Obama to Seek ISIS War Approval, AC/DC Drummer Charged With Procuring Murder, Missouri Marriage Ban Struck Down: A.M. Links

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 11.6.2014 9:20 AM

President Obama said he will seek authorization from Congress for a military campaign against ISIS.
Sen. Mitch McConnell is suddenly interested in "ending gridlock."
Could Facebook skew an election?
AC/DC drummer Phil Rudd has been charged with arranging for two murders.
An International Criminal Court says potential Israeli war crimes aren't serious enough to warrant prosecution.
A Missouri ban on same-sex marriage was ruled unconstitutional.

Follow Reason and Reason 24/7 on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Subscribe to Reason Roundup, a wrap up of the last 24 hours of news, delivered fresh each morning.

NEXT: Andrew Napolitano: On 'Culture War' Issues, Both Parties Fail Us

Hide Comments (445)

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago

A Missouri ban on same-sex marriage was ruled unconstitutional.

And still unsexy. Have you seen Missourans?
1. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  Hello.
  
  Apparently punctuality is not part of the libertarian moment.
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    Someone called it on the earlier thread: it must be ENB’s turn.
    1. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
      
      So A.M. links is a chore now for Reason staff?
      
      I see.
    2. Elizabeth Nolan Brown 8 years ago
      
      Wait, why? I’m never late with links! This is the first time I’ve ever been late!
      1. WTF 8 years ago
        
        We assumed because women are never on-time.
        TIWTANLW
      2. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
        
        I defended you, and blamed Root. Never again!
      3. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
        
        Keep that information private for your significant other.
        
        Steve G 8 years ago
        
        +
        
        Idle Hands 8 years ago
        
        –
      4. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
        
        Pay no attention to them ENB. No one else does. That’s why they’re jerks:)
  2. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
    
    Coffee: Check.
    
    Morning Dump: Check.
    
    AM Links:
    
    Fuck it. My day is ruined.
    1. Pope Jimbo 8 years ago
      
      Lighten up, Playa. You think you have it bad, think about ENB’s boyfriend.
      
      He woke up to her rushing about the apartment screaming, “I’m late, I’m late, OMG I’M LATE”
Slammer 8 years ago

AC/DC drummer Phil Rudd has been charged with arranging for two murders.

Dirty Deeds. Too easy.
1. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  He’s on a Highway to…yeah too easy.
  1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
    
    Have a drink on…
    
    or is that not how we’re playing this game?
    1. Suellington 8 years ago
      
      I hear it pays well…
  2. Apple 8 years ago
    
    He’s got the biggest balls of them all.
2. waffles 8 years ago
  
  Of course I’m too slow. Now the question is what price is exactly “dirt cheap”?
  1. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
    
    a price that gets you caught, apparently.
    1. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
      
      HA!
    2. JWatts 8 years ago
      
      “a price that gets you caught, apparently.”
      
      Yep. I think it’s definitionaly true. If you don’t get caught, you spent the correct amount of money.
      1. C. Anacreon 8 years ago
        
        I thought the line was “kindly deeds and they’re done for free.” Oh, wait, that was the Ned Flanders version.
  2. Brett L 8 years ago
    
    Buying hitmen and bombs should cost at least as much as the best defense lawyer in the country getting someone off mass murder charges. If it doesn’t, you are buying a fraudulent or inferior product.
    1. JWatts 8 years ago
      
      Also, an important safety tip. Never ask for a bribe larger than the cost of having you assassinated. You don’t want to be on the wrong side of that equation.
3. gaijin 8 years ago
  
  ok, so that picture is NOT someone playing drums.
  1. NebulousFocus 8 years ago
    
    Why bring Angus into this?
  2. Elizabeth Nolan Brown 8 years ago
    
    UGH. This is not my morning. Fixed! Thanks
    1. gaijin 8 years ago
      
      A much better picture…I can almost smell Bon Scott
4. Grand Moff Serious Man 8 years ago
  
  Damn you, Elizabeth. I saw that story this morning and already had my AM Links response: Why HELLS BELLS!
  1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown 8 years ago
    
    =)
  2. Slammer 8 years ago
    
    Ask and ye shall receive.
5. Mike M. 8 years ago
  
  He’s got big balls.
  1. Clich? Bandit 8 years ago
    
    Listen to the money talk.
Auric Demonocles 8 years ago

You could at least have put an apology in the alt-text.
Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago

An International Criminal Court says potential Israeli war crimes aren’t serious enough to warrant prosecution.

No one wants to be anti-Semetic here.
1. WTF 8 years ago
  
  Investigation of potential Palestinian war crimes still pending.
2. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  I missed the part where they charged the aid boat crew with war crimes for supplying weapons to blow up Israeli schools.
  1. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
    
    It was in the big announcement where they charged the leadership of Hamas with a long list of war crimes.
    
    Not.
3. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
  
  Not to mention their complete lack of ability to do anything about it anyways.
Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago

Mitch McConnell is suddenly interested in “ending gridlock.”

And so the go along to get along begins.
1. WTF 8 years ago
  
  Proving right out of the gate they are indeed the Stupid Party. He has already indicated he is going to restore the senate rules to get rid of Harry Reid’s ‘nuclear option’ which Reid installed to block Republican filibusters and be able to pass everything with 51 votes. Of course the Republicans will now restore the filibuster to allow the Democrats to block them, because using the Democrat’s tactics against them would be unmutual, I guess. You can’t make this shit up.
  1. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
    
    Because they don’t want to get anything done. That would require taking positions on things, which might cost them votes. This way they can just continue blaming Harry Reid and Obama for why everything hasn’t lived up to the voters delusional fantasies.
    1. Lillia 8 years ago
      
      So much this. Now he can take up every bill republicans want passed without a chance in hell of getting them through. I voted L in VA, and I know most voters probably couldn’t define filibuster, but this is going to really piss off the volunteers who are informed and actually worked to get this dumbass back into a position of power.
      1. Lillia 8 years ago
        
        Actually it kind of makes the Rs a little less scary than Ds — whatever their platform they are too scared to act on it. Works for me.
  2. Notorious G.K.C. 8 years ago
    
    Under Bush, I was so proud of myself for defending the filibuster, because if the rs abolished it the ds would invoke the precedent ehen they were in the majority. I was so nonpartisan and sophisticated!
    
    Then the ds used the nuclear option – they didn’t wait for the rs to set a precedent.
    
    So heck with it, keep the nuclear option and hoist the ds on their own retard.
    1. WTF 8 years ago
      
      And this is why the D’s are willing to pull shit like this and set a precedent – they know the R’s are too stupid and cowardly to use it against them once the R’s get back in power. I think we need a stronger epithet than just “Stupid Party”.
      1. cavalier973 8 years ago
        
        I propose: The Republican Party.
  3. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
    
    As a tactical political move, restoring the filibuster is good thinking.
    
    It forces the Dems to take a meaningful vote on every bill. They can’t just vote against bills that they know are going to pass on a party-line vote, regardless, or vote for them because they were going to pass anyway.
    
    Nope. Now they have to cast deciding votes.
    
    Take the Keystone Pipeline. No filibuster, little exposure for Dems to oppose as it will pass regardless and they can keep their cred with their base without paying the cost of killing the bill.
    
    Now, they have to choose. Fluff the base and take the beatings from the general public, or do the right thing and piss off the base.
    1. JWatts 8 years ago
      
      The filibuster as enacted by Harry Reid was just for judicial nominees.
      
      “Democrats used a rare parliamentary move to change the rules so that federal judicial nominees and executive-office appointments can advance to confirmation votes by a simple majority of senators, rather than the 60-vote supermajority that has been the standard for nearly four decades.”
      
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..story.html
  4. JWatts 8 years ago
    
    “Proving right out of the gate they are indeed the Stupid Party.”
    
    So many comments, so little deep thought. They might be the Stupid Party, but McConnell is a Genius in this case. None of you are actually thinking about the mechanics of this.
    
    What did the nuclear option do? It allowed the minority party to block Presidential judicial nominations. Are the Democrats going to block Obama’s judicial nominees? No, of course not.
    
    So restoring the filibuster doesn’t cost the Republicans any political power and gains them good press. So it’s a brilliant PR move.
    
    People (and this includes me) continuously underestimate turtle head’s intelligence.
2. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
  
  Why, pray tell, do you think you won, dumbass? Because the voters were endorsing Obama and Democratic policies?
  
  Ye gods.
Stormy Dragon 8 years ago

*kills you dead with the cute*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euHh6fFwpFg
1. lap83 8 years ago
  
  I liked the part where it squeaks every time the guy pokes it.
  1. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
    
    Is it an Asian girl?
    1. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
      
      Orphaned baby sea otter.
2. Francisco d'Anconia 8 years ago
  
  It would make a nice hat.
waffles 8 years ago

AC/DC drummer Phil Rudd has been charged with arranging for two murders

Dirty Deeds!
Slammer 8 years ago

New, non-white human emojis in the works

Non-white? They’re yellow, you morons. And they are NOT real people.
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  what was wrong with the name ’emoticon’? When and why did people start blathering ’emoji’?
  1. Rich 8 years ago
    
    Sounds more Japanese.
  2. The DerpRider 8 years ago
    
    I too am interested in this answer.
  3. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
    
    I believe emoji is a IM application that consists of nothing but emoticons.
    1. Ted S. 8 years ago
      
      I think they’re not just traditional faces either.
      
      See the wikipedia article on emoji. I can get it being used in Japan, but why the rest of us should learn an ideoglyph-based language is beyond me.
      1. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
        
        You’re not the target market. This is trying to capture the “sub-literate moron” demographic.
        
        JWatts 8 years ago
        
        But they have a dedicated “beer” icon. Oh wait, never mind.
        
        trshmnster the terrible 8 years ago
        
        Stormy hits it out of the park!
        
        Swiss Servator, spare a franc? 8 years ago
        
        Yeah, that was about a 452 foot homer there.
  4. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
    
    Wikipedia is your friend, in this solitary instance.
    1. Ted S. 8 years ago
      
      Wikipedia may have been your friend five minutes earlier, but not now.
      1. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
        
        Wikipedia has always been a back-stabbing asshole.
        
