Petition In Support of Lifting the FDA Ban on 23andMe Gene Testing Reaches 10,000

Back in November, the Food and Drug Administration sent a letter to the genotype-screening company, 23andMe, basically ordering it to stop offering its $99 direct-to-consumer Personal Genome Service to the public. In December, the company knuckled under the regulators' demands.
The TechFreedom think tank launched a Change.org petition with the goal of urging FDA regulators to back off. The petition stated:
The FDA seems to think that Americans can't be trusted with more information about their potential health risks because some people might make rash decisions with it. But hampering the sales of personal genomics devices isn't the answer.
We haven't all used 23andMe yet, but those of us who have know the real problem is that doctors themselves are behind the curve. When 23andMe sent us our results, we followed their advice: we asked our doctor to talk about them. Most doctors didn't know where to begin. But the more of us ask, the more the medical profession is catching up: brushing up on genomics, taking the time to understand the site, and talking to us about our results and what, if anything, to do about them. By prompting such dialogue, 23andMe has sparked a revolution in how the medical profession uses genetic information.
We urge you not to short-circuit this revolution. Please trust us — and our doctors — to make responsible use of our own genetic information. Instead of hamstringing new technologies, the FDA should focus on educating doctors and patients about the benefits, and limitations, of genetic testing.
The TechFreedom petition has now garnered 10,000 signatures. In a media statement, TechFreedom president Berin Szoka said:
As our petition shows, thousands of Americans were appalled when the FDA ordered 23andMe to stop marketing its home genetics testing kits. The agency claims such tests will cause users to get too little, or too much, treatment. But the FDA hasn't offered any real evidence that Americans are so foolish about their own health — not a single example of someone being hurt, even indirectly, from a test like 23andMe. Nor does the FDA acknowledge perhaps the greatest benefit of 23andMe: encouraging Americans to talk to their doctors about genomics, thus forcing old docs to learn new tricks.
The FDA crackdown has forced 23andMe to cease providing new customers with health-related reports, the primary value of the service. Worse, it has forced at least one upstart competitor to close its doors. This regulatory uncertainty will only slow the inevitable integration of genomics into everyday medicine.
Then-Senator Barack Obama acknowledged this coming revolution in 2007, declaring that "in no area of research is the promise greater than in personalised medicine." Unfortunately, his FDA has undermined this revolution by denying Americans access to information about their own genomes.
See Reason's topic tag for 23andMe more background on this sorry example of regulatory overreach.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good luck with that. Internet petition "signatures" are even less meaningful than Facebook "likes."
How about prayer requests? Will those work?
Try it. Maybe one will cure Epi's cretinism.
Thanks for your opinion, Mary. It really means a lot to all of us.
Remember, only women own their bodies, and only for one specific narrow purpose.
Churning butter?
Gotta keep this sort of information out of the wrong hands!
When Bailey brought this to my attention last year, I asked the family to buy me a kit for Christmas. I've done the spit-in-the-tube thing and mailed it in. I'm now waiting for my results.
Because of this stupid bullshit, 23andMe can only send me raw data. Bailey mentioned another firm that can analyse it for me.
LM: That would be Promethease. Use its new interface.
Instead of a petition, why not write a public comment on the proposed rulemaking? It gets it into the record for any litigation of a resulting rule.
Dude that makes no sense at all man. None.
http://www.AnonWork.tk
I am so outraged at this action by the FDA that I am regularly tempted to send a nasty letter to the people involved telling them exactly what I think of them and what I think they should do with themselves, but I have refrained because, with this administration, I would not be surprised to find the IRS suddenly taking a great interest in my tax returns.