Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Did You Hear About the Sex Traffickers Abducting Grown Women From Hobby Lobby?

The police "said that this is a common thing," stated the Facebook post gone viral. And yet...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.8.2015 2:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/here-we-go-again/
(https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/here-we-go-again/)

Maggie McNeill

Lest you need any further indication that sex trafficking has become a genuine Moral Panic, I bring you the tale of Emily Stringer. In late May, Stringer was shopping at her hometown Hobby Lobby in Oklahoma City when she noticed "a middle aged lady" following her around the craft store. Stringer "stuck with (her) instinct" and left abruptly, calling local police afterward to report the incident. "The policeman said that this is unfortunately a common thing," Stringer posted in a subsequent Facebook warning. "They are abducting people for sex trafficking." 

Except…. of course not. There have been no cases of anyone, of any age, being stalked and abducted by sex traffickers at Hobby Lobby or any other Oklahoma City chain store. Outlets from Snopes to The Washington Post tore holes in Stringer's story, and the Oklahoma City police even distanced themselves from the apocryphal anecdote—but not before the post was shared by tens of thousands of people on social media. Within a few days, Stringer's sex-trafficking warning had received 147,000 shares. The police rebuttal, meanwhile, was shared less than 500 times.

JohnTV.com

This is, unfortunately, the kind of thing that fuels public perception of a sex trafficking "epidemic" in America. (Stringer is not alone in her belief that grown women are being snatched up by sex traffickers while running errands.) And public belief in this epidemic is what fuels lawmakers to pass really bad laws to address the problem—laws such as the "Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act" (JVTA), which President Obama signed into law on May 29. 

In a piece for Politico Magazine last week, I highlighted some of the "tough on crime" tactics baked into the JVTA and similar state laws, including mandatory minimum sentences of the variety that are on the way out when it comes to drug sentencing. Even strong opponents of mandatory minimums, such as President Obama and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ken.), were silent about their inclusion in the trafficking law. In the end, only three members of Congress (all in the House) voted against the JVTA.

One such dissenter was Rep. Bobby Scott, co-chair of Congressional Human Trafficking Caucus, and his objection centered on the new mandatory minimum the JVTA establishes. From my Politico piece: 

Scott is wary of the "the possible scope of defendants who could be prosecuted" under this provision. Known as the SAVE Amendment, it prohibits not just placing an "escort" ad for a minor or someone forced into it but also benefiting financially in any way from the ad—meaning that classified-ad hosting sites could be held criminally accountable as sex traffickers. And the penalty for this trafficking? Mandatory minimum imprisonment of 10 to 15 years.

While this may be justifiable in some cases, those prosecutable could include "all of the employees of the ad company, including the receptionist or the computer guy," said Scott. "The judge should have the discretion to consider all the facts and the culpability of the particular defendant."

The JVTA's approach to the issue of human trafficking is also ascendant in the states, which have each passed a few (if not a few dozen) trafficking laws in the past five years. In Georgia, human trafficking now comes with a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years, or 20 if the victim is under 18. … In Montana, sex trafficking anyone under 18 comes with a mandatory 100-year prison sentence, albeit eligible for parole or probation after 25 years.

"The alleged increase in domestic human trafficking fuels the sense that these laws are proportionate," I note. "Yet there's no credible research showing that human trafficking has been increasing the U.S." (Read the whole thing here.)

The price of this miscalculation isn't just "a little extra money or time going toward fighting a heinous crime." It's willing sex workers, their associates, and low-level offenders being arrested and locked up when cops can't actually find these alleged trafficking rings (and you can bet the drug war's race and class biases will be repeated). It's civil liberties infringements of all sorts. It's less time and money going to other crime-fighting, and less resources going to programs that might actually help people coerced or forced into prostitution or labor. As Brian Bates at JohnTV writes:

Is human trafficking very real? Yes. … Does any of that give credibility to Cindy's story? Absolutely not. Stop the madness folks. The tactic of fear mongering in the absence of reality ultimately hurts the longterm effort to raise sustained awareness and move the social conscious.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of people with reasons to perpetuate the madness. In response to my Politico piece, for instance, seven women wrote an op-ed ("The Truth About Sex Trafficking") countering my assertion that the JVTA is bad policy. They do this mostly by misrepresenting what I wrote and offering the same statistical distortions I'd tried to expose, with a healthy dose of vague and indignant huffing and puffing. Of the op-ed's seven authors, two hold leadership positions with Rights4Girls, two are with the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW), one is with ECPAT-USA, and two co-founded the Advisory Council on Child Trafficking—all organizations with a vested interest in promoting a certain narrative about sex trafficking and certain legislative responses to it.

