Andrew Napolitano on Indiana's Clumsy Embrace of 'Religious Freedom'
The Indiana firestorm was the consequence of a governmental solution for no problem.


When the owner of a northern Indiana pizza restaurant said she would decline to deliver pizza to a same-sex wedding because of her religious views, it set off a firestorm. Should the pizza restaurant owner have been able to make that promise and carry through with it? Under Indiana's original Religious Freedom Restoration Act—now revised—it would have been lawful. But by permitting the rejection of services because of sexual orientation so long as that rejection was based on a religious belief, Indiana was effectively making discrimination based on sexual orientation lawful, argues Andrew Napolitano.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?