        What else is new?
    2. Zeb 8 years ago
      
      Wikipedia is always my friend. Stay away from anything at all controversial and it’s pretty good. I find it particularly good on math and (non climate related) science.
    3. Rhywun 8 years ago
      
      Wikipedia is your friend
      
      Not really.
      
      “Emoji” are the horizontal emoticons that are common in Japan, like ^-^ and friends.
      
      “Emoticons” are the vertical ones that are common in the US, like :-/ and relatives.
      
      The use of “emoji” to cover Unicode characters is just an annoying hipsterism.
      1. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
        
        “Emoji” are the horizontal emoticons that are common in Japan, like ^-^ and friends.
        
        Those are kaomoji.
        
        Rhywun 8 years ago
        
        Now you’re just making shit up _
        
        Rhywun 8 years ago
        
        Fuck. That was supposed to be “angry face”.
        
        JWatts 8 years ago
        
        Epic kaomoji fail.
2. Doctor Whom 8 years ago
  
  It’s “beyond the scope of Unicode” to represent diversity in other ways, such as “hair styles and color, use of eyeglasses, various kinds of facial hair, different body shapes, different headwear, and so on.”
  
  It’s microagression all the way down.
3. Scruffy Nerfherder 8 years ago
  
  Thank God, I was concerned
4. Rich 8 years ago
  
  Activists have been calling for black and other non-white characters.
  
  Then let those activists develop them or STFU.
  1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
    
    “let those activists develop them”
    
    They’re not really all that active.
    1. JWatts 8 years ago
      
      No, they’re very active. They’re just rarely productive.
      1. jmomls 8 years ago
        
        Henceforth, activists shall be called “b*tches”. It’s a better-suited term.
  2. WTF 8 years ago
    
    Yeah, if you really think there is a market demand for them, go for it.
  3. Fluffy 8 years ago
    
    It’s not fair that people who don’t know how to do anything can’t get what they want done!
    
    They should be able to FORCE the people who do know how to do stuff to do it FOR them!
    
    Signed,
    
    MNG
    1. WTF 8 years ago
      
      Well yeah, you’re not free unless you are free to have people provide you with shit that you want.
      /Tony
    2. Clich? Bandit 8 years ago
      
      I HAVE A PHD!
      
      /MNG
      1. WTF 8 years ago
        
        ADULTS WITH A PHD WHO MAKE MORE MONEY THAN YOU ARE TRYING TO HAVE AN ADULT CONVERSATION HERE!! GO BACK TO YOUR TRACTOR PULLS!!
        /MNG
  4. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
    
    Well my messaging screen is black so would spaces count as black emoji?
5. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  A whut?
6. Ted S. 8 years ago
  
  Fuck emojis anyway.
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    I wonder if they make fuck emojis?
    1. Rich 8 years ago
      
      Yes, they do.
7. a better weapon 8 years ago
  
  Well, the Simpsons are yellow and not real people, and they still manage to have Carl be black.
  1. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
    
    Carl’s a Republican so he’s not really black.
    1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
      
      Dr. Hibbert is also a Republican. Hmmmm.
SugarFree 8 years ago

Prepare yourselves…

Warty Hugeman has successfully reproduced with a human woman.

The age of man’s dominion over the Earth has ended. May your gods have various mercies on your souls.
1. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  Was it human? The reproduction.
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    Something more. Something wonderful. Something more terrible than you can imagine.
    1. WTF 8 years ago
      
      “Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Warty R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn,”
      1. Riven 8 years ago
        
        Ia ia!
    2. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      A monolith may have been involved.
      1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc? 8 years ago
        
        + 1x4x9
        
        UnCivilServant 8 years ago
        
        That’s the size of an alien ration bar in the book I’m writing now (in inches – they’re large aliens)
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        When they first change her diapers, they’ll say, “My God, it’s full of stars.”
      2. Slammer 8 years ago
        
        50 minutes of monolith METAL
        
        If you’re doing something else today, put it on in the background. It’s a great listen.
2. Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago
  
  Producing not so much a demigod but a ___________.
  1. Ted S. 8 years ago
    
    A demiurge?
    
    Now lets see if I match Brett Somers or Charles Nelson Reilly.
    1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      Are you crazy? Go with Dawson. He’s psychic.
    2. Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
      
      lets what see?
      1. Ted S. 8 years ago
        
        Oh, fuck.
        
        And I can’t use lack of coffee as an excuse.
        
        Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
        
        I have been waiting for 2 years to nail you, and I hope that this utter humiliation will be the end of your odd obsession of correcting others’ misspellings where the use of the apostrophe is concerned.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        It really should be phrased as “obsession with.”
        
        WTF 8 years ago
        
        It’s pedants all the way down.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        Actually, it’s turtles.
        
        Slumbrew 8 years ago
        
        /slow clap
        
        WTF 8 years ago
        
        Nice.
        
        Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
        
        I considered dropping the apostrophe in others’ to see if I could elicit a similar response. I didn’t catch that one, so good for you.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        We could run the OED from here, the pedantry being so thick.
  2. AlmightyJB 8 years ago
    
    Demi Moore?
3. waffles 8 years ago
  
  The real one or the timebelt-wearing spacefucker?
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    It’s cute that you think there is a difference.
4. invisible furry hand 8 years ago
  
  Did she survive?
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    The woman is fine. She the mother of what will replace the puny race of man.
    1. Scruffy Nerfherder 8 years ago
      
      Is this Eve, Mother of Monsters?
5. Swiss Servator, spare a franc? 8 years ago
  
  *quietly prepares for End Times*
  1. Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago
    
    Actually, he’s already talking about using the offspring to join the House of Warty with another house through marriage. It may be years before this plays out.
    1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
      
      I have a vast and increasing brood. I’m open to offers.
      1. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
        
        A deal has already been made.
      2. Tejicano 8 years ago
        
        My entire brood was born years apart, spawned by a single, non-coitial act – and are still preschoolers. As long as Warty-Gen2 is female we might have to consider plans.
  2. The DerpRider 8 years ago
    
    I assume the name is already picked out.
    
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7N7TDBceHY
  3. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
    
    *noisily prepares for End Times*
6. gaijin 8 years ago
  
  So this ‘human’ woman…she was little more than a fermentation vessel?
  1. JW 8 years ago
    
    Baby Warty burst through it’s mother’s abdomen at 5:50 this morning.
7. Rich 8 years ago
  
  Pics, or ?.
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    Warty is still looking for a camera strong enough to capture her terrible beauty.
    1. Rich 8 years ago
      
      Ah.
    2. some guy 8 years ago
      
      All shall love her and despair.
8. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
  
  Would Judge Napolitano consider it covered by the personhood amendment?
  1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
    
    Will it care what puny Napolitano thinks?
9. Raston Bot 8 years ago
  
  So you’re saying I should get my next box of 7.62mm in silver?
  1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
    
    Depleted Uranium.
    1. Swiss Servator, spare a franc? 8 years ago
      
      Non-depleted uranium would seem necessary.
  2. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
    
    Actually, Palladium is more effective in this case.
    1. WTF 8 years ago
      
      The Doomcock will easily swat it all aside.
      1. SugarFree 8 years ago
        
        Or eat it.
        
        WTF 8 years ago
        
        *shudder*
10. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
  
  I can hear the lamentations of the nurses all the way down in Florida.
  
  Congratulations to Warty, whose seed at last found a purchase. . .rather than killing the victim.
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    All Hail The Power of Her Uterus!
11. Banjos 8 years ago
  
  D’AWWW, when are we going to get pics? I can’t wait to see the adorableness.
  1. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    Hers is a beauty that will drive men mad and topple nations.
  2. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
    
    No, no, she’s too adorable. It’s like that Star Trek episode with the ugly thing in the box that drove people crazy, only replacing ugly with adorable. You have to wear special glasses and everything.
12. Kaptious Kristen 8 years ago
  
  I bet it looks like a fluffy kitten. An evil fluffy kitten, but still.
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    Like this?
13. The Immaculate Trouser 8 years ago
  
  By “human woman”, you mean axlotl tank… right?
  
  Please tell me I’m right.
Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago

President Obama said he will seek authorization from Congress for a military campaign against ISIS.

The one that’s currently going on?
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  Doesn’t that violate the ex-post facto rule then?
  1. Fist of Etiquette 8 years ago
    
    Has it been 60 days yet?
2. Raven Nation 8 years ago
  
  A post-dated declaration of war.
3. Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
  
  Of course! Then he can blame the inevitable clusterfuck on those dastardly Republicans!
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    BINGO! We have a winner!
4. Anonymous Coward 8 years ago
  
  TEAM Red/Stupid could try doing something not stupid, like flatly rejecting any authorization for this illegal war.
  
  I know, it’s funny because it’ll never happen.
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    The war-boner faction of the R’s will ensure the authorization passes. And the R’s will then own the results.
    Genius!
5. GILMORE 8 years ago
  
  Yeah, exactly =
  
  obama didn’t want anyone in his own party to have to take credit for what will likely be a long, expensive, and fruitless campaign, but now that TEAM RED is running things? OH BOYS? WE NEED YOU TO APPROVE THIS THNXKBAI
6. GILMORE 8 years ago
  
  The absurd thing – you will struggle to find a single media outlet that notes the procedural oddity of the president suddenly deciding to backdate his urgent war and get Congressional Authorization. Maybe they will gloss past it, but no one will point out the glaring hypocrisy because, well, TEAM
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Snake tries to drag woman down toilet

According to the UK’s Metro newspaper, Rampeung Onlamai was just getting out of her shower when the snake emerged from her toilet and sank its fangs into her right hand.

She managed to fend it off with a broom, while screaming for her daughter to help.
1. Careless 8 years ago
  
  And by “toilet” they mean “hole in the ground”
2. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
  
  Headline seems sensationalist. The snake just bit her. I don’t see any evidence of it having tried to drag her back into the toilet.
  1. Raston Bot 8 years ago
    
    Maybe it’s metaphorical. She had turned her life around from her days as a prostitute to an entrepreneur rug weaver. Now with her hand badly damaged, her future earnings have been flushed down a shithole.
3. Suellington 8 years ago
  
  True story. I once was sitting on a toilet in Costa Rica (actual flush toilet) and heard a sound below me. I got off and saw something emerge from the depths. It hopped on the edge of the seat and then started hopping around the bathroom out into my room.Yes, a shit frog. When I tried to chase it outdoors with a broom its skin bubbled with white ooze. To this day I often look down when taking a crap wondering if one will come back.
  1. Rhywun 8 years ago
    
    Fu-u-u-uck. I would never be able to go again.
    