Rights4Girls worked closely with the authors of the JVTA and similar legislation, and is active in lobbying for increased federal funding to fight sex trafficking. (Its founder was also instrumental in getting Craigslist's adult services section shut down.) CATW describes itself as "the world's leading abolitionist organization," states that the best way to end human trafficking is to prosecute men who pay for sex, calls all sex workers "prostituted women," and helped launch "the first federally funded human trafficking task force that became the model for federally funded human trafficking task forces across the country." ACCT is run by volunteers, including several former White House and congressional staffers, D.C.-based political consultants, and the wife of Politico executive editor Jim VandeHei. ECPAT lobbies for anti-trafficking legislation, runs training programs to teach people how to spot trafficking victims, and takes people on sex-trafficking awareness tours of Thailand. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Barcelona's New Mayor Promises a People's Revolution, Says Government Privileges Are 'Symbolic'

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PolicySex TraffickingCultureMoral PanicSex WorkCriminal JusticePoliceSex CrimesConspiracy Theories
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (182)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...those prosecutable could include "all of the employees of the ad company, including the receptionist or the computer guy," said Scott.

    Oh, I'm sure no prosecutor would try to pad the anti-sex trafficking portion of his resume by prosecuting some ad agency's custodial staff.

    1. mr lizard   10 years ago

      Double bonus: taking out the shred bin just became a Sarbanes charge

      1. MSimon   10 years ago

        Gillespie says don't discuss this: http://popehat.com/2015/06/08/.....eason-com/

        1. PS   10 years ago

          Ken White called me an obnoxious asshat. Summon the Grand Jury.

        2. PS   10 years ago

          Ken White called me an obnoxious asshat. Summon the Grand Jury.

        3. SimonJester   10 years ago

          Oooo ... "Blowhard Stupidity." I like that one. Looks like Popehat follows Tony on twitter...

        4. BDub   10 years ago

          I hope there is a special place in hell reserved for the U.S District Attorney that issued that subpoena.....*snikers*

    2. Tionico   10 years ago

      maybe not... but looking about just a bit, it is not much of stretch to realise that SOME can, and tus will. How many motorcycle guys are stil behind bars in Waco three weeks after a police massacre, under million dollar bonds, and with NO speicific evidence that they, as individuals, were involved in any crime more heinous tan driving into the car park near that restaurant at the time the coppers opened fire. So here we have a prosecutor using boilerplate warrants (all 170 arrest warrants are identically worded, and include NO specific evidence against ANY of the 170 arrestees.

      Prosecutors can be, and are, as crooked as any other group of public employees. Consider ,too, some of the rotten practices recently evident in Malheyr County Oregon.... when large sums of money with no hint o f"dirty" origin are simply seized by the local gendarmerie, clad in government issued costumes, tin badged and armed..... with never a hint of criminal charges brought against the owners of those funds...... no, prosecutors already have far too many "tools" to use to place, andhold, innocents behind bars. Consider, too, that many of our prisons are for-profit private enterprises. COULD it be that such mandatory minimum sentences, even for the janitor at the advert's print shop, might play into the hands of the prison operators, and thus encourage some sort of under the table kickback for each person sentenced? Leave a loophole, and some corrupt party WILL walk through it.

  2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    There's another one of those going around that I saw yesterday. Lemme see if I can find it again.

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      http://www.facebook.com/photo......nref=story

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        If you can't see the link, I'll paste the text. It's basically OMG YOUR DAUGHTER WAS JUST SOLD INTO SEX SLAVERY!!!

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          Jesus Christ, people are fucked up

          1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            Please, for your own mental health, do not read any of the comments.

            1. (????)?? ???   10 years ago

              Damn you, Charles, luring me in with your reverse psychology.

              1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

                I assure you that I haven't unstudied any minds since reading those comments, O' Moniker of Unknown Meaning.

