Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

It's Tax Day! Here is Some Comic Relief

Paul Detrick | 4.15.2014 2:48 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Are you standing in line at the post office waiting to file your taxes? Here are some tax day videos that may provide some comic relief from the agony of writing a fat check to Uncle Sam:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Laugh While You Cry on Tax Day

Paul Detrick is a former video reporter and senior producer at Reason.

PolicyReasontvTaxesIRS
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (69)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    My taxes paid for the internet these videos are shown on.

    1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

      I think I'll go take my dog out for a walk and marvel at all the asphalt and concrete on the ground that would not be there if it weren't for government and its taxes.

      1. CampingInYourPark   11 years ago

        Just make sure you keep your cows at home because that would be a total misuse of government property.

        1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

          What do you think he is? An anarchist?

  2. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

    "Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery."

    --Calvin Coolidge

    1. paranoid android   11 years ago

      It always bothered me that Coolidge, whose administration concurred with enormous wealth creation in the country and started no wars or massive social/economic upheavals, is explained to kids in school today as this boring guy who's not even worth talking about, when he should really be seen as a model of good governance and administration.

      I imagine something bad had to occur somewhere in his presidency, I'm not exactly a Coolidge scholar, but he's a nice contrast to the stereotypical notion of "great Presidents" where greatness is proportionate to how many people you got killed.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        Same as Jimmy Carter - the dereg king.

      2. Jordan   11 years ago

        I imagine something bad had to occur somewhere in his presidency

        Yeah, he didn't try to go kill enough foreigners or coerce enough people here at home. Historians only give a shit about TOP MEN.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          Yep, same with Carter. Coolidge is vastly underrated too.

      3. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

        As far as I can tell his only peccadillo was being anti-immigration and maybe favoring higher tariffs.

        Beyond that the regulatory state was non-existent, he was very pro-cilv rights and gave citizenship to all Native Americans, and restored public confidence in the executive branch after the brazenly corrupt deeds of the Ohio Gang in Harding's administration.

        1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

          Immigration is about one step higher on my list than abortion. Meaning it doesn't even register.

          I'm having a hard time deciding my stance on it. I'm leaning towards open borders being an anarchist position. Not sure I hold with it. That said, it's probably an economic net positive (as it stands).

          1. JEP   11 years ago

            If the system wasn't set up such that everyone has their fingers in everyone else's pie, then I would be for open borders.

            As it is, I think we should favor letting in people who aren't going to be parasites on the system - we have enough of those already.

            And that's a huge generalization about the typical immigrant(sorry). As things are, I don't see the advantage to letting everyone in.

      4. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

        Yep. What I'd give for a do-nothing government.

        Shit, I'd quadruple their salaries if they'd just agree to stop working.

  3. Episiarch   11 years ago

    When you play the game of taxes, you pay or you die.

  4. Mint Berry Crunch   11 years ago

    I couldn't believe all the "slut-shaming" from the dwarf in the last episode.

    It's like the creators are trying to make the audience hate the character, so we aren't too upset when he loses his head in episode 9.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      Well, Tyrion needed to send her away. I am presuming this is partly because they don't want to have the TV character do what Tyrion does to her in the books, especially after building her up to have way more personality than in the books.

      1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

        I wish the show would have the balls to do that. She is incredibly obnoxious and I don't buy their relationship one bit.

        1. Episiarch   11 years ago

          Agreed, she is pretty annoying. And by building her up like that, it's almost assured that we don't get to have what happens in the book, because it would make a lot of fans very shocked at Tyrion. So, they send her away, and get rid of an annoying character at the same time.

          1. Virginian   11 years ago

            Oh shit I haven't even thought of it that way. I just assumed she'd come back for Tyrions final scene in A Storm of Swords. I mean, they can't change it that much.

            1. Episiarch   11 years ago

              They can't change the Tywin part much (and would be fools to do so) but can certainly cut the Shae part out. I just can't see them having the TV Tyrion do what the book Tyrion does. They've made him a little too nice for that.

              I'd be impressed if they did it anyway, but I just don't see that happening.

              1. Virginian   11 years ago

                They really should stick to it. It's a very important moment for Tyrion.

              2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

                They won't change the Tywin part.

