The annual Bilderberg meeting begins today in Telfs-Buchen, Austria. This year the summit's influential attendees range from David Petraeus to Henry Kissinger, from the CEO of Airbus to the secretary general of NATO. There are some press figures on the guest list too—Bloomberg's John Micklethwait, The National Post's Andrew Coyne, The Washington Post's Anne Applebaum, and a few others. But the journalists won't be writing about what they see, because the whole thing is off the record.
This combination of power and secrecy inevitably produces conspiracy theories, and the Bilderbergers have been dogged for decades by people convinced they're the secret parliament of the world. The meeting is more mundane than that, sitting somewhere on the spectrum between a G7 summit and a Davos forum. But if some of the things people claim about Bilderberg are crazy—a couple years ago, Michael Tracey interviewed a protester outside the meeting who was convinced it featured "Devil worship" and "pedophilia"—it's not at all kooky to recognize that powerful people are gathered there and that the things they're saying in private may be newsworthy. Bilderberg is not a hidden government, but it's certainly an elite institution, and it has been since it was founded in 1954.
So each year some journalists who aren't on the invite list try to cover the event. Since 2009, The Guardian has dispatched the reporter and comedy writer Charlie Skelton to the summit, or at least its outskirts; over the years he's gotten tailed by the cops, checked off who was entering a discussion of the situation in Ukraine, and, this week, had this little adventure:
The Guardian
At one point, in my umpteenth roadside check, I turned round to see an officer taking my picture on his phone. I trotted over and gave him a card with my email address. "Do you mind sending me that photo? Just so I can remember this moment." He mumbled something about not taking one, so I got my own camera out. "No photographs! You must not take pictures of police." No, no, I assured him. Not my intention at all. I handed him the camera. "Could you take one of me?" A bit confused, he obliged—and promptly took one of me and his colleague.
I wonder if he'll be charged under anti-terror legislation and thrown into jail for seven days for taking a photo of a policeman, because that's what journalists here have been told.
The sessions themselves may be secret, but the Bilderberg website does have a helpful list of this year's "key topics for discussion." It's mostly the sort of stuff you'd expect—Greece, Iran, terrorism, the U.S. elections—but it also includes "artificial intelligence," which is intriguing. Since I'm not allowed to attend, I'll just imagine that part will involve a test of wits between Henry Kissinger and a malevolent chatbot. The prize? The world.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Taking a break from breaking big rocks into small ones?
I'm honestly surprised that Obama didn't make a greater push for making stereotypical "prison labor" into jobs for free people, you know, because prisoners shouldn't be slave laborers, and also swelling the ranks of pubsec union membership rolls Stimulus!
"I wonder if he'll be charged under anti-terror legislation and thrown into jail for seven days for taking a photo of a policeman, because that's what journalists here have been told."
Is it even remotely possible that journalists have been told this?
He mumbled something about not taking one, so I got my own camera out. "No photographs! You must not take pictures of police." No, no, I assured him. Not my intention at all. I handed him the camera. "Could you take one of me?" A bit confused, he obliged?and promptly took one of me and his colleague.
My classmate's step-aunt makes $61 hour on the internet . She has been fired from work for nine months but last month her pay check was $12801 just working on the internet for a few hours. try this out.
GO TO THE SITE TEC NEXT TAB FOR MORE INFO AND HELP
????? http://www.workweb40.com
You know who else had secretive meetings in Austria?
SPECTRE?
Ernst Stavro Blofeld?
Arnold?
And you know how he got there....he GOT TO DAH CHOPPAH! NOW!!!
We make a stand now, or there will be nobody left to get to the chopper.
FIFA?
Bruno?
Kurt Waldheim, every day during the entire war...but alas the records are secret so he can't prove it.
The Von Trapp family?
I blame the Trilateral Commission.
the summit's influential attendees range from David Petraeus
Taking a break from breaking big rocks into small ones?
At Club Fed? More like breaking decks of cards for the next session of Old Maid with the other "inmates".
He got the Sandy Burglar..er, Burger deal - misdemeanor, no jail.
Precisely.
Hence, he can play Old Maid ANY TIME HE WANTS! With ANYONE!
Just stay away from the maids with the crazy eyes, like Broadwell.
Taking a break from breaking big rocks into small ones?
I'm honestly surprised that Obama didn't make a greater push for making stereotypical "prison labor" into jobs for free people, you know, because prisoners shouldn't be slave laborers, and also swelling the ranks of pubsec union membership rolls Stimulus!
"I wonder if he'll be charged under anti-terror legislation and thrown into jail for seven days for taking a photo of a policeman, because that's what journalists here have been told."
Is it even remotely possible that journalists have been told this?
Considering its in Europe and free speech in Europe is marked with an asterisk, I'd say its plausible.
I took it as almost a certainty that they had, in fact, been told EXACTLY this, for the reasons DaveSs notes.
Uh, the next Davos forum will be anything but mundane. On the contrary, he's gonna be fuckin' pissed about what happened over the weekend!
No spoilers
Whatever. Anyone can guess by now that Davos and the Red Woman end up falling in love.
That's some pretty good trolling.
My classmate's step-aunt makes $61 hour on the internet . She has been fired from work for nine months but last month her pay check was $12801 just working on the internet for a few hours. try this out.
GO TO THE SITE TEC NEXT TAB FOR MORE INFO AND HELP
????? http://www.workweb40.com
That's like 52 and a half hours a week. Are you sure your programmers know what "a few hours" means?
Your last line is wonderfully comical. There are far too many attendees for serious conspiracies. Those are done in twos and threes!