                On a serious note - I suppose I could have written "Please, for your own mental health, do not read Reason Hit & Run nor yet the comments sections under each article. If, however, you ignore my advice and afterward want to further test your sanity, you can read many of the comments associated with the Facebook page for which PM provided a link.

                /semi-sarc followed by genuine warning"

                Would that have worked?

                P.S. How far did you get before experiencing near-utter dismay?

        2. RBS   10 years ago

          Taken was based on true events.

        3. JW   10 years ago

          I just want to know how I can get in on this action.

      2. Warty   10 years ago

        Cyndi Malvita
        A guy sends you a friend request. You don't know him, but he's got a cute profile picture, so you accept his friend request.
        It's your baby girl's first day of school. She looks SO cute in her new outfit you just have to take a picture and put it on Facebook so all your friends and family can see.
        You're so excited dropping her off that you 'Check in' to her school on FB saying
        'I can't believe how big she's gotten. Time sure flies. One proud momma/daddy right here'.
        Meanwhile, the mystery guy whose friend request you hurriedly accepted earlier this morning is saving that picture you posted of your daughter in her cute new outfit to his phone and texting it to 60 other grown men across the world with the caption ?

      3. Warty   10 years ago

        'American Female. Age 5.
        Brown Hair. Black Eyes.
        $5,000-'.
        Not only did you provide a picture of your little girl to a child trafficker, you've handed him the name and exact location of her school on a silver cyber platter.
        You go to pick her up at 3:00 this afternoon, but she's nowhere to be found.
        Little do you know, your precious baby girl was sold to a 43 years old pedophile before you even stepped foot off campus this morning, and now she's on her way to South Africa with a bag over her head, confused, terrified and crying because a man she's never seen before picked her up from school, and now she doesn't know where her parents are, where she's going, or what's gonna happen to her.
        STOP ADDING STRANGERS ON FACEBOOK
        and
        STOP
        posting everything about your life on Facebook.
        Avoid keeping children's pictures as profile picture.
        Please SHARE it for the sake of all kids and parents.
        http://www.charliesangelsoutreach.org heart emoticon http://www.facebook.com/caofl

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          The South Africa bit is the best part.

          1. Almanian!   10 years ago

            "Silver Cyber Platter"

            Great name for....something

          2. SIV   10 years ago

            Boer perverts!

            1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

              Boer Naked Perverts!

        2. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          PSA: This woman can vote. Anarchism: it's what's for nonretards.

          1. Xeones   10 years ago

            "Of course i'd prefer to be in anarchy, but then we'd all have to act like adults, wouldn't we?"

          2. Christophe   10 years ago

            Someone this dumb could be neutralized by just removing party labels from the ballots. That'd be sufficient.

        3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          While the story is basically lifted from the awesome movie Taken, that last part is good advice. The internet doesn't give a shit about your life so stop posting your day-to-day minutiae.

          1. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

            Or from Call of the Wild.

            1. Fizban   10 years ago

              So Buck didn't go to the wolves on his own free world, he was abducted?

              1. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

                He was stolen at the beginning.

        4. Paul.   10 years ago

          STOP ADDING STRANGERS ON FACEBOOK
          and
          STOP
          posting everything about your life on Facebook.

          These two bits of advice, by themselves are perfectly reasonable.

          1. R C Dean   10 years ago

            Well, they'e a start.

            I would have gone with just a plain old "STOP FACEBOOK", myself.

        5. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          "Little do you know, your precious baby girl was sold to a 43 years old pedophile before you even stepped foot off campus this morning, and now she's on her way to South Africa with a bag over her head, confused, terrified and crying because a man she's never seen before picked her up from school, and now she doesn't know where her parents are, where she's going, or what's gonna happen to her."

          I laughed really hard at this.

          1. MJGreen   10 years ago

            At least your kid is traveling the world and meeting new people.

        6. Rasilio   10 years ago

          The really truely mind numbing stupid part of this is the clown car circus that these mythical criminals would have to be operating.

          I mean here you have a jaded sociopath who thinks nothing whatsoever about abducting a 6 year old and selling her into sexual slavery and his primary targeting tool is peoples facebook pages and leaving an IP trail a mile and half long from the girls parents to him.