    Reason #1244 I stay up north.
  2. cavalier973 8 years ago
    
    Thank you for sharing.
4. Tejicano 8 years ago
  
  We know from the story that this didn’t happen in Florida because had that been he location she would have killed it with a 44 Mag and served it for dinner… and it would never have been considered news.
Scruffy Nerfherder 8 years ago

Obviously, Bo and Shriek are over the shock of yesterday and are back in the game.
1. SugarFree 8 years ago
  
  Speaking of… read the comments on this article that are by DinoT and tell me it’s not the same algorithm script as shrike.
  
  DinoT 15 hours ago
  @ralph_w How about we just take the expanded Medicaid and any Obamacare benefits from the white trash who voted for republicans yesterday?
  The first should be those with sick kids.
  
  DinoT 15 hours ago
  I cannot WAIT for republicans to start instituting their greed-soaked, non-empathetic policies. The rural white trash will get slammed harder than ever and the blue collar trash will lose far more than health care.
  
  DinoT 14 hours ago
  @grifty @DinoT As long as the republicans keep heaping pain on the white trash who vote for them, I’m fine with it.
  1. Scruffy Nerfherder 8 years ago
    
    It’s close, but I’m not seeing the blatant narcissism that shrike loves to put on display.
    1. SugarFree 8 years ago
      
      When it posted as DeenoC, it would often make 15-20% of all the posts on a thread, responding to everyone. It think it is still finding its footing. I think it got banned, which is quite a trick when you are constantly giving Obama a rimjob.
  2. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
    
    Since you love Marcotte:
    
    http://twitchy.com/2014/11/05/…..suggest-so
    1. SugarFree 8 years ago
      
      She won’t be satisfied until all opposition to The Obama is torn out by branch and root.
    2. JWatts 8 years ago
      
      “Amanda Marcotte – It’s sobering to realize Democrats haven’t had a clear shot to push their agenda federally in my entire lifetime.”
      
      Ouch my eyes! The stupid, it burns.
  3. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
    
    I don’t see Shreeky there.
    1. Palin's Buttplug 8 years ago
      
      “Greed” is a term I avoid in political discussions. Greed is good.
      1. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
        
        Well, you’re welcome.
  4. Rev-Match 8 years ago
    
    As long as the republicans keep heaping pain on the white trash who vote for them, I’m fine with it.
    
    Prog disdain for people whom they disagree with will never cease to amaze me. Keep thinking everyone else is beneath you. That is probably good for your ideology’s public image.
    1. WTF 8 years ago
      
      It is, because then any idiot can consider themselves superior merely by being a prog.
      1. Rev-Match 8 years ago
        
        I bite my thumb at them.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Dutch to public: Don’t pee on the royal palace

After a multimillion-euro renovation ended in late 2011, people began urinating against the palace’s sandstone facade. That prompted authorities to put up a fence.

But the Interior Ministry on Wednesday called the fence “unworthy” of the historic location. It is now installing lights and movement sensors to deter people from relieving themselves. The government also warned that peeing in public is punishable by a 140-euro ($175) fine.

If those measures don’t work, authorities are considering installing a urinal near the palace that rises out of the ground at night and sinks back below the sidewalk during the day.
1. Scruffy Nerfherder 8 years ago
  
  +1 Piss on the wall
2. waffles 8 years ago
  
  a urinal near the palace that rises out of the ground at night and sinks back below the sidewalk during the day.
  
  They have those!?
  1. Rich 8 years ago
    
    It’s sarcasm, waffles — Dutch for “summary execution”.
    1. The DerpRider 8 years ago
      
      Sure, sure. A special urinal.
      
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-vRpQ0YyYo
3. Zeb 8 years ago
  
  In Antwerp, Belgium, there is an actual public urinal on the side of the massive cathedral in the center of the city. I thought that was pretty awesome.
4. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
  
  It is now installing lights and movement sensors to deter people from relieving themselves.
  
  Replace the lights with flamethrowers, and they’ll have something.
  1. jmomls 8 years ago
    
    Just put some electrified mesh all over the ground and I guarantee the pissing will stop post haste.
Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago

Science?

Spice Girls’ ‘Wannabe’ Named Catchiest Song Ever By New Study

So what makes a song catchy? It’s not simply your ability to know it and recognize it. It’s how the song stays in your head even when it stops playing — the so-called earworm effect.

To measure this, the researchers developed a game. Because they’re measuring “catchiness,” it’s not your typical name-that-tune type of arrangement. Instead, you hit the stop button the moment you recognize a tune, and then the game tests the ability of the song to keep playing inside your head.

It’s called Hooked on Music, which you can actually play for yourself right here. Warning: Your productivity for the day will plummet the moment you click on that link. Then again, how often do you get to participate in real science?
1. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
  
  #20 Catchiest- Elton John, “Candle in the Wind”
  
  Yeah, ok.
2. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  Earworms are crimes against humanity.
  1. Zeb 8 years ago
    
    It mostly happens to me with songs I like.
  2. BakedPenguin 8 years ago
    
    The worst is when a song you hate pops into your head during a hangover. NO NO NO
3. invisible furry hand 8 years ago
  
  catchy like herpes
4. Rich 8 years ago
  
  The researchers … hope to use the results to further research into dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.
  
  Uh-huh.
  1. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
    
    Please Rich, won’t you fund them?
    1. Rich 8 years ago
      
      *** starts humming “Money, it’s a hit ?.” ***
5. sarcasmic 8 years ago
  
  I remember hearing or reading someplace that ABBA, when writing songs, would not write anything down the same day. They’d see if they remembered it the following day, and then if they did then they figured it was catchy enough to write down.
  1. antisocial-ist 8 years ago
    
    They should have waited longer, like a few decades.
    
    Seriously though, I’ve heard that Ronnie Van Zant from skynyrd never wrote down any of his lyrics on the theory that if you couldn’t remember it, it wasn’t worth singing.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Penn practices its gaydar in reading student applicationse

As a private school, Penn’s internal admissions notes probably aren’t accessible under state or federal open-records law, but it’s still worth The Daily asking for records showing what exactly admissions officers consider “gay” and how that affects applicants’ chances. (Statements like “I won a decorating award” or “At this flannel party I hosted”? Maybe “I fooled around with my bro and it wasn’t as weird as I thought it would be”?)

As long as names, grades and other identifying details are redacted, there shouldn’t be any privacy issue with revealing what admissions officers are marking on applications. It’s certainly not covered by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, though I’m sure Penn would raise that baseless defense.
1. Rev-Match 8 years ago
  
  Private schools are private. Who knew?
2. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
  
  As a private school, Penn’s internal admissions notes probably aren’t accessible under state or federal open-records law,
  
  With all the federal money they take, they have signed onto the full boat of “non-discrimination” laws. I wonder if that isn’t an avenue to forcing disclosures.
3. Lillia 8 years ago
  
  I am so using this. In 12 years I am going to help my son write the gayest college admissions essay ever written. If he turns out to be gay, then it will be even more convincing.
4. John 8 years ago
  
  Another reason why I should have taken up figure skating as a child. Not only would I have been the only straight guy in a social group full of gorgeous and fit girls apparently I also would have been the recipient of affirmative action from private schools looking to admit more gays. What the hell was I thinking not doing that?
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

How Republicans Can Get Things Done
What the GOP can learn from Democrats about how to govern.

The beauty of the way Democrats approach politics is that their willingness to accept half a loaf means that they can keep making incremental gains even when they appear to be “losing.” Lane Kenworthy, a sociologist at the University of California?San Diego and the author of Social Democratic America, puts it beautifully: “Small steps and the occasional big leap, coupled with limited backsliding, will have the cumulative effect of significantly increasing the breadth and generosity of government social programs.” That is, conservatives can try to nibble at the edges of new social programs, but they’ll rarely succeed in rolling them back completely.
1. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
  
  The Evaporating Democratic Majority
  
  In this particular case, what was overestimated and misjudged was the permanent effectiveness of the Democratic blueprint from 2012, whose mix of social-issue appeals and tech-savvy voter targeting was supposed to work in tandem with demographic trends to cement a new socially-liberal, multicultural coalition, and render the G.O.P.’s position entirely untenable absent a major ideological reboot. That blueprint really was effective in ’12, and the underlying demographic trends are real, and one bad midterm election does not prove that the coalition cannot hold together, as Republicans may learn to their cost two years from now. But from a lot of the commentary after Obama’s re-election, you would have thought that the combination of ethnic-interest appeals on immigration policy, “war on women” rhetoric on social issues, and brilliant get-out-the-vote operations run by tech-savvy Millennials (who, we were told, were too liberal to ever build a website for a Republican) posed a kind of immediate and existential challenge to the G.O.P., requiring immediate capitulation on a range of fronts, with no time for finesse or calculation and no room for resistance.
  1. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
    
    whoops – replied to my own post
2. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  EVIL.
  
  But something the Reason community knew all along.
  
  The question is: How do we stop this?
  1. WTF 8 years ago
    
    Short of a bloody revolution, we don’t. And the bloody revolution just ain’t happening, ever.
    1. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
      
      “Ever” is a long time.
      
      If current trends continue, I think we will get to a point where there will be armed resistance.
      1. WTF 8 years ago
        
        I guess by “ever” I really mean “not in our lifetimes”.
3. Rev-Match 8 years ago
  
  generosity of government social programs
  
  All that money that funds said “generosity” does not come from anywhere important…
4. B.P. 8 years ago
  
  So, is a “big leap” anything like a Great Leap Forward?
Citizen Nothing 8 years ago

Ok. I’m pissed that I missed yesterday’s bourbon thread. But I’m psyched by tonight’s Battle of Ohio. And that’s the latest from CN. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
1. gaijin 8 years ago
  
  Go Bengals
  1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
    
    From your mouth to Howard Cosell’s ears.
  2. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
    
    Go Browngels.
    
