Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

ISIS

OMG! U.S. Central Command Hacked by Terrorists! Er … Not Exactly

Scott Shackford | 1.12.2015 3:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
They don't even know how to do a header image properly.
Twitter

So while President Barack Obama was presenting his plan to regulate students' online privacy to reduce the ability of businesses to target them with advertising, somebody seized the Twitter feed and YouTube account for the U.S. Central Command. For a short time, it appeared as though the Islamic State had taken control of the feed and was posting all sorts of secret U.S. intelligence, like maps and personnel information.

Until people started looking closely. It turned out none of it was actually classified information. The slides and maps could be easily sourced online. The personnel information was not particularly secretive information. Some of it looked like it was from military post or base directories that are easily available. From the Associated Press:

Most of the material was labeled "FOUO," which means "For Official Use Only," but none of it appeared to be classified or sensitive information, suggesting the hackers did not breach classified material.

One of the documents appeared to be slides developed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Lincoln Laboratory, a federally funded research and development center focused on national security. The slides appeared to depict what it called "scenarios" for conflict with North Korea and China.

"This is little more than a prank or vandalism. It's inconvenient and it's an annoyance. But that's all it is," said Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman. "It in no way compromises our operations in any way shape or form."

What appears to be the same hacker or hackers took over the Twitter feed of a Maryland CBS affiliate last week. Whether these folks have actual strong beliefs in support of Islamic terrorism or if they are just pranksters is an open question.

In any event, there's no sign that Central Command itself was hacked. Somebody got access to their social media accounts. That's obviously not the same thing as getting access to the classified data storage.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 'Directly Confronting Congress,' D.C. Legislators Push Marijuana Regulation

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

ISISCybersecuritySocial MediaPentagonTwitterFree SpeechTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

    They should have had someone in charge who's really competent with information security, like the people in charge of hiding Obama's college records.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      Valerie Jarrett?

  2. Rich   10 years ago

    Somebody got access to their social media accounts. That's obviously not the same thing as getting access to the classified data storage.

    There are those who might claim that, in these days of modern times, it's *worse*.

  3. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    If super-secret material was compromised, would they readily admit it?

    Sad when you can't believe a single word your government tells you, isn't it? Not that you should even when it is more trustworthy than the current iteration, but still.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      "Not only was super-secret material compromised, it was done by the North Korean government!"

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        What a useful scapegoat North Korea has become.

  4. The Immaculate Trouser   10 years ago

    Thank God they didn't seriously threaten US security by posting pics under the US Central Command page of Barack Obama with a wang photoshopped on his head.

    1. mad.casual   10 years ago

      The only rational response would be for his followers to start shooting up internet cafes all over the Middle East.

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        His followers DON'T HAVE ANY GUNS, mad, cause ICKY!

        They'd pummel the mideast with hashtags, though. BURY the fuckers in hashtags.

  5. Helvidius   10 years ago

    They wouldn't have hacked anything classified as confidential or higher since those computers are kept on networks wholly separate from the non-secure network that is hooked up to the internet. Occasionally there's some idiot who plugs in a laptop with a classified drive to the non-secure network, but that's usually caught quickly before there's any classified file spillage.

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      Occasionally there's some idiot who plugs in a laptop with a classified drive to the non-secure network, but that's usually caught quickly before there's any classified file spillage.

      Except, of course, when Microsoft systems are involved.

      1. Helvidius   10 years ago

        As far as I know, DoD doesn't use Windows 8.1.

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      I'd have thought that before some lower-level contractor walked off with all the NSA data he could eat.

      1. Helvidius   10 years ago

        That's only because Snowden had physical access to the secured network. He wouldn't have been able to hack it from home.

  6. PapayaSF   10 years ago

    Turns out "obamasucks" was not a very secure password.

    1. Almanian!   10 years ago

      +1 high- low-strength password

  7. Almanian!   10 years ago

    I got concerned when they posted, "All ur base are belong to us."

  8. MJGreen   10 years ago

    I bet this was all Snowden's doing!

  9. userve32   10 years ago

    Lets roll with it man. Wow.

    http://www.Web-Privacy.tk

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Texans Gain the Right To Try Individualized Medical Treatments

J.D. Tuccille | 6.6.2025 7:00 AM

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!