The Congressional Budget Office is Still Worried About the Federal Debt

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released the latest federal budget baseline update this morning. The baseline is the starting point for its regular legislative cost estimates; it represents CBO's assumptions about what will happen—how much the federal government will spend, and on what, and how that will affect the deficit—if the law stays generally unchanged. When CBO scores a legislative proposal, that score is the difference between the baseline and what the budget office projects would happen under the changes called for in the law.
That means that the baseline is fairly important, and that changes to it are worth noting. The big change in this update is a reduction in projected cumulative deficits between 2016 and 2025: the budget office now expects that the total gap between spending and revenue during that time will be $431 billion less than the $7.6 trillion it projected several months ago. It's a modest reduction, in other words, that still leaves us with more than $7 trillion in annual deficits over the next decade.
The single biggest factor in the decline, the CBO says in its report, is lower expected growth in private health insurance premiums, based on lower than expected spending in 2013 and preceding years. In addition, the budget office also now expects somewhat lower enrollment in Obamacare's exchanges. All told, the health law is now expected to cost $209 billion less between 2016 and 2025 than the January estimate.
This doesn't mean that spending on the health law is going to drop from its current level. In fact, spending on private health insurance subsidies is going to rise quite a bit, and chew up a larger share of the economy in the process, going from about 0.2 percent of GDP today to about 0.4 percent in a decade.
Meanwhile, after a few years of stability, Social Security and Medicare spending are set to rise as a percentage of the economy, jumping from 4.9 percent and 2.9 percent of GDP this year to 5.7 and 3.6 percent of the economy in 2025.
In addition, CBO projects a big spike in federal debt payments over the next 10 years, in part because interest rates are expected to rise, and in part because "debt held by the public is projected to increase significantly under current law."
The next few years will be relatively calm, but the overall picture is fairly bleak. Federal debt will hold around 73 or 74 percent of GDP over the next several years and then rise to 77 percent by 2025—which leads to the CBO issuing the following warning on the first page of the report:
Such high and rising debt would have serious negative consequences for the nation: When interest rates returned to more typical, higher levels, federal spending on interest payments would increase substantially. Moreover, because federal borrowing reduces national saving over time, the nation's capital stock would ultimately be smaller and productivity and total wages would be lower than they would be if the debt was smaller. In addition, lawmakers would have less flexibility than otherwise to use tax and spending policies to respond to unexpected challenges. Finally, a large debt increases the risk of a fiscal crisis, during which investors would lose so much confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget that the government would be unable to borrow at affordable rates.
We've seen this same basic warning from the CBO before, but it's still worth highlighting, because it underscores the looming economic risks of our federal government's debt trajectory. Yes, we're in a period of relative budget calm, at least for the moment. But given what's coming, that's reason to take action to stabilize and reduce the nation's long-term debt problems now rather than postpone working on solutions until a crisis has arrived.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What difference, at this point, does it make?
Also this.
So it basically means jack shit. Gotcha.
Federal debt will hold around 73 or 74 percent of GDP
What?
The United States recorded a Government Debt to GDP of 101.53 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product in 2013. Government Debt To GDP in the United States averaged 60.81 Percent from 1940 until 2013, reaching an all time high of 121.70 Percent in 1946 and a record low of 31.70 Percent in 1974. Government Debt To GDP in the United States is reported by the U.S. Bureau of Public Debt.
http://www.tradingeconomics.co.....ebt-to-gdp
I'm sure that'll buff right out.
Will someone please tell the CBO that we have a fiat currency? We can't run out of money.
I'm going to give you partial credit on this one, but only because we've been out of money for a long time, and it's not like you can go double out of money.
You might not be able to run out but you can devalue it to the point where no one accepts it any longer.
My best friend's mother-in-law makes $85 /hour on the internet . She has been out of work for 5 months but last month her pay was $16453 just working on the internet for a few hours.
Visit this website ??????????????? http://www.jobsfish.com
my friend's sister-in-law makes $63 /hour on the internet . She has been fired from work for 6 months but last month her payment was $16955 just working on the internet for a few hours. go to the website.......
????? http://www.netjob70.com