    Who dat lettin us down one last time!
sarcasmic 8 years ago

Ha! It was ENB’s turn!
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Indiana candidate hits political rival with car, steals campaign signs on eve of election

Yencer wrote an editorial in the Muncie Free Press just three days earlier claiming Messer “will win in a landslide” despite deriding the congressman for dodging candidate forums in the lead-up to Election Day.

The duo challenged Yencer outside a church late Monday and discovered more campaign signs in his trunk, including Ratchford’s, according to The Star Press.

That’s when Yencer opted to drive off. But Lee blocked Yencer’s exit and, police allege, was struck in the knee when Yencer’s 1994 Nissan backed into the politician.

Yencer, a Democratic candidate, was a reporter at The Star Press for four decades until 2010. Ratchford and Lee are Republicans.
sarcasmic 8 years ago

Diner outraged after he had to buy $3,750 bottle of wine when he asked waiter to recommend one (but he did get a $1,200 discount)

Joe Lentini asked the waitress at Bobby Flay Steak in Atlantic City for a wine recommendation for a business dinner
He and other diners thought the waitress said the bottle was ‘thirty-seven fifty’ and assumed that meant $37.50
When they received the bill, they found out that the wine was actually a $3,750 bottle
The restaurant dropped the price after the party complained – to $2,200

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new…..eaper.html
ouch
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  No rotted grape juice is worth more than $50.
  1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
    
    I won’t pay more than $20 for a bottle of wine.
    1. Elspeth Flashman 8 years ago
      
      That’s my top limit too. Mostly I stick to things around 9.99 a bottle for every day drinking. But after $20.00 I am not sure I can tell a difference.
      1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        Honestly, I like Chablis from a box. Chill the shit out of that shit and drop in a few ice cubes.
        For a dinner wine I usually buy a Beaujolais nouveau.
      2. antisocial-ist 8 years ago
        
        Most “experts” can’t tell the difference either. Hell, a lot of them can’t distinguish red wine from white wine with food coloring.
        
        sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        Hell, a lot of them can’t distinguish red wine from white wine with food coloring.
        
        Most white wine is made from red grapes. They remove the skin which has all the color. So I could see how coloring a white wine made from a red grape could fool someone into thinking it is a red wine.
        
        robc 8 years ago
        
        With non-experts, in blind taste tests, there is an inverse correlation between price and preference.
        
        With experts, there is a slight positive correlation — but not statistically significant.
        
        The inverse correlation with non-experts is statistically significant.
        
        Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
        
        People who aren’t into wine tend to judge it on one criteria: sweetness. Since better wines tend to be drier, people who don’t drink a lot of wine don’t like good wine.
        
        sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        Oh I don’t know about that. Many people, like myself for example, aren’t into sweet stuff. Even before I got into wine (and by “got into” I mean spending a couple years buying a bottle or two a week of something under twenty bucks) I preferred dryer wines.
      3. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
        
        Here’s another dirty little secret: I love bourbon, and love to display “show” bottles. But there’s almost no difference between a $30 bourbon and a $100 bourbon.
        
        BakedPenguin 8 years ago
        
        The biggest difference in liquor isn’t between a $15 or $100 750 ml bottle. It’s between a $7 and $12 bottle.
        
        Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
        
        True dat.
        
        Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme) 8 years ago
        
        Big difference in going from 4yr olds to 12 yr olds. Anything older costs a lot more and has very little difference in taste.
        
        Hmm, without context, that first sentence sounds a little creepy.
        
        I’m talking about bourbons, you sick fucks!
        
        Steve G 8 years ago
        
        Thanks, I’d actually considered trying expensive whisky just to see if it would make a difference since I can’t stand any straight liquor. I just don’t get it. What’s the appeal of drinking something that causes a gag/cough reflex. I’m in my 40s and every few years I try a stiff drink thinking maybe by now my taste for it has arrived thus ushering in manhood or something, but nope. Same for cigars. Guess I’ll never be one of the cool kids..
        
        Tejicano 8 years ago
        
        Yeah. I once went to one of those hoity-toity scotch bars here in Tokyo with an extremely well-traveled, experienced, investment banker buddy. We sampled a few of the better known brands to find my groove. I walked away knowing pretty much what I already knew – a $30 bottle of Glenlivet is about my speed.
        
        Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
        
        It’s like spicy food. If you eat it a lot, you build up a tolerance.
        
        Zeb 8 years ago
        
        I find that once you get past maybe $50 bottles, more expensive doesn’t really mean better, but often the more expensive bottles will be something that you can’t get for less.
        I’m more of a Scotch guy and I’m not sure how much this applies to bourbon, but I imagine it does. I’ve had some super old and expensive single malts and while they are not necessarily better than more affordable things, they are distinct and interesting.
        
        Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
        
        I still want to try Pappy Van Winkle to see if it’s as good as everyone makes it sound.
      4. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
        
        I’m with you,. Elspeth. Above about $20/bottle, the marginal return just isn’t there for me.
        
        Too much chili, whiskey and cigars, I guess. Not much left of my tastebuds at this point.
    2. Zeb 8 years ago
      
      Yeah, there is loads of good wine under $20. I’ll go a bit higher for a bottle of decent Champagne on occasion.
  2. Zombie Apocalypse 8 years ago
    
    Apparently you’ve never had a fine bottle of Far Niente Chardonnay, Opus One, or Mondavi Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon, while having orphans polish your monocle collection.
    1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
      
      I don’t react well to tannins. All I smell in every bottle of wine is rot and decay – and I taste it in any distilled spirit aged in wood.
      1. Zeb 8 years ago
        
        Aren’t you the one who doesn’t like beer either? Weirdo.
  3. Brett L 8 years ago
    
    Oh, it probably is, but not to my beer-swillers taste.
2. waffles 8 years ago
  
  So how was the wine? Self-declared wine amateur Lentini says, ‘It was okay. It was good. It wasn’t great. It wasn’t terrible. It was fine.’
  
  I went to a wine tasting thing last week and this is just about my response to every offering. Now beer, I can appreciate beer.
3. The DerpRider 8 years ago
  
  $10 for fries? Bobby is flaying everyone.
  1. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
    
    I’m going to guess that they were mango-chipotlie fries with a side of poblano corn relish.
    1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
      
      That sounds awful.
      
      You’d have to provide them for free if you expected me to try them.
      
      That reminds me, I should check if the purple potatos being sold in my local supermarket are actually the kind that are purple inside and not just outside.
      1. Aloysious 8 years ago
        
        The good ones will be. You get into that organic shit, and colors are subject to change.
      2. Tejicano 8 years ago
        
        Hah! This evening I just happened to fry up a diced potato in pork fat which I had skimmed off the top of a pot of Carne Adovado. Jeez, I’m not sure how I didn’t nibble most of that away before I served the actual meal.
    2. The DerpRider 8 years ago
      
      Check the menu. It says black pepper french fries. That being said, I’ve had some truffle fries that were worth $10.
      1. The DerpRider 8 years ago
        
        Er, I checked.
4. lap83 8 years ago
  
  It sucks to be him, but at the same time I don’t blame the waitress for suggesting a more expensive bottle, although she should have said it differently. Most people don’t spend less on a bottle of wine at a restaurant than they do on their steak (the one on the receipt was 90). Wine is notoriously marked up in restaurants because people who want it when they go out will pay more.
  1. JWatts 8 years ago
    
    True to some point. But the guy probably wouldn’t have raised a ruckus if the wine had been $375, even if he had mistaken the price. But very few people are expecting $3,750. The waitress should definitely thrown an “Are you sure?” in there.
sarcasmic 8 years ago

Making a splash: Controversial Baywash car wash proves a hit with bikini-clad women employees – and cops had to be banned from getting free washes

Baywash Bikini Car Wash in based in the town of Winter Park, Florida
Employs six young women to wash vehicles wearing only swimwear
Owner Steve McMahon started business to raise money for local school
But it has proven so successful he wants to open branches across U.S.
However local police officers have been banned from visiting the car wash

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new…..kinis.html
1. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
  
  Doesn’t that guy know that they have machines that was cars now?
  1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
    
    Do the machines have perky titties?
    1. Idle Hands 8 years ago
      
      They will in the future.
2. Ted S. 8 years ago
  
  “Our bodies, our choice”.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Turkey: Hair removal advert ‘uses al-Qaeda photo’

The infamous photo of the alleged 9/11 mastermind, with chest and back hair spilling out of his white T-shirt, was taken after he was captured in Pakistan in 2003. The cosmetics company used it alongside the caption: “That hair will not shed itself,” The Daily Sabah website reports. But the company which created the advert is keen to point out he was chosen for his profuse body hair, not his terrorist activities. “We didn’t know that he was a terrorist,” company representative Mehmet Can Yildiz tells the Hurriyet Daily News. “The guy is quite hairy, so we thought his body was a good fit for our ad.” He says the picture was taken from a social networking site, where it had been used several times alongside amusing captions.
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  Given the hirsuite nature of Turks in general, they didn’t have anyone on staff furry enough for the role?
2. Slammer 8 years ago
  
  You could call decapitations ‘haircuts’, I guess.
  1. JEP 8 years ago
    
    They’re just taking a little off the top.
sarcasmic 8 years ago

You know how it ends… right? Bella Thorne reads her first novel Autumn Falls while relaxing at cafe

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs…..Falls.html
Probably reading it for the first time.
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  Probably reading it for the first time.
  
  Seconded.
  
  By the time a book hits print, I don’t want to see it again for some time because I’d have read it a dozen or more times during composition and editing. There’s no way for the trad publisher to change the content now, so if she’d actually written that, there’s no way she’d be willingly reading it.
  
  There’s also the chance it was a deliberate publicity event, knowing the paparazzi and the daily fail would be watching.
  1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
    
    There’s also the chance it was a deliberate publicity event, knowing the paparazzi and the daily fail would be watching.
    
    I figure that’s a given.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

European Stocks Fall as Investors Seek Stimulus Clarity

European stocks fell for the third time in four days, as the European Central Bank held interest rates at record lows, and investors awaited a press conference for any signals on further stimulus from President Mario Draghi.

