D.C. Democrat Accused of Censoring Scandals on His Own Wikipedia Page


Summer recess may be underway for the Washington, D.C. City Council, but Councilman Jack Evans, a Democrat, is hard at work improving his own image. Or, that's what some Wikipedia editors allege. They say that Evans, or someone posing as him, has been scrubbing negative information about himself from his Wikipedia page.
A user with the name "EvansJack1" made about 35 changes in a roughly 24-hour period between Wednesday and Thursday last week. EvansJack1 removed unflattering bits of history, including "records that show that Evans used nearly $136,000 of constituent money to purchase sporting event tickets over the last decade," and the claim that he once called a journalist "a fucking idiot." The user also censored the fact that Evans at some point had a live in nanny. All of the information has been restored.
Is it really Jack Evans, though? When questioned by Wikipedia moderators about a potential conflict of interest, the individual added the biographical note "I am the longest serving Councilmember in dc history. I have been a leader in revitalizing our city and have great accomplishment, none of which are mentioned. Just a lot of inaccurate accusations." He also gave Evans' personal phone number to a Wikipedia moderator.
These don't necessarily confirm that Evans is behind the stunt, but his office wouldn't confirm or deny it either when questioned by the Washington City Paper. For what it's worth, EvansJack1 doesn't care for the City Paper. He describes it as a "satire" news organization that cannot be trusted for honest information about Evans, and that Wikipedia is "insane" for allowing it to be cited.
Wikipedia placed a 48-hour block on EvansJack1 after the string of changes.
If Evans isn't behind this stunt, it seems like a cunning plot to discredit him as an egotist with a bad past. If Evans is behind it, he has fallen for what so many other egotists with bad pasts have: the Streisand Effect, which says that the more someone tries to hide something from the Internet, the more the Internet will be titillated, and the people will find out and talk about it.
The real Evans is also currently in hot water for his unpaid parking tickets in the city.
This isn't even the first Washington-Wikipedia scandal this month. As Reason recently noted, someone with access to Congressional IP addresses has been spending so much time vandalizing Wikipedia – on pages ranging from Bradley Manning, to the Cato Institute, to Justin Amash, and much more – that the site felt compelled to ban all Congressional IP addresses from making changes for a short while. Of course, there's a Wikipedia page all about the history of Congressional edits of Wikipedia pages.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wouldn't you?
Although I would definately be stealthier than that. Good God.
Seconded. I'd at least use an alias that doesn't point back at me.
Totally off topic; and totally awesome.
What if Michael Bay Directed "UP"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5KQQWlIgGc
Very funny.
""the claim that he once called a journalist "a fucking idiot."""
Unpossible! No one says such things to the wisest of the wise!?!
Wait, why would he delete that?
Because he's a control freak and a moron?
What he should've done was embellish it.
You should go to Wikipedia and add this statement (I customized it for you): "Evans once called a journalist a fucking idiot [citation not needed] while fucking the journalist's mother."
Substitute "journalist" with "lawyer" and you might have something.
Which journalist--the first or the second?
"Wikipedia placed a 48-hour block on EvansJack1 after the string of changes."
Wiki needs a "back" button to return the page to what it was.
It has that.
"I am the longest serving Councilmember in dc history. I have been a leader in revitalizing our city and have great accomplishment, none of which are mentioned. Just a lot of inaccurate accusations."
So it's okay to abuse power! Is dids alls dese goods things!
Stated another way: I made the trains run on time so it's okay to curb civil liberties.
Even if his good deeds were relevant, there would still be the question of how much credit Evans (or any other councilbeast) deserves for the revitalization of the city. He's like a rooster saying, "I make the sun rise every morning, so I get to do stuff like this."
Evans served at the 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012 Democratic National Conventions
Served what, hors d'oeuvres? *harharharhar*
Guest: "What's this?"
Evans: "Mini egg-rolls. Custom served by your longest serving councilMAN, madame."
/Bows.
A Democrat on the DC City Council? What are the odds?
Just glancing at some of the edits, its not at all clear to me that Evans really did anything wrong. Lot of those edits are fairly minor, like for example the wiki entry says:
"His 3,600 square foot rowhouse was built in 1876 and remodeled in 2011 by architect Dale Overmyer with an aim of providing each child with their own room."
Which he editied to say:
"His 3,600 square foot rowhouse was built in 1876 and remodeled in 2011 by architect Dale Overmyer"
I think you can make a good argument that the latter edit is more concise and relevant then the former.
Or this edit:
In which he changed the line:
"Evans appointed Josh Brown as his campaign manager. Brown has said that his strategy is to plaster the city with Evans signs to make "this city to look like it barfed up Jack Evans."
To:
Evans appointed Josh Brown as his campaign manager. Brown has said that his strategy is to plaster the city with Evans signs
Again, its hardly obvious that the former edit is better than the latter.
This whole page is hilarious. A few favorites.