Report: Colombian Sex Parties One of the Job Perks for DEA Agents

Justice Department report says Colombian cops watched over DEA property while agents had sex with women provided by drug cartels.



Agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) enjoyed "sex parties" on government-leased property with women hired by Colombian drug cartels, according to a report released Thursday by the U.S. Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The agents were not undercover, and Colombian police officers even provided "protection for the DEA agents' weapons and property" during these Bogotá shindigs. 

Yes, you read that correctly: federal law enforcement agents entrusted their guns and headquarters to foreign cops while they went off to have sex with women procured by the very organized criminals they're allegedly targeting. The war on drugs in action, folks!

Ten DEA agents admitted to attending the sex parties, for which they were punished with suspensions of two to 10 days, Politico reports

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz told POLITICO on Thursday he wanted the agencies involved to swiftly fire those involved and that his panel would immediately start digging into the allegations. … "We need to understand how these people are being held accountable. There should be no question about the severity of the punishment," Chaffetz said. "I don't care how senior the person is, they are going to have to let these people go."

The OIG report encompasses a larger investigation into recent sexual misconduct and harassment within the DEA, FBI, U.S. Marshals Service, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). It accuses all the agencies of repeated failure to report improper sexual conduct. But the most serious allegations by far are aimed at drug enforcement agents and their superiors.   

The DEA was apparently not very forthcoming with information about its Colombian activities. "We interviewed DEA employees who said that they were given the impression that they were not to discuss this case," states the OIG, noting that "our report reflects the findings and conclusions we reached based on the information made available to us."

Based on the available information, the OIG concluded that a "foreign officer allegedly arranged 'sex parties' with prostitutes funded by the local drug cartels for these DEA agents at their government-leased quarters," where DEA laptops, BlackBerry devices, and other government-issued equipment were present. 

The parties reportedly took place from 2005 to 2008, but the DEA's Office of Professional Responsibility became aware of them only in 2010, after it received an anonymous complaint. DEA supervisors, however, had been aware of the allegations for several years because of complaints from management of the building in which the DEA office in Bogotá was located.

DEA agents attending the parties say they didn't know the Colombian sex workers were paid with cartel funds but evidence suggests otherwise, notes the OIG. "The foreign officers further alleged that … three DEA [agents were] provided money, expensive gifts, and weapons from drug cartel members." 

In 2013, another Justice Department investigation revealed that Secret Service Agents had been hiring women for sex while in Colombia arranging an upcoming Barack Obama visit. The encounters were facilitated by agents from the DEA.  

NEXT: Chris Christie Says Pot Legalization Is a Gateway to a Slippery Slope

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “suspensions of two to 10 days”

    Yes, and I bet a “civilian” who used drug cartel hookers would likewise get nothing more than a 10-day suspension from his job and a solemn warning not to do it again.

    1. Who says these drug warriors got, or deserved, the humiliation of a solemn warning?

    2. I suppose it would depend on who their employer is. If it were me, I’d say go with it, as long as you get your job done. I mean, what’s the point of being posted in Colombia if you can’t enjoy some hookers and blow?

      1. Hey, our brave DEA Drug Warriors need a bit of rewarding relaxation now and then! If we can reward them this way and save us all a bunch of taxpayer money, why not? Pay them now, or pay them later, pay them this way, or pay them that way?

        Cum to think of it, our anti-prostitution “vice squad” should (to save us tax money) be allowed to go to illegal gambling establishments, with the bills footed by the local whore-house.

        And the anti-illegal-gambling “vice squad” should have access to illegal drugs (opium dens?), with the bills footed by the local mob-run betting house!

        Brilliant? Yes, I know it! You’re welcome!!!!

    3. Justice Department report renders National Lampoon and SNL obsolete.

  2. Isn’t the GOP supposed to be looking for something in the budget to cut?

      1. ^^THIS^^ is the correct and only response.

        1. If it’s Xeones, I’m also OK with “Fuck BUTTPLUG, yo”

          1. I don’t express the proper fealty to Team Red. I am aware of that.

            SHUN HIM!!