Lenders were among the worst performers, with Societe Generale SA and Credit Agricole SA falling after reporting declines in consumer-banking profits. Legrand SA lost 4.5 percent after saying 2014 sales and operating margin will be at the low end of its targets.
1. Rich 8 years ago
  
  investors awaited a press conference for any signals on further stimulus from President Mario Draghi.
  
  I don’t understand this stuff. It seems these signals are generally “could go up, could go down, could remain steady”. I suppose, though, in bankese that’s probably code for something slightly more meaningful.
  1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
    
    I dont understand either. Why would stocks fall for businesses that instead of making money need to have outside cash poured endlessly into them?
    
    I don’t get it.
2. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  The market is addicted to stimulus.
  
  Junkies.
  
  Not good.
Restoras 8 years ago

A proposal for reform of the Senate.

As it stands now, states like NY, MA, IL, CA, PA, etc. that have mega-urban populations basically have two senators that represent the vast majority of the population ? that happens to be concentrated in urban centers. By way of example, NY has two liberal senators that represent the urban center of the state ? and no senator that represents the rural portion of the state. The interest of these urban centers is not always (or more likely, never) aligned with the interest of the rural portions of the state. This creates a more ‘democratic’ ? and a less ‘republican’ ? government than the Founders intended. It is also creating, slowly but inexorably, a wider urban/rural divide in the country that in the long term will /could be the source of greater friction in the country as a whole. Now, I am sort of ok with that friction as I think the rural portion of the country is better able to fend for itself than the urban centers are, but in the interest of avoiding a revolution in the traditional sense of that word (i.e.- a crap ton of bloodshed and years of discord and misery) I think that states dominated by large urban centers should have one senator elected from the urban center, and one elected form the rural diaspora.

Would this would create more gridlock as it would act as a check on the growing power of urban interests? Yes, yes it would, and that’s the point.
1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
  
  I’d settle for repealing the 17A.
  1. Restoras 8 years ago
    
    That might be easier.
2. gaijin 8 years ago
  
  The only issue is that Senators represent people, not land area. So if you have enough rural people to equal the urban people in a state, then I don’t see the problem. BUt if the counties around Chicago have 65% of Illinois’ population, for instance, then I don;t see how a ‘rural’ senator doesn’t end up with a disproportionate share of power.
  1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
    
    Wrong, Senators represent state – ie land area.
    
    House members represent people and are therefore apportioned by population.
    1. Mike M. 8 years ago
      
      Yep. The senators from Wyoming have just as much political power as the senators from California, just like it was intended.
      1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        Except that the senators were supposed to be chosen by the state governments, not the people, giving the states a check on federal power.
        As it is, states governments have no representation at all within the federal government.
        The idea being that the people through the House can propose spending, but the state governments through the Senate could say no.
        This way the state governments could block unfunded mandates, expansion of social programs and such.
        
        Clown Hunter 8 years ago
        
        And that’s why popular election of Senators was the first step toward a centralized, and thus Total, State.
    2. gaijin 8 years ago
      
      I understand that. But if the original idea was to apportion Senators by population locus within a state, then my point is that you are apportioning senators by population (where number of urban v rural voters is the population)…thus giving the smaller number of rural voters’ votes a disproportionate representation.
      1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
        
        Right now they have no representation in the senate. It’s disproportionate either way.
        
        gaijin 8 years ago
        
        This is true in the sense that when the person you vote for loses, you have no representation…whether you are rural or urban.
      2. Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
        
        If that was the intent, there would be 2 senatorial districts in each state, each representing half of the population.
        
        Restoras 8 years ago
        
        At the time of the Founding, there was much less power concentrated in urban centers. I think that needs to be addressed.
        
        Roger the Shrubber 8 years ago
        
        I believe the original intent of the bicameral legislature with 2 senators per state was to prevent the population apportioned House from overrunning the less populous southern states.
        
        sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        I believe the original intent of the bicameral legislature with 2 senators per state was to prevent the population apportioned House from overrunning the less populous southern states.
        
        The Senate was supposed to represent state governments and give them a veto power on federal legislation.
        For example I doubt that a Senate that represented state governments would pass unfunded mandates or bills that require states to raise their drinking age as a condition of receiving highway funds. The 17A removed a powerful check against federal power, as well as taking the country away from being a republic and more towards being a democracy.
        
        KDN 8 years ago
        
        And the less populous Northern ones. The original appeal for equal representation came from NJ, which was bordered by high pop NY and PA.
        
        Restoras 8 years ago
        
        I believe the original intent of the bicameral legislature with 2 senators per state was to prevent the population apportioned House from overrunning the less populous southern states.
        
        Sure, but at that time the population as a whole was much more dispersed within individual states, not concentrated in urban centers.
        
        Part of the point of having two senators from each state was to act as a check on the power of the HoR. Now, you have more urban representation in the senate then you had in the past owing to the shift of populations off the farm and into urban centers.
        
        Urban centers as concentrations of power is a growing problem.
  2. Restoras 8 years ago
    
    That’s a good point. It’s an idea that occurred to me as a means of addressing the rural/urban divide – not saying it’s perfect.
  3. KDN 8 years ago
    
    Again, this why the 17th should be repealed. Currently, Senators represent the people of a state rather than the state itself. The system is designed for the opposite.
    
    The Senate and House should be antagonistic. They represent different interests, after all.
    1. Restoras 8 years ago
      
      How did it work before the 17A – did the entire legislature select the senators, or was it one of the houses of the legislature that selected them?
      1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
        
        I believe it was up to the state governments to decide. Some already did a popular vote. Others had the legislature decide. Some were appointed by governors. Thing is, there was so much corruption going on that many states didn’t have representation in the Senate because the state governments couldn’t agree on who to put in there. The 17A was supposed to fix that, but instead it removed one of the most effective checks against federal power. Look at how the federal government exploded once the states lost their veto power against federal legislation.
      2. KDN 8 years ago
        
        I honestly don’t know. The article imply states “by the legislature,” so my guess is both houses would have to ratify the appointment.
        
        JEP 8 years ago
        
        Can’t remember where I read it, but I believe that most states would have the governor choose from among the state congress and then the congress would ratify.
      3. DK 8 years ago
        
        Here’s a good article. Sarcasmic (above @10:26) has the gist of it. I suspect if 17A was repealed, most (if not all) states would just maintain direct elections. However, I think that the state legislatures might want to at least maintain removal power for themselves.
  4. Rev-Match 8 years ago
    
    Senators represent people, not land area.
    
    They are supposed to represent States, as the federal senate is supposed to be the house of the States. This is why, initially, senators were chosen by State legislators.
3. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
  
  Yeah, it’s totally weird how the areas of the country where 81% of the population lives are getting more political power.
  1. kbolino 8 years ago
    
    Thus defeating the purpose of a limited federal republic.
    
    The urban centers are not supposed to dominate national politics. Their political power should be exercised at the local level.
    
    The idea that a major urban center should be calling all the shots not only for itself but also for the vast rural areas surrounding it is absurd.
    
    Of course, the converse also applies, but since as you note the urban centers have greater population, it is impossible for the rural areas to dominate them politically in a democracy.
    
    The national government stands for two purposes: to defend from external threats and to oppose the tendency of localities to use political power to oppress each other.
    
    When you combine democracy with arbitrary boundaries, you get injustice of the majority over the minority. It is impossible to flee an authority that claims everywhere as its dominion.
    1. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
      
      I get that, but as a practical matter, any society where 81% really wants something and is thwarted by the remaining 19% is not going to remain long term stable.
      1. kbolino 8 years ago
        
        How do you identify a particular polity as constituting a single society?
        
        I bet you can find an issue that 81% of the world’s population agrees on, yet is not a cause of any instability.
4. antisocial-ist 8 years ago
  
  Not a bad idea, I would rather the large urban areas become their own separate state though.
  1. Restoras 8 years ago
    
    I have thought about the city-state idea – I suppose that might work too, where let’s say NYC would have there own two senators and the rest of NY would also have two.
    1. Rhywun 8 years ago
      
      Meh. I would rather just focus on lessening the power they have over us.
      1. Restoras 8 years ago
        
        As do I, but even that won’t address the urban/rural divide.
        
        Rhywun 8 years ago
        
        I don’t think city-states will either. Look at the constant messing around with governmental units in places like Canada and England. Has it helped?
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

I was once a climate change denier
I’m a scientist now, but the embarrassment lingers. Here’s why I let myself be duped — and how I came to my senses

I, a scientist with a PhD in microbiology and immunology, was a climate change denier. Wait, let me add, I was an effective climate change denier: I would throw on a cloak of anecdotal evidence, biased one-sided skepticism and declare myself a skeptic. Good scientists are skeptics, right? I sallied forth and denied every piece of evidence that was presented to me for a relatively long time.

It feels strange when I look back ? I inadvertently fell into almost every pitfall of pseudoscience, shutting my eyes and repeating a series of mantras, such as “I don’t believe it!” “Why does it even matter?” and “I don’t care!”

Thankfully, those days are over, but the memories linger. Although the evolution of my thought ? from ignorance, to denial, to skepticism and finally to acceptance ? was a continuum. In retrospect, I can distinguish certain phases that are worth listing and discussing. I hope my experience encourages others to loosen up some strongly held beliefs and listen to the din of evidence.
1. Rufus J. Firefly 8 years ago
  
  ‘I, a scientist with a PhD in microbiology and immunology’
  
  Sorta like Krugman – an economist – passing off as a political expert?
2. gaijin 8 years ago
  
  a scientist with a PhD in microbiology and immunology
  
  Which has what exactly to do with climate science?
  1. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
    
    Which has what exactly to do with climate science?
    
    Some microbes produce methane….maybe?
  2. WTF 8 years ago
    
    Well, it indicates he is familiar with the scientific method, and that science is done by experiment and observation, not consensus, and that the failure of the climate models has falsified the AGW-CO2 hypothesis. But evidently, he prefers to go ahead and argue the equivalent of creationism. I guess he figured out which side the grant money and career-advancement are on.
    1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
      
      I guess he figured out which side the grant money and career-advancement are on.
      
