General Kane said in a prepared statement. "[Mayor Reed's] conduct is at the root of the fiscal issues that continue to plague the City of Harrisburg today."
The grand jury's findings substantiate what's been widely known for eons about Harrisburg's former "mayor for life," a common moniker for the man who held office from 1981 to 2010 and was an icon in this small city of about 49,000 residents. Reed's artifact collecting makes for colorful copy, but it's just one small example of how he destroyed the city's finances with insane schemes. Reed created multiple public authorities, encouraged them to borrow heavily to raise cash, and then raided their coffers to fund his pet projects. He poured city money into failed redevelopment projects. Under Reed, when a minor baseball team threatened to leave Harrisburg, the city purchased the team. Under Reed, when a hotel was on the verge of closing its doors, Harrisburg bought the hotel.
Reed's costliest venture was an attempt to make money burning garbage. Harrisburg's incinerator turned out to be a lemon, requiring costly repairs, and leaving the city on the hook for hundreds of millions in debt. In a state of fiscal emergency, the city entered receivership in December 2011.
An irony is that by all accounts Stephen Reed wanted the very best for Harrisburg. Though he was power hungry and corrupt, Reed wasn't out to line his own pockets. His failing was that he was willing to break the law in pursuit of his belief that cities should do more than create the conditions for businesses to thrive; they should act like thriving businesses. As Randy King put it, Reed "believed it's a responsibility of the leadership of the community to step in occasionally when there's a need that the private sector isn't addressing."
For more on how Reed's grand vision for Harrisburg turned into an even grander nightmare, watch my 2012 Reason TV documentary on the topic:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Unrestrained spending is great for politicians, because they can much more easily steal money and allocate it to cronies without pesky constraints and accountants.
You can do that when you're the "Mayor for Life".
With all that spending he couldn't keep Troegs from moving? Lame.
Would you stay? Any business with any sanity would have beat feet out of the Burg by now.
Seeing my hometown become Detroit on the Susquehanna is depressing.
Though he was power hungry and corrupt, Reed wasn't out to line his own pockets. His failing was that he was willing to break the law in pursuit of his belief that cities should do more than create the conditions for businesses to thrive; they should act like thriving businesses.
Had his failing have been to line his pockets and of those well-connected, he probably wouldn't be in the legal trouble he is today.
I'm having a little trouble believing someone who is "power-hungry and corrupt" didn't financially benefit in any way.
I'm applying Hanlon's Razor here.
Why not malicious stupidity?
Or stupid malice?
...and it's still a shithole.
Drive north along the river for some spectacular scenery.
How is the investigation of Kane going?
Every city in Pennsylvania seems to be taking a different approach to decline.
Allentown: Insane tax giveaways for commercial constructions, and the FBI thinks there's corruption.
Harrisburg: Wild-eyed "business" schemes and corruption.
Philadelphia: Corruption, but also tax giveaways for new residential construction.
Pittsburgh: "Nonprofit" organizations.
Reading: Panic, and corruption.
Scranton: Let the unions loot every last thing of value.
Philadelphia: Corruption, but also tax giveaways for new residential construction.
It's OK to do giveaways to the developers, they'll make it up plus more from the purchasers.
If ever a mug said "GET OFF MY LAWN!", it is that guy's mug above.
Damn kids with their skateboards and their music...
Better headline: "He was stealing for the children."
*applause*
Did . . . did no one stop to ask what the in the hell the 'wild west' has to do with Pennsylvania?
I mean, you'd think a 'state-sponsored' museum might be related to things *about that state*.
This is the functional equivalent of having your tourism board advertizing 'look how great Arizona is'.
Top. Men?
Well men anyhow, guess you don't always get the top. Well, rarely get the top, really.
Don't just leave that hanging, Epstein.
"This is one of the most disturbing cases of public corruption this office has investigated," Pennsylvania Attorney General Kane said
Almost as disturbing as letting him amass 499 criminal charges over 30 years instead of swooping in after, say, three and stemming the decay around 1981.
wow. i played a "christian rock basement" in harrisburg seven or eight years ago. the "house band" was an acoustic comedy duo a la tenacious d called "anti cool", and they were, as promised, not cool