Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Washingtonian Mag Ranks Congress: Amash 'Lobbyists' Worst Enemy'

Zenon Evans | 10.9.2014 11:15 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)

Gage-Skidmore-cc-by-sa

Washingtonian magazine this week released its fifteenth biennial survey on the best and worst of all the Congresscritters roaming our great nation's swampy capital.

The publication takes a jab at them:

Despite approval ratings lower than Vladimir Putin's, the men and women of the 113th Congress have continued to debate, investigate, raise funds, and campaign with ebullience. Seeing as little if any legislation arises from their activities, it's apparent that if there are winners and losers, hits and misses, the average citizen isn't privy to the scorecard.

As such, the survey is conducted not among the great unwashed of the American public, but among the aides of these lawmakers.

Most of the categories have a total of four spots, two for each house. For example, the "meanest" in the Senate are 1. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and 2. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), and in the House are 1. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.) and 2. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.).

However, one category, Lobbyists' Worst Enemy, has a lone representative: Justin Amash (R-Mich.). The libertarian-leaning congressman, who posts on Facebook detailed explanations of all of his votes in the House, succinctly commented on his distinction: "Hmm."

Conspicuously below him in the Lobbyists' Best Friend category were two other Republicans: 1. Eric Cantor (Va.) and 2. John Boehner (Ohio).

Of course, Cantor's biggest distinction this year was losing his primary. He is the first sitting House majority leader ever to manage that. Washingtonian notes that the survey was handed out just after his loss. Cantor resigned in August but bounced right into an investment bank gig worth $3.4 million.

As for Boehner, rumors have long swirled that fellow Republicans are going to try to oust him from his Speaker position.

Some other interesting highlights from the poll include Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who earned spots in the Rising Star, Best Speaker, Surprise Standout (whatever that means), and Most Likely to Run for President (with competition only from Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

On the other hand, presidential hopeful Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) "earned… a variety of dubious distinctions in our survey, including showhorse, clueless, and most disappointing—and that was just from Republicans," explains Washingtonian.

Read the rest of the rankings here.

Read about how earlier this year, an affiliate magazine, Washingtonian Mom accidentally revealed that former Press Secretary Jay Carney decorates his house with communist propaganda. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: List of 13 Creepiest Clowns Inexplicably Leaves Out Joe Biden, Other Pols

Zenon Evans is a former Reason staff writer and editor.

PoliticsRepublican PartyCultureCongressCongressional ApprovalJohn BoehnerJustin AmashLobbyingHarry Reid
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John   11 years ago

    Despite approval ratings lower than Vladimir Putin's, the men and women of the 113th Congress have continued to debate, investigate, raise funds, and campaign with ebullience. Seeing as little if any legislation arises from their activities,

    They say that like its a bad thing. And even if it were, the President has to sign a bill for it to be law. Maybe if Obama came out of retirement there might be a few more laws passed.

    1. WTF   11 years ago

      What they ought to be doing is repealing laws, but that will never happen.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

        If the federal register stops growing, we all die.

    2. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      Why bother to sign a bill when he can just issue a decree?

    3. DesigNate   11 years ago

      Last time I checked, the House has sent lots of bills to the Senate.

      They're all stacked up on Harry Reid's desk.

      1. Scarecrow Repair   11 years ago

        He's never there. He's always on the can, shitting on everybody, but it's useless, he's still full of shit.

      2. Warren's Strapon   11 years ago

        I've read this comment a few times, and pretty much assumed it was bullshit. So I looked it up, and found an article that claimed it was bullshit.

        But here's the thing: the facts in the article make it clear that the claim is not bullshit.

        1) The article claims that ignoring hundreds of bills from the other chamber is normal. And it is. But that doesn't make the "hundreds of bills" claim false, and it disputes the "do-nothing" claim.

        2) At the bottom, the article claims that each chamber is passing fewer bills than average. But that claim is not true if you look at the past 20-25 years; it's pretty normal over that range. Where there is a dip is in the number of bills enacted, which indicates either a difference in ideology between the chambers (which is the way things were designed) or a do-nothing president.

        Standard libertarian disclaimer: I'm perfectly fine with a do-nothing Congress.

