Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

'Hacktivist' Hysteria in Baltimore

The debunked #BaltimoreLootCrew tweets find a new way to feed fearmongering.

Jesse Walker | 5.4.2015 1:46 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I'm all for debunking social-media memes and telling people not to believe everything they read. But this Baltimore Sun piece takes a kind of weird approach to it:

After riots overtook West Baltimore on Monday, a hashtag began to appear on Twitter and other social media—#BALTIMORELOOTCREW—linking together posts that depicted pilfered prescription drugs and demolished store shelves.

But that "crew" was not actually in Baltimore protesting the death of Freddie Gray, according to a local cybersecurity company. Many photos shared using that label, and others, were taken years ago, and often not even in the United States, employees at Federal Hill-based ZeroFox found.

Bad actors and so-called "hacktivists" descended on Baltimore—electronically, at least—this past week, flooding social media with automated accounts and inauthentic images, said James C. Foster, CEO of the social media risk management firm. Law enforcement and cybersecurity experts said such barrages increasingly target areas of unrest around the world, spurring violence and challenging efforts to contain it.

"There's a global reach now where they don't have to be here to further instigate it," Foster said.

Note the outside-agitator framing, in which Twitter trolls are presented as "hacktivists" who "instigate" violence around the world. In the second-to-last paragraph of the story, we're finally informed that "there was no proof that such misinformation led to any specific acts of violence."

More:

The company's specialty is rooting out cyber criminals lurking on social media. And when West Baltimore erupted in rioting Monday, its employees felt compelled to apply their skills. ZeroFox worked into the night tracing tweets and Facebook accounts that shared photos of looting and violence.

What they found was that much of the activity was coming from well outside of Baltimore, in some cases from Russia, China, India and the Middle East.

"I just killed a pig," wrote one tweet, showing a bloodied police officer slumped on the ground. Not only was the photo of an officer in South America, but the account sharing it was not in Baltimore.

I guess it's nice to know the highly skilled specialists at ZeroFox can do a reverse image search. But you really don't need to adopt such a spy-story tone to remind readers that the Internet is global or that trolls post faked or otherwise misleading photos during disasters and riots. Apparently, the people who pulled the #SandyLootCrew prank are still at it, or have inspired imitators. There's an interesting story to be written about that, but it won't read like an advertorial for a security firm.

Related: BuzzFeed gets trolled.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Duke Student Who Hung a Noose on a Tree Made a Bad Pun. Expel Him Anyway?

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

CultureScience & TechnologyTrollsTwitterSocial MediaCybersecurityInternetFreddie GrayBaltimoreFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (36)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Law enforcement and cybersecurity experts said such barrages increasingly target areas of unrest around the world, spurring violence and challenging efforts to contain it.

    Once they trace it to the source, you just know it's all going to be coming from the Trilateral Commission.

    1. Swiss Servator, Switzier!   10 years ago

      I thought it was them Freemasons!!!!

      *adjust foil hat*

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        We Masons don't have time for such nonsense.

        Those silly Illuminati....

        *droll chuckle*

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          It is definitely NOT the Lizardmen, so disregard any rumors you hear that say it is.

          1. Almanian!   10 years ago

            That's what Mr. Lizard told us, too, so...

            Heeeeeeeey! Wait a minute!

    2. erissa   10 years ago

      I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h? Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link... Try it, you won't regret it!......
      http://www.work-cash.com

  2. Swiss Servator, Switzier!   10 years ago

    I guess it's nice to know the highly skilled specialists at ZeroFox can do a reverse image search. But you really don't need to adopt such a spy-story tone to remind readers that the Internet is global or that trolls post faked or otherwise misleading photos during disasters and riots.

    FEEL. THE. BURN.

  3. Almanian!   10 years ago

    #Kony

  4. Eggs Benedict Cumberbund   10 years ago

    Who really gives a fuck about Twitter?

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      Amanda Marcotte?

    2. Xeones   10 years ago

      Hitler?

  5. GILMORE   10 years ago

    I think "Drayquon" is my new favoritest word

    It means, "making fun of easily-upset people". to me at least.

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      I thought that was Ohio State's new quarterback?

      Learn something every day...

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        "Draequon" means "dragon dick" in Swahili

  6. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    That Buzzfeed troll article is hilarious:

    "The story, A Racist Gamer Group Has Been Posing As Baltimore Looters On Twitter, focuses on a group called ColorCabal, which BuzzFeed reports is using social media?and the hashtag #BaltimoreLootCrew?to spread old photos, claiming they are Baltimore looters, bragging about taking advantage of rioting in the city to steal.

    The BuzzFeed story quotes two self-described members of the group?one of them saying the objective of their social media effort is to do "anything that will help paint African Americans in a bad light.""

    This totally sounds legitimate and not like a troll at all. Totally.

    1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      Holy God, it gets worse.

      http://i.imgur.com/ZQvdBV0.png - Here's how the reporter for Buzzfeed did 'research.' She basically just talked to some dude over the internet without confirming his identity and was given quotes like this:

      "It is my mission as a Gamergate supporter to enforce ethics and remove niggers from video games."

      When asked "why don't you want black people in video games?" he says "because they're niggers and they ruin everything."

      I can't see how this journalist possibly could have known she was getting trolled when the troll was speaking in such a realistic fashion.

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        Damned niggers, trolling Buzzfeed like that....

