Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Pornography

Thwarted by Excessive Regulation, British Pornographers Call for… More Regulation!

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 10.6.2014 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
OllieDTog/Twitter

If you would like an utterly depressing portrayal of the pornography industry circa 2014, do check out this account of the annual European adult industry trade summit. As reported by The Guardian's Amelia Gentleman, the London-based expo was a veritable cornucopia of sad, full of broke porn-site proprietors lamenting the myriad factors killing their businesses—one big one being a U.K. law requiring a porn site age-verification process. 

"The mood of the Xbiz EU 2014 conference is beleaguered, with panellists conferring on how to respond to new regulations requiring them to verify the age of anyone who tries to access hardcore content" and "whether it makes sense to escape regulation by moving their companies offshore," writes Gentleman. The U.K.'s new age-verification requirement—championed by TV-on-demand company ATVOD—has caused "considerable bitterness" among U.K. porn proprietors, she notes.

With good reason: The requirement will wind up costing already-struggling websites around £1.50 per site visit, and that's not counting the cost in lost customers. Because porn-seekers can easily access sites outside the U.K. that don't require age verification (and all the browser problems that the apparently-buggy filtering technology brings with it), many will simply navigate to another site.

You would think this might have British porn businesses trying to fight the age-verification requirement, but those quoted in the Guardian piece seem strangely on board with the government's assertion that this is necessary to protect the children. "We have to demonstrate that we take child protection seriously," said one expo panelist. "I hate the idea of my seven-year-old daughter seeing something that is not appropriate," said another. 

The problem, they insist, is simply that the rest of the world's Internet is less regulated, which creates an uneven playing field, as does the U.K. government's refusal to require age-checks on other sites where porn shows up, such as Twitter. 

"The biggest sites accessed by people in the UK are international. Why doesn't the government take those sites down? It isn't the UK industry that has provided the increased access to internet porn. It is international," Jamie, from Studio 66 TV, says. 

Ban the whole Internet! Sigh… Like the taxi cabals who try to quash Uber because its drivers don't face the same strict regulations they do, or the folks who want to forbid businesses from moving headquarters overseas for less taxes and bureaucracy, it seems porn site owners aren't immune to the "Needs more protectionism!" approach to government policy, either.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 29-Year-Old Woman Moves To Oregon for Legal Aid in Dying

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PornographyRegulationUnited Kingdom
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (81)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

    WTF is that creature in the picture on the right?

    1. SugarFree   11 years ago

      That's the real reason the British porn industry is dying.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        I hope to god whoever/whatever is banging that thing is wearing a condom.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          I wouldn't doubt it if both of the pictured wear condoms.

          1. SugarFree   11 years ago

            This is a good photo to support my contention that gender is not a spectrum, but rather a circle that meets where hypermodified women are indistinguishable from botched MtF reassignment disasters.

            1. Jerry on the sea   11 years ago

              You leave Kim Kardashian alone!

            2. BigT   11 years ago

              I prefer the one with the tits to the tats.

        2. Marty Comanche   11 years ago

          But where would you get one big enough to pull over her head?

    2. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

      I hope that's not WTF (the HnR commentator).

    3. Warty   11 years ago

      Apparently it's a "Chessie Kay". I don't recommend googling.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        I almost certain that it is a goblin based on what I've read in literature.

    4. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

      The one on the left is worse, although the one on the right no doubt looks less hideous by comparison.

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        I dunno - the one on the left, minus the obvious fake boobz, looks good in a
        "crazy tattoo goth chick who is an absolute sex machine" way. The one on the right just looks... odd. Not that I would touch either with a three meter pole.

        Of course maybe if I was from the UK, maybe this is the best thing in the area.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          Just think, if the Scottish Yes crowd would have shown everyone in the country that picture 'these are British wiminz!', it may have put them over the top.

          1. Zeb   11 years ago

            Scots are British.

            1. Hyperion   11 years ago

              Welsh aren't British, and they have the best goats. They'll show those wussy Scotts how to secede.

