On November 3, Reason Senior Editor Damon Root will speak at the Cato Institute about his new book Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court (pre-order your copy now). Here's the event description followed by registration details:
Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court
Featuring the author Damon Root, Senior Editor, Reason magazine and Reason.com; with comments by Jeffrey Rosen, Professor of Law, George Washington University, and President & CEO, National Constitution Center; and Roger Pilon, Vice President for Legal Affairs, Cato Institute, and Director, Cato Center for Constitutional Studies; moderated by Walter Olson, Senior Fellow, Cato Institute.
What is the proper role of the Supreme Court under the Constitution? Should the Court be "active" or "restrained"? Or is that even the proper way to look at the question, however much we've heard it put that way for several decades now? In his new book, Damon Root traces this debate from the Constitution's conception to the present. His central focus, however, is on the emergence of the modern libertarian approach, which cuts through the often sterile debate between liberals and conservatives and points to the Constitution itself by way of determining the proper role of the Court under it. Please join us for a refreshing account of this recent history.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
What is the proper role of the Supreme Court under the Constitution? Should the Court be "active" or "restrained"?
It should be active with regard to issues we want pushed forward in spite of the voters, and it should be restrained with regard to issues we want suppressed, in spite of the voters.
If anyone goes to this be sure to ask what his punishment was for the unforgivable transgression of posting Mourning Lynx at 9:30AM.
I already know the answer. He had to do research for a book about the Supreme Court.
The Koch Brothers won!
What is the proper role of the Supreme Court under the Constitution? Should the Court be "active" or "restrained"?
It should be active with regard to issues we want pushed forward in spite of the voters, and it should be restrained with regard to issues we want suppressed, in spite of the voters.