            1. BUTT! BUTT! BUTT-BUTT-BUTT!


            2. What a goddamn ignorant turd you are, dipshit. Like anyone on this site wouldn’t IMMEDIATELY endorse the abolition of the DEA.

              Yeah, real TEAM RED partisans we are.


              1. You’re doing it wrong.


            4. “That’d be the butt, Bob”

              1. +1 Newlyweds but upon further research the wife actually said

                In the ass

                1. I know, but my Ma & Pa had a running joke that was “That’d be the butt, Bob”, so there ya go.

            5. Buttplug isn’t even that great of a troll, first of all, I wonder if he thinks adding “Palin” to it will piss us off on this board? What this fucktard doesn’t get is, we aren’t Republicans and we hate Sarah Palin. He/she/it is a complete fail clown and none of its trolling comments are even funny. Buttplug, we’re not laughing with you, we’re laughing at you, go back to the Dailykos.

        2. Or you could just ignore him.

          1. I do.

          2. Where’s the fun in that? I think i am giving shriek’s contributions exactly the amount of respect they deserve.

            1. I think you should do whatever you want.

              1. I WAS GONNA

        3. No it’s not; unless you are trying to encourage it to provide more gibberish, it’s not the appropriate response.

          Remember, it is not sentient; it is like an ant farming aphids. It makes a comment using phrases that in the past elicited very filling responses, and you guys feed it by reacting to it.

          If you guys want it to go away, I’d recommend you stop leaving food out for it.

          1. Might I point out that it’s probably enjoying the back and forth over whether or not anyone should respond to it?

            1. Why does anyone care? Unless they are reaching toward Mary or White Indian levels of disruption, I don’t give a shit. Usually I ignore it. If it seems close to saying something worthwhile I might respond. I’m pretty sure at this point that there is no strategy that will make shriek or Tony go away.

              1. Just noting that arguing over it seems to be a pointless exercise, it’s not worth it.

                1. Dude, we’re libertarians. Arguing is what we DO.

                  1. I see your point

                    1. I told you once!

              2. If it seems close to saying something worthwhile …

                THIS is when the shit really starts to unravel.

    1. No, the Elephants and the Donkeys don’t cut the budget. That’s why people here aren’t republicans or democrats.

      So fuck off, assface.

  3. Come on, DEA agents aren’t going to work there without some perks. Though I must say that they can do better than “Columbian drug cartels.” I don’t think women from Columbus compare to women from Colombia.

    1. Check your spell-correctly privilege!

      1. Columbian is correctly spelled–person from Columbus. I suppose it could mean Georgia, or maybe DC.

        1. South Carolina doesn’t even exist for you, does it you heartless monster.

          1. Actually, it does, but the women there are more attractive and less good as an example.

            1. One of the best things about Ft. Jackson were the weekends out and about all the nubile co-eds with “COCKS” emblazoned on their ample breasts.

    2. Here’s a pretty smokin’ Columbian.

      1. Look, trust me on this one, Colombia wins.

        1. I know, I know (I wouldn’t kick Sophia Vergara out of bed). But the rust belt can, on occasion, produce decent results.

          1. Oh, sure. I mean, sometimes they have genetic ties to more attractive people, producing attractive offspring. And sometimes more attractive people have babies at the airport.

          2. You meet them all the time in California.

          3. Really, KK? I’m sure the straight boyz here would love to hear more about that. 😛

            1. Weird, my browser is playing some sort of funky 70s porn music. What is it with this site, anyway?

            2. Since I’m 43 today, I’d be happy to describe such a scenario.

              Melissa McCarthy lookalike (except with a bowl cut) walks into the sauna, her white t-shirt immediately soaking-wet, exposing her droopy, fat chick tits….

    3. I prefer to be known as a Columbo.

      1. +1 last thing

        1. You did something there. I saw it.

  4. One of these things is not like the other: Report: Colombian Sex Parties One of the Job Perks for DEA Agents Justice Department report says Columbian cops watched over DEA property while agents had sex with women provided by drug cartels.

