Sharing Economy

Ban Taxis

If Uber isn't safe, then taxicabs aren't either.


SACRAMENTO — A search of "taxi" and "car crashes" will reveal a long list of troubling news stories. In San Francisco last year, an Ohio couple died after a cab with bad brakes slammed into a concrete pillar. A year earlier there, a taxi driver who caused a deadly crash was identified as a man convicted in a notorious murder case, yet he passed the background checks.

Normally, I would say this, sadly, is part of life. Driving is an inherently dangerous activity and despite a litany of state and local taxicab, driving, insurance, and other regulations, there's no way to make the world perfectly safe. But now my conclusion is different: The only solution to the taxi-safety problem is to ban all taxicabs from the roadways.

Where did I come to such an outrageous (and admittedly tongue-in-cheek) idea? From the taxicab industry itself. Based on a tragic accident in San Francisco involving a driver with the ridesharing service, Uber, the taxi industry says such firms are too dangerous and should be shut down or at least faced with the same type of regulations faced by cab companies.

Local governments typically limit the number of cabs that can operate. Regulators set rules, rates and insurance requirements. Cab companies complain about all the regulations, but they also benefit from the way this system keeps out the competition.

Ridesharing companies – known as Transportation Network Companies, or TNCs — have created a new model that circumvents all these rules and government control. Companies such as Uber, Sidecar, and Lyft don't operate cars, but run smart-phone-based applications that enable riders to find drivers. The TNCs self-regulate — they require drivers to maintain insurance and car-quality levels, for instance – and have been growing because the public seems to like the service.

No one likes to lose business, so cab drivers and company owners are upset. A few weeks ago, one could hear a cacophony of car horns as cab drivers drove around the California Capitol to protest the TNCs and to support efforts to hobble them.

Los Angeles City Councilman Paul Koretz, a prominent backer of two bills in the state Capitol, said in published reports that "Without regulation, these ridesharing services should not be allowed to operate on our streets." He called them "unsafe."

The two current state bills would not ban the services, but critics see them as an attempt to chip away at their competitive advantages. A.B. 612 would force TNCs to become more like the highly regulated taxicab business. It has been softened through amendments . And A.B. 2293, dealing with insurance mandates, has a good chance of passage when the Legislature reconvenes in August.

That Uber-involved accident in San Francisco highlighted a gray area. The accident took place after the driver had the app on but before he had passengers. Is the driver (and that driver's insurance policy) or the TNC liable for any crash in that situation? That's a fair question, although the insurance carriers could answer it by spelling out their coverage more clearly in policies they offer.

"Uber/Lyft do not want to pay for commercial insurance to cover the acts of their drivers, and are trying to subsidize their commercial expenses through claims payments under personal insurance policies," Rex Frazier, the head of the Personal Insurance Federation of California, told me.

But many critics say the bill, which imposes a $750,000 insurance requirement, also is meant to limit competition. The bill "adds unnecessary state insurance requirements … over and above what is currently required for any car on the road, including most taxis, during the period when no rider is in the car and no commercial activity is taking place," said Uber's Eva Behrend.

The political situation is complicated, as many cabbies oppose A.B. 2293 because they believe it will legitimize the existence of ridesharing companies. So whatever happens with the bill, the taxi industry wants more — the end of "unfair competition," as taxi-driver/protesters put it during one recent anti-Uber rally in Los Angeles.

These efforts, the taxi industry says, will protect the public. But if one Uber tragedy justifies the shutdown of an industry, when do we start taking taxicabs off the road?

NEXT: Chicago Officials Pretend to Be Puzzled at Traffic Cameras Sending Out Undeserved Tickets

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. If taxis are outlawed, only outlaws will have taxis.

  2. In this dystopia where consenting adults use free apps on their phones to conduct mutually advantageous transactions, what would become of the cabbies, the dispatchers, the taxi lobbyists, and the civil servants who oversee the licensure system?

    Isn’t it just like a libertarian to want to destroy jobs for the sake of freedom and economic growth?

    1. God forbid I should know something about the driver before the ride, or that they should know something about me.

      Chaos. Utter chaos.

      1. should know something about the driver before the ride

        What? The Mary Jo Kopechne rule?

        By the way, Happy MJK Day!

        1. “Why are you still talking about Mary Jo Kopechne?”

          “Because she’s still dead.”

    2. In this dystopia where consenting adults use free apps on their phones to conduct mutually advantageous transactions, what would become of the cabbies, the dispatchers, the taxi lobbyists, and the civil servants who oversee the licensure system?

      Isn’t it just like a libertarian to want to destroy jobs for the sake of freedom and economic growth?

      Just like with ATMs. They came along, and now we’re all starving in the streets, just as Dear Leader analyzed.

  3. People who own their cars tend to keep them in good condition, as you can easily see when you ride in a cab.

    1. Snap!

  4. We just spent a week in DC using Uber. It was wonderful! I can see why the cab companies are scared.

  5. Go to to try out Uber or Lyft for yourself! The website compares the two most popular ride-sharing services. $30, $25 of FREE ride credit for new passengers and up to $500 sign-up BONUS for new drivers!! Drivers can make as much as $40/hr! Hope you can see what all the hype is about 🙂 Thanks!!

  6. Why not use slippery slope argument and claim that taxi industry wants to ban cars and drivers too. That’s laughable as the article is focused on misrepresenting the true argument taxi industry is having. The whole argument is having fair playfield where TNC companies will compete with taxi companies. Today taxi companies in California are regulated by local governments, which forbid them to dispatch calls to any unlicensed by city driver and unlicensed by city vehicle. Taxi companies required to ensure all taxicab owners are properly insured, as taxicab owners/drivers should not be confused with taxi company management.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.