Newly Appointed Obamacare Exchange Chief: "Part of me thinks that this year is going to make last year look like the good old days."

It would be a challenge for Obamacare's second open enrollment period, which begins in November, just after the elections, to go any worse than last year's, especially when it comes to the health insurance exchange technology that failed so miserably during the first few months of last year's rollout.
Many of the consumer-facing issues were eventually ironed out, and the performance during the late-breaking sign-up surge at the end of this year's open enrollment period in March was not spectacular, but basically acceptable.
Most observers, then, think that this year will go better. At the very least, the technology problems that crippled the federal exchange last fall won't persist. But that doesn't mean that everything will go off without a hitch. Indeed, there are multiple signs that this year's open enrollment period could be something of a mess too.
Here, for example, is what the recently installed overseer of the federal exchange system recently told The New York Times about his expectations for the second open-enrollment period.
"In some respects, it's going to be more complicated," said Kevin Counihan, the former chief executive of Access Health CT, Connecticut's online marketplace, who was just named as the head of the insurance marketplaces for the federal government. Connecticut's marketplace was among the most successful state-based exchanges, sharply reducing the number of uninsured in the state. "Part of me thinks that this year is going to make last year look like the good old days."
One added complication is that last year the exchanges and participating insurers only had to deal with new sign-ups. This year, there are expected to be millions of new sign-ups, along with people changing plans and renewing existing coverage. And guess what? The particulars of managing the renewal process apparently haven't been worked out yet. Back to the NYT:
People will be renewing at the same time that others are enrolling for the first time, starting a week and a half before Thanksgiving, on Nov. 15. To ensure that they have a new plan by the beginning of the year, those who renew will have to sign up by Dec. 15. Exactly how the renewal process will work has not yet been determined.
"We're still waiting on the details of the process," said Paula Steiner, chief strategy officer for Health Care Service Corporation, which offers Blue Cross plans in five states. "We haven't gone through any testing yet of any changes to the system for 2015."
"I think there's a possibility that there's equal or more confusion this fall," she said.
Will this create a rollout-level debacle? I doubt it, but it's not a promising sign. Remember that this time last year, the administration was promising a working launch, despite warnings from the Government Accountability Office and others that the project was very much not on track. And part of what came out afterwards is that the system simply hadn't been tested. Some of the individual parts worked in demonstrations, but no complete system test was ever run, so they never really knew how, or if, it would all fit together.
Fitting all the pieces together is, of course, a major part of the challenge. And it's not just the federal government trying to figure out how to make things work. In California, which is running its own exchange and by most accounts has one of the more successful state-based implementations, the renewal process looks like, well, an ungainly bureaucratic process. According to the Los Angeles Times:
The state-run marketplace and its 10 participating insurers want to simplify the task of renewal and save consumers from applying all over again. For instance, people will be automatically renewed into their existing policy by Dec. 15 unless they want to change. That's similar to how it is for employees covered through work.
But a cumbersome two-track process outlined by California officials could complicate matters, some consumer advocates warn. Policyholders will have to sort through separate notices from the state and their health plan in the weeks ahead.
One crucial detail — a person's government subsidy amount for 2015 — may not arrive until late in the year. Nearly 90% of Covered California's enrollees received federal money to lower their insurance bills.
These are just some of consumer issues that will be felt by individuals trying to use the exchange. Premiums will go up for many individuals, and subsidies will change based on income and other factors. It's going to be complicated, even for those who are already in the system.
And there's the small issue of the federal exchange back-end, the part that communicates crucial payment information to insurers, not being finished. Those systems were supposed to be complete last year, then early this year, and then before this summer, but have now been pushed off until sometime next year—after the second open-enrollment period is through.
Federal health officials recently requested bids from tech contractors to continue work on the back end, but announced this week that Accenture, the firm currently managing technology for the federal exchange, which replaced the original contractor earlier this year, would have its contract extended until July of 2015.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
my friend's ex-wife makes $84 an hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for 5 months but last month her payment was $20531 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Visit Website.....
============== http://www.netjob70.com
But is she working on the fedgov site???
When you've lost the guy you just appointed.....
...no one cares cause Obama is so smart & dreamy.
"Part of me thinks that this year is going to make last year look like the good old days."
All of me has been saying that since 2006 - and I've been right every year.
A law that most everyone hates, that is doing damage to a weakened economy and is widely expected to cause even more damage, that is, despite the rulings to the contrary, clearly unconstitutional, that is a complete mess to enforce and comply with, and that is almost certainly going to have severe consequences for the party that foisted it on all of us. . .all of those things and more, yet the government can't/won't repeal it.
These are the people we trust with power? I wouldn't let them wipe their own asses without adult supervision.
To fair I believe 8% of the people think it's just ducky.
Mighty influential bunch of people, huh?
I heard that Barbara Boxer lost an entire box of wet wipes up there once.
If she can't wipe her own ass, why let her wipe yours? Vote LP.
- A law that most everyone hates
Check
[I note = that article really does its best to spin the shitshow as being the fault of "republican 'attacks'"... and not, you know, things like 'paying significantly more for poorer policies/access']
- that is doing damage to a weakened economy and is widely expected to cause even more damage
Check
that article notes the reduction in small business working-hours in order to get under the coming 2015 cap
...
- "A law...that is, despite the rulings to the contrary, clearly unconstitutional
i think it has yet to be decided whether the White House non-enforcement of the small-business mandates constitutes an unconstitutional abrogation
even if it is not - i think some of the related details in that 'delay' (e.g. the 'attestation') may individually be eventually ruled at least 'illegal'.
- "a law that is almost certainly going to have severe consequences for the party that foisted it on all of us."
There doesn't seem to be 2 sides to this. However, we can never write off the possibility of the GOP doing enormously stupid things to hurt themselves before then.
I still would like to know whether the site's gaping security flaws have been fixed. Actually, I already know the answer to that; I'd just like to see it confirmed.
How do you think those celebrity nude images got leaked?
They're keeping it super secret because they don't want hackers to realize that it's extremely well designed with robust and reasonable security measures.
And what's up with the IRS penalties? Am I still on track to get fined on my 2014 return, or has that been delayed again?
The ACA has saved millions, if not hundreds of millions of lives.
If they weren't afraid of giving out premium information before the 2014 elections, they would start on 10/15 and give themselves enough time. As it is, any glitches will kill the chance to get everyone enrolled by 12.15. Another "Year of Living Dangerously".
http://www.arrowseason3.com