TV Photographer Who Used Drone Suing Police For Calling His Employer and Recommending He Be Disciplined
He was off the clock; had he been working he might be afoul of the FAA too


A TV photographer in Hartford, Connecticut, is suing police after they stopped and questioned him for using a drone to capture images of the scene of an accident, and then allegedly contacted his employer recommending the TV station discipline the photographer. Pedro Rivera, who was not working for the TV station when he used his drone, was briefly suspended and is now suing police for lost wage and the violation of his right to free speech and his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, according to Poynter. In their incident report, a police officer claims he was worried about the "privacy of the victim's body," but Rivera points out photographers on the scene had equipment that caught far more detailed photos of the scene than his remote-controlled aircraft could.
Rivera is not in trouble with the FAA primarily because he wasn't working for the TV station at the time. Had he deployed his drone in the course of working for a media outlet, he would have run afoul of FAA regulations, which permit limited individual use of drones, but prohibit the use of drones for "commercial activity," which for the FAA includes journalism, until regulations are in place in 2015. It's disheartening but not surprising that the feds draw a distinction between individuals and groups of individuals, and deny to the latter group rights that belong to both simply because of a misguided bias against "commercial" activities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He droned the police and there was no boom?
Obviously he needs to sue the manufacturer for selling him a defective drone.
Optional Hellfire missiles not included
It's disheartening but not surprising that the feds draw a distinction between individuals and groups of individuals, and deny to the latter group rights that belong to both simply because of a misguided bias against "commercial" activities.
KKKORPORASHUNS AREN'T PEEPUL!
/Occutard
Pedro Rivera, who was not working for the TV station when he used his drone, was briefly suspended...
Another craven local news director?
Isn't it easier to simply ID the ones that are not? Otherwise, I assume any newsie values their access more than almost anything else.
Did he try telling the cops "This is not the drone you're looking for?"
Alt text: This machine kills farmers fascists.
Or if title text doesn't support html, simply above the law.
"[police]...then allegedly contacted his employer recommending the TV station discipline the photographer"
I've seen this before.
I knew some cops who 'recommended' a bar owner comp them on a regular basis. Then 'suggested' that their currently-suspended buddy be hired 3 nights a week to work the door. They 'recommended' $500 a night. Its amazing how they have such diverse expertise in how other people should run their businesses.
"911, what's your - oh, you're the guy who's too cheap to hire the best possible protection for his business. Don't worry, we'll be right over, if we get around to it."
Any bar is probably running afoul of several regulations, just because there are so many (often nonsensical) regulations, so complaining can be a quick trip to the front of the inspection line.
If Robert De Niro in Casino had just given Joe Bob Briggs one more job where he couldn't do any damage, things would have gone a lot better for him, that's for sure.