        1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

          Number of bills is a worthless measure, since a bill can range from 2000 pages asserting control over 1/5th of the economy, to two pages declaring April National Illegal Immigrant Gay Marriage Month.

  2. Paul.   11 years ago

    As such, the survey is conducted not among the great unwashed of the American public, but among the aides of these lawmakers.

    This insidey insider stuff really annoys the shit out of me. Who cares what a particular aide of a given member of congress thinks about the guy sitting across the aisle. Of course they're going to hate "that other guy". When you've been given a prestige job working for a sitting national politician, you're supposed to hate the other guys, and love yours.

    1. Raston Bot   11 years ago

      The opposing party is your adversary, the people are the enemy.

    2. John   11 years ago

      Honestly, I hate the aids and the staffs more than I hate the politicians. No matter how much I loath the politicians, I have to give them some grudging respect for managing to get elected. I couldn't do that.

      The aids and staff in contrast are the worst sorts of scum. Nothing but idiot sons, loathsome hacks and douche bag yes men. The Hill staff of both parties are everything you think they would be and worse. Arrogant, utterly ignorant but drunk with power fucking up everything they touch.

      1. Paul.   11 years ago

        The Hill staff of both parties are everything you think they would be and worse. Arrogant, utterly ignorant but drunk with power fucking up everything they touch.

        Oh I know, I watch Veep religiously.

        1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

          Can't wait until next season.

      2. Juice   11 years ago

        I met a few of these people when I first moved to DC. I never have violent thoughts about people, but after just hanging around with some of these Hill staffers for a couple of hours I wanted to strangle them, and I can't explain precisely why.

        1. John   11 years ago

          I have the same feeling. I think it is some kind of instinct left over from when humans lived on the plains of Africa or something. An instinctual understanding of when another person is a parasite on the tribe.

          1. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

            Okay, that was a good line.

    3. Bill Dalasio   11 years ago

      Much less so with the insiders as you'd think. Most of the political class from the two parties has a lot more in common with one another than they do with the rest of us. The "hateses" are just for show.

      1. John   11 years ago

        ^^THIS^^

  3. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Even the civil liberty lobby???

    1. Paul.   11 years ago

      Obama is the civil liberty lobby. He got a constituency!

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        With his midget and broom and whatnot.

  4. Raston Bot   11 years ago

    http://instagram.com/p/tYlrmJOrMm/

    holy shit

    1. DesigNate   11 years ago

      I saw that on Yahoo.

      I would have shit myself.

    2. SugarFree   11 years ago

      Farewell and adieu to you, fair Spanish ladies
      Farewell and adieu to you, ladies of Spain;
      For we have received orders
      For to sail to back to Boston,
      And we may ne'er see you fair ladies again

    3. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      NSFW. Unless you work somewhere that's pretty liberal about continence.

  5. antisocial-ist   11 years ago

    If I were Amash I would carry that title like a badge of honor. Ask all the news channels to put it on screen after his name. Maybe even get a little trophy made and put it on his desk in D.C.

    1. GroundTruth   11 years ago

      He needs a better quote than "hmmm". Something along the lines of "If this be intransigence, then make the most of it!"

      The floor is open to suggestions!

      1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

        "Say hello to my leetle fren'"?

  6. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

    I think Amash should run for the GOP nom. He might not win but he'd be another libertarian voice. Maybe he should win? Seems to have less baggage and just a bit better touch than Rand, who I still think is great.

  7. AD-RtR/OS!   11 years ago

    Amash will wear that as a badge of honor.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Innocent Man Sues for Over $60,000 After Police Blew Up His Business. A Court Says He's Entitled to Nothing.

Billy Binion | 12.29.2025 5:37 PM

These Companies Want To Use AI To Make Cheaper and Cleaner Energy—If the Government Lets Them

Jeff Luse | 12.29.2025 4:09 PM

The TRUMP AMERICA AI Act Is Every Bit As Bad As You Would Expect. Maybe Worse.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.29.2025 12:40 PM

This 1,300-Page Anticapitalist History Gets a Few Things Wrong

Phillip W. Magness | 12.29.2025 7:00 AM

Is Zohran Mamdani Coming Around to Housing Deregulation?

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks