David Harsayni on the U.S.-China Climate Change Deal


At a Beijing news conference, President Barack Obama called a new China-United States climate deal a "historic agreement." But there are two problems with treating the deal as big news, argues David Harsanyi: 1) we're not really doing anything we weren't going to do anyway, and 2) neither is China.
Specifically, though, the United States pledges to impede its own economic growth right now, in significant ways, while China will be free to continue building coal-powered plants, expand its economy, and cement its place as the world's leading polluter—perhaps even doubling its output against ours. Until 2030, that is, or some year around that time, when China's carbon emissions are expected to peak. Specifics aren't important. The agreement contains no binding language requiring any goals to be met. But in around 15 years, the Chinese promise that they will implement some vague action plan. All we need to do is trust them.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?