Google Files Motion to Keep Innocence of Muslims on Youtube—News Roundup
Actor claims she can copyright her performance
UPDATE (2:45 p.m., 2/28/14): Google has filed an emergency motion to keep the "Innocence of Muslims" video online while it appeals the Ninth Circuit's censorship order.
Previously: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered Google to remove the "Innocence of Muslims" video from Youtube after an actor in the film, which sparked protests around the world, claimed that she could copyright her performance.
From CNET:
Google must remove a controversial anti-Islamic film from YouTube, after a US Appeals court on Wednesday ordered it to do so.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 that taking down the film did not constitute a prior restraint on speech -- Google's argument for initially refusing to remove it.
The video, "Innocence of Muslims," has incited international outrage and sparked protests around the world. Its surfacing online also coincided with attacks in Bengazi, Libya, in 2012, during which a US ambassador was killed.
The film was initially cited by then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice as the cause of the riot in Benghazi that resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in September, 2012.
Related previous coverage from Reason:
Scott Shackford on the "Innocence of Muslims" filmmaker not holding a grudge against the Obama administration despite the film being blamed for prompting the deadly 2012 protest in Benghazi.
Nick Gillespie on the reduced security at the Benghazi consulate ahead of the 2012 attack.
Matt Welch on President Obama saying that "those who slander the prophet of Islam" should be condemned.
More from Reason.com on "Innocence of Muslims" here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I assume thirty or forty other websites will be hosting the video in the near future.
So, the first Amendment is dead.
Noted.
I figure it would have to be a pretty specifically worded contract to make sense and most no budgets just do "sign this sheet along with everyone else saying you're cool with being filmed". At least the handful I worked with. They didn't piss of all of Islam though. Just got banned in Germany.
I can totally feel for her trying, but she's still going to be beheaded at some point so she might as well ride the stardom.
It's the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - the most dangerous anti-American, anti human rights court in the country.
No soup free speech for you!