              1. Zeb   11 years ago

                Actually they are all British. Britain is the name of the island where England, Scotland and Wales are.

                1. Zeb   11 years ago

                  Or "Great Britain", I should say if I am going to be all picky and pedantic.

                  1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

                    I was in a bar Saturday night, and had a few drinks. I noticed two large women by the bar. They both had strong accents so I asked, "Hey, are you two ladies from Ireland?"

                    One of them screamed, "It's Wales, you idiot!"

                    So, I immediately apologized and said, "Sorry, are you two whales from Ireland?"

                    That's all I remember.

                    1. perlhaqr   11 years ago

                      I laughed. 😀

                    2. Lord at War   11 years ago

                      PapayaSF

                      Reminds me why I read H&R despite Tony, Shriek, and insufferable "parodies" like the Dunphy clone and craiginass.

                    3. PapayaSF   11 years ago

                      I thank you both.

                  2. Marty Comanche   11 years ago

                    And the Welsh were the original Britons, so I don't see how anybody could say they're not from Britain, Great or otherwise.

        2. Drake   11 years ago

          Looks like Jason Newsted circa 1989 with boobs.

        3. Hyperion   11 years ago

          Agreed. The one on the left is a lot more attractive if you're only looking at the face.

          I think the one on the right escaped the lair of Kim Jong Un, she's the most excellent horse like woman.

        4. Zeb   11 years ago

          I think the oddness might have something to do with the lens used to take that picture.

    5. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      If you would like an utterly depressing portrayal of the pornography industry circa 2014

      Just look at that picture. Of course, I assume those are British women, so the global state probably isn't so bad.

      1. Drake   11 years ago

        Every portrayal of the porn industry I've seen was utterly depressing.

    6. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnx95KyQEAA

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ANYTHING FOR PAGE CLICKS, I SEE, ENB.

    1. Elizabeth Nolan Brown   11 years ago

      I know, I know, the British porn industry isn't really within my editorial jurisdiction, but I found the attitude of these people so puzzling I couldn't resist....

      1. Warty   11 years ago

        Wait, it's not???

      2. hamilton   11 years ago

        reason has editorial jurisdictions?

        1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

          ENB enjoys diplomatic immunity. (Or, some clever play on that term that you can come up with yourselves for all I care.)

          1. Bee Tagger   11 years ago

            Unrelated, but does diplomatic immunity apply to "yes means yes?"

          2. Agammamon   11 years ago

            She's the editorial equivalent of 'Minister without Portfolio'

  3. Episiarch   11 years ago

    The biggest sites accessed by people in the UK are international. Why doesn't the government take those sites down?

    Uh, because it's not under the UK's jurisdiction, you blithering idiot? I think I see the reason these people want protectionism. It's because they're too stupid to make it any other way.

    1. Warty   11 years ago

      See, I read that as a subtle protest against the dismantling of the Empire. In a better world, the sun never sets on British smut.

      1. Episiarch   11 years ago

        British smut isn't that good, but I know I shouldn't expect more from you. What's the matter, steroids make you tasteless?

        1. Warty   11 years ago

          British smut is horrible, kind of like your mom. Which is appropriate, since your mom's the blond up top.

          1. Episiarch   11 years ago

            At least my mom can get porn work unlike yours! And Airtight Grannies 3 doesn't count!

        2. Agammamon   11 years ago

          Yeah, you want good european smut you have to go continental.

  4. Hyperion   11 years ago

    Don't worry so much, limeys. Once are your wiminz are in burquas, there won't be any porn, then you can be happy.

    1. Warty   11 years ago

      A quick search indicates that burqa porn is absolutely a thing.

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        What isn't? /jaded pron surfer

      2. Hyperion   11 years ago

        Why is it I don't have any problem believing that. It's probably 2nd fav in the Arab world next to camel pr0n.

        1. John Titor (Formerly Jensen)   11 years ago

          Porn MD seems to show their porn searches as being mostly boring.