                I didn't mind the change to the Shae part really. Sure, she's annoying, but either way she's gone.

                1. Warty   11 years ago

                  If they don't have Tyrion do the thing Tyrion does, it'll demonstrate just how fucking stupid the writers are. Seriously, that would be fucking retarded. Where do whores go? They go to HBO and fuck up perfectly good books, that's where the fuck they go.

          2. Mickey Rat   11 years ago

            I figure she probably never got on that ship.

            1. waffles   11 years ago

              Isn't this the second time she was supposed to get on a boat? She has it coming.

      2. paranoid android   11 years ago

        Seriously, they'd cheat us out of that? Man, that was probably the most powerful scene in an entire book of really powerful scenes.

        1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

          And it shows Tywin in a slightly different light. They have to have that scene.

          1. Episiarch   11 years ago

            I'm telling you there is no way the Shae part of that scene gets into the show. No way. Not with how they've built Shae up, and how popular (and nice) the TV Tyrion is.

            1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

              My fiance, who watches the show more religiously than I do, said the same thing. You both may be right.

              On the other hand, they could just be making reveal all the more surprising.

              1. Episiarch   11 years ago

                Where do whores go?

                I think that's too much reveal. They're already deviating like mad from the books, so why not in this case? The TV Tyrion is way less unpredictable and ruthless than the book Tyrion.

                1. Rhywun   11 years ago

                  I had a hard enough time following one plot when I was reading the books. Two plots... forget it.

    2. Mickey Rat   11 years ago

      He tried to hurt her to make her leave because she would not believe she was in danger. I don't think he would have said that otherwise.

  5. Dogwater   11 years ago

    Tax day is also the anniversary of the Titantic sinking.

    Hmmmmm......

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

      Fitting.

  6. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

    It should also fucking be election day..

    /grumble.

    1. RannedPall   11 years ago

      "This great country of ours, even hop fiends get their vote."-Bill

  7. Game of Thrones fan   11 years ago

    "We do not sow."

    - Government

    1. MJGreen   11 years ago

      Nice.

  8. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

    For several reasons we were quite late this year with taxes, and I actually just came from our accountant's office where we e-filed. OUCH! Obamacare took three large brand new chunks out. Even our accountant, who is about as Left as someone with a business can be (his office is in Berkeley, and free love/60's memoirs clutter the desk and walls), grimaced as he showed us the new huge bites, such as the 3.8% new tax solely to pay for health care.

    I think as others see these same punches in the mouth, no one is going to forget about the ACA come November elections, no matter what Shreek says.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      How many of "you" are there among voters?

      5000?

      1. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

        that's Democracy for you.

      2. Andrew S.   11 years ago

        Well, we know how 8% of the voting populace feels about the ACA.

      3. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

        If you are asking if there are about 5000 such taxpayers in the small suburb we live in, I guess you are about right. Nationwide 'we' number in the tens of millions.

        1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

          Six million in the entire country.

          http://www.factcheck.org/2008/.....an-250000/

          And as a group you have voted for Obama 52-48 over the last two elections.

          1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

            That's six million households. Guessing that there has to be an average of at least two voters per such household, with adult children in the household balancing out single taxpayers, we can say there is at least 12 million voters in this group -- as I said, over 10 million. You said five thousand.

            I know in your mind I should feel guilty for making a decent income but I'm sorry, I don't. I did college, medical school and residency, so I was overwhelmed and never really made more than minimum wage until I was thirty -- when you were in your late 20s getting drunk and getting handjobs from fat girls behind the disco, I was up all night with a patient with unstable blood sugar.

            I still work 80 hours a week to this day, mostly in patient care and research. And my wife works crazy long hours too. So from all this we actually made it into the top 10% of wage earners by middle age. Wow! But I'm sure your confiscatory colleagues will figure out a way to bring us back down to the pack by taking even more, and will start working on snagging our retirement accounts soon, too. Because nobody deserves to make more than a certain amount, correct? Except for certain inner circle pals of the right politicians.

  9. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

    such as the 3.8% new tax solely to pay for health care.

    No such thing - since the prior tax was 2.9%. And it only applies to income over $250,000.

