Medical Marijuana

Obama Administration Eliminates Gratuitous Barrier to Medical Marijuana Research

Scientists studying therapeutic applications for cannabis will no longer need Public Health Service approval.


Jacob Sullum

For decades federal officials have argued that there is not enough evidence of marijuana's medical benefits to justify removing it from Schedule I, the most restrictive category of the Controlled Substances Act. At the same time, they have made it difficult to do the research necessary to provide such evidence by erecting gratuitous bureaucratic obstacles. This week, according to a Federal Register notice to be published tomorrow, the Obama administration is lifting one of those barriers by eliminating an additional layer of review by the U.S. Public Health Service for studies involving marijuana.

"The Obama administration has actively supported scientific research on whether marijuana or its components can be safe and effective medicine," a spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy told The Huffington Post. "Eliminating the Public Health Service review should help facilitate additional research to advance our understanding of both the adverse effects and potential therapeutic uses for marijuana or its components."

As the Post's Ryan Grim notes, even prohibitionists such as anti-pot activist Kevin Sabet and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have recently said the process for getting medical studies approved should be streamlined. In addition to Public Health Service review, the special burdens on cannabis researchers include the necessity of obtaining marijuana from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), the only legal source. The Drug Enforcement Administration has rejected requests to allow private sources of marijuana for research, as it does with all other Schedule I drugs. But NIDA itself recently has responded to criticism of its stinginess and the poor quality of its offerings by expanding its menu, another piece of evidence that the administration is serious about making medical marijuana research easier to do.

"The president has often said that drug policy should be dictated by unimpeded science instead of ideology, and it's great to see the Obama administration finally starting to take some real action to back that up," says Marijuana Majority's Tom Angell. "But there's more to be done. The next step should be moving marijuana out of Schedule I to a more appropriate category, which the administration can do without any further congressional action. Given what the president and surgeon general have already said publicly about marijuana's relative harms and medical uses, it's completely inappropriate for it to remain in a schedule that's supposed to be reserved for substances with a high potential for abuse and no therapeutic value."

NEXT: Meet the Press Runs 'Gun Violence' Report After Racist Massacre, Calling the Issue 'Color-Blind'

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. And only 6 years into his reign!
    We have an all-wise and benevolent dictator!

    1. Damn right 6 yrs.
      Imagine, first black president, going soft on pot? HAH!!!
      Remember first term? Muslim, terrorist, anti american, kenyan, gay, they threw EVERYTHING at this dude, absurd as hell and all.

      Can you IMAGINE the rhetoric if he appeared to be soft on drugs? holy shit there would have been impeachment hearings, and he would not have been re-elected, and i knopw this sight is pretty anti-obama, sure, but if you think romney or mccain would have given you MORE liberty, thats.. insane.

  2. … even prohibitionists such as anti-pot activist Kevin Sabet and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have recently said the process for getting medical studies approved should be streamlined.

    It’s easy to make the change when your fellow prohibitionists won’t push back.

  3. I’m glad the President made this decision. Also the President should make this his legacy. Walk back the WoD. Save lives. Stop needless imprisonment. Hell, sell it as disparate impact on blacks and as a civil rights win. I don’t care.

    1. Yep. I’d turn into a bit of an Obama defender if he focuses on rolling back the WoD.

      And you want my approval, don’t you, Barack?

  4. It was interesting. I didn’t mind the fact that there was no romantic interest. Gives you more time for action but you more nice video check this way and comment me
    Best Home Deal ??????

  5. While I agree that it should be moved to a more appropriate schedule, what legal authority does the prez actually have? Isn’t scheduling of marijuana specifically determined by the US’s treaty obligations which requires Congressional override?

    1. The treaty just says it has to be limited to medical, scientific, & industrial use by law.

    2. Essentially, having it on Schedule I is literally insane – that’s supposed to be for dangerous drugs that have NO therapeutic use.

      And I literally know what ‘literally’ means.

  6. While this is definitely a positive step forward, leaving PHS in the process and getting NIDA and the DEA the hell out of it would have made a lot more sense.

    1. DEA’s particip’n is required by statute. NIDA’s isn’t.

  7. Can we say “Obama throws some regulations in the Woodchipper” ?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.