Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Tagalong Confidential: Do Girl Scout Cookies Promote Abortion?

Nick Gillespie | 3.11.2014 5:18 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Here's more proof we live in a crazy, mixed-up world: Some anti-abortion groups are calling for a "cookie-cott" of Girl Scout cookies not because they are duplicitously filled with decadent and depraved trans fat but because they are part of a wicked baby-killing agenda.

In 2012, reports Politico, the Family Research Council "urged its 455,000 followers to pray that cookie sales would lag so that the Girl Scouts would break off their alleged relationship with Planned Parenthood."

This year, Pro-Life Waco and Pro-Life Wisconsin are leading the charge against Thin Mints, Thank You Berry Muches, delicous Samoas (known as Caramel deLites west of the Mississippi and north of Carcosa), and all other varieties.

From Politico:

Dubbing their effort "cookie-cott," abortion opponents have been urging allies to refuse to purchase cookies from any girl scout this year to show their opposition to what they perceive as the Girl Scouts' increasing support of people and advocacy groups with ties, however tendentious, to abortion.

The most recent in a long line of perceived offenses, and the one that spurred the latest cookie boycott, was the organization's alleged endorsement of Texas state senator Wendy Davis, who last June famously filibustered the state's new law that will close most of the abortion providers in Texas. The Girl Scouts' Twitter account tweeted a link to a Huffington Post Live segment discussing potential candidates for woman of the year for 2013. Texas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis was mentioned as a contender, as were singer Beyonce, Pakistani activist Malala Yousafzai and even "the brave women on social media."

So is that box of Savannah Smiles (blech) a political statement of any sort? Not to the Girl Scouts, at least:

"To quote the Girl Scout promise, we are committed to serving God and our country and to helping others at all time," states Ana Maria Chavez, CEO of Girl Scouts of the USA in a recent video response to the religious right's allegations. "We do not now, nor have we ever had a relationship with Planned Parenthood. Girl Scouts of the USA believes that reproductive issues are deeply private matters best left to families. I find it unsettling that anyone would use the Girl Scout brand to have very adult conversations. A box of cookies is not a political statement. It is an investment in a girl and her dreams."

More on Girls Scouts and odd bedfellows from Snopes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Homework Can Turn Your Kid Into a Stressed-Out Wreck, Researchers Say

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsCivil LibertiesCultureNanny StateAbortionBoycotts
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (49)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SIV   11 years ago

    I'll boycott the Girl Scouts for that #banbossy campaign.

    1. Acosmist   11 years ago

      Why is there a campaign to encourage the proliferation of officious cunts?

      ON TOPIC: you can't spell "proliferation" without "prolife"!

      1. SIV   11 years ago

        I'm thinking the leanin facebook ceo lady should team up with the Beastie Boys-suing pink tinkertoy faux-engineer and launch a girl's empowerment campaign.
        Call it: "THAT'S NOT FAIR"!

  2. prolefeed   11 years ago

    That's a heck of an excuse to be cheap and not buy any cookies.

  3. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

    Ralph Reed and his Orwellian "Faith and Freedom" group approves this Cookie-Cott.

  4. SIV   11 years ago

    BanBossy

    1. Number 7   11 years ago

      she's the boss, just not bossy

      1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

        But is she "like a boss"?

        1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

          I'm not sure that's going to be in any corporate training videos very soon.

          Except in some of the more avant-garde companies.

    2. CE   11 years ago

      Funny, I just watched a celebrity Chopped where Brandi Chastain was competing for her girls' sports charity named "BAWSI".... She thought it was a good term to promote self-confidence for young women....

  5. Number 7   11 years ago

    well, if the Girl Scouts are going to endorse political candidates, shan't they reap what they sow? Seems fair game to boycott an organization that endorses candidates anathema to you. Probably a stretch that it is a front for a pro-choice organization but... anyway, why the fuck are the girl scouts endorsing political candidates?

    1. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

      How does the indicated tweet qualify as a political endorsement?

    2. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      I agree. Who's really politicizing the cookies? Sound's like it's the girl scout organization. I don't believe for a minute they don't see that. Maybe they never thought they would be called out on it. I'll still buy them 'cause I don't really care, but I'm hardly outraged that people are exercising their right to not buy a product that's funding groups and causes they disagree with.

      1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

        There's a pretty easy remedy for the girl scouts if they don't want to be politicized.

      2. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

        The things complained of are not overtly political.

        1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

          Meh, everyone's entitled to their own opinion about what bunches up their panties.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

            Sure, it just seems a bit unfortunate to have boycotts based on Seven Degrees of Separation.