      Bingo!
      1. Cdr Lytton 8 years ago
        
        As a returning student, I see climate change has infected just about every corner of academia as the cause of all the troubles in the world. Shocking but not surprising.
3. Rich 8 years ago
  
  I, a scientist with a PhD in microbiology and immunology, was a climate change denier.
  
  “But then parasites infected my brain.”
4. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
  
  You know, you never hear about this in the real world. I mean, the one that isn’t fictionized bullshit crafted for political reasons. It always seems to go the other direction now.
5. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
  
  What do you know? Never worked a day in his life. Surprise surprise.
  
  Masters’ in Public Health expected 2016
  Surprise surprise.
  1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
    
    Most PhDs have been so damaged by academia that they can’t survive in the wild.
6. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  “I, a scientist with a PhD in microbiology and immunology,” ….know jack-shit about climate science, earth science, the sun, the atmosphere, or historical geology.
  
  He attempts to make a case without any evidence at all, just psychological blather.
  
  I am guessing he is expecting to come into some sweet research funds now that he is part of the consensus.
  1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
    
    I, a Doctor of Laws, have no credentials whatsoever in climatology.
    1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
      
      Nor do I, but I am not trumpeting my credentials as a ‘scientist’.
      
      The case for AGW does not stand on its on. Thus the ‘ I am not a climate scientist, but I play one on TV’ meme, and the consensus, neither of which is sound logic or proper science.
      1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        We need a science certification company, like UL for electrical stuff. “NOT SCIENCE. CONSUME AT YOUR OWN RISK.“
        
        Suthenboy 8 years ago
        
        How long before they are captured by social activists masquerading as science certifiers?
        
        *grin*
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        It’s not a government organization, so if it fails to provide the service that it’s paid to deliver. . .then it dies, like all failed companies do.
        
        Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
        
        Isn’t that the type of thinking that the Climate Cult wants? An imprimatur is an attempt to shortcut the analysis an individual should to do when encountering arguments.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        Dear Science Lords:
        
        I was reading something about AGW being so bad that the Earth will ignite in twenty years. Is this science?
  2. Brett L 8 years ago
    
    Yes. It would be nice if this person would cite the exact papers which changed their mind. I mean, I’d think someone with a PhD would do academic research and point to something other than UN white papers.
  3. Brett L 8 years ago
    
    Its interesting but the 4 engineering societies whose membership I have reviewed all state in their membership ethics that using your credential as an engineer to assert credibility in a field you don’t work in is highly frowned upon.
    1. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
      
      Using your credentials as an anything to assert credibility in a field you don’t work on is highly frowned upon pretty much everywhere.
      
      Still, I wonder if engineering groups take such a strong stance due to fallout from the hijinks of Fred Leuchter.
      1. Brett L 8 years ago
        
        Or Herbert Hoover.
    2. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      As it should be. It’s become a problem with scientists in general, who think being smart enough to get a PhD and a job in a science means that you know more about everything else than most everyone else. See the same in other fields, too, but the deeper steeping in the academic tea corrupts them more, I think.
      1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
        
        I’m of the opinion that anyone so specialized as to get a PhD is too focused to speak on anything not covered by their narrow slice of expertise.
        
        Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
        
        How dare you deprive Noam Chomsky of 99.9999999% of his life?!?!?
        
        Rhywun 8 years ago
        
        Would you believe I had never heard of his “other life” before my linguistics degree? I can’t imagine going thru college today without having him shoved down your throat every other day.
7. SugarFree 8 years ago
  
  The conversion of the sinner is a common religious trope.
  
  I, a deacon and long-standing member of this church, was a sinner. Wait, let me add, I was a prolific sinner: I would drink and gamble, take the Lord’s name in vain, I ran around with loose women and even watched pornogrpahy. You can be a part-time Christian, right? I sallied forth and sinned at every chance that was presented to me for a relatively long time.
  
  It feels strange when I look back ? I fell into almost every pitfall of Satan, shutting my eyes and repeating a series of mantras, such as “I don’t believe in God!” “Why does it even matter?” and “I don’t care!”
  
  Thankfully, those days are over, but the memories linger. Although the evolution of my thought ? from ignorance, to denial, to skepticism and finally to acceptance of the truth of Jesus Christ ? was a continuum. In retrospect, I can distinguish certain phases that are worth listing and discussing. I hope my experience encourages others to loosen up some strongly held beliefs and listen to the din of evidence for God’s love.
  1. waffles 8 years ago
    
    That’s pretty damn good.
  2. John 8 years ago
    
    Pretty much. It is not that this guy changed his mind. Everyone is entitled to do that and indeed people probably don’t do that enough. It is the reasoning he gives for changing his mind. And the reasons read very much like a faith based conversion or some kind of internal revelation of the truth.
    
    Whatever you think of the validity of such conversions or revelations, I am pretty sure we all agree they are not the way to settle a factual or scientific dispute.
    1. SugarFree 8 years ago
      
      And there is also a touch of the aloholic’s “rock bottom” story if you read the entire article.
      
      The “faith” presentation of science and the “addict” presentation of ideas is deeply creepy.
      
      He’s witnessing, to use the Protestant terminology, and it’s very unsettling because he’s asserting that the only way to disagree with him is to be blind (or blinded) to the truth.
      
      I never really understood it in the “libertarian” conversion articles, but this makes it very clear what they are doing.
      1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        Deniers Anonymous.
        
        SugarFree 8 years ago
        
        “You ever sucked dick for a climate model?”
        
        \Billy Bong Thorton
  3. Rhywun 8 years ago
    
    I too thought I was reading a form letter that S***n hands out to its supplicants.
8. Andrew S. 8 years ago
  
  I see Salon finally ran out of “I used to be libertarian” articles and decided to come at it from another angle.
  1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
    
    That’s another one I haven’t really observed in reality: Someone moving away from libertarianism to statism. More the other direction, I’d say. Certainly, few become less skeptical about human behavior as they age.
    1. lap83 8 years ago
      
      The ones who ‘used to be libertarian” initially only knew about the drugs legalization aspect, then change their mind the second they find out about the other stuff, like not thinking the Koch brothers are evil, and/or that Jon Stewart doesn’t think libertarians are cool.
  2. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
    
    “I used to be a Mexican ass worshiping pot-smoker and then I woke up.”
    1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
      
      And now it’s nothing but Latvians, titties and cocaine.
Slammer 8 years ago

Russian actor and Putin critic found dead in Moscow

Police said the scene was being investigated and there was no immediate confirmation of whether he had been murdered, or the potential motives of a killer.
However, Mr Devotchenko’s outspoken criticism of the rule of Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president, is likely to provoke intense scrutiny over how and why he died.

In 2011, the actor said he was renouncing two state acting prizes “received from Putin’s hands”, saying he was “ashamed”. “I’ve had enough of all this tsar-state stuff,” he wrote in a blog post. “With its lies, its cover-ups, its legalised theft, its bribe-taking and its other triumphs.”

A year earlier he had urged fellow actors, artists and musicians to boycott “ultra-patriotic, propagandistic, chauvinistic, anti-Semitic, or pro-Stalinist feature films and television projects” and “agitprop documentaries”.

He also called on them not to talk to “lying and tendentious state media” or to take part in Kremlin-linked banquets.

Money earned from such appearances, “smells of dank prison cells, of neglected hospitals and homeless shelters, of the acrid smoke of burnt-out architectural monuments and historical buildings and night clubs and homes for the elderly,” he said.
“It smells of the boots of the OMON riot police.”
1. John 8 years ago
  
  That is straight out of the KGB playbook. After Stalin left and the Soviets could no longer just shoot people at will, the method for dealing with publicly known dissidents or those in the government who had fallen out of favor with the party was to murder them and then arrange a car accident to cover up the dead publicly. The vehicle accident death rate among Soviet Party members in the 1970s was higher than that of formula one drivers at the time.
  1. Zombie Apocalypse 8 years ago
    
    +1 poison-tipped umbrella with a shot of Po-210-laced tea.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

wait… wut?

New Zealand model re-creates viral catcalling video, does not get catcalled at all
The issue isn’t “boys being boys.” It’s deep culturally embedded sexism

In an interesting test of the “boys will be boys” hypothesis, the New Zealand Herald decided to re-create the Hollaback video on the streets of Auckland, recruiting a model named Nicola Simpson to star. As in the New York video, Simpson walked around the city for 10 hours behind a hidden camera chronicling her trip. And guess what happened? She received zero catcalls. None. Not one.

Simpson was stopped twice, both times by men; one asked if she was Italian, and the other asked for directions. If this is catcalling, it’s markedly different from the U.S. variety. The experiment does suffer from its lack of a controlled variable, and it’s impossible to overlook the fact that Simpson is not Shoshana Roberts, the actress in the original video; the two also look virtually nothing alike. But you know who also doesn’t look like Shoshana Roberts? Amanda Seales, the comedian who recently went on CNN to say that she regularly experiences verbal harassment similar to that shown in the Hollaback video.
1. waffles 8 years ago
  
  She was in Auckland, not Harlem. There is a vast difference.
  1. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
    
    so racism!
  2. RG 8 years ago
    
    That’s my new favorite way to troll the SJWs. Ask them why minority men are on the wrong side of the war on women.
  3. Rev-Match 8 years ago
    
    It’s deep culturally embedded sexism
    
    Complimenting a girls features is sexist.
2. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
  
  In an interesting test of the “boys will be boys” hypothesis, the New Zealand Herald decided to re-create the Hollaback video on the streets of Auckland, recruiting a model named Nicola Simpson to star.
  
  Well there’s the problem. If you want catcalls in Aukland, you have to use a sheep.
  1. Tejicano 8 years ago
    
    How could that hve been so mis-stated?
    
    “If ewe want catcalls…”
3. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
  
  She was wearing sunglasses. Totally different.
  1. Heroic Mulatto 8 years ago
    
    That and the fact that she had no ass.
    1. Certified Public Asskicker 8 years ago
      
      Her shirt appears to be long enough to cover her flat ass too.
4. Raston Bot 8 years ago
  
  She looks like a skinny, stuck up model. The girl in Brooklyn had an everygirl quality plus she was stacked like a front loader. Day laborers are not going to catcall that which does not attract.
5. lap83 8 years ago
  
  “it’s markedly different from the U.S. variety.”
  
