Andrew Napolitano on Obama's Bergdahl Deal
Late last week, President Obama announced the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who had been held by the Taliban in Afghanistan for more than five years. The government apparently negotiated with the Taliban—a group characterized by federal law as a non-state terrorist organization—on a deal that required the U.S. to release five former senior Taliban officials from the American prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
It's likely that Obama violated federal criminal law in the deal he cut, writes Andrew Napolitano. While it's not a crime to release a prisoner who has been acquitted, it is criminal to release an untried prisoner whom the government reasonably believes will aid a terrorist group.
The president may argue that he enjoys the constitutional authority to make these prisoner swaps. Yet he's sworn an oath to enforce all federal laws faithfully. He cannot knowingly or legally exclude himself from the obligation to comply with laws with which he disagrees, argues Napolitano.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?