Ronald Bailey Argues that Practicing Virtual Eugenics Is Just Great

Childbearing is a lottery. The good news is that most babies are winners who are born without major structural or genetic birth defects. But wouldn't it be good to stack the odds further in favor of having a healthy baby? That's the aim of the new genetic testing company GenePeeks. The company's Matchright service simulates fertilization by combining genetic screening information from women wanting to use donated sperm with the same information from donors to generate the genomes of thousands of virtual children. Based on that information, the company steers women clients toward donors with whom they are more likely to have healthy children. While some object and trot out the tired "designer baby" trope, Reason Science Correspondent Ronald Bailey argues that there is no good reason to stand in the way of prospective parents who want to use this technology to increase the odds that their kids will be born healthy.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?