Reason Wins 4 First-Place Prizes at the Southern California Journalism Awards
We also got 1 silver and 5 bronzes
Last night in Los Angeles, the Greater Los Angeles Press Club issued its 57th annual Southern California Journalism Awards, covering work produced in 2014 by journalists and publications headquartered between San Ysidro and Santa Barbara. Reason was up for a record (for us) 18 awards, and we pulled down 4 first-place plaques. They were for:
* Best Online Political Column/Commentary: Jesse Walker, for "Regulating Hateful Speech Won't Stop Hateful Crimes." The judges commented:
[M]akes his case with strong logic and writing, cutting through more emotional arguments to limit hate speech.
* Best Online Non-Political Column/Commentary: Robby Soave, for "Is the UVA Rape Story a Gigantic Hoax?" Judges:
This column was ahead to the curve, raising questions about the veracity of the UVA rape story that appeared in Rolling Stone. Soave raises legitimate questions about some of the story contents without declaring it a hoax. He shows respect and sensitivity toward the victim while still addressing journalistic inconsistencies in the story.
* Best Magazine Review/Criticism/Column: Amy H. Sturgis, for "Not Your Parents' Dystopias." Judges:
What a great job of looking at dystopias past and present through a cultural lens. Regardless of where the future takes us, Amy H. Sturgis has done a great job of explaining how writers and others have gotten us where we are.
* Best Magazine Commentary: Matt Welch, for "When the Left Turned Against Free Speech," "Rand Paul, Racism, and Prison," and "Kiss Your Financial Privacy Goodbye." Judges:
Insightful, well-written commentaries [that] present a clear picture of how social and political forces have come to threaten liberty in the United States today in ways sometimes ironic and unexpected.
We also received one 2nd place certificate and five 3rds. The runner-up:
* TV/Film Documentary Short (under 25 minutes): Todd Krainin, for "Jay Austin's Beautiful, Illegal Tiny House."
And the bronzes went to:
* Magazine Commentary: Greg Beato, for "The Benefits of Unregulated Pot," "Kickstarting Utopia" and "The Surprising Power of Subtitles."
* Magazine Entertainment News or Feature: Peter Suderman, for "The New Face of Television."
* Magazine Review/Criticism/Column: Jesse Walker, for "The Sultan of Sewers."
* TV/Film News: Zach Weissmueller and Paul Detrick, "Ferguson Protestors React to Michael Brown Robbery Footage."
* TV/Film Personality Profile/Interview: Nick Gillespie and Meredith Bragg, "Nirvana's Krist Novoselic on Punk, FairVote, Why He Dumped the Dems, & Why the GOP Should Embrace Anarchy."
All of this award-winning work is due directly to your support of the Reason Foundation, the 501(c)3 nonprofit that publishes all of our journalism here, for which we say THANK YOU. Donate even more money at this link! You can also subscribe to the print or digital versions of the magazine for no more (and often less!) than $15 a year.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
NO ONE COUNTS THE SILVERS AND BRONZES MATT.
(but congrats).
What's my cut of the prize?
"In spite of" does not warrant a cut of the prize.
I'm sure that if you'd managed to comment first that they would have had some gratuity for you fist!
Always next year!
"Best Magazine Commentary: Matt Welch, for...yada, yada, yada..."
Bullshit! We know the best commentary occurs BELOW the article! ;o)
Congrats to you all!
Reason: A Commentariat with conviction... pending.
Four golds, one silver, five bronzes, three cease-and-desists, two federal subpoenas, a no-knock raid...
... and a cartridge in a lever action.
No love for Nick's woodchipper?
Soave raises legitimate questions about some of the story contents without declaring it a hoax. He shows respect and sensitivity toward the victim while still addressing journalistic inconsistencies in the story.
"Grab its motherfucking leg"
"sensitivity toward the victim"
The fraternity?
"Best Online Non-Political Column/Commentary: Robby Soave, for "Is the UVA Rape Story a Gigantic Hoax?""
Anna Merlan disagrees.
Congratulations
"We also received one 2nd place certificate and five 3rds. The runner-up"
And just where is OUR participatory ribbon for our contribution to whatever it is we've added to...whatever.
In a woodchi-
Nevermind.
See above: In spite of does not warrant a prize.
He shows respect and sensitivity toward the victim while still addressing journalistic inconsistencies in the story.
I love how, even after this shitstorm has played out, people still continuously refer to her as 'the victim'. Because 'respect and sensitivity' apparently supersede actual reality and evidence.
I don't think that's what's meant here. Just that Soave managed to walk along a tightrope over a chasm by pointing out all the 'inconsistencies' of the story and then sitting back and letting everyone else come to the realization that 'oh yeah, this is all completely made up'.
At the time he *wrote* those articles, she might have actually *been* a victim with a screwed up recollection of events - and that statement is meant to cover the article's reception at the time it was published, not to say that she's still considered a victim now.
Soave didn't really point-out anything - he shamelessly copied Bradley's story. A number of commenters on this board called-out BS when Soave ran the FIRST story in the series.
"Shamelessly copied"? He wrote his own piece about the events, and quoted and linked to the Bradley piece. I see nothing improper there.
Not improper, but certainly not worthy of adulation. Soave "writes" very little - most of his stories are cut/paste with a heavy dose of qualifiers/disclaimers. In any event, I stand corrected, and retract "shamelessly."
'The victim' still assumes guilt on the accused. 'Accuser' may have a negative connotation but it's far more accurate even early on with the information provided.
I can agree with this - but that's a separate issue from what your post was talking about.
Ugh at them calling Jackie Hoaxley a victim.
^ yeah, what Titor said.
It's official, Soave has earned a seat at the table.
What table?
The wooden one that ... oh, never mind.
Gratz
I'm disappointed that Reason didn't place in the "Most Troublesome Commentariat" category. We shall have to redouble our efforts, and hopefully claim the garland next year.
Beyond a Federal subpoena, what can we do?
All the wood chippers tip their hats, most likely.
Congratulations guys.
Kudos to Matt Welch. We're happy the Novoselic interview got a prize, too; that's a gem.
What the fuck is it with these smart rockers who have real inquisitive lives. Krist Novolselic and Brian May rock the cerebrum and the constellations.
Commetariat is the reason.
Just as Lucille said I didnt know that anyone able to get paid $7158 in four weeks on the computer .You can look here????????????? http://www.workweb40.com
Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.online-jobs9.com