  I am guessing the writer is a typical New Yorker who gets their city confused with the country at large.
  1. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
    
    If you could induce the SJWs to leave their cozy BosWash environs and head into the rest of the country, it would be interesting to duplicate the experiment in various cities.
    
    Seriously, it would.
invisible furry hand 8 years ago

A Pilbara resident has spoken of his surprise at seeing a plane parked outside his local pub after its owner apparently taxied it down the main street so he could get a drink.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/201…..ub/5861970
1. db 8 years ago
  
  Wow, the Australian authorities really know how to shit their pants over nothing, huh?
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Take a look inside home of ‘devil worshiper’ accused of murder, sacrificing animals

Last month a front-end loader scooped up tires, lawn mowers and other debris from outside the home. Burch’s friend spoke about conditions inside the house that were so bad she thought she might vomit.

When the friend first arrived to visit Burch in 2009, Algarad was completely naked and never put on any clothes during the visit. The excrement on the floor might have been both animal and human, the friend said.

“He was on all kinds of drugs and would drink when I got there,” she said. “I’m pretty sure I witnessed him peeing in the corner.”

The friend said Algarad’s behavior was “very sexual, very provocative.”
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

Thankfully, those days are over, but the memories linger. Although the evolution of my thought ? from ignorance, to denial, to skepticism and finally to acceptance ? was a continuum. In retrospect, I can distinguish certain phases that are worth listing and discussing. I hope my experience encourages others to loosen up some strongly held beliefs and listen to the din of evidence.

Salon’s “I once was lost, buy now am found” meme branches out from libertarianism to climate denial.

What will be next?
1. Raston Bot 8 years ago
  
  Prolly a reformed gun owner who saw the evil of his ways and had everything melted down into modern art.
Kaptious Kristen 8 years ago

I haven’t been able to stomach Facebook since election night. I peeked in this morning and the baffled butthurt was still going strong among the bubble-dwellers. I ducked out again. I’d rather go through the two weeks of “First Day of School” pics than this shit.
1. Pl?ya Manhattan. 8 years ago
  
  Mine was only one guy. He’s on mute now.
  1. Kaptious Kristen 8 years ago
    
    I’d say about 8-10% of my Facebook friends are conservatives and/or libertarian. It can be difficult during election season. It’s either smug satisfaction or extreme butthurt with a side of elitism.
    
    I think I’ll go see if there are any donuts left in the cafeteria.
2. Lord Humungus 8 years ago
  
  My best friend – who lives down in Austin – is a big-time liberal… so I end up blocking his FB posts to control my blood pressure. Of course I miss the fun, non-political stuff.
  1. The DerpRider 8 years ago
    
    /snort. Do we share the same friend who was boasting about his Wendy Davis vote on Tuesday?
    
    I find the unfollow button works great for not completing blocking people, but avoiding their status updates so I don’t have to see the political crap.
3. Raston Bot 8 years ago
  
  You’re not going to engage and rub their noses in it? You win some sort of award for self-restraint.
  1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
    
    Tell them: “If you like your Obamacare, you can keep it!”
    1. Cdr Lytton 8 years ago
      
      That’s what Mitch said!
  2. RG 8 years ago
    
    “Elections have consequences”
  3. Kaptious Kristen 8 years ago
    
    There’s not much rubbing to do, in that I didn’t vote, and even if I did, it certainly wouldn’t have been for anyone who actually won. The schadenfreude is kind of nice, especially in that they all seem so surprised. But really, it’s a hollow “victory”.
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

y t
1. Mike M. 8 years ago
  
  You don’t say.
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

the baffled butthurt was still going strong among the bubble-dwellers

I did a Morning Joke drive-by; Mika Fluffzinski’s reaction seemed to boil down to, “The Democratic Party is unworthy of Him.”
1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
  
  Pathetic. Obama is an abysmal failure even from the Democratic point of view.
  
  This kind of dehumanizing of a public official is not only sick, it’s dangerous.
2. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  How small and lost do you have to be to join a cult of personality?
  
  This, I really do not get.
  1. Andrew S. 8 years ago
    
    I sell the things you need to be
    I’m the smiling face on your TV
    I’m the cult of personality
    I exploit you, still you love me
    I tell you one and one makes three
    1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      It’s impossible to hear that song and not think of the empty idiot the left decided to make into a cult figurehead.
  2. Kaptious Kristen 8 years ago
    
    This is what I don’t get – treating a politician like a teen idol. A fucking politician. It’s like idolizing a TV disability lawyer. Yet people always think “this guy/gal is different!”.
Lord Humungus 8 years ago

Hitler Sightings In Berlin?

Constantin Film is going undercover for Look Who’s Back, its big-screen adaptation of Timur Vermes’ bestselling novel that imagines the return of Adolf Hitler to modern-day Germany. The powerhouse German company is replicating the Borat model, thrusting its notorious central character played by unknown German actor Oliver Masucci into unsuspecting real-life situations in Germany.

Actual principal photography begins Saturday, but reaction to the “pre-shoots” with Masucci as Der Fuhrer has spread virally across the country, where the dark days of Nazi rule remain a blot on the German psyche. The shoot will take place all over Germany with a particular emphasis in Berlin.
1. PRX 8 years ago
  
  can I have your autograph Mr. Bronski?
John 8 years ago

http://www.politico.com/story/…..12619.html

The deep abyss of House Democrats. The article mentions several Democratic incumbents from the South and West Texas who were thought to be untouchable but lost Tuesday. Maybe having a national party message of “we are the party of minorities, feminists and urban whites and voting for us is a way to show how much you hate everyone else” makes it hard to win the votes of the everyone else.
1. Raston Bot 8 years ago
  
  That MD’s governor is GOP was the biggest shocker for me. They really motivated the opposition these past couple years.
  1. John 8 years ago
    
    Me too. I think a little bit of that is the wages of the media being so protective of Prog politicians. O’Malley was horrible. But no one outside of Maryland knew it because the media showers love on any far left governor not under indictment.
    
    I think the coverage of O’Malley allowed the Maryland Democrats to live in denial of what a fuck up he was. So they didn’t understand that running Brown amounted to a giant “go fuck yourself Maryland you will vote for anyone we put up no matter how awful”.
    1. Raston Bot 8 years ago
      
      But it will be shown that Brown lost because Maryland is full of Obama-hating racists just like Virginia.
      1. John 8 years ago
        
        Progs are addicted to the race card like an addict is addicted to drugs. You would think an ass kicking this bad would cause them to seek some help. But it won’t. They will just retreat deeper into denial. Tuesday wasn’t an election so much as a national intervention aimed at the Democratic Party.
        
        BakedPenguin 8 years ago
        
        One they are rejecting out of hand. It’s amazing that the reason for it – that their policies don’t work, or have major negative side-effects – is the one they’re rejecting completely.
        
        John 8 years ago
        
        The other thing they can’t come to terms with is the idea that basing so much of their national message on marginalizing rural whites, non feminist men, and conservative Christians has made it impossible for any Democrat to win in any district where such people are the majority.
        
        They actually have the nerve to act shocked that they can’t win in Georgia or Arkansas anymore. How dare those people not vote for us just because our entire party is built around hating them. They actually think that.
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

This kind of dehumanizing of a public official is not only sick, it’s dangerous.

Better a petulant, feckless god than no god at all, I guess.

The very last thing people seem to want to hear is, “Good luck. You’re on your own.”
1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  The very last thing people seem to want to hear is, “Good luck. You’re on your own.”
  
  Except for the weirdoes, ~7% of people, that would sigh in relief.
Pro Libertate 8 years ago

But Obama is no kind and loving god! He’s one of the old gods! He demands sacrifice!
1. RG 8 years ago
  
  Has anyone seen Debbie Wasserman Schultz?!?!?
  1. John 8 years ago
    
    As annoying as she is, it is not her fault this happened. What was she supposed to do different? Whatever you think about her, she is a loyal soldier and put out the party message.
    1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
      
      Things went so bad for the Dems in Ohio that the state party chairman lost his own “safe” state representative seat.
      That’s some sweet schadenfreude right there.
    2. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      She’s a symptom, true, but she’s bad even for a modern Democrat. Their leadership has been truly awful. Not just in political activities but as examples of Homo sapiens sapiens.
      1. John 8 years ago
        
        She is terrible. But mostly she is a mouth piece. Had the Democratic message been better she wouldn’t have been so awful. Replacing her won’t do any good if you stick the next person with the same awful message.
    3. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
      
      As annoying as she is, it is not her fault this happened.
      
      When bad things happen, the boss is always responsible.
      
      She’s the boss of the DNC. Not Obama.
      
      She’s responsible. She should have seen this coming and done something about it. They managed to keep a muzzle on Obama and Michelle, after all, which couldn’t have been easy given the way those two narcissists love a devoted crowd. So they can buck the White House.
      
      You’re in the big chair, you take the big jump.
      1. John 8 years ago
        
        Except that she is not the boss. The boss is in the White House and leading the Democratic Caucuses in the Congress. Those three are the ones responsible here.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        Where does the buck stop? With the Republicans?
  2. Andrew S. 8 years ago
    
    I went to my mom’s house last weekend. She lives in DWS’s district, and of course, she had a DWS sign in her yard.
    
    I’m not sure how I survived my upbringing.
    1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
      
      Who the fuck likes that woman? Holy cow.
  3. SugarFree 8 years ago
    
    If I ever saw Debbie Wasserman Schultz and she was crying, I would go up to her and ask if it was because of her terrible hair.
  4. Doghouse Riley Jr. 8 years ago
    
    Has anyone really wanted to?
2. Andrew S. 8 years ago
  
  Outstanding reference. Truly outstanding.
  1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
    
    I do own the complete collection, so I am influenced.
    1. Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
      
      Awesome collection. The biggest challenge is keeping the grubby paws of the 9-year-old twins off it. I’ve had to buy them multiple copies of the various soft-cover collections to satisfy their C&H lust.
      1. Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        My rule is that only humans who have passed the gom jabbar can read it.
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        Humans and tigers, that is.
        
        Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
        
        My rule is that only humans who have passed the gom jabbar can read it.
        
        Don’t mix the narrative streams!!!
        
        Pro Libertate 8 years ago
        
        My people have many myths, legends, and other forms of indigenous entertaniment.
      2. RG 8 years ago
        
        My 7 year old son reads everything. He noticed my collection and asked to read it. Got through all three volumes in under a week.
        
        Frank Frankelson 8 years ago
        
        Related, I just got my 9 year old daughter started on the Dragonlance Chronicles (The Wiess-Hickman orginial series, not the fifty cajillion spin-offs) she loves them.
        
        I am a proud papa.
        
        Citizen Nothing 8 years ago
        
        I sheepishly admit that I am unfamiliar with Dragonlace, but I will check it out. The boy and girl are both into the Warriors (cat) series, which I do not read. And we all are finding the “Diary of a Wimpy Kid” series, our current bed-time out-loud read, to be quite funny.
        
        Frank Frankelson 8 years ago
        
        They are quite good, although they do read like a transcribed table top D & D campaign, which they are. I still re-read them every few years.
        
        They are pretty kid-friendly too, provided your kids are okay with the normal wizards and warriors stuff. Some of the other series from the same authors in the same universe that are pretty good, once you start straying too far from those the writing tends to be rather hit or miss.
John 8 years ago

This is Ralph Reed talking. So who knows how true this is. Even if it is half true, it is a pretty striking statistic and puts lie to the idea that Republicans can win by throwing the SOCONS out of the party.

On Election Day, self-identified conservative Christians made up 32 percent of the electorate and voted 86 percent Republican and only 12 percent Democrat. These voters contributed an astonishing 52.4 percent of all the votes received by Republican candidates…

The Catholic vote, the swing vote in American politics for a half century, was also critical. Republicans won the Roman Catholic vote (23 percent of the electorate) by a twelve-point margin, 56 to 44 percent. Even more dramatically, faithful Catholics who attend Mass once a week or more often and comprise one out of every ten voters, cast 70 percent of their votes for Republican candidates and only 30 percent for Democratic candidates.

http://www.nationalreview.com/…..ralph-reed

I think the birth control mandate really hurt the Democrats. Catholics have generally voted Democrat. Kind of hard to do that now. Even though Catholics don’t follow the church, they generally feel an obligation to defend it.
1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  Algore tells us that there is a scientific consensus on AGW.
2. Stormy Dragon 8 years ago
  
  tl;dr: You libertarians can vote for big government with a side of SJW or big government with a side of SoCon, but you will vote for big government whether you like it or not.
John 8 years ago

http://www.washingtontimes.com…..as-leader/

You would think Pelosi would want to quit out of loyalty to the party. Even Newt Gingrich, who is an epic egomaniac, stepped down when he realized he was nothing but a drag on the party and there was no way to fix it. At this point, I don’t think it is fair to call Pelosi a partisan. Partisans at least care about the cause. Pelosi is just a sociopath who doesn’t give a shit about anyone but herself.
1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  I saw an interview once with a married couple that ran a business, some kind of home repair contractors. They did tens of thousands of dollars of work for the Pelosis and after praising the work Nancy refused to pay them.
  
  She told them to go fuck themselves, sue if they wanted.
  
  I have no idea how true that is or if there is more to the story, but given the personality she puts forth publicly, it was sure believable.
  1. John 8 years ago
    
    It doesn’t surprise me. Pelosi came to speak at a girls high school my wife was working at a few years ago. She showed up two minutes before her speech, didn’t talk to anyone on the staff and then proceeded to go up and do nothing but hawk her book. She gave the standard book hawking speech. Didn’t take any questions, didn’t have anything encouraging to say to the students. Nothing except buy my book.
    
    She is one of those people about whom I have never heard a positive word said other than “I love her politics”. There isn’t a single story out there about her helping someone or acting graciously in any way. It is all about how fabulous her politics are or stories like yours and mine.
    1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
      
      Now that you say that….yeah. Not a single story.
      
      I disliked Mitt Romney as a candidate. I disagree with his politics and felt certain he would be a loser. I wouldn’t vote for him as dog catcher.
      
      As a person? I have heard lots of stories about him in his private life being a stellar human being.
      
      Pelosi? I got nothin’. Come to think of it, I got nothing on Obama either.
      
      Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence that Obama is anything but a narcissistic personality disorder?
      1. Suthenboy 8 years ago
        
        Heh.
        
        http://psychcentral.com/disord…..-symptoms/
      2. John 8 years ago
        
        Or even on the other side Howard Dean. Dean is a doctor who from what I have heard has done a lot of very nice things for people who couldn’t afford his services and was by all accounts a good doctor who cared about his patients.
        
        Pelosi and Reid both are just monsters. The Democrats are going to rue the day that they allowed such people to run their party. The problem with such people is that since they are sociopaths they will happily destroy your organization if they think doing so is in their interests.
Anonymous Coward 8 years ago

Thank (Or Blame) The Supreme Court For Credential Inflation

Our mania for college credentials works strongly against upward mobility for individuals who, for whatever reason, don’t have a college degree. They are confined to the shrinking and mostly low-pay segment of the labor market where educational credentials still don’t matter.

But how did this regrettable situation come about? Why don’t employers directly evaluate applicants’ capabilities rather than insisting that they first put in the huge amount of time and money it takes to obtain a degree?

A 1971 Supreme Court decision, Griggs v. Duke Power, had a lot to do with it, by giving employers a strong incentive to use educational credentials as a proxy for aptitude testing.

Chief Justice Burger’s opinion deferred to the EEOC’s vast reinterpretation of the law and held that Duke Power was in violation because its educational and testing requirements had a disparate impact on minority workers. The law, he wrote, required “the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment where the barriers operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissible classification.”
1. John 8 years ago
  
  That argument has been around for a long time and I think it is largely true. Thanks to Duke Power businesses just can’t give objective skills tests to applicants. So they can only judge on credentials.
  
  The effects of this are only going to get worse in the future. Thanks to the internet people can teach themselves skills more than ever. If not for Duke Power, companies would be free to hire people who had self acquired skills and the higher education monopoly would end even quicker.
  1. Cdr Lytton 8 years ago
    
    Skills test are ok, as long as they’re related to the actual job duties of the position. Duke‘s problem, if I recall correctly, was they were using an iq test.
    1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
      
      What about police departments that use iq tests?
      
      Oh yeah, when they do it they disqualify people for being too intelligent, which isn’t discrimination.
    2. John 8 years ago
      
      Yes. But the case struck those down because they had a disparate impact on minorities. So the rule in the case was not “no IQ tests”. The rule was “no objective tests that have a disparate impact on minorities”. For example, police and fire departments were sued all over the country for discrimination even though their skills tests to get hired were totally relevant to the job. Even though something like the ability to pick up and carry a normal sized adult 20 yards is definitely relevant to being a fireman, the departments still got sued and lost because it had a disparate impact on women or minorities.
    3. Clown Hunter 8 years ago
      
      Skills test are ok, as long as they’re related to the actual job duties of the position.
      
      If those tests give “disparate impact” results, you are fucked in the ass by the DOJ and the OCR.
      
      Even if you win, its an assfucking.
      
      So it sounds good, but in the real world its risky.
      1. John 8 years ago
        
        What Clown Hunter said. It is even worse than that. The presumption is that anyone with the credentials is qualified. So no matter how good your test is, if minorities or women with the right credentials can’t pass it, you are screwed.
  2. Anonymous Coward 8 years ago
    
    The disparate impact analysis has always struck me as peculiarly opposed to the common law idea of mens rea, in that you can be found guilty of discriminaton even if you as an employer never intended to discriminate against anyone, but your workforce numbers came up “wrong.”
    1. John 8 years ago
      
      That is all it is. People objected to forced percentages of minorities. So the SCOTUS put them in through the back door via the disparate impact test. The only way you can prove your hiring standards don’t have a disparate impact is by hiring a percentage of minorities and women equal to the percentage of qualified and interested minorities and women in your area.
      1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
        
        But if they failed the objective aptitude test, they aren’t qualfied.
        
        John 8 years ago
        
        No. It means your test is racist. Remember, the whole system is based on credentials. So if they have the credentials, they by definition must be qualified and the only reason they don’t pass your test is because its racist.
        
        The disparate impact test is really that insane. It is one of the worse doctrines in law.
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

Chief Justice Burger’s opinion deferred to the EEOC’s vast reinterpretation of the law and held that Duke Power was in violation because its educational and testing requirements had a disparate impact on minority workers. The law, he wrote, required “the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers to employment where the barriers operate invidiously to discriminate on the basis of racial or other impermissible classification.”

I missed the Constitutional requirement that Supreme Court justices be (barely) functionally retarded.

Demonstrable aptitude is an “artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barrier to employment”?
1. sarcasmic 8 years ago
  
  Well, yeah! I mean, people deserve to have jobs! Requiring that they prove they can actually do the work before hiring them is unfair!
2. Suthenboy 8 years ago
  
  “When people see their beautiful world of equality and social justice, they won’t like it very much.”
  
  -Soviet political officer
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

It appears that a lot of us have proggie parents. Maybe a baby-boomer thing?

Not my parents, but most of the aunts and uncles. Also, my brother and sister.

Once more I say-

Being a libertarian means never saying EVERYBODY AGREES WITH ME.”
1. GILMORE 8 years ago
  
  *unless you’re Bo
The Late P Brooks 8 years ago

Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence that Obama is anything but a narcissistic personality disorder?

Dude, he hugged that ebola nurse, on teevee!
1. UnCivilServant 8 years ago
  
  After she was no longer contagious.

Please log in to post comments

Comments are closed.

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Micah Kilpatrick

Obama to Seek ISIS War Approval, AC/DC Drummer Charged With Procuring Murder, Missouri Marriage Ban Struck Down: A.M. Links

Latest

Twitter Quits the Biden Administration's Ham-Handed Crusade Against COVID-19 'Misinformation'

Eric Adams' Plan To Involuntarily Hospitalize Mentally Ill Homeless People Will Face Legal Challenges

Kansas Judge Blocks Law Banning Telemedicine Prescriptions for Medication Abortions

What Does the Respect for Marriage Act Actually Say?

Iran Attempted To Use the World Cup To Stoke Nationalist Pride

Recommended

Login Form