    1. That’s just mean, Tonio.

      1. That wasn’t my intent, PL, I was trying to be light-hearted about it. I generally like ENB.

        1. Sorry, I was kidding. Not like I didn’t do the same thing, albeit with a gratuitous shot at an entire city.

        2. She also fixed it, so now our conversation will be cryptic to historians.

          1. All conversations here will be cryptic to historians.

            1. Oh, they’ll have theories. Besides, Elizabeth isn’t so smart. Look up at the URL for this page.

        3. I generally like ENB.

          That chick is like the Pele of sexbot coverage.

    2. Maybe the sex party was Colombian and the cops were from Columbus?

  5. Someone forgot the old adage: what goes TDY, stays TDY.

    1. As I have reminded many a peer “TDY is not a marital status”.

  6. Reports that one such party was held on an ancient Spanish galleon becalmed in a swamp could not be confirmed, nor could allegations that several of the DEA agents were followed by swarms of butterflies throughout the proceedings.

  7. Colombian Sex Party? Is that the new Red Hot Chili Peppers album? Are they still making records? Why?

  8. Boys will be boys.

  9. DEA: We do hookers and blow so you don’t have to.

    1. “Taking cocaine off the streets – and putting it up our noses!”

    2. DEA: We do hookers and blow so you don’t have tocan’t.

      Fixed it for you.

      1. If that’s their plan, they aren’t doing a very good job of it.

    3. That’s called The Lil’ Wayne Strategy.

  10. OIGs are terrible institutions. Like so much else in government, they live by rules and regs, and to be done right, have to follow those rules and regs as closely as possible let they set a bad example. Zero tolerance!

    If they follow the book, they scare some of their targets so much that nothing gets done; better to err on the side of caution than to make a mistake which draws attention to themselves. So the targeted bureaucracies get nothing done by need twice as many employees to do so.

    This also makes them eminently tempting targets of corruption, and we all know that where the market perceives a use for corruption, it will be found.

    Yet if the OIGs are allowed to show judgement, that not only makes corruption easier, it also introduces so much fudge factor that the people they supervise will start taking chances and making mistakes which the OIGs have to accept lest they be perceived as being rigid assholes who forbid all innovation.

    O the poor OIGs. What a miserable life they lead. Will no one cry for the poor OIGs?

    1. That’s why we need the a Censor of the US.

      1. Can we just self-declare a Censor?

        1. What? Without proper training from our institutions of higher learning (Colleges of Cosmetology and Ninja Studies)?

          1. I’m willing to start a Censor Academy right here in this thread.

            1. “No, fuck you, cut spending “

              1. Who are you who is so wise in the ways of censoring?

                1. I learned it by watching you!

                  1. Okay, you’re ready for our co-op program, where you go remove a minor official from office. Let’s see. . .ah, yes, please remove the Deputy General Manager of the Brazos River Authority.

          2. Terpsichorean ecdysiasts. You’re welcome.

          3. Ninja Cosmetologists would be a GREAT band name.

  11. I thought there was a general trend of Top Men getting away with illegal behavior, Hillary Clinton being just the latest example. But these men getting to keep their jobs after taking what amounts to a bribe suggests maybe even low-level people are above the law.

    1. Maybe a top man or two was at said party, thus ensuring the proles safety.

  12. “The parties reportedly took place from 2005 to 2008, but the DEA’s Office of Professional Responsibility became aware of them only in 2010, after it received an anonymous complaint. ”

    Somebody didn’t get invited and held a grudge for two years? Awww.

    1. Or someone retired.

    2. So this stopped in 2008? Or the investigation only included events up to 2008? Trying to figure out why they got off the party train 2 years before the investigation started.

  13. OT: Marseille chief prosecutor says co-pilot deliberately flew germanwings plan into mountain.

  14. Good work if you can get it

  15. The Obama administration continues the War on Women, allowing a boyd club atmosphere in several of the most vital law enforcement agencies.

