Pulitzer Winners Call for End of DOJ Pursuit of Journalist's Testimony, Not That the Feds Will Care


Given the way the Obama administration has treated journalists, they might be better off getting celebrities to speak out. Nevertheless, the Freedom of the Press Foundation has gotten 14 Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists to speak out against the administration's terrible treatment of New York Times reporter and author James Risen. The Department of Justice has been trying to force Risen to give the name of a leaker who provided information to him that detailed the government's effort to sabotage Iran's nuclear program for a book. The government believes the source to be Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA official, and he's one of the guys the administration has targeted under the Espionage Act.
The Supreme Court has declined to get involved in the case, so Risen's supporters are left with little but to try to pressure the administration and Department of Justice to let the matter drop. Here's what two-time Pulitzer winner David Barstow (also of The New York Times) had to say:
"Enough is enough. The relentless and by all appearances vindictive effort by two administrations to force Jim Risen into betraying his sources has already done substantial and lasting damage to journalism in the United States. I've felt the chill first hand. Trusted sources in Washington are scared to talk by telephone, or by email, or even to meet for coffee, regardless of whether the subject touches on national security or not. My fellow investigative reporters commiserate about how we're being forced to act like drug dealers, taking extreme precautions to avoid leaving any digital breadcrumbs about where we've been and who we've met. If you value a vibrant free press, you want the Jim Risens of the world out hunting for the toughest truths about how power is used and abused. You don't want them rotting in jail cells. Do we really want to be that kind of country?"
Depends on who you ask. But the only answer that matters is the one from the guys with the guns and the prisons.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Do we really want to be that kind of country?"
Yes.
/O! and Eric Holder
Aaaand . . . more rubes self-identify.
You supported (and I feel quite confident that these paragons of the DemOp media were supporters, with at most one or two exceptions) a stunningly unqualified product of the corrupt and vindictive Daley machine, who has been engaged in a relentless campaign of lying and actual persecution of reporters, and you just now manage to get this rather tepid protest out?
Feckless morons, the lot of them.
Yeh, no, we don't, but Top Men do, and what else matters, at this point?
What's the problem? The policy seems to be working. The constitutional-scholar-in-chief knows how to get around the first amendment. If you can't legislate, then placate. When that fails, intimidate.
I think it goes legislate - intimidate - placate.
Given the way the Obama administration has treated journalists, they might be better off getting celebrities to speak out.
You mean the same journalists that support Obama?
The candle stick maker is not going to like that.
http://www.AnonGalaxy.tk
new balance shoes
new balance outlet
new balance shoes
cheap nike air max