Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Friday Funnies: Spying and the Senate

Chip Bok | 3.21.2014 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Welcome to the Herd

Chip Bok
PolicyCivil LibertiesCentral Intelligence AgencySenateSurveillance
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (44)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Inaccurate. I don't think the Senate could get Obama to express its anal gland. Other way around.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      Disturbing. However, who *is* the anal gland of the Senate? Barrasso, Corker, Crapo, and Schatz are obvious candidates; but Biden may be a more appropriate choice.

      1. Swiss Servator, mehr Spr?ngli   12 years ago

        I was going to say Schumer, but I realized he is the moobs of the Senate.

        1. Almanian!   12 years ago

          I'm going with Feinstein.

          1. Rich   12 years ago

            I thought the commentariat had agreed it's now "Feinstain".

            1. SugarFree   12 years ago

              Cutesy names just make you sound like a petulant prog whining about Bushitler.

              "Feinstein" has made her actual name into a more than sufficient insult all on its own.

              1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                Concur. For an extreme example, see Old Mexican's tiresome "insults"

              2. Suthenboy   12 years ago

                You have a point, but....

                How many silly, insulting names did bush inspire? Half a dozen maybe?

                It is interesting to me that Obama has inspired so many more and likely holds the all-time record. Hell, a list of them would be as voluminous as a mid-sized city's phone book.

                Along with his signature legislation I see that as part of his legacy.

                As for the other half-wits, well, it is kinda fun making up names.

                1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                  As for the other half-wits, well, it is kinda fun making up names.

                  It's not that I disagree with the occasional punny or insulting name so much as the compulsion to use the same one (or a limited set) over and over again.

                  Puns have the shortest have-life of all humor. They cease to be funny after the second or third repetition, positively moribund after a few dozen, and under constant use start to sound like the illiterate guffaw of the mentally deficient.

                  1. pogi   12 years ago

                    Have-life?

            2. Rich   12 years ago

              Concur. With all due respect, it's "Feinstein".

              She's worked hard for that title.

              1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                ha!

                1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

                  Making up great names for people like "Feinstain" may make you sound like a petulant prog whining about "Bushitler", but that may mean those jabs are hitting the progs in the jaw...

                  They live by making mockeries of their opponents! See Sarah Palin, "Palin's Buttplug" or anything they've directed at any other Republican female for the past six years. If we can make people like Feinstein look ridiculous in people's eyes using the same tactics, why wouldn't we?

                  Besides, some of these targets are irresistible. What, am I supposed to stop calling calling Liz Warren things like "Sitting Liz", "Spitting Bull", "Lie-a-watha", or, my personal favorite, "Granny Cheekbones"?

                  The progs use that shit because it works! Not with logic-infused, principled libertarians, no, but guess what? The world isn't exactly full of logic-infused, principled libertarians...unfortunately.

                  1. PRX   12 years ago

                    I have to agree. you didn't build that. the progs who take credit for road construction did. and if Hitlery Clixon doesn't like it, tough saggy bitch titties.

  2. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

    The melty-faced guy from Raiders of the Lost Arc attended the Culinary Institute of America? But... but... it wasn't founded until 1946.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Actually, I think they were looking for the Lost Radius, not the Lost Arc.

      1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

        you mean those wings on top of the box weren't a giant arc lamp?

  3. Pompey   12 years ago

    Obama's yellow latex-clad erection is going something furious. ...I have never seen anything quite like it. The only weirder thing I have ever seen was a dude's johnson going 'round in a helicopter fashion.

  4. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

    All credit to Bok, he captured Obama's look of dog-induced sensual pleasure quite well

  5. WTF   12 years ago

    What in the fucking hell is that tube thing on the mole man's head?

    1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

      That's a backhand, attached to the spine at the base of the neck. It's a deformity among sinister people that leads to the derogitory 'backhanded'. It's less commong among dexter people.

    2. Swiss Servator, mehr Spr?ngli   12 years ago

      I thought it was a set of buttocks on a plate,

  6. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

    I have no idea what message this is trying to convey. Is it that the Senate is the President's lapdog (OK) and that the President doesn't care if his lapdog gets spied on?