      3. Episiarch   11 years ago

        Rule 34, dude. Rule 34.

      4. Paul.   11 years ago

        A quick search indicates that burqa porn is absolutely a thing.

        Meaning you looked in your browser cache?

    2. John Titor (Formerly Jensen)   11 years ago

      Uh burqa porn already exists, though I would approve of more.

      1. Hyperion   11 years ago

        It's like a christmas present. You don't really have any idea what's inside that big black tent.

        1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

          Something that doesn't shave?

          or STEVE SMITH? /being redundant

          1. Agammamon   11 years ago

            I've seen Steve Smith - he shaves his head now.

        2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          It could be anybody it could be "insert person you wanna fuck". The only limit is you imagination.

        3. John Titor (Formerly Jensen)   11 years ago

          Honestly at this point in time burqas would probably improve British porn.

    3. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      I'm pretty sure the prospect of getting British women into burqas is the main reason so many Brits are tolerating religious extremism these days.

  5. The Heresiarch   11 years ago

    When will the whole shaved-side-of-head thing die? Total boner killer.

    1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

      It's a hipster thing, you wouldn't understand.

      1. The Heresiarch   11 years ago

        I'll take that as a compliment. Thanks.

        1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

          you should.

    2. Episiarch   11 years ago

      Agreed, it's a terrible style.

      1. SugarFree   11 years ago

        Cyrus-bot is keeping it going.

      2. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Like you know style.

    3. Zeb   11 years ago

      I have a lesbian friend who has her hair cut that way at the moment. Maybe "boner killer" is the whole point.

  6. Paul.   11 years ago

    That woman on the left looks like the lovely and talented Christy Mack, who was recently savagely beaten by her boyfriend, War Machine. And I ain't talkin' no little black-eye savagely beaten.

    1. BigT   11 years ago

      True dat.

  7. Aloysious   11 years ago

    I'm just sitting here, looking at the picture.

  8. Hyperion   11 years ago

    Being serious, I have to disagree with the sentiment that there aren't any good looking British women. There are actually some damn hot British women. Yeah, there are also some scary looking ones, but that's true of everywhere.

    1. Brett L   11 years ago

      Of course there are. Her parents just come from India or other Commonwealth lands.

      1. Idle Hands   11 years ago

        Exception being Liz Hurley.

        1. SugarFree   11 years ago

          There are plenty of attractive British women, they are just all in Hollywood, or biding their time at the BBC.

      2. Paul.   11 years ago

        Of course there are. Her parents just come from India or other Commonwealth lands.

        Boom.

        My mother was British and considered quite attractive, but I like to remind people that she was half Czech, and born in Prague.

        The British half of her family looked like Prince Charles' homely cousins.

      3. Zeb   11 years ago

        I've known some very good looking British women. But now that I think of it, most of them had some Italian, Gypsy, Indian or South American ancestry.

        I think I read somewhere that British women have the biggest breasts, on average. Maybe that makes up for it.

    2. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      Well, sure. Lots of foreigners have come to Britain over the years, and their genes must surely crop up from time to time.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        Most are descended from Germans, French and Vikings. Kind of surprising that they aren't a more attractive people.

  9. Rhywun   11 years ago

    I must be missing something - WTF is the "age verification process" and why does it cost so much or discourage consumers? Surely they're not talking about the little box that says "check here if you're 18 or over"?

    1. Agammamon   11 years ago

      Its the 'enter your credit card number for age verification - you will not be charged' box.

      1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

        I would not trust a porn site to keep that promise.

      2. Rhywun   11 years ago

        Ah, I've people I know have never seen that.

      3. LarryA   11 years ago

        This. Under UK law the site has to verify that you are 18, not just trust you to tell the truth about it.

        1. LarryA   11 years ago

          "ATVOD believes that websites should require the user to supply valid credit card details or other personal information that can be cross-referenced with the electoral roll or another ID database, thus establishing the user's identity."
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATVOD#Adult_websites

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!