Frank Serpico Explains How Police Violence is the New Graft


In 1971 Frank Serpico was shot in the face while opening a door during a drug bust in a Brooklyn apartment, and left there to die by the cops with him because Serpico had testified against crooked cops in the narcotics division. An elderly man in the building, not the other cops, called 911 to send an ambulance.
In a piece at Politico, Serpico explains that to this day he's shunned by the New York Police Department (NYPD). A Medal of Honor recipient, he's only been invited to the annual dinner once, when Bernard Kerik was commissioner. While the graft is, thanks to greater accountability, not as systematic as it used to be, Serpico writes, a lack of accountability is why police violence is such a problem. Via Politico:
I tried to be an honest cop in a force full of bribe-takers. But as I found out the hard way, police departments are useless at investigating themselves—and that's exactly the problem facing ordinary people across the country —including perhaps, Ferguson, Missouri, which has been a lightning rod for discontent even though the circumstances under which an African-American youth, Michael Brown, was shot remain unclear.
Today the combination of an excess of deadly force and near-total lack of accountability is more dangerous than ever: Most cops today can pull out their weapons and fire without fear that anything will happen to them, even if they shoot someone wrongfully. All a police officer has to say is that he believes his life was in danger, and he's typically absolved. What do you think that does to their psychology as they patrol the streets—this sense of invulnerability? The famous old saying still applies: Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. (And we still don't know how many of these incidents occur each year; even though Congress enacted the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act 20 years ago, requiring the Justice Department to produce an annual report on "the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers," the reports were never issued.)
It wasn't any surprise to me that, after Michael Brown was shot dead in Ferguson, officers instinctively lined up behind Darren Wilson, the cop who allegedly killed Brown. Officer Wilson may well have had cause to fire if Brown was attacking him, as some reports suggest, but it is also possible we will never know the full truth—whether, for example, it was really necessary for Wilson to shoot Brown at least six times, killing rather than just wounding him. As they always do, the police unions closed ranks also behind the officer in question. And the district attorney (who is often totally in bed with the police and needs their votes) and city power structure can almost always be counted on to stand behind the unions.
Serpico goes on to write that while he understands the need for cops to protect themselves, militarized gear isn't necessary in everyday situations—he says while he was off-duty he once disarmed a suspect who had three guns using just a snub-nose Smith & Wesson—and helped to isolate cops from the communities they're supposed to serve.
He also dismisses politicians who offer rhetoric but little action, all the way to the top:
As for Barack Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder, they're giving speeches now, after Ferguson. But it's 20 years too late. It's the same old problem of political power talking, and it doesn't matter that both the president and his attorney general are African-American. Corruption is color blind. Money and power corrupt, and they are color blind too.
Read the whole thing, including Serpico's policy recommendations, here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought the article was fantastic, the only problem was it featured Frank walking around in UGGs which almost made me want to side with the cops.
He is a lesson to 'honest cops' of what happens when you cross the 'blue line'.Today though they just ruin your life.Kind of like the Feds and whistle blowers.I always laugh when I hear cops complain about the no snitching in cities and they have the same rule for their co-workers.
That's different, they'r heros!!1!
Somebody wants to get shot in the face again.
/slowly turns and stares at serpico
Good article. Sad that so little progress has been made. Feels like we are going backwards in some of the bigger police departments.
Hank Scorpio is right!
called 911? back in 1971?
must have been using a cellphone
911 was introduced in 1968, something that takes about fifteen seconds to discover on this thing called "the internet".
That's what they call PWND.
#rekt
Serpico in Philadelphia, confronting a dirty cop
Never seen to Pacino movie. In fact, never knew anything about this guy at all. Worth a watch?
"never seen THE Pacino movie"
It's ok, I'd rather watch the episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia where they do the parody of it.
"4 the mare."
It's one of my favorite movies. I love 70s flicks
Added to my torrent ..ah, I mean netflix que
my buddy's step-aunt makes $86 /hour on the computer . She has been out of work for 7 months but last month her pay check was $16159 just working on the computer for a few hours. see it here.....
?????? http://www.cashbuzz40.com
I reckon 9/11 set the agenda back, what, with all the hero worshiping in the aftermath. It bought cops and firemen years of good will and 'get of jail' cards.
Mr. Krayewski, (may I call you Ed?), link can't be found.
Ed clipped a character off the end of the URL.
The Police Are Still Out of Control
Frank, you lost me as soon as you said "Most cops today can pull out their weapons and fire without fear that anything will happen to them, even if they shoot someone wrongfully." Frank, you haven't been a policeman in 40 years. Sorry to burst your bubble, but that is most definitely not the case, as anyone who has been a police officer in the last decade or two or three can tell you. I respect what he did, 40 years ago, but he is no longer an expert on current law enforcement practices.
Serpico just doesn't understand how awful being suspended with pay truly is.
He doesn't understand what it's like to be a police officer outside of NYC, in the 21st century. He's old news.
Rolling with that line in a place that documents daily police abuses where the police more often than not get off scot-free probably wasn't the best choice.
Yeah, and like I trust such a "place", such a rag. Sorry, but comments like that from people who know nothing about law enforcement really are meaningless.
What I said is still correct-- Serpico did a great thing in his time, 40 YEARS ago. Not so relevant now, and not so relevant to departments outside of NYC.
Putting your fingers in your ears and shouting LALALALALALA doesn't make reality go away, and the reality is that it's just as bad or worse, just about everywhere, as it was 40 years ago in NYC.
[citation needed]
Hi Tulpa
You can crow all you want about imaginary reforms, but police misconduct and abuse has become worse rather than better (all due to the "immunity" thing). Your stating the opposite is an empty argument. You have to search for police officers that have lost their job for misconduct. It's much easier to find officers awarded for shooting a dog or flash-grenading a child or beating a jaywalker's face to a pulp.
[citation needed]
[citation needed]
My buddy's sister-in-law makes $83 /hour on the computer . She has been without work for 8 months but last month her pay was $17994 just working on the computer for a few hours.
For information check this site. ????? http://www.jobsfish.com