    1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      yes and yes?

      1. invisible furry hand   12 years ago

        and, yet, also no and no

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      No, no, NO! The President's eyes are *closed*! He doesn't *know* his lapdog is being spied on!

      1. Swiss Servator, mehr Spr?ngli   12 years ago

        Not until he reads it in the paper the next day.

      2. WTF   12 years ago

        Actually, shouldn't the CIA be a puppet with the President's hand up it's ass?

        1. WTF   12 years ago

          "its"
          Jesus, need coffee.

        2. Rich   12 years ago

          Could the *CIA* get Obama to express its anal gland?

      3. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

        I assumed that it was a deliberate closing of eyes.

        I think Bok fails here because the dog looks actually mad. The Senate is going to do precisely jack and shit about this.

        1. Rich   12 years ago

          The Senate is going to do precisely jack and shit about this.

          Just you wait, NK. Ol' Di seemed pretty pissed.

          OTOH, covering it up could very well be a Matter of National Security with a Compelling Government Interest.

          1. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            Oh yeah she's so pissed I am sure she may even find it in her to blame a Republican or two.

            1. Loki   12 years ago

              I am sure she may even find it in her to blame a Republican or two.

              It's all BOOOOOSH'S fault.

              Actually I'm surprised she hasn't already fallen back on that. Afterall, the Senate committee was investigating the CIA's use of torture during his presidency.

        2. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

          If it's one of those little high-strong dogs that are all bark and no bite, then it's the perfect metaphor for the Senate.

          1. Doctor Whom   12 years ago

            *strung

          2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

            man have you ever been bit by a Chihuahua? that shit hurts.

            1. Bones   12 years ago

              If you've allowed yourself to get bitten by a Chihuahua you deserve the discomfort. Normal people just kick them away.

              1. UnCivilServant   12 years ago

                They swarm like the little ratdogs that they are.

              2. Neoliberal Kochtopus   12 years ago

                they're sneaky bastards. the one literally bit my heel when I walked away.

  7. The Laconic Marc F Cheney   12 years ago

    "See, this is the dog talkin' now..."

  8. Almanian!   12 years ago

    I...I don't....I don't get it. And yet, I know it is awful. And, therefore, perfect.

    Happy Friday, Reasonoids. I got yer labels - RIGHT HERE!

    1. hamilton   12 years ago

      Happy Friday! Between work and comment squirrels this week sucked. My current goal is to drink away the memory. Someone start the drinking game, please.

      1. Rich   12 years ago

        Very well.

        We didn't have these posting problems when Virginia Postrel was in charge.

        1. Swiss Servator, mehr Spr?ngli   12 years ago

          For a site called Reason...

      2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

        You need a game to drink?

  9. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    If the dog is angry, why is it wagging its tail?

    1. Will4Freedom   12 years ago

      The asses of the Senate are blistfully happy to be on the king's lap... balls to balls, you might say. While those with eyes want their privacy.

      The king is sleeping, dreaming of flying off to his next 18 battle war. Either that or he's mid orgasm.

      How's that for a load of Friday BS?

  10. Bee Tagger   12 years ago

    Why can't Robert DogNiro remember one of his most famous lines from a movie?

  11. Will4Freedom   12 years ago

    If that thing sticking out of the back of the pig... i mean dog.. is supposed to be a tail.... Dogs don't wag their tail when they growl, do they?

    1. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   12 years ago

      It could be that the dog has four tails with which to wag itself. But that would be too complex.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Cutting Edge

Charles Oliver | 12.17.2025 4:00 AM

A Texas News Vlogger Asks SCOTUS To Decide Whether Criminalizing Journalism Is 'Obviously Unconstitutional'

Jacob Sullum | 12.17.2025 12:01 AM

Even Trump's Supporters Are Slamming His Post About Rob Reiner's Murder

Robby Soave | 12.16.2025 7:40 PM

Localism and the Limits of Regulating What We Love

Christian Britschgi | 12.16.2025 3:55 PM

The Federal Government Has Shed 271,000 Jobs This Year. That's Great.

Eric Boehm | 12.16.2025 3:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks