Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Social Security Drops Efforts To Collect Old Debts From Children of Debtors. Maybe.

J.D. Tuccille | 4.18.2014 1:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Carolyn W. Colvin
Social Security Administration

After a good deal of embarrassing coverage, the Social Security Administration announced it's suspending its efforts to collect old debts—those stretching into that past, beyond 10 years—on April 14. The official statement from Carolyn W. Colvin (pictured at right), Acting Commissioner of Social Security, carefully stays clear of any mention that they were often trying to collect these debts from the next generation.

I have directed an immediate halt to further referrals under the Treasury Offset Program to recover debts owed to the agency that are 10 years old and older pending a thorough review of our responsibility and discretion under the current law to refer debt to the Treasury Department.

If any Social Security or Supplemental Security Income beneficiary believes they have been incorrectly assessed with an overpayment under this program, I encourage them to request an explanation or seek options to resolve the overpayment.

Controversy over the program swirled around both the age of the debts Social Security was trying to collect and the fact that it was putting the touch on people who were children when the debts were supposedly incurred by their parents and guardians.

People rarely keep documentation for decades on the off chance they may have to dispute future debt claims. And Social Security officials themselves admitted that they had no records of the alleged debts. They just wanted the money and were willing to take it.

Tapping the next generation for debts supposedly incurred by parents has been even more troubling to commentators, because it lies outside modern practice by demanding that people take responsibility for debts in which they have no say. Social Security claimed the modern generation benefited as children from overpaid public assistance and therefore personally owed the money.

Social Security officials are apparently surprised that anybody found this objectionable.

In an email, Social Security spokesman Mark Hinkle said, "We want to assure the public that we do not seek restitution through tax refund offset in cases when the debt in question was established prior to the debtor turning 18 years of age." He added, "Also, we do not use tax refund offset to collect the debt of a person's relative. We only use it to collect the overpaid benefits the person received for himself or herself."

But that seems to have been Social Security's claim along, subject to novel interpretation. Which means some variant may well return once the fuss dies down.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Damon Root on the Supreme Court's Next Big Gun Rights Case

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PolicyDebtSocial SecurityIRS
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

    Seems to be an appropriate response to the SS........A

  2. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

    Tapping the next generation for debts supposedly incurred by parents has been even more troubling to commentators, because it lies outside modern practice by demanding that people take responsibility for debts in which they have no say.

    Uh, isn't that exactly what the government is doing by spending more money than it has and taxing future generations to pay off the loan interest?

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      Shh, Hugh! You're giving away the "secret"!

      1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

        It's no secret. It's right there in that social contract that you signed in blood the moment your parents got you a social security number. Blame them.

    2. Suki   11 years ago

      Uh, isn't that exactly what the government is doing by spending more money than it has and taxing future generations to pay off the loan interest?

      Yes, exactly.

      Is there any other debt in the US that relatives can be forced to pay? If I lend you money to buy a car and you die, will a court ever order your kids to pay the debt?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        If I lend you money to buy a car and you die, will a court ever order your kids to pay the debt?

        You may want an example where there isn't collateral that can be seized from the estate.

        1. Agammamon   11 years ago

          If I lend you money to buy a car and you die in a horrible wreck in that car, completely wrecking it and not leaving anything salvageable, will a court ever order your kids to pay the debt?

          And keep in mind that there is a difference between the *estate* and the inheritor.

          The debt is held against the estate and the estates assets are used to pay off creditors *before* the estate passes to the inheritors.

          If the total value of the debts is equal or higher than the value of the estate then that's it - you inherit nothing, including the remainder of that debt. The creditors are just SOL.

          1. Adam330   11 years ago

            Also, even if there is enough value in the estate to pay off the debts, and creditor doesn't come forward at the time the estate is being settled, he is SOL (unless he can show fraud).

    3. prolefeed   11 years ago

      Uh, isn't that exactly what the government is doing by spending more money than it has and taxing future generations to pay off the loan interest?

      Try translating this from statist-speak into anarchist-speak:

      "Uh, isn't that exactly what the mafia is doing by spending more money than it has and stealing from future generations to pay off the loan interest?"

      Put that way, this * transaction * can't be considered "demanding that people take responsibility for debts in which they have no say", since someone robbing me at gunpoint isn't me taking "responsibility" for whatever shit they want to buy next with the stolen loot.