          A far far easier course would simply be to rent a house across the street from the school and photograph the kids as they walked by and lets face it neither he nor the buyer would give a damn about the kids name

          1. pan fried wylie   10 years ago

            lets face it neither he nor the buyer would give a damn about the kids name

            I mean, cmon, someone illegally purchasing a lil kid isn't going to have any qualms about renaming it.

        7. BillEverman   10 years ago

          Your adorable little five year old asks if she can play outside like the other kids. "Please, Mommy, I'd like to frolic in the yard and see the sun." So you let her. You keep an eye on her the whole time, and make sure that her leash is securely fastened to the concrete and steel post in the back yard...and you make sure to get her safely inside after just fifteen minutes.

          "Please, Mommy, can't I have a window like the other kids? I'd like to see the sun more than fifteen minutes a day." So you hire a contractor and have a window installed in her secure basement bunker.

          The next morning, you go into her room, and she's gone! A pedophile took pictures of her while she was outside, and broke the window with a rock. He cut the rope you'd secured her with (why didn't you stay with the chains, even though she said they were uncomfortable?), and now you'll never see her again.

          And you have only yourself to blame, you sack of human garbage.

      4. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

        Amy Jessina Janssen - My children's father is playing with trafficking my own daughters. If people want in.. They will get in. Its all in God's hands. No one is safe.

        So either this person needs get off Facebook and to go to the cops, or she is an attention seeking whore willing to ruin the life of her significant other for a little bit of internet fame.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          Yeah, that right there is some Grade A retard

          1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

            She's one of the reasons I recommended not reading the comments, above.

        2. Paul.   10 years ago

          I choose B!

        3. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

          She pointedly did not call that person her SO.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

            Good point. She just wants to ruin her ex's life. That's cool.

        4. pogi   10 years ago

          So standard Facebook serial poster, then.

      5. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   10 years ago

        Ah, Lenore tackled that one recently: http://www.freerangekids.com/s.....is-insane/

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Dang. I just saw it yesterday.

          I consider it a victory, though. Of my few hundred odd friends on Facebook, only 1 was retarded enough to click share. I'm pleasantly surprised.

          1. RBS   10 years ago

            Same here, until I was bombarded with Beau Biden posts.

            1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

              What it was like to cover Beau Biden's funeral

              Printed at the Washington Post.

              1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

                Nothing like a good old glorified state funeral

              2. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

                Didn't RTFA, was there a 21 shotgun salute from the balcony?

                1. Hayeksplosives   10 years ago

                  Lolz

            2. MarkLastname   10 years ago

              What a tragedy. I mean the fact that a person actually named their offspring Beau.

      6. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        Oh God, this is amazing:

        "Why is someone a moron Lisa Schmon Coffman plenty parents do it!!! And there is NO NEED FOR NEGATIVE COMMENTS!!!! IF IT WAS YOUR CHILD DO YOU WANT ME TO CALL YOU A COMPLETE DUMBASS MORON"

        And the argumentum ad 9/11:

        "All these comments full of excuses and "it can't happen to me" mentality. We thought 911 couldn't happen. Well, IT DID."

        1. Brian   10 years ago

          That's the great thing about being paranoid. Even a broke clock is right twice a day.

          So, you know that, eventually, you can hold something over everyone's heads, proving that you were right all along.

          1. JW   10 years ago

            Everything happens, eventually.

            BE PREPARED. FOR EVERYTHING.

            1. Riven   10 years ago

              ... Sounds like someone joined Cultfit

  3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    They do this mostly by misrepresenting what I wrote and offering the same statistical distortions I'd tried to expose, with a healthy dose of vague and indignant huffing and puffing.

    BREAKING NEWS: Reason contributor finds out that activists are often ends-justify-the-means types, especially if the means is lying their asses off.

  4. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    This is just a Facebook game. You make shit up, and see how many shares you can get. This isn't even one of the outrageous ones.

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      Dude, we should totally conspire to make one up.

      Maybe about a Castle of Doomcock in Cleveland or something....

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        If we're successful, it means our friends are retarded. Do you really want to confirm that?

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          I already know a bunch are retarded. I'm checking on the others....

        2. Catatafish   10 years ago

          There is nothing wrong with trying to attain perfect information in the friend marketplace.

        3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

          Wait a minute- you're one of my friends. Are you retarded?

          1. Agammamon   10 years ago

            If you don't know who's retarded - it might be you.

