Police Abuse

Grand Jury Doesn't Indict Cop Who Shot and Killed Unarmed Man; Cop Could Still Lose Job

No special privileges in Texas guarantee his job just because of the absence of charges related to possible misconduct.



In February, Ruben Garcia Villalpando was shot twice in the chest after approaching Robert Clark, a police officer, with his hands on his head despite being ordered to stop. It was the end of a short chase that started when police approached Villalpando as he sat in his truck in a parking lot. At the time activist suggested Villalpando, who was an illegal immigrant, could have been trying to get away from police because he didn't have documents. His family's attorney now says Villalpando was intoxicated but that that still didn't justify the use of deadly force. A grand jury disagreed, declining to indict the officer.

NBC in Dallas reports:

"The grand jurors were given complete and open access to all the evidence in this case, included cellphone videos, the dash cam video from officer Clark's vehicle, witness statements, police records and reports, and any additional information that they requested," said Larry Moore, Chief of the CDA's Criminal Division, who led the state's presentation. "They heard testimony from witnesses representing both Mr. Villalpando and officer Clark. The attorneys representing officer Clark and the Villalpando family were also given the opportunity to directly address the grand jury, should they wish to do so."

The dashcam video was released this week after the grand jury's announcement, but does not show the shooting—it happened off camera. The Villalpando family's attorney says he believes the video could have been doctored, because a video taken moments after the shooting shows Villalpando's body in front of the dash cam. He may have been referring to this cellphone video. The person who took says he was surprised at the time none of the cops were offering Villalpando medical assistance as he lay on the ground. The family's attorney says he'll be hiring an expert to examine the video.

While the grand jury has declined to indict, Grapevine police say their internal investigation continues, and could still lead to Clark's firing. The proceedings of the grand jury were secret so it's difficult to assess what happened. But if a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, he should also be able to fail to indict someone who deserves it. Because prosecutors depend on police on their daily bread and butter (suspects to charge with crimes), there's going to be room for skepticism in decisions like these. How much skepticism, and how engaged local residents are about it, will determine how long the present arrangement continues around the country.

After the grand jury declined to indict anyone in the case of the death in police custody of Eric Garner, the state's attorney general requested authority from the governor to oversee investigation of alleged criminal activity by police officers while on duty that results in death. Both the attorney general and the governor were in office for nearly four years before this happened—it took the attention Eric Garner's death drew to a situation that shouldn't ever have been politically tenable in the first place.

Meanwhile a bill introduced in Missouri by Jay Barnes, a Republican state legislator, one of sixty bills related to police reform introduced after events in Ferguson last summer drew national attention to the need for police reform, would have required the appointment of special prosecutors to deal with cases against cops. That bill, and most of the others introduced in Missouri, failed to pass. One prosecutor, Jackson County's Jean Baker, insisted prosecutors usually don't bring cases to grand juries except when it comes to police, saying that that explains the lower rate of grand jury indictments of cops. But she didn't see how that's a problem. Instead, she says she believes she's accountable to the public and can be trusted to deal with alleged criminal actions by cops. And if people didn't think so?  Baker told the Kansas City Star: "If they don't like how I'm handling cases, they can remedy that quickly with their ballot. A special prosecutor is not accountable in that way." Democracy as justice, in action.

NEXT: 10 Great Points in Rand Paul's Patriot Act Attack

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Yo, Reason, I’m pimping Michael Paulsen’s now constitutional law textbook for free (so it isn’t technically pimping, when you think about it)

    “The myth of judicial supremacy”


  2. That dude really was trying to get shot. Cop was spazzing out and he was clearly trying to creep on him. I fucking yield to no man in my loathing of cops, but that guy was trying to get shot…

    1. Well his attorney says he was drunk.

      Why not tazer him?

      1. This is a legitimate question.

        1. Tazers get mistaken with guns all too often….

  3. Compliance in policing doesn’t exist but it does in trillion dollar worlds like JPMorgan. Fuck up an paperwork because your fucking F.A. ass worked 20 70 hour weeks? Called out on a violation and perhaps fired. You didn’t torture or kill a single soul. You forgot an address on a form.

    Man, shit is getting real on people on financials and cops who actually KILL people get vacations.

    Law enforcement needs the same compliance world smacked on their goddamn asses that financial universes are now dealing with. Bring on compliance nazis found in new investment banks and transmit these bitches to police stations…

    POLICE will cry forever like little girls in pink panties… No cop can handle powered compliance because most cops break the law and ethics. MOST. Not a few. MOST. Bring on the Democratic compliance machine to law enforcement. I’m all for it.

  4. Why are cops cry towels?

    Why are cops trained to weep?

    WAAAAAA…. I’m a cop. I’m lonely and tired and weepy all this year cuz…. parades and protests and the fucking slime bags in the local F.O.P. are like crap sewage face suck… because ALL fraternal order of police in ALL locations are mafia turds…. screaming little girls in pink panties but really big fat boys super white in pink little girl panties everywhere cuz we don’t get wespect cuz we want all you citizens to get fuckin charged with all sorts of shit our pink panty minds can imagine from the early 80’s til now and then pretend like we are not bad little boys cuz we don’t want to fuck with normal society….

  5. So I feel this orgasm brain jet finger crap to draw lines for these worlds I geneclask whitherings
    like sentence s pounding vowels on a dead ghost
    when care scrams screams and creams on limbs on lost puddles
    but yyea Im living on piano keys and coke right not but I want to draw lines for this thread crunch dino mons glans…

    ok so I’m fucked up so this friday I plan on drawing art for that party… I want to draw cocks and vaginas on a R for this froday. Reason is sex. reason. the mind math is sex and death. which makes the left right wing screams for CONTROL fruitless bullshit… ALL the controllers on FOX and CNN and Heritage and PJMedia and Salon and SLate and Gawker will all DIE. Dead . over forever. over for eternity you young fucks. Your young asses will be like dead bitches. Humans live a short screen you dumbass college fucks… and old people often outlive young people so don’t ry that shit with me… and I’m not old but I’m fucking smart enough that things roll

  6. like some sort of magic incantation the words “I was afraid for my life” magically turn all sins into simple “procedural errors.”

  7. Why the hell are cases like this kept secret?

    1. All Grand Jurys are kept secret. A better question is why was the defendant allowed to argue in this Grand Jury? Ive never heard of defendants being granted entrance to a GJ hearing, let alone a defendants lawyer presenting witnesses and arguments. A GJ is not a trial. Unless its target is a cop.

  8. I hear Baltimore is accepting applications. Perhaps he can relocate if he gets fired.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.