  3. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

    Tapping the next generation for debts supposedly incurred by parents

    I thought that this was congress' basic financial strategy?

  4. Loki   11 years ago

    Which means some variant may well return once the fuss dies down.

    I think you can pretty much count on that. These shitheads never give up, especially when it comes to money.

  5. Brett L   11 years ago

    Social Security officials themselves admitted that they had no records of the alleged debts.

    Classic mob shakedown. "Give us the money you owe us!"
    But I don't own you any money
    "Your dad owed us before he kicked."
    He never said anything about that....
    "Fuck you, pay us."

  6. WhatAboutBob   11 years ago

    Just get rid of the IRS and the Federal Reserve. Both of them make a free and peaceful society impossible!

  7. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    ...I encourage them to request an explanation or seek options to resolve the overpayment.

    You will receive the former, in the guise of a middle finger. Halting future collections is the bare minimum the administration must do to head off the PR nightmare. No money will be returned.

    1. Brett L   11 years ago

      Dear Mr. Etiquette:

      Thank you for your inquiry into the possible over repayment of benefits. At this time, it has been determined that you are not eligible for a refund because fuck you, that's why.

      Sincerely,
      The SSA

      1. Root Boy   11 years ago

        Plus, if you contact us again, we'll kill your dog.

      2. Agammamon   11 years ago

        In addition, review of your records has brought to light a significant overpayment.

        The SSA requests that you immediately refund the balance of that overpayment, along with late fees and penalties accrued.

        Failure to remit within 2 working days of this notice being posted may result in further administrative and/or legal action, including but not limited to:

        Further financial penalties
        Liens placed on real property
        Criminal sanctions, including jail time
        Heavily armed men breaking down your door at 5 in the morning and shooting your dog.

        1. DontShootMe   11 years ago

          If you do not own a dog, you will be ordered to procure one, then it will be shot.

  8. wadair   11 years ago

    He added, "Also, we do not use tax refund offset to collect the debt of a person's relative. We only use it to collect the overpaid benefits the person received for himself or herself."

    I love government euphemisms. "Tax return offset" is so nebulous.

    Withholding tax overpayment to "offset" an SS overpayment to the same person makes sense. But thieving the tax overpayment of someone who might have somehow unknowingly benefitted from the thievery of another is not "offset." It's stealing.

    1. Root Boy   11 years ago

      Yes, total doublespeak. What if you were a kid, your parents got SS by mistake and you happen to turn 18 when the last check came. They still try to put it on you for their fuckup.

      I think Grassley has a letter out (oh, the horror!) to SSA telling them what they did was illegal - not that it matters much to the gov about breaking their own rules.

      1. Brett L   11 years ago

        Honestly, it would be really great if the Senate in 2017 is held by the party that didn't win the Presidency. Imagine actual Senate confirmation hearings in which specific bad actors and agencies were discussed in detail in public.

        1. Root Boy   11 years ago

          Divided government seems to be the only way to slow down its growth, though a Bush with a Dem congress will still grow only a little slower than Obama did in '09-'10

  9. Pulseguy   11 years ago

    "We only use it to collect the overpaid benefits the person received for himself or herself."

    This, in and of itself, does not say they won't do this again in the future.

    If my parents collected welfare, for example, and 30 years later the gov decides it was fraudulent they might come after me for the child portion of it, since that was my benefit, collected by my parents. They might say I received the benefit via my parents. They could do the same with food stamps.

  10. concerned cynic   11 years ago

    I see no evidence that the Feds are agreeing to cease and desist from doing anything. SSA has only agreed to do "a thorough review of our responsibility and discretion under the current law". This prose was carefully crafted by an SSA lawyer, not Mrs Colvin.

    BTW, it is easy to arrange one's tax affairs so as to include a check with one's tax return, rather than to collect a refund. Doing this pretty much defeats this collection program.

  11. Eric L   11 years ago

    "In an email, Social Security spokesman Mark Hinkle..." So, this is what becomes of former chairs of the National Libertarian Party.

  12. Silver Fang   11 years ago

    Government is just out of touch with the general public? How could they think that people wouldn't be angered over their tax refunds being raped to pay off decades old debts that they themselves didn't incur and may not even exist?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

What Frederick Douglass Can Still Teach Us About the Fourth of July

Damon Root | 7.3.2025 7:00 AM

Cincinnati's Beer-Loving Germans Endured Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Alcohol Resistance

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!