Revealed: CIA Created 'Foreign Power' Chatbot, Interrogated Own Agents


If you ever get hauled off by CIA for an interrogation, just count your lucky stars Agent Analiza isn't on the force anymore. That guy was cold, heartless (literally!), and … a bit glitchy.
Analiza was an artificially intelligent (A.I.) chatbot used in the 1980s. Vice's Jordan Pearson this week spotlights this ambitious, forward-thinking piece of technology, thanks to a document the agency just released through a freedom of information request.
Titled "Interrogations With an Alleged CIA Agent" and dated 1983, the document details the bot's features:
Through sophisticated algorithms the program breaks down Joe's responses and looks for key words and phrases in order to formulate a reply. In addition, it draws from its own internal question bank to direct the questioning to new topics. Because it retains its memory of the topics covered, it will have more surprises in store for Joe as the sessions continue; with time it becomes increasingly more knowledgeable about Joe.
Other aspects of the program are probing Joe's vulnerabilities. A.I. records "focus variables," Joe's tendency to concentrate on various subjects, and "profile variables" to serve as indicators of Joe's hostility, inquisitiveness, talkativeness, and understandability, and to pose questions about these.
Also, it could "detect hostility and to exert certain defensive measures against it," but by the agency's own admission, Analiza was "primitive," "crude," and "has a long way to go before it even approaches the merest capabilities of humankind."
Still, it is pretty impressive – and eerie – for a piece of technology that predated Tetris.
Here's part of the interrogation between Analiza, acting as an agent for a "foreign power," and a real agent under the pseudonym "Joe Hardesty":
A.I.: You had better straighten out your attitude, Joe, or it will be a long time before you ever leave this country.
Hardesty: What do you mean by that crack?
A.I.: You know what I mean.
Hardesty: No, I do not.
A.I.: Think about it.
Hardesty: Why?
A.I.: Why do you want to know why?
Hardesty: You made a threat and I want an explanation.
A.I.: I think the message is clear.
Hardesty: What message?
A.I.: Do you work for the American Central Intelligence Agency?
Hardesty: Hell, no.
A.I.: Why do you persist in lying to me?
Hardesty: I am not lying. You have no right to treat me like this.
Throughout the interview, the bot presses Hardesty to "go on" and give more details so it can build its knowledge for the next round of questions.
So how far have we come in the last 30 years? As Pearson points out, the federal government is currently testing bots to interview people for national security purposes. But, there's still some way to go, since even this year's "most intelligent" chatbot isn't as smart as its developers hyped it to be.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'd leik put ourz spambots against that AI any day!
Roll that beautiful bean footage!
lol! Jack Frapp is jsut not gonna liek that one bit!
http://www.CIAbots.aint.anon/de/rp
And failing that... UNLEASH TEH SQRLZ!
Vicious attack SQRLSY One right here, at yer service! They will FEEELZ the lash of my fluffy tail!
The excerpted portion of the interrogation displays a level of analytical depth and reasoning that eludes even our best trolls, so considering its age, I'd give it an A for effort.
what do you know PM.
your just a goober
//joshrendell
+1 nut
Do you work for the Koch brothers?
Do you listen to Rush Limbaugh?
Why are you lying to me?
"Why do you want to know why?"
That's classic ELIZA right there. I guess not too much has changed in 50 years.
Remember when the US developed bots to do useful shit like play Jeopardy and chess?
This isn't any fun...
So someone at the CIA installed ELIZA. I assume this required a billion dollars of Research and IT funding.
I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave....
+ 9000
Step 1: buy $5 back issue of Creative Computing
Step 2: pay intern $5 to type in ELIZA.
Step 3: PROFIT!
Through sophisticated algorithms the program breaks down Joe's responses and looks for key words and phrases in order to formulate a reply.
Fucking hell, it's dunphy.
hth
Can we get some of these to be politicians? They could read and operate off of the Constitution.
LOL! Like anything can use THAT operating system anymore!
No, new bots have to use Progtard-tution 2010, a "living, breathing" constitution operating system. It is itself adaptive, responding to things not present in colonial times when the original constitution was written. Things like justice, equality and eco-sensitivity.
So - bot-iticians can run, but only on the new Progtard-tution 2010, not that old, musty operating system that dead white men used...
LOL that dude clearly knows what he's talking about!
http://Www.privatesy.com/yourprivatesonline
They could read and operate off of the Constitution.
COMMERCE CLAUSE SMASH!
Would you like to play a game?
Now we know where Tony came from.
They already do that with the TherapyBot 2.0
COMPUTER: What would you like to talk about today?
PATIENT: It's my job, doc, I just can't stand my boss...
COMPUTER: Uh, huh, I'm listening...
PATIENT: And my conniving, manipulative, suck-up coworkers...
COMPUTER: Go on...
PATIENT: I just can't take it any more...
COMPUTER: That's interesting...
PATIENT: Sometimes I fantasize about just coming to work and killing everybody.
COMPUTER: Uh huh, I'm listening...
Change 'PATIENT' to 'WIFE' and 'COMPUTER' to 'HUSBAND' and it's done a relatively decent job of at least duplicating the amount of investment on the computer's part.
If it's programmed by the same people behind "PB" and "Tony" I think we can rest easy.
I believe the words 'sophisticated' and 'algorithm' were used in tandem to describe this bot.
Tony and PB's algorithms are modestly more complex than 'Obama' for 'Yes', 'Bush' for 'No', and 'Government' for any answers falling in between.
"analiza"? Jesus, they couldn't even be original. Why didn't they just name it "Agent Eliza".
That question pattern above is typical of why chatbots are so useless and stupid. All they do is press you to talk more by saying things like, "go on" and "tell me more".
I'm ashamed of my country that they actually employed this utterly useless piece of technology. Artificial "Intelligence" indeed.
Oh, now I get it. I was trying to figure out who Iza was.
Yeah, I don't know how old you are, but Eliza was one of the first popular chatbots that everyone thought was so cool, but in reality got fucking stupid after the... oh, I'll be generous, second statement. The conversation above didn't look much better.
The trick to all chatbots: Answer every question with another question. Scan for keyword in answer, follow up with question using keyword.
What is your problem with 'Keywords'?
This is all they have left after Pierce destroyed Zola.
What an "interrogation" of a spy would look like: http://www.artificial-intelligence.com/comic/20