    1. C. Anacreon   11 years ago

      There's also a surprising new cut in itemized deductions that no one mentioned publicly, and we only learned about today. Once you get beyond a certain point they start only allowing a percentage of your charitable contributions and mortgage interest to be deducted (and the money goes to Obamacare!). We lost the ability to deduct about 40% of our contributions to charity as a result.

      But, I know you are fine with that, Shreek. Because people on the Left never contribute much to charity, because they feel the government should take care of everyone cradle to grave, so there should be no need for charity, right? And those icky churches are considered a charity, and people who go to church tend to vote for the wrong team.

      I will tell you one thing -- anyone who says that those of us who actually pay taxes aren't paying enough can go fuck themselves.

      1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

        You also lose your personal exemptions.

    2. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

      You are a fuck wad. Yes there is a new 3.8% tax.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        No there isn't. There is a new .9% tax on top of the old 2.9% tax.

        1. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

          Yes there is. You are stupid so you wouldn't know this.

          http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroo.....e-Tax-FAQs

  10. Darth Soros   11 years ago

    "Submit quietly, serfs!"

    There--I've translated all of "Palin's Buttplugs" posts for you.

  11. Andrew S.   11 years ago

    Points to Remy for the James Franco reference.

    1. BiMonSciFiCon   11 years ago

      It took the second listen to notice that reference. But I enjoyed it when I did.

  12. RannedPall   11 years ago

    I filed my taxes back in February, and the refund was actually deposited the day I left for a weekend in Vegas. I then promptly took my free munny and made another $200 at the craps table. Good times.

  13. Derek Magill   11 years ago

    This year, as last year, my occupation will be listed as "taxpayer."

    1. Big Chief   11 years ago

      That's good. I'll have to do that next year.

  14. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

    Happy Tax Day from the Half-Man

    The richest 1 percent of Americans are now getting the largest percent of total national income in almost a century. So you might think they'd pay a much higher tax rate than everyone else.

    But you'd be wrong. Many millionaires pay a lower federal tax rate than many middle-class Americans.

    Some don't pay any federal taxes at all. That's because they're allowed to deduct from their taxable income such things as large interest payments on mortgages for huge homes, also the costs of business entertainment and conferences (aka vacations at golf resorts), and gold plated health care plans.

    Some also take advantage of tax loopholes that let them park some of their earnings in offshore tax havens like the Bahamas or the Netherlands Antilles.

    And other loopholes that allow them to treat some income as capital gains - subject to a much lower tax rate than ordinary income. If you happen to be a hedge-fund or private-equity manager, there's a capital gains loophole designed especially for you.

    [...]

    Put these all together and you see why Warren Buffet, the second richest person in America, pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, as he readily admits.

    What a lying piece of shit. Saying the rich pay less in taxes is like saying the sky is purple.

    1. Virginian   11 years ago

      Liar remains a liar

    2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

      Some don't pay any federal taxes at all. That's because they're allowed to deduct from their taxable income such things as large interest payments on mortgages for huge homes

      That's a damn big home if they can get rid of all their taxes.

    3. RannedPall   11 years ago

      Envy. At the end of the day, this all boils down to envy.

    4. MJGreen   11 years ago

      Why would we think they pay a higher tax rate? I'd think they pay more taxes, and they do.

      So...

    5. DesigNate   11 years ago

      That bit about Buffett was disproven years ago.

    6. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

      Lower rate? Perhaps. Still MORE dollars for identical service.

      Oh, and this.

    7. Teaching Student   11 years ago

      What's an Alternative Minimum Tax?

  15. Certified Public Asskicker   11 years ago

    Many millionaires pay a lower federal tax rate than many middle-class Americans

    A millionaire is someone with a net worth of a million dollars, not someone with a million dollar income.

    What a fucking moron.

    1. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

      Hey says "millionaire" like that's still a lot of money.

  16. RishJoMo   11 years ago

    Sammy Meemo Diapomns is like way cool!

    http://www.GotsDatAnon.tk

  17. J-   11 years ago

    My favorite tax comedy video was from a Canadian TV show about the Canadian Income Tax, but is fully appropriate here:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEm_dkqqYQw

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Nathan Fielder's 737 Stunt Involved Elaborate Workaround of Ridiculous 1,500-Hour Rule

Christian Britschgi | 6.5.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!