Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Brickbat: Get Those Kids Out of Here

Charles Oliver | 12.12.2014 6:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Officials in San Luis Obispo, California, plan to buy houses in certain neighborhoods and sell them with deed restrictions requiring they be owner occupied. The goal is to keep college students from living in those neighborhoods. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Congress Passes $1.1 Trillion Spending Bill, President Promises to Sign

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (28)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    "The difficulty that arises when you just have one group of people in a neighborhood is that it becomes like segregation," Marx said. "And the city's policy is that it's healthier for everyone if there's integration in neighborhoods."

    That doesn't sound like a quote from Das Kapital

    1. Suthenboy   11 years ago

      "And the city's policy is that it's healthier for everyone if there's integration in neighborhoods."

      Well, if the city officially declared it to be so, then it must be so.

      Why then is the city not declaring a plethora of other things to be so? So many vexing problems could be solved if they just had more resolve. Geez, they are really dropping the ball here.

    2. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      "And the city's policy is that it's healthier for everyone if there's integration in neighborhoods."

      It sounds like this is the opposite of what they are doing.

    3. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

      Integration by excluding people we don't like! Paging Mr. Orwell. Mr. Orwell, please go to any white courtesy Telescreen.

  2. Vapourwear   11 years ago

    Fucking deed restrictions.

    A couple of years ago we had to get one purged, "so long as no negroes occupy the property..." (Good old central PA...)

    The idea that the current owner of land can restrict future owners is probably one of the most screwed up concepts in law.

    1. DJF   11 years ago

      But at the same time it is contract law, if you don't want to buy it with that restriction then don't buy it.

      The question of whether government should be putting on deed restrictions is another quesiton, but individuals can. But the buyer should get at least a discount on price since the restrictions reduces the value of the property since you are not getting full use.

      The same thing can be said about minning, or water rights

      1. Adam330   11 years ago

        Well it's not contract law. It's property law. If a person in 1800 puts the deed restriction on, it continues in effect for every owner down the line to every owner, including owners long after the one that put the deed restriction in place is dead. And the current seller cannot take it off when he's selling.

  3. Lady Bertrum   11 years ago

    What kind of dummy buys a property with a deed restriction?

    1. Jgalt1975   11 years ago

      Someone who doesn't mind the deed restriction?

    2. Almanian!   11 years ago

      Nixon?

      /reset

    3. Adam330   11 years ago

      If you own property in US, you definitely have some type of deed restriction, even if you don't know it.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Without this you would find neighborhoods filled with rapists and rape victims.

    1. Adans smith   11 years ago

      You mean CIA agents?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        No, Secret Service Agents.

      2. Almanian!   11 years ago

        Nixon?

        /reset

    2. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      Wartopia?

  5. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    But it's the happiest, and most friendly place in America.

    http://www.visitslo.com/

  6. martae   11 years ago

    That's a terrible way to squander tax payer money. Let the market decide where students live.

    1. Almanian!   11 years ago

      This mythical "market" you speak of - I would like to learn more about how it would operate, if it were allowed to exist.

      Perhaps you have a newsletter to which I might subscribe?

  7. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    From the comments: has a pretty low bar for godwinning:)

    "Pretty soon, the council of slo will only allow white anglo saxon protestants who are card carrying Nazi's to own property in slo. Can we say discrimination. If you are a renter in slotown you can only live in those areas that council deems appropriate. What a bunch of elitest snobs. I would say racist, but clearly this is discrimination based upon the ability to own. How is this any different then the deep south. Oh that is the hometown of at least one of these nazzi leaders."

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      You know who else was a card carrying...uh, never mind.

      1. Swiss Servator, Winter kommt!   11 years ago

        Walter Mondale?

      2. Almanian!   11 years ago

        Nixon?

      3. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

        According to my progressive Facebook friends, whoever doesn't agree with them 100%.

  8. Fluffy   11 years ago

    The essence of property ownership is control.

    If you don't control the use of property, you don't own it.

    "Deed restrictions" of any kind on a piece of property should constitute affirmative proof that the property is still "owned" by whoever put the deed restriction in place - and that owner should bear any liabilities of ownership of that property, for tax, insurance and civil purposes.

    We have to wring out of our system all the elements of the "common law" that arise from deliberate medieval schemes to create bondage. The entire notion that you can "restrict" a deed in this way dates back to a time when conveying a piece of real property wasn't actually meant to create genuine ownership at all, but was meant to bind parties together in a web of medieval obligations. Properties restricted in this way aren't "owned" in the modern sense, the way you "own" a radio or a donut after you buy it; it's much more appropriate to consider them "leased".

  9. Doctor Whom   11 years ago

    Discrimination: The worst sin ever when a private party does it; perfectly okay when government does it.

  10. NL_   11 years ago

    I like the idea that this won't cost money to SLO, even though they are purely stripping out all future rights to lease the property. What if future owners need to lease the house for a year or two based on some temporary need to move, or on an inability to find a buyer? The property is worth less because the owners can't rent it.

    The neighborhood may become more valuable if it's all families, but SLO is just assuming that these two effects will immediately counter balance despite the deed restriction being immediate and permanent but the neighborhood effects being delayed. It's also possible that neighborhoods in SLO won't get more valuable for whatever reason, so all they've done is remove a potential income stream from the property.

  11. ronaldbarrkem   11 years ago

    I buy almost everything except food and clothing from online auctions most people aren't aware of the almost I unbelievable deals that they can get from online auction sites the site that has the best deals is.....
    BEST HOME BASE GIFT-------- http://snipr.com/29inp5v

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

There Are Better Ways To Help Restaurant Workers Than No Tax on Tips

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 7.12.2025 7:00 AM

Digital Nomads Are Getting Caught in the War on Tourism

Fiona Harrigan | From the August/September 2025 issue

Trump Walks Back Talk of Abolishing FEMA

Autumn Billings | 7.11.2025 5:18 PM

Watch a New Mexico Sheriff's Deputy Jovially Hurl a Baby Rabbit to Its Death As His Supervisors Laugh

Jacob Sullum | 7.11.2025 4:10 PM

Americans Don't Party Enough. Here's How To Change That.

Emma Camp | 7.11.2025 2:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!