    This would be above the fold news if the President were Republican. Even if the behavior occurred in the previous administration.

    1. It’s unbelievable how willingly people give up things they supposedly care about for team politics.

    1. Huh, don’t see whorin’ or snortin’ on the list.

      1. Those only come with seniority.

      2. Well, the ‘Professional and Administrative’ section photo looks like they’d be up for a sex party. They look suspiciously happy for somebody in a paper pushing job.

      3. “Other duties as assigned.”

        1. The catchall! The head of the DEA must have some serious discretionary powers: “Go, and sin some more.”

  16. DEA agents attending the parties say they didn’t know the Colombian sex workers were paid with cartel funds but evidence suggests otherwise, notes the OIG

    Now I know why those guys never want to pay for .sex with their own hard earned money.
    Sex workers beware, US govt employees are not to be trusted !

    1. Hmmm. Wonder if Warren Sapp was with the DEA?

  17. FBI….DEA…ATF….local cop…these people are so over rated in their importance and stature in our lives. There is NOTHING special about them, and their jobs are NOT nearly as dangerous as we’re led to believe.

    They are sort if like a high-maintenance girl friend: Very expensive, not all that bright, not that great in bed and requiring massive amounts of smoke blown up her bum to keep the ego inflated.

  18. So sex trafficing right? So those agents are going to be charged with rape right? War on women.

  19. If you’re gonna be corrupted by something, it might as well involve Colombian chicas.

    Money is nice and wealth entails a certain amount of freedom and all, but if you’re gonna sell your freedom short for anything, isn’t it going to be for…the biological imperative?

    A girl asked me the other day if I liked her dress. I told her everything she puts on looks great just because she’s wearing it–and it’s true. It’s true, and she knows it’s true.

    She could make any given secret service agent dress up like a lumberjack if she wanted to.

  20. Attend a sex party, and get 10 days off work. That’ll teach ’em!

  21. Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income… You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection… Make $90 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up… You can have your first check by the end of this week………………….

  22. Mitigating!!!! How’s this for mitigating:
    Abolish the DEA. Get rid of it, dump it, can it, along with every agent and manager.

    Do you own your own body? Or does the government?
    If you own yourself you should be able to ingest anything you want to.
    Who needs the government or the DEA to tell you otherwise?

  23. Chaffetz said. “I don’t care how senior the person is, they are going to have to let these people go.”

    This is how disgusting even the people looking to clean this shit up are.

    It should be ‘I don’t care how *junior* the person is . . .’

    Junior people get to make mistakes, senior people are expected to know better already. Anyone of those guys who was in a supervisory position, no matter how minor, should simply be summarily fired. *Then* the remainder scrutinized for salvageability.

  24. War on drugs is a failure. As long as there is a demand, there will be a supply. Just spends the money on rehab and counseling centers. Round up any drug user involved in theft or any kind of violent action, send them to mandatory counseling, let them have one strike, then if they repeat, go through counseling again, then they can make their choice – do you want to be locked up in a room with free drugs or be sent to rehab?

    Once you choose free drugs option, you can’t leave unless you prove that you are worthy of the effort to rehab. If you choose the free drugs option, you get free drugs as long as you clean the room you are part of , do your chores. If you OD to death, that is collateral damage. Also, if you want free drugs from the government, you can volunteer to go on the pill if you are a woman and some kind of a vasectomy if you are a man. The costs will be well worth the investment in preventing such losers giving birth to kids.

    Meanwhile flood the market with cheap drugs so that there is no incentive for organized crime to spend so much time on dealing drugs. I know this is not a libertarian solution, but I feel it is a rational solution and that is to divert the drug war money towards family services. ANd no, that doesn’t mean waste time policing families with kids that walk to the park on their own. The idea is not to police people for not having perfect families but to police criminally bad parenting.

  25. To be fair, there are some just absurdly fit women that come from that country. So I’m going to give the drug crusaders a pass on this one.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.