Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Pornography

Thwarted by Excessive Regulation, British Pornographers Call for… More Regulation!

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 10.6.2014 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
OllieDTog/Twitter

If you would like an utterly depressing portrayal of the pornography industry circa 2014, do check out this account of the annual European adult industry trade summit. As reported by The Guardian's Amelia Gentleman, the London-based expo was a veritable cornucopia of sad, full of broke porn-site proprietors lamenting the myriad factors killing their businesses—one big one being a U.K. law requiring a porn site age-verification process. 

"The mood of the Xbiz EU 2014 conference is beleaguered, with panellists conferring on how to respond to new regulations requiring them to verify the age of anyone who tries to access hardcore content" and "whether it makes sense to escape regulation by moving their companies offshore," writes Gentleman. The U.K.'s new age-verification requirement—championed by TV-on-demand company ATVOD—has caused "considerable bitterness" among U.K. porn proprietors, she notes.

With good reason: The requirement will wind up costing already-struggling websites around £1.50 per site visit, and that's not counting the cost in lost customers. Because porn-seekers can easily access sites outside the U.K. that don't require age verification (and all the browser problems that the apparently-buggy filtering technology brings with it), many will simply navigate to another site.

You would think this might have British porn businesses trying to fight the age-verification requirement, but those quoted in the Guardian piece seem strangely on board with the government's assertion that this is necessary to protect the children. "We have to demonstrate that we take child protection seriously," said one expo panelist. "I hate the idea of my seven-year-old daughter seeing something that is not appropriate," said another. 

The problem, they insist, is simply that the rest of the world's Internet is less regulated, which creates an uneven playing field, as does the U.K. government's refusal to require age-checks on other sites where porn shows up, such as Twitter. 

"The biggest sites accessed by people in the UK are international. Why doesn't the government take those sites down? It isn't the UK industry that has provided the increased access to internet porn. It is international," Jamie, from Studio 66 TV, says. 

Ban the whole Internet! Sigh… Like the taxi cabals who try to quash Uber because its drivers don't face the same strict regulations they do, or the folks who want to forbid businesses from moving headquarters overseas for less taxes and bureaucracy, it seems porn site owners aren't immune to the "Needs more protectionism!" approach to government policy, either.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 29-Year-Old Woman Moves To Oregon for Legal Aid in Dying

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PornographyRegulationUnited Kingdom
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (81)

Latest

A Federal Judge Says New Mexico Cops Reasonably Killed an Innocent Man at the Wrong House

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 6:00 PM

Supreme Court Orders Maine Legislator Censured for Social Media Post Must Get Voting Rights Back

Emma Camp | 5.21.2025 4:30 PM

The GOP Tax Bill Will Add $2.3 Trillion to the Deficit, CBO Says

Eric Boehm | 5.21.2025 4:10 PM

A Judge Blocked Apple From Collecting These Commissions

Jack Nicastro | 5.21.2025 3:52 PM

The FTC's Probe Into 'Potentially Illegal' Content Moderation Is a Blatant Assault on the First Amendment

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 3:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!