NSA Privacy Chief: Civil Liberties a Top Concern


Speaking yesterday at a privacy conference NSA Civil Liberty and Privacy Officer Rebecca Richards said, without a hint of irony or sarcasm, that the intelligence agency considers civil liberties a top concern.
From The Hill:
Civil liberties are a top concern at the National Security Agency (NSA), the agency's new privacy chief said Thursday.
"In their blood is [the] protection of your privacy," Rebecca Richards said Thursday, speaking at a privacy conference hosted by the International Association of Privacy Professionals.
Richards has been the NSA's privacy and civil liberties officer for a little over a month. The creation of the position was announced last year, as the Obama administration responded to a series of controversial revelations about sweeping U.S. government surveillance.
Given that Richards' job was only created last year as part of the Obama administration's response to reporting on the information leaked by NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden it is hard to take seriously Richards' claim that NSA employees have privacy protection "in their blood."
Before starting her current job at the NSA Richards worked as Senior Director of Privacy Compliance at the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the notoriously privacy conscious TSA.
As Reason's J.D. Tuccille wrote about President Obama's weak and vague NSA reforms last January.
More from Reason.com on the NSA here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OT: MLS equals MLB in popularity with kids
I had to stop and figure out what "MLS" was.
I guess kids are getting into real estate.
That too is probably more interesting than baseball.
It's probably just a new way of getting high off of fermented labia sweat or something.
"Bam!|3.7.14 @ 12:13PM|#
I had to stop and figure out what "MLS" was."
Hopefully we can find a cure soon.
I'm doing a walk-a-thon and shit.
Also OT: CA wants to fuck SeaWorld
I've seen a few Free Tilly signs around. If they actually release that orca into the wild, he'll be dead in a week.
But, it's the Orca Welfare and Safety Act. Banning Orca death's is probably in there somewhere.
Although apparently it looks like Sea World would be allowed to keep their Orcas, just not do shows with them.
Do public autopsies before shipping them off to feed lions count?
Where's the Mexican Space Agency when we need them most?
OnT: Give us alt-text Feeney.
Ha! Go ahead, pull the other one.
NOBODY expects the National Security Agency! Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as fear of civil liberties, surprise, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope, and nice red uniforms - Oh damn!
The Soviet communists always claimed that the Soviet Union was a free democratic country. The NSA is no different.
We laugh at Kim Jong-un when we hear he says he invented sliced bread and is a three-time Playmate of the Year and has a herd of flying unicorns just because it's absurd to believe anyone could possibly believe that anyone would believe such preposterous lies - but here we are.
So why would somebody say something that is not only a big, fat lie and not only something that absolutely everybody knows is a big, fat lie but something that everybody knows everybody knows is a big, fat lie? Is there some sort of psychological explanation for why people say things that are patently ridiculous?
Or is it simply a powertrip thing where they look you right in the eye, tell you "I'm going to lie right to your fucking face just to prove to you that I can do any fucking thing I want and there ain't a goddamn thing you can do about it, you worthless piece of shit"?
"In their blood is [the] protection of your privacy,"
Yeah, like the AIDS virus.
"NSA Privacy Officer"
WTF?
Protects the privacy of the NSA.
Don't you know govspeak?
Exactly. You don't think a corporate CFO is looking after your finances, do you?
Civil liberties are a top concern - they keep getting in the way.
Glad I read these before commenting, that was the phrasing that I was going to use.
I don't see how anybody's civil liberties have been getting in the NSA's way, myself.
from the looks of that parking lot, civil liberty seems to peak between 5PM and 9AM.
"In their blood is [the] protection of your privacy," Rebecca Richards said Thursday,
..and that's why thousands of them have resigned in protest at the billions of felony wiretapping counts that their colleagues commit day in and day out, right?
I wish I'd been there so that I could call her a lying bitch.
-jcr
Top. Concern.
"NSA Privacy Chief: Civil Liberties a Top Concern"
"...and once they are destroyed, there will be NO STOPPING US!!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFg7esxnrXs
NSA Privacy Chief: Civil Liberties a Top Concern
Lol'd at the blatant contempt for US citizens.