Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Nope, Charter Schools Aren't Driving Away Problem Kids

A new report debunks the myth that charters push away students who hurt their bottom line.

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 1.29.2015 3:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Cayusa / photo on flickr
(Cayusa / photo on flickr)

It makes intuitive sense: Schools, including charter schools, that aren't required to serve every single kid in a district can be choosier about their students. Maybe, the theory goes, they get better results because they can push out low performers or troublemakers and even discourage disabled students from sticking around. 

You can hear that very argument in Jim Epstein's excellent video about charters in Camden, New Jersey, just after the 2 minute mark: 

But a new report from the New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO) finds that isn't what is actually happening, at least in the City that Never Sleeps (Except in Geometry Class, Sometimes). The report tracked 3,043 students in 53 charter schools and 7,208 students in the 116 traditional public schools nearest to each charter.

Here's what the IBO, which performs an auditing and scoring function similar to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, found:

  • On average, students at charter schools stay at their schools at a higher rate than students at nearby traditional public schools.
  • Students at charter schools left the city's public school system at the same rate as students in nearby traditional public schools.

In other words, charters probably aren't systematically kicking out fuck-ups. At least not any more often than traditional public schools.

A corollary to the "retention myth" is that charters don't accommodate special needs kids at the same level as public schools, or that they subtly (or not-so-subtly) force out kids who turn out to need extra help. Not so, says the report: 

  • When we consider any student identified as having a disability in kindergarten as a special needs student, these students remained at their charter schools through the 2012-2013 school year at a higher rate than similar students at nearby traditional public schools. 

Via Eva Moskowitz's Twitter feed.

Reason Foundation is a partner in National School Week, an annual event that draws attention to increasing educational options for K-12 students and their parents. For more information on resources and activities, including more than 10,000 events taking place nationwide between January 25-31, go here now.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cleveland Cops Claiming Racial Discrimination in Suspensions for Shooting Two Unarmed Black People Can Still Appeal, City Says

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicySchool ChoiceCharter SchoolsEducation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (4)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Almanian!   10 years ago

    Ohhhh, KMG! With all your little "facts" and "statistics"! lol!

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      WTF? Let's make that "KMW" above"

      As you were....lol! "facts"...since when do THOSE matter to the "narrative"?!

  2. Acosmist   10 years ago

    It's good charters don't select students in the first place, or this might all be meaningless!

    Holy shit the statistical ignorance here is staggering. Why would you say something this stupid in public?!

  3. cpmondello@gmail.com   10 years ago

    5 Devastating Facts About Charter Schools You Won't Hear from the 'National School Choice Week' Propaganda Campaign - It's nothing more than a slick ad campaign, disguised as public service.

    By Laurie Levy / AlterNet January 27, 2015

    http://www.alternet.org/educat.....hoice-week

    1. There are no data that support the idea that charter schools are superior to public schools.

    2. Unlike public schools, charters can pick and choose their students.

    3. Children who are better resourced with more family support are the winners in the school choice game.

    4. It's family income, stupid.

    5. Public schools, in some communities, are doing just fine.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Anti-Israel Violence Does Not Justify Censorship of Pro-Palestinian Speech

Robby Soave | 6.4.2025 4:31 PM

Belated Republican Objections to the One Big Beautiful Bill Glide Over Its Blatant Fiscal Irresponsibility

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 2:50 PM

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!