    3. aix42   11 years ago

      Nothing wrong with this kinda stuff, as long as you don't try to have the government enforce 'your' side.

    4. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

      Front for pro-choice organizing? No.

      Front for propagandizing each and every aspect of the progressive crazy quilt, including the fucked-up economics and the particularly insane progressive take on feminism, affirmative action, and any number of other issues (including but certainly not limited to abortion)? Hells yes.

      1. CE   11 years ago

        Do they need a cookie table franchise to sell those things in New Jersey?

  6. Rich   11 years ago

    "cookie-cott"

    Now, simply lean forward into "tax-cott".

    1. Dweebston   11 years ago

      I'm confused why "cookie-cott" and not the seemingly obvious "girlcott". Or does that sent the wrong message?

      1. CE   11 years ago

        You can say that again.

    2. Dweebston   11 years ago

      I'm confused why "cookie-cott" and not the seemingly obvious "girlcott". Or does that sent the wrong message?

      1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        "cookie" is slang for "pussy".

        http://www.urbandictionary.com.....erm=cookie

  7. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    "To quote the Girl Scout promise, we are committed to serving God and our country and to helping others at all times"

    Wait a minute - what about the atheists? Will nobody think of them?

    Whenever you buy a box of thin mints, you're basically saying you think there's a Sky Fairy off in the clouds somewhere.

    Sod off, you reactionary clerico-fascists!

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      Atheism is a sign of maturity and independence.

      Let the Girls grow into it.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        QED

    2. CE   11 years ago

      When I down a box of Samoas, I'm convinced there is a God.

  8. An Innocent Man   11 years ago

    At 4 bucks a pop, the cookies are a rip off.

    1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      There not even made out of real girl scouts.

      1. prolefeed   11 years ago

        That was a thread winner, IMO.

        1. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

          It's just a quote from the Adams Family movie.

          1. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

            One of my favorite movie quotes ever.

            1. CE   11 years ago

              And stay out of the Woolworth's!

  9. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

    I read that as Tagalog Confidential at first.

  10. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    I think John needs to show up with a speech about true tolerance.

    1. PM   11 years ago

      Why? It's not like you've ever needed an excuse to issue your follow-up speech about True Libertarianism (TM)

      1. Acosmist   11 years ago

        For the moment, I feel uneasy replying to the admitted racist Bo. But that will probably change when he says something egregious again.

  11. Duke   11 years ago

    It is a wonderful thing to use the marketplace to make your political voice heard, however silly it may be. That's what freedom and libertarianism are all about.

    Unless it's against abortions.

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

      Girl Scouts do abortions now?

      Hope they at least get a badge for that.

      1. Duke   11 years ago

        An article just above this one applauds patrons booting a cop from Denny's because he killed a mentally ill man and got away with it. It cites this as a great example of the free market making its voice heard and effectuating justice outside the courts.

        Usually, Reason is all about people using the free market to make their voices and choices heard. Look how many inane pot articles are posted on a daily basis as examples of the indomitable freedom spirit at work.

        But Gillespie has had several recent articles sneering at those who oppose abortion. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If these people want to boycott the Girl Scout cookies because they perceive a political agenda, however silly their reasons may be, let 'em do it and applaud their freedom to do so.

        1. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

          I think he's sneering at this idea of boycotting someone based on this weird chain of guilt by association reasoning.

          I imagine he would feel the same about boycotting a company because they did business with a business that sponsored a NRA gun safety program.

          1. PM   11 years ago

            I imagine he would feel the same about boycotting a company because they did business with a business that sponsored a NRA gun safety program.

            Only he's never actually written anything denouncing other boycotts over inane or frivolous causes, and frequently writes in support of them as an example of non-violent, market-based protest.

            But then you couldn't very well heave big sighs about the stupidity of the KKKULTURE WARZ!!! if you weren't balls deep in critiquing the particulars of every culture issue.

        2. CE   11 years ago

          Just think if they built a giant fence out of boxes of Girl Scout cookies to keep illegal immigrants out.

  12. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    Girl Scouts + Bedfollows = Rape Culture.

  13. CE   11 years ago

    Can't they just get back to banning the word "bossy" so young girls can grow up to be bosses?

  14. PM   11 years ago

    Gillespie, meanwhile, won't let his son join the Boy Scouts over political disagreement, but that's totally different.

    1. CE   11 years ago

      My dad wouldn't let me join because he didn't want me brainwashed into being a soldier for the state. He remembered the Nazi Youth brigades.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        Hey, who among us hasn't spent a sweaty, sleepless night contemplating the horrors perpetrated by the Boy Scout Nazi Youth brigades?

        Gillespie's hang up is teh gaiz though.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!