He'd been prescribed the antidepressant Seroxat at 17 and, barring one or two brief breaks, had been taking it ever since. Now, with Provigil, Hari was thrilled to discover, "you can do even more work, and be constantly processing information, and sleep only four hours a night". He began buying the drug on the internet – and for a while it worked. But when he tried to stop taking it, he failed. "When you're prone to depression, there can be a strong temptation, or there was for me anyway, to try to accelerate through it – to speed up, to kind of outrun the feelings of depression and I did that for years.
"But this is totally unrelated to the things I did wrong journalistically," he says quickly. "This is really important. I did those things before and during the use of this drug. So I want to make it clear that I'm not in any way attributing anything I did to that drug use. They are totally separate things." […]
He stopped taking both Provigil and Seroxat one week after leaving the Independent, but can't be sure what withdrawal was like because, "It's hard to separate the challenge of stopping those drugs from the wider challenge of what was happening at that time." I ask if he would place himself in the 10% vulnerable to addiction, and he says, "Probably at that point, yes. Not now, because I've changed the way I live so much that I wouldn't put myself in that category any more."
You can choose to believe Hari's self-depiction and reported output or not (I choose the latter, having once published a piece of his whose central interview I suspect was made up). But what I think you really shouldn't do, if you are a news organization, is present a review of the book—or even, in some cases, an excerpt—without letting readers know that the author has serially and spectacularly made stuff up, and has been challenged on his latest work as well.
There are exactly two possibile explanations for this oversight: Either they didn't know, or they didn't care. So perk up, Brian Williams! If you wait long enough, and maybe choose the right subject for a book, some of America's journalistic institutions are waiting for you with open arms.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
For those of us who have no idea who this guy is and really no idea why we should, what are his well documented troubles? I can't figure it out from this post. And I have no idea who this clown is.
Short answer: He's well-known enough to have won both the Orwell Prize and Gellhorn Prize, two of the UK's highest journalism honors, and written for a wide swath of top U.S. outlets, and now he's got a positively reviewed book out on a subject Reason readers care about.
In 2011 he was caught out plagiarizing other people's interviews as his own, making up anecdotes and details, and also trashing his critics anonymously on Wikipedia. He treated these transgressions dismissively at first, then coughed up a dissembling, half-hearted apology, before disappearing for a while.
Wow. Basically the media has no standards. There is no reason why this guy should have ever gotten another publishing contract. Lots of people can write books. There is no reason to bother publishing a known liar. You only get one chance not to lie.
No one has a right to be published or a right to a soap box. It drives me nuts that they give such platforms to known liars.
Maybe he should write a book.Of course, so doing would, of needs, involve the ability to do something more than reading a tel-prompter, which he might or might not be able to do.
my best friend's ex-wife makes $65 an hour on the computer . She has been without a job for seven months but last month her check was $13740 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this..............
Matt,
For those of us who have no idea who this guy is and really no idea why we should, what are his well documented troubles? I can't figure it out from this post. And I have no idea who this clown is.
There are hyperlinks in the text.
Short answer: He's well-known enough to have won both the Orwell Prize and Gellhorn Prize, two of the UK's highest journalism honors, and written for a wide swath of top U.S. outlets, and now he's got a positively reviewed book out on a subject Reason readers care about.
In 2011 he was caught out plagiarizing other people's interviews as his own, making up anecdotes and details, and also trashing his critics anonymously on Wikipedia. He treated these transgressions dismissively at first, then coughed up a dissembling, half-hearted apology, before disappearing for a while.
The first paragraph helps explain him
The second one could describe a wide swath of journalists from the MSM, so specifics help.
Wow. Basically the media has no standards. There is no reason why this guy should have ever gotten another publishing contract. Lots of people can write books. There is no reason to bother publishing a known liar. You only get one chance not to lie.
No one has a right to be published or a right to a soap box. It drives me nuts that they give such platforms to known liars.
C'mon Matt. Brian was on television. You can't compare a journalist like Brian Williams so somebody that literally writes stuff.
...without letting readers know that the author has serially and spectacularly made stuff up, and has been challenged on his latest work as well.
Publications review fictional works all the time.
Our current VP literally plagiarized his life story, and our future first lady prez lied about ducking gunfire on the tarmac.
Behind every apparent double standard is a rigorously enforced single standard.
Wait, Joe Biden wasn't the first to climb Everest?
No no, that was Hillary that climbed Everest. Biden did K2.
Biden did K2.
That would explain a lot, actually. Especially if he OD'd on it.
Maybe he should write a book.Of course, so doing would, of needs, involve the ability to do something more than reading a tel-prompter, which he might or might not be able to do.
my best friend's ex-wife makes $65 an hour on the computer . She has been without a job for seven months but last month her check was $13740 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this..............
????? http://www.netpay20.com