        /stormfront

      2. Episiarch   10 years ago

        Like I (sort of) say above, there are people who have realized that there are idiots out there who will lap up anything you give them, no matter how absurd, if you just reinforce their biases. These idiots who want this are so cluelessly controlled by their own desire to confirm their own biases that they actually apply zero critical thinking to anything that scratches their itch. The more it confirms their biases, literally the less they analyze it. It's stunning. And the people who have realized this are working overtime to give these idiots what they want, because it so incredibly easy to do so, and they will reward you massively for it.

        Incentives matter.

      3. Jerry on the sea   10 years ago

        Ema O'Connor
        News Fellow at BuzzFeed
        Education: Columbia University in the City of New York

        1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          COLUMBIA STRIKES AGAIN

      4. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

        we're part of the 8chan image board its an offshoot of gamergate

        And here's where someone serious could have gotten an easy first hint that this is a troll (albeit not a definitive one) given that 15 seconds on Wikipedia would inform you that 8chan predates GamerGate. I'm sure there's at least one GamerGater in existence who thinks 8chan was started in response to GamerGate, but it's a good reason to start being skeptical.

        But of course, she's not someone serious.

      5. GILMORE   10 years ago

        "I can't see how this journalist possibly could have known she was getting trolled "

        You are presuming that Buzzfeed people dont generate their own Internet Racist Gamergaters the way other people self-generate 'Rape Threats'

        its not 'being trolled' when you're desperately looking for exactly the evidence someone else conveniently provides.

        This is my same beef with some of the post-hoc analysis of Sabrina Rubin Erdely's UVA-rape story = people keep describing her as being "fooled" and "deceived" by the source 'jackie'. This is a presumption of innocence which i think is unwarranted given the facts. She willingly, knowingly misrepresented the degree of fact-checking she had done before anyone had even busted her. Which shows "awareness of guilt". why would she hide/misrepresent how much firsthand reporting (i.e. "talking to people") she'd actually done if she was actually confident in the original source at that time?

    2. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

      For those who are unfamiliar, 8chan and 4chan are open message boards that often stage large-scale and highly offensive or destructive internet pranks and "cyberterrorism," including the misogynist GamerGate.

      Setting aside the ludicrousness of the "cyberterrorism" label (HACKERS ON STEROIDS!!!) and the poor word choice ("often stage" versus "often used to stage"), what's funny is that "offensive" is linked to a post about an anti-GamerGate comedian who made threats while pretending to be a GamerGater* and "destructive" links to a description of a stunt that, while disgusting, doesn't actually provide evidence of, you know, destruction.

      *Perhaps the offensive part is the alleged harassment of said comedian by 8channers**? How meta.

      **Which, if it transpired as alleged, did go over the line, not that I should have to point that out.

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        "large-scale and highly offensive or destructive internet pranks"

        Which no one would know even existed if there weren't a screaming cadre of the perpetually-offended social justice clique letting everyone know about it in major media channels, 24/7

        Who's really committing the 'prank' here?

  7. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

    The tank on ZeroFox's website is awesome.

    1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      I'm not sure I even want to go to a cybersecurity firms web page.

  8. Klansman   10 years ago

    Remember when being a "hacker" used to mean something? Creating a fake twitter account with a picture of a Black is not "hacking."

    1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      Shut the fuck up, American.

    2. GILMORE   10 years ago

      I GOT AN IDEA LETS MAKE RACIST NAMES AND POST STUPID COMMENTS AT HIT AND RUN THEN EVERYONE CAN POINT AT THEM AND GO, "LIBURTARIANS IS RAYCISTS!!? SEE?"

      they're probably salontards.

  9. Free Society   10 years ago

    Drayquan....

  10. Charles Easterly   10 years ago
    1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      Hacker's Jokes

      1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

        Another attempt:

        Hacker's Jokes

  11. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

    HJ

  12. Almanian!   10 years ago

    ^^ yeah, this, a whole lot!

  13. Episiarch   10 years ago

    There is an entire industry starting to develop where depraved people give idiots who want something so badly exactly what they want, so much so that's it's too perfect (for whatever they want) to be true. The Rolling Stone Jackie story. Emma Sul...Sup...whatever her name is. Kony. The people who make a career out of having been a trafficked child prostitute...except they never were. And so on.

    The more people who are willing to believe a story the more it too perfectly fits exactly what they were looking for, the more people will step up to deliver just that. Because if there's one trait that people who are willing to believe stories that are too perfect to be true have, it's that they will reward the fuck out of someone who tells them what they want. So of course people are going to start catering to that market. The market of soothing lies.

    Modern day snake oil salesmen.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Can Schools Ban This 'There Are Only Two Genders' Shirt? Supreme Court Declines To Hear Free Speech Case

Billy Binion | 5.28.2025 5:21 PM

RFK Jr. Denigrates Privately Funded Medical Research

Joe Lancaster | 5.28.2025 3:55 PM

Can Trump Yank Harvard's Remaining Federal Funding?

Emma Camp | 5.28.2025 3:30 PM

A Federal Judge Lists 8 Ways That Trump Violated the Constitution by Punishing a Disfavored Law Firm

Jacob Sullum | 5.28.2025 3:15 PM

Elon Musk Is Right. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' Is a Bad Deal.

Eric Boehm | 5.28.2025 1:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!