Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

1.4 Million Taxpayers Exposed to 'increased risk of fraud and identity theft' by IRS

Nice work, oh tax collectors.

J.D. Tuccille | 8.14.2014 4:41 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Computer hacker
Stian Eikeland/Foter

The geniuses at the Internal Revenue Service gave sensitive data on over a million taxpayers to a printing contractor wiout checking the bona fides of any of the contractor's employees, says the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. The news comes from a report dated last month but just released to the public. This and several similar screw-ups "exposes taxpayers to increased risk of fraud and identity theft."

The report reveals a number of interesting tidbits, such as the fact that, in adddition to IRS personnel, 14,000 contractors have "staff-like" access to Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) information. Such protected data includes "any information under the IRS's authority that the loss, misuse, unauthorized access, or modification of could adversely affect the national interest, the conduct of IRS programs, or the privacy to which individuals are entitled under law." To gain that access, contractors have to submit to background checks.

One wonders how 14,000 contractors, plus actual IRS employees, can be expected to keep that stuff close to their vests, but the point is moot, since the IRS didn't follow its own rules, anyway. The tax collection agency failed to perform background checks when handing out five reviewed contracts for courier, printing, document recovery, and sign language interpreter services. The report also found a dozen other contracts where the IRS planned to perform background checks, but didn't get to all of the people on the job.

One highlight:

One contract was awarded to print and mail IRS tax forms during which the IRS provided the contractor a compact disk containing 1.4 million taxpayers' names, addresses, and Social Security Numbers. The IRS used a Government Printing Office contract to fulfill this requirement; however, the IRS had not provided the Government Printing Office with the appropriate security provisions for inclusion in the related solicitation and contract as required.

None of the contractor personnel who worked on this contract underwent a background investigation. 

The report concludes that "Allowing contractor personnel access to and custody of sensitive information prior to the appropriate background screening process increases the risk to taxpayers and the IRS of misuse of taxpayer and other sensitive data and possible identity theft."

This is true, but it's worth pointing out that the IRS is currently embroiled in a scandal over the deliberate misuse of tax data and its power over tax rules. Adding carelessness on top of that, along with permitted access to sensitive data by tens of thousands of government employees and temps, is just gravy.

It's obvious that letting the IRS compel the public to disclose abusable information is a really bad idea in itself.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Scott Shackford Interviews Newly Seated Australian Libertarian Sen. David Leyonhjelm

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicyIRSPrivacyGovernment failure
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Ooo. I would hate to be IRS officials when the repercussions for all of this happen.

    1. Ken Shultz   11 years ago

      I shudder to think.

      Some of them may end up with a sternly worded letter in their confidential personnel file.

      1. MegaloMonocle   11 years ago

        More likely, mysterious gaps in their email archive.

  2. Suthenboy   11 years ago

    It is a good thing the IRS doesn’t have even more sensitive personal information on everyone, like their health records and……oh, wait.

  3. Invisible Finger   11 years ago

    All we need now is a rogue accountant with some thumb drives, exposing the truth. “Amazon has embedded IRS software…”

  4. sasob   11 years ago

    This and several similar screw-ups “exposes taxpayers to increased risk of fraud and identity theft.”

    Hmm. Just which taxpayers would those be, I wonder? Couldn’t possibly be any with political ideas unacceptable to the present administration, could it? Nah, that’s just paranoid, huh?

  5. userve32   11 years ago

    Wow I am not surprised at all dude.

    http://www.AnonWays.tk

  6. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    “The geniuses at the Internal Revenue Service gave sensitive data on over a million taxpayers to a printing contractor wiout checking the bona fides of any of the contractor’s employees”

    What about the geniuses that make up Reason’s editorial staff?

  7. CE   11 years ago

    100 million taxpayers exposed to certain theft by the IRS twice a month.

  8. Las Vegas Screen Printing   11 years ago

    The IRS seems to want to know everything about you.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!