Shikha Dalmia on the Impossibility of an Ideology-Free Conversation on Global Warming

Democrats and Republicans played their part in the global warming saga last week. The White House issued a showing that global warming was unleashing its wrath on America through mudslides, hurricanes and pests. Republicans trotted out their own brief, dismissing this as the usual liberal gloom and doom.
Why do Republicans so stubbornly resist the climate change story? Conversely, why are liberals so eager to buy the climate apocalypse?
The answer, writes Reason Foundation Senior Analyst Shikha Dalmia, is that each side is driven by concerns over whether this issue advances or impedes its broader normative commitments. And, she adds, that's not a bad thing.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?