Government employees

Anti-Leak Brigade Seeks Occupational Code

Institutionalizing the Leak Scare.

|

THE ENEMY WITHIN
Defense Security Service

In 2011, the Obama administration created the Insider Threat program—sort of a central office for stopping leaks. Now Nextgov notes a sign that the effort is settling in for the long haul:

"It's a privilege to work in that program. And the only reason that you are there is to help protect your colleagues, not to out them. So, we've got to professionalize that workforce of people who do this for a living," said Patricia Larsen, co-director of the National Insider Threat Task Force….

[T]here is no occupational series and pay scale for the insider threat profession. The task force is exploring whether a new occupational code might be warranted, Larsen told Nextgov.

I wrote about the Insider Threat initiative in a Washington Post piece last year, and I discussed it again in the afterword to the paperback edition of my book The United States of Paranoia. (*) Here is an excerpt from the latter:

My readers are legion.
Camilo Gómez

The initiative, which stretches across multiple departments, encourages federal employees and contractors to keep an eye on allegedly suspicious indicators in their co-workers' lives, from financial trouble to divorce. A brochure produced by the Defense Security Service, tellingly subtitled "Combating the ENEMY within your organization," sums up the spirit of the program: "It is better to have reported overzealously than never to have reported at all."

The word "espionage" appears ten times in that pamphlet, while "leak" isn't used even once. But that doesn't mean leakers aren't being targeted. The effort blurs the boundary between spies and whistleblowers: an agent of a foreign power is considered an "insider threat," and so is someone releasing information to the media. The program has been adopted in agencies that have little or nothing to do with national security, including the Social Security Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Education, and the Peace Corps. A tutorial for Agriculture Department employees includes a long list of "examples of behaviors that may indicate an individual has vulnerabilities that are of security concern," ranging from sleeping at his desk to expressing "bizarre thoughts, perceptions, or expectations." The list was imported, word for word, from a Defense Department document.

Whether or not this exercise in profiling can identify potential leakers, it isn't likely to stop leaks. As the security specialist Bruce Schneier wrote in 2010, after the WikiLeaks website started to publish thousands of classified State Department cables, "The government is learning what the music and movie industries were forced to learn years ago: it's easy to copy and distribute digital files." Nearly five million federal employees or contractors have access to at least some of that secret information.

That creates a double bind: The more the government trusts someone with sensitive data, the more it has reason to fear that person. Trust breeds mistrust. It's the sort of situation that could make a person paranoid.

If they adopt a pay scale, I'll be curious to see it. Just to know how much such services are officially worth.

(* ONLY TWO MORE SHOPPING DAYS TIL CHRISTMAS! I'm just sayin'.)

Advertisement

NEXT: We should condemn both crimes against police and crimes committed by the police themselves

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Opaque is the new transparent.

  2. Only two days? I haven’t got my free copy yet, Jesse. Have I fallen off your Christmas list?

  3. Wow. This is straight out of the ’50s red scare, only then we at least had a credible global enemy.

    Now, the enemy seems to be their American subjects.

  4. Most. Transparent. Administration. Ever.

  5. “It’s a privilege to work in that program. And the only reason that you are there is to help protect your colleagues, not to out them. So, we’ve got to professionalize that workforce of people who do this for a living,” said Patricia Larsen, co-director of the National Insider Threat Task Force….”

    I’d rather get kicked in the nuts than have to work for the government.

    Can you imagine if we all had to work for the government? It wouldn’t be like working for Captain Picard on Star Trek at all!

    It would be like working for Patricia Larsen the “co-director of the National Insider Threat Task Force”. If Patricia Larsen were working for me? Her unofficial title would be “Shithead”.

    No wonder ex-government bureaucrats are completely fucking worthless in the job market. I’d rather hire a jailbird. You know how they’re always saying that they get such amazing pension benefits because they can’t participate in Social Security? I’m actually sympathetic to the suggestion that the reason they get such rich pension benefits is because after they’ve been working for the government (and people like the co-director of the National Insider Threat Task Force), nobody in their right mind, outside of government, would ever hire them again!

    1. ex-government bureaucrats are completely fucking worthless in the job market

      Not to mention there’s always the chance they’ll go postal.

    2. You know how they’re always saying that they get such amazing pension benefits because they can’t participate in Social Security?

      I always figured it was the other way round. They don’t get SS because they get such great pensions.

    3. No wonder ex-government bureaucrats are completely fucking worthless in the job market.

      Maybe the lower level ones. The higher level ones go on to work in the firms that they used to regulate.

  6. “If they adopt a pay scale, I’ll be curious to see it. Just to know how much such services are officially worth.”

    Twenty bucks, same as downtown.

  7. Gee, I wonder why NOAA might be concerned with an insider threat.

    1. “Some men just want to watch the world burn hurricanes blow.”

  8. “It is better to have reported overzealously than never to have reported at all.”

    Sums up the whole post-911 American experience perfectly!

  9. b-b-but who will watch the watchers? Better spin up a new division!

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.