          2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            If I know you're retarded, there's no way you can know that I'm retarded unless we're at the same group home.

            1. Agammamon   10 years ago

              Kinda depends on how retarded I am, doesn't it?

      2. Marcus Aurelius   10 years ago

        hasn't Cleveland suffered enough?

      3. MarkLastname   10 years ago

        Is it that there's a castle called Doomcock in Cleveland?

        Because that may be a tenable way to generate some tourist revenue for Cleveland. Just saying, they could use the tourists.

      4. Michael Price   10 years ago

        I know, we'll say men are going around selling woodchippers door-to-door. If you let them in your back yard, they feed you into the woodchipper, ransack your house and leave no evidence.

  5. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

    No I haven't. What's the punch line?

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      "Nikki IS the worst."

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        I'm so bad no one has ever tried to white-slave me.

        I mean, except for the state. But they're not really trying amirite?

        1. Episiarch   10 years ago

          You're not white enough to white-slave, you Sicilian monster.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            +1 Dennis Hopper

        2. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

          It's not slavery if you consent to it, nicole.

          1. Paul.   10 years ago

            Taxes are the price we pay for civilization, Hugh.

            1. pan fried wylie   10 years ago

              Fun Fact: Nikki is the only person ever to actually locate and sign The Social Contract.

              1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                Actually, it's just an EULA, but instead of shrinkwrap, someone pulls you out of a vagina.

                1. Agammamon   10 years ago

                  That makes more sense - nobody ever read a EULA they disagreed with and decide 'nope, I'm not going to use this software'.

    2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      What's the punch line?

      "Wanna hear something funny, funny man? Knock, knock MY FIST UP YOUR BALLS."

      1. Xeones   10 years ago

        STEVE SMITH SAYS "GO ON..."

      2. MJGreen   10 years ago

        ...Who's there?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

          There's a man who's streets ahead.

          1. MJGreen   10 years ago

            I'm glad you recognized. Otherwise I'd have to flash you my Forest Whitaker eye.

    3. Agammamon   10 years ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xECUrlnXCqk

  6. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

    Like Warty would ever go to Hobby Lobby.

    1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

      Where do you think he got the parts for his Timesuit?

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Michael's?

      2. Episiarch   10 years ago

        Uh, those parts were painstakingly assembled over years from various worlds throughout this galaxy and the three closest galaxies to this one. Admittedly, most of the parts were from Hobby Lobby stores on those various worlds--Hobby Lobby is an intergalactic chain, after all--but not all of them. Some of them were from Bed, Bath, and Beyond. Because Bed, Bath, and Beyond coupons NEVER EXPIRE, Nicole. NEVER.

  7. Paul.   10 years ago

    So my mother was right. Grown women out in public on their own might get picked up.

  8. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    Would it be out of bounds for me to question why they chose Hobby Lobby as the site for their horrible abductions? It sure is coincidental that people talking about a woman's issue primarily founded in mindless fear of Stranger Danger would pick as the location for their sex-trafficking hysteria a store that a few years ago was attacked and castigated for undercutting government birth control requirements.

    I'm sure that's just a coincidence though and they weren't trying to libel Hobby Lobby as punishment for standing up to state birth control requirements. The type of activist who would make up stories of sexual abduction would certainly never do such a thing.

    Also, there are a lot of these idiotic, viral facebook postings. I remember a few years ago I read one that got thousands of shares and was all about how gangs were totally leaving fake babies by the side of the road so that when you stopped they'd abduct your ass. It was such obvious nonsense that I questioned how anyone could believe it.

    1. Paul.   10 years ago

      Are you suggesting that Hobby Lobby isn't the go-to destination for oppressing wimminz?

      1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

        I heard from a guy Jo-Ann fabrics is the place to go.

        1. MoriahJovan   10 years ago

          Jo-Ann's for rich white women with lots of time for making poor-folk necessary-labor into an expensive pastime.

          Button prices are outrageously expensive.

          And fuck you, WalMart, for taking out the fabric department. That's where your troubles began.

          /bitter

          1. PACW   10 years ago

            Thought I was the only one (certainly the only one on Reason) who was bitter about the fabric department cut.

        2. MoriahJovan   10 years ago

          Which, of course, buttresses your point. Lost myself there in the velvet section for a minute.

