Nope, Charter Schools Aren't Driving Away Problem Kids
A new report debunks the myth that charters push away students who hurt their bottom line.

It makes intuitive sense: Schools, including charter schools, that aren't required to serve every single kid in a district can be choosier about their students. Maybe, the theory goes, they get better results because they can push out low performers or troublemakers and even discourage disabled students from sticking around.
You can hear that very argument in Jim Epstein's excellent video about charters in Camden, New Jersey, just after the 2 minute mark:
But a new report from the New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO) finds that isn't what is actually happening, at least in the City that Never Sleeps (Except in Geometry Class, Sometimes). The report tracked 3,043 students in 53 charter schools and 7,208 students in the 116 traditional public schools nearest to each charter.
Here's what the IBO, which performs an auditing and scoring function similar to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, found:
- On average, students at charter schools stay at their schools at a higher rate than students at nearby traditional public schools.
- Students at charter schools left the city's public school system at the same rate as students in nearby traditional public schools.
In other words, charters probably aren't systematically kicking out fuck-ups. At least not any more often than traditional public schools.
A corollary to the "retention myth" is that charters don't accommodate special needs kids at the same level as public schools, or that they subtly (or not-so-subtly) force out kids who turn out to need extra help. Not so, says the report:
- When we consider any student identified as having a disability in kindergarten as a special needs student, these students remained at their charter schools through the 2012-2013 school year at a higher rate than similar students at nearby traditional public schools.
Via Eva Moskowitz's Twitter feed.
Reason Foundation is a partner in National School Week, an annual event that draws attention to increasing educational options for K-12 students and their parents. For more information on resources and activities, including more than 10,000 events taking place nationwide between January 25-31, go here now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ohhhh, KMG! With all your little "facts" and "statistics"! lol!
WTF? Let's make that "KMW" above"
As you were....lol! "facts"...since when do THOSE matter to the "narrative"?!
It's good charters don't select students in the first place, or this might all be meaningless!
Holy shit the statistical ignorance here is staggering. Why would you say something this stupid in public?!
5 Devastating Facts About Charter Schools You Won't Hear from the 'National School Choice Week' Propaganda Campaign - It's nothing more than a slick ad campaign, disguised as public service.
By Laurie Levy / AlterNet January 27, 2015
http://www.alternet.org/educat.....hoice-week
1. There are no data that support the idea that charter schools are superior to public schools.
2. Unlike public schools, charters can pick and choose their students.
3. Children who are better resourced with more family support are the winners in the school choice game.
4. It's family income, stupid.
5. Public schools, in some communities, are doing just fine.