Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Nope, Charter Schools Aren't Driving Away Problem Kids

A new report debunks the myth that charters push away students who hurt their bottom line.

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 1.29.2015 3:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Cayusa / photo on flickr
(Cayusa / photo on flickr)

It makes intuitive sense: Schools, including charter schools, that aren't required to serve every single kid in a district can be choosier about their students. Maybe, the theory goes, they get better results because they can push out low performers or troublemakers and even discourage disabled students from sticking around. 

You can hear that very argument in Jim Epstein's excellent video about charters in Camden, New Jersey, just after the 2 minute mark: 

But a new report from the New York City Independent Budget Office (IBO) finds that isn't what is actually happening, at least in the City that Never Sleeps (Except in Geometry Class, Sometimes). The report tracked 3,043 students in 53 charter schools and 7,208 students in the 116 traditional public schools nearest to each charter.

Here's what the IBO, which performs an auditing and scoring function similar to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, found:

  • On average, students at charter schools stay at their schools at a higher rate than students at nearby traditional public schools.
  • Students at charter schools left the city's public school system at the same rate as students in nearby traditional public schools.

In other words, charters probably aren't systematically kicking out fuck-ups. At least not any more often than traditional public schools.

A corollary to the "retention myth" is that charters don't accommodate special needs kids at the same level as public schools, or that they subtly (or not-so-subtly) force out kids who turn out to need extra help. Not so, says the report: 

  • When we consider any student identified as having a disability in kindergarten as a special needs student, these students remained at their charter schools through the 2012-2013 school year at a higher rate than similar students at nearby traditional public schools. 

Via Eva Moskowitz's Twitter feed.

Reason Foundation is a partner in National School Week, an annual event that draws attention to increasing educational options for K-12 students and their parents. For more information on resources and activities, including more than 10,000 events taking place nationwide between January 25-31, go here now.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cleveland Cops Claiming Racial Discrimination in Suspensions for Shooting Two Unarmed Black People Can Still Appeal, City Says

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicySchool ChoiceCharter SchoolsEducation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (4)

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!