    2. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

      I'd pick Victoria's Secret.

  9. GILMORE   10 years ago

    This is memorable of the ad-campaign war depicted in Mr Show's "The Fairsley Difference"

    "At Fairsley Foods you can shop comfortably, knowing your children will not be abducted and shipped to a Pakistani whorehouse, where they will spend the rest of their lives in indentured homoerotic servitude.

    Come With Your Kids - Leave With Your Kids. THAT'S the Fairsley Difference"

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      They are getting a show or a special on Netflix, which is exciting.

      "it's insane...this guy's taint."

  10. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

    This is unbelievable! Some people will believe anything.

    Now excuse me, I need to change out my vodka soaked tampons.

    1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      Ah, so you've figured the secret of out how to get a Russian to go down on you!

  11. Paper Wasp   10 years ago

    My theory is that the women who volunteer for groups like Rights4Girls and CATW are a bunch of ugly, fatassed, dowdy, frizzy-haired and/or aging butterfaces who crusade against prostitution because of a latent jealousy that no one will fuck them. It's the reason why voluntary sex workers can scream at the top of their lungs that they're not being exploited or abused, and organizations like these ignore them. All they see is that younger, more attractive, oftentimes foreign women are "stealing" the men they supposedly "own."

    See also: women who crusade against bikini baristas.

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      Everything accurate up until...."who crusade against prostitution because of a latent jealousy that no one will fuck them...

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        ...should have been... ""...because there's a gold-rush of funding for modern feminist panic-mongering, which can net you federal grants, teaching positions, speaking engagements, and plaudits from just about anyone who lives in fear of social-scorning"

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          ALSO

          fried chicken

        2. Paper Wasp   10 years ago

          It can't be both? I think it can be both. This is how they both (1) get paid, and (2) express their anger at being rejected by men because they're uglier than a sack of baboon assholes.

          1. GILMORE   10 years ago

            2 is just a stupid misogynistic claim whose only obvious purpose would be to discredit critics of sex-trafficking moral panics

            I mean, feel free to troll with it though.

            1. GILMORE   10 years ago

              Also, please peruse the people who you are accusing of being hateful because "men won't stick it in them" or something =

              e.g.
              YASMIN VAFA

              AUTUMN HANNA VANDEHEI & Co.

              1. Jimbo   10 years ago

                Ok, excluding those 4, they're all fuglies. Is that ok?
                Damn, them are some fine looking ladies. I wonder if they'll participate in my slavery fantasies?

              2. MarkLastname   10 years ago

                I think the difference is this: the fugly ones are more thorough; they more often tend to be more full-blown Dworkinesque types.

                The hot ones, on the other hand, are "have my cake and eat it too" feminists; they will unashamedly use their attractiveness to manipulate men, for example, and encourage other women to do the same, even while condemning the men who allow themselves to be manipulated by beautiful women.

                There is certainly no shortage of decent-looking feminazis. They're often kinda weird though. Sometimes they really hate fat people and slutty women, even though supposedly those groups are marginalized by the patriarchy and supposedly their allies by nature. But of course, even beautiful women get free stuff from the government because vagina; they just also like getting free drinks from random men too.

    2. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      "Kent Bikini Baristas gone wild."

      You know who else went amok in Kent, don't you Paper Wasp?

      1. Unreconstructed   10 years ago

        +1 hairy-handed gent

      2. Brett L   10 years ago

        I heard he was exquisitely coutured.

        1. Greg   10 years ago

          Do you think he ever found Lee Ho Fuk's?

  12. Paul.   10 years ago

    One such dissenter was Rep. Bobby Scott, co-chair of Congressional Human Trafficking Caucus

    Wait, this just sank in... we have a whole congressional caucus for this?

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

      Looks great on the resume

    2. Almanian!   10 years ago

      We could use some more human trafficking. Too bad Congress is on it - they fuck up everything.

    3. Episiarch   10 years ago

      We need a variation on Rule 34. Instead of "If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions", it would be "If it exists as a false panic/concept, there is someone in government getting paid to care about it. No exceptions".

    4. Xeones   10 years ago

      Oh hey, what up, my congressman.

      I ran against him as a write-in candidate last election and got almost 3 votes!

