Foundation Gives Obamacare Enrollment Group $13 Million After Sebelius Call

Around this time last year, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius came under fire for making a series of calls to private companies and a foundation requesting support for Enroll America, a non-profit organization dedicated to boosting enrollment in health coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
The calls were questionable because Sebelius was reportedly calling companies that HHS regulated, and because Enroll America is run by a former Obama administration campaign staffer and HHS political appointee.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigated the incident and released its report to the public yesterday. The report doesn't attempt to judge the legality of the HHS secretary's actions, but focuses instead on establishing the facts of the matter.
Here's the short version: Between January and April 2013, Sebelius called five outside groups and requested that they provide either financial or technical assistance to Enroll America. In the months following the calls, one of those groups, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), gave Enroll America two grants totaling $13 million.
Sebelius wasn't the only government official who spoke with RWJF about supporting Enroll America. The former White House deputy assistant to the president for health policy—Jeanne Lambrew, who is identified in the report only by her title—also spoke with the foundation about the need to raise $30 million to finance outreach efforts surrounding the health care law. Lawbrew didn't name a specific amount. But she "indicated a hope that RWJF would provide a significant financial contribution to support such efforts."
Basically, the administration asked, and then, some time later, RWJF gave.
Was there a relationship between the request and the funding? The foundation claims there wasn't. An RWJF representative who spoke to the GAO said that the "two grants were not made in response to the Secretary's call." The foundation representative also noted that RWJF had supported the creation of Enroll America, and, prior to the call from Sebelius, provided an early grant for the group's strategic planning.
Fair enough, I suppose: RWJF, a foundation that supports lots of work in the health policy realm, had an existing relationship with Enroll America, and it's certainly plausible that they might have donated anyway.
What the report really underscores, though, is how closely linked the Obama administration is with Enroll America. The GAO looked into whether HHS was aware that RWJF had donated following the call from Sebelius, and HHS responded that while there was no official tracking, staffers had heard about the donation. How did they find out? From Enroll America, which told GAO that "they had an ongoing relationship with HHS and likely discussed which organizations had decided to contribute."
So Enroll America is an organization run by a former HHS and Obama campaign staffer, dedicated to boosting participation in the Obama administration's most prominent legislative achievement, and which meets with senior White House officials and maintains an ongoing relationship with a key administration agency. It's no wonder the cabinet-level head of this agency makes fundraising calls in support of this organization. It's practically an arm of the administration.
Is this arrangement uncommon? Perhaps in some of the particulars, but in general, no, it's not entirely unusual for administrations to work closely with friendly outside groups. But it's rare to see the inner workings detailed so clearly.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), gave Enroll America two grants totaling $13 million.
I see the Obama administration listens to NPR.
I read that first as the Richard Wood Johnson Foundation and figured that an organization with that name is just asking to get dicked over.
What the fuck is wrong with these people? In what world isn't this extortion?
I know, FYTY.
FYTW
Can you extort the willing?
Depends on what you mean by "willing".
If your boss invites you to come see his stupid kid's play on your day off, do you go "willingly"?
Based on libertarian views, I do.
Furthermore, I work for the same boss for $5 an hour and no benefits because, after all, someone else bid the position down to that level.
"Furthermore, I work for the same boss for $5 an hour and no benefits because, after all, someone else bid the position down to that level"
So you agree that your labor is worth $5 an hour ?
craiginmass|4.22.14 @ 4:28PM|#
"Based on libertarian views, I do."
Is it possible for brain-dead lefties to post without lying?
I'm saying "no".
Why in the world do the vast majority of people think taxation is not extortion?
Most people think they're shoveling the burden onto someone else.
47% are
Because the same people also don't realize that most sex is rape and prostitution. Or that marriages may be human trafficking.
"We' just don't get it an are glad that people such as yourself are more intelliegent an can explain the world to us.
Thanks
#thankalibertarian
craiginmass|4.22.14 @ 4:26PM|#
"We' just don't get it an are glad that people such as yourself are more intelliegent an can explain the world to us."
You're welcome.
It's their world.
We're just living in it.
Was there a relationship between the request and the funding? The foundation claims there wasn't. A representative of the foundation who spoke to the GAO said that the "two grants were not made in response to the Secretary's call." The foundation representative also noted that RWJF had supported the creation of Enroll America, and, prior to the call from Sebelius, provided an early grant for the group's strategic planning.
So the players involved say there was no scandal, there's no scandal.
Let's replace the players involved... you know, just a fun parlour game.
Let's replace Sebelius with, oh, I dunno, Karl Rove, and let's replace the RWJF with the Koch brothers.
Why, whatever could you be implying????
And here I thought money was free speech.
Jackand Ace|4.22.14 @ 1:28PM|#
"And here I thought money was free speech."
And I'm sure you're stupid enough to think there was some equivalence there.
Kathleen Sebelius isn't people!
Yet, soylent green is people.
What's the difference between Soylent Green and Kathleen Sibelius?
You could eat Soylent Green if you had to!
"Was there a relationship between the request and the funding? The foundation claims there wasn't."
Naah (chuckle, chuckle), not a bit. (snerf, giggle, HAAA Ha HAAAAA! STOP!)
yes, they really do think we are that stupid. Largely because a voting majority actually IS that stupid, so doesn't matter about the rest of us.
It's obvious, but cannot be proven. Thus they follow the advice of their lawyers and deny, deny, deny.
You teathuggers already forced Sebelius into early retirement (because the ACA was so successful!). What more do you want?
I read that as Teat-Huggers, and I am not offended in the slightest.
"Sebelius? Never heard of her!"
Guy writes a whole article and then realizes that this is the way government has worked for decades - probably centuries...maybe even longer!
Wow. I am amazed that people do thing to further their interests. I learn something new each day here.
craiginmass|4.22.14 @ 4:25PM|#
"Guy writes a whole article and then realizes that this is the way government has worked for decades - probably centuries...maybe even longer!"
No, that's not what he wrote, but since you ARE a brain-dead lefty, we should not be surprised.
What he wrote is, specifically: "it's not entirely unusual for administrations to work closely with friendly outside groups. But it's rare to see the inner workings detailed so clearly. "
You see, he's comparing the historical workings with the slimy, lying turds in this administration.
That organization is full of dicks!