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

        Dude, you're in my hood. Of course, District 2 is a clusterfuck arrangement of localities. Imma guess you live in Suffolk.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

          District 3, sorry

          1. Jimbo   10 years ago

            Not as bad as District 9

            1. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

              Yeah. Fucking Prawns.

        2. Xeones   10 years ago

          Norfolk, actually. The easternmost end of this gerrymander-assed district that stretches all the way up to Richmond.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

            I live in Williamsburg but work in Newport News. We should meet on neutral ground sometime.

            1. Agammamon   10 years ago

              Is this like a Highlander thing?

              1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

                I always parley first

                1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

                  Isn't that because you want to parley all the time?

                  1. Agammamon   10 years ago

                    Only his girl.

    5. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Congressional Human Trafficking Caucus

      Before I can pass judgment, I need to know:

      Are they pro- or anti-?

      1. Brett L   10 years ago

        Are we selling politicians into slavery?

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Nah. They're useless, so there's no money in it.

    6. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      After this, we can all be certain that Bobby Scott fucks toddlers in his basement every night.

  13. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    Idiots. Childish, attention-seeking idiots.

    1. Hugh Akston   10 years ago

      The Bernie Sanders thread is further down, dude.

  14. Raston Bot   10 years ago

    Well I'd hate to waste a good hyper-paranoid episode gripping the public.

    "Why do you need another gun?"

    "Didn't you read that trafficking story?!"

    1. Catatafish   10 years ago

      This is...utterly brilliant.

    2. The Elite Elite   10 years ago

      Never let a good made-up crisis go to waste!

  15. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

    Hobby Lobby and white slave trafficking? We really are approaching the derponic convergence. Now we just have to figure out a way of linking Caitlyn Jenner to the story.

    1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      Was Caitlyn Jenner the stalker?
      ... the would-be victim?
      ... the shadowy figure on the grassy knoll?

    2. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Caitlin Jenner, and Chick-Fil-A.

      1. Derp-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

        I heard that Chik-Fil-A refused to cater Caitlin Jenner's gay wedding to another MtoF transsexual after denying her access to OTC birthcontrol at Beau Biden's funeral!

  16. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

    Had she ever considered that these might be store cops and they were following her because she was sticking yarn in her bra?

    1. OneOut   10 years ago

      this.....is my guess.

    2. dinkster   10 years ago

      The yarn was covering her surgery. Why do you hate breast cancer survivors?

    3. Marty Comanche   10 years ago

      That's one way to get more attention.

    4. MarkLastname   10 years ago

      Pretty sure the woman following was actually with the sex crimes unit who's job is to follow people in grocery stores they suspect of being human traffickers.

  17. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

    So STEVE SMITH has people working for him now? Wonders will never cease.

    1. Agammamon   10 years ago

      Its the internet - it doesn't matter how sick and horrible your interests are, you can find a community that shares them and welcomes you.

      1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

        Ahem...

        Aggy, I can envision someone copying your exact words and using them to describe most of us who visit regularly here at Reason Hit & Run.

        And, for the record Aggy, I'm only horrible because someone keeps moving my chair.

        1. Agammamon   10 years ago

          And we would use those exact words to describe those who frequent the comments at, say, Jezebel.

          The difference of course, is that we would be *right*.

  18. Rasilio   10 years ago

    Yes, because there is such a huge market for the dumpy middle aged to elderly women that make up 90% of Hobby Lobby's clientel.

    It is not like they'd be staking out a planet fitness or a tanning salon or got gods sake a Lulumon at a minimum

    1. Brett L   10 years ago

      Is planet fitness the gym that fit-shamed a woman?

  19. Raston Bot   10 years ago

    The latest paranoia I'm aware of is the danger of crumb rubber infill for turf fields. Recycling tires for playground surfaces was pushed hard by enviromentalists a decade ago. Well now some are shitting their pants b/c when you inject carbon nanotubes into mice, it acts like asbestos.

    http://www.nature.com/nnano/jo.....8.111.html

    Bonus: the FIFA women's world cup announcers won't shut up about the hazards to the players from rubber infill on synthetic turf.

    1. Brett L   10 years ago

      Well for fuck's sake, its not like goddam Astroturf that would break your ankle and take all the skin off your thigh after burning through you pant leg. These chicks need to put on their big girl pants.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

      when you inject carbon nanotubes into mice, it acts like asbestos

      Gee, no one could see that one coming from a million miles away

      1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        So all we have to do is stop the mandatory pre-match astroturf injections, and all will be well?

    3. R C Dean   10 years ago

      First question:

      Do tires have carbon nanotubes?

      1. mad.casual   10 years ago

        Whaddya talking about? Global warming *causes* carbon nanotubes.

        The only reason we survived the cancer caused by tire swings and tractor-tire sandboxes was because they used simpler, more organic methods of vulcanization and we weren't constantly bathed in WiFi.

        #IFLS

      2. Brett L   10 years ago

        Statistically, almost certainly. Much like there are probably a couple of molecules of cyanide floating around inside you right now. Thermodynamics and the law of large numbers virtually guarantee both.

      3. gaoxiaen   10 years ago

        Only nanotires.

    4. Agammamon   10 years ago

      Tell 'em to wear a respirator and goggles.

      1. MarkLastname   10 years ago

        Fuck it, just have 'em wear hazmat suits.

    5. DesigNate   10 years ago

      How, exactly, do they plan on injecting the rubber infill into the players?

      1. Agammamon   10 years ago

        Forcibly?

  20. macsnafu   10 years ago

    I'd already read this on Snopes, but good to have the story rounded out a bit.

  21. Libertarian   10 years ago

    Not long after Disney World opened (I was in Tampa, late 70s) I remember the urban legend of little boys being abducted in the Magic Kingdom by men who would take them into the men's room and castrate them, dye their hair, and put them in little dresses to smuggle them out of the park. Good times, good times.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   10 years ago

      castrate them, dye their hair, and put them in little dresses to smuggle them out of the park

      Your cunning plan, there might be a few issues....

      1. Brett L   10 years ago

        Nah, just spill some blood on the front of your clown suit.

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          But I still haven't gotten the old blood stains out!

  22. Pulseguy   10 years ago

    Trying to white slave the women in my neighbourhood would be a very bad business model. They can all spend more in an afternoon at Costco than you could earn off them in a year.

    1. R C Dean   10 years ago

      If your business model involves giving your slaves credit cards, well, yer doin' it wrong.

      1. mad.casual   10 years ago

        In his defense, a good number of those that fit the description would be very hit-or-miss with regard to any of the other white slave positions you might need to fill.

    2. OneOut   10 years ago

      But your slave dungeon will never run out of toilet paper.

  23. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

    They were not "abducted"' . Everyone knows hobby lobby chicks are whores.

  24. marilynchandler741   10 years ago

    I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,

    ------------- http://www.jobnet10.com

  25. Hayeksplosives   10 years ago

    My sister shared that FB abduction story. I started to type out an explanation of why that was pretty much a spam story for the gullible.

    And then i remembered Craig Ferguson's advice for getting along with spouse/close friends: Before you say something controversial, ask yourself, "1. Does this need to be said. 2. Does this need to be said by me. 3. Does this need to be said by me NOW?"

    So I deleted my draft. Sigh.

  26. AD-RtR/OS!   10 years ago

    But, it was on Social Media.....
    No one would lie on Social Media....

  27. Lorenzo Valla   10 years ago

    She's a possible victim of a possible sexual assault, so therefore we should take her story at face value. Oh wait, she wasn't on a college campus, but perhaps she thought she was...

  28. piyahibire   10 years ago

    Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out.
    This is wha- I do...... ?????? http://www.netcash5.com

  29. scsloan58   10 years ago

    Shared this to Twitter, which auto-posts to FB for me. This was my mom's response (we shop there a lot):

    "Couple of points here.. firstly, very rarely are nubile women in Hobby Lobby. Secondly, the 'middle aged woman' probably saw this idiot do something that looked like shoplifting and wanted to stop it and thridly, Oh Wow!, she stared down the potential perp while changing checkout lines! In conclusion, the only reason women would be abducted from Hobby Lobby would be as housekeepers."

    NOOOOO!!! Housekeeper Trafficking! Must go write a post. 🙂

  30. Lorenzo Valla   10 years ago

    Yes, because the inevitable conclusion they reach in any situation of perceived inequality is that women are the victim and it's the government's role to make it better. That both presumptions are faulty doesn't enter into the equation.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!