Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Virginia Happy Hours Will Soon Be Slightly Happier, Less Regulated

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 1.8.2014 3:41 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
happy hour
Credit:byt.com

Frankly, I'm not sure whether to raise a glass to toast the good news about happy hour deregulation in Virginia, or quickly down a drink to drown my sorrows about the glacial pace of progress. 

Starting on January 29, Virginia bars and restaurants will enjoy the freedom to advertise the fact that they have happy hours. Cheers!

Previously, drinking establishments could tout drink specials inside their own premises, but nowhere else. Now tweets, signage, and other forms of advertising are legit. 

BUT bars still can't advertise what those drink specials are, only that they exist. Passersby and Twitter followers are only allowed to know the place and time, and the fact that a happy hour is occurring.

"Two for one appletinis at Douchebar tonight" remains a verboten tweet, and the rules still make it tough for bars to compete for customers by offering especially enticing deals.

Also, here's a bunch of other stuff Virginia bars still can't do, via WaPo:

  • All happy hours must end by 9 p.m., and no specials can be offered after that. They can, however, begin again at 6 a.m.
  • Mixed drinks, including margaritas, cannot be served by the pitcher.
  • Open bars with unlimited drinks are not allowed under any circumstances. That's why New Year's Eve parties at Clarendon Ballroom or Clarendon Grill include a couple of drink tickets with the admission fee instead of access to an open bar, as many bars in Washington and Maryland do.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Computer Security Conference Loses Speakers over NSA Scandal

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicyCivil LibertiesCultureNanny StateAlcoholRegulationFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (115)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

    At least it's better than Massachusetts and Vermont. Cheers to Virginia for getting slightly less statist!

    1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

      What's the deal with VT? I see the Prohibition Pig in Waterbury advertising drink specials on Facebook all the time.

      1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        I believe it's that you can't do it time based, but you can do day based.

        There's a place in Burlington (Three Needs) that gets around it by doing "Duff Hour" which is that they open a keg of "Duff" when they open at 4 and it's a dollar a beer. Once the keg runs out there's no "Duff" left.

      2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Also if you haven't been to PP yet, go. And the next time you go to Jay Peak try out the Belfry nearby in Montgomery.

        1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

          Oh, I've been to the Pig. Their Punter's Doddle cocktail is out of this world. I couldn't get it out of my head (though it's a pretty girlie drink, made with Pimm's)

    2. RannedPall   11 years ago

      On the other hand, Nevada has very lax drinking laws, which shows how much clout the gaming industry still has in a usually blue state. Sweet, sweet irony.

  2. RannedPall   11 years ago

    Even though prohibition has long since been repealed, it seems like temperance is still a very much state sanctioned attitude in the Old Dominion. Because F. Y. T. W.

  3. Paul.   11 years ago

    I demand you take that picture of my mother down. She didn't even know she was pregnant with me at the time.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Gotta support the team.

  4. Paul.   11 years ago

    Isn't virginia essentially a suburb of DC, filled with all the petty bureaucrats that make your life hell from Washington? And we're shocked that it's a regulatory hellhole?

    1. RannedPall   11 years ago

      ^This

    2. Creme Fraiche   11 years ago

      Why my wife and I won't settle in Va

      1. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

        Bad as it is, it's still better than MD or DC.

        1. Juice   11 years ago

          I can buy a pitcher of margaritas in MD and DC, not in VA.

          1. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

            You can wear a gun in a bar, as long as the owner does not object, in VA.

    3. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

      From what I heard from my ex, who was in love with DC, one of the best things about DC was the happy hours.

      1. John   11 years ago

        There are some good ones. But they are filled with DC people. If I were single and just looking to nail hot chicks, the happy hours are seriously a target rich environment. But beyond that, it is Washington.

        1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

          She really liked everyone being in suits all the time. And oddly the DC weather. One of our sticking points was that I was not going to move to DC or NYC.

          1. Fluffy   11 years ago

            DC has mild winters but in the summers it is capital H Hot.

            And humid.

            One time I counted 23 days with intense 15 minute thunderstorms every day from 5:15 to 5:45 PM. The humidity was so strong it just had to discharge itself somehow.

            1. John   11 years ago

              The summers in Washington are arctic compared to Texas or the low country in South Carolina and Georgia.

              1. some guy   11 years ago

                And the Gulf states make Washington feel like a desert.

            2. RannedPall   11 years ago

              Living in SoCal, this is foreign to me. We only have two seasons here: dry hot and chilly cold. With the only two questions before we leave the house being: "Do I need a sweater?" Or "Can I wear shorts?". I kind of wish we had four distinct seasons, but then I reconsider when I see you polar vortex chumps prying your car door opens with crowbars.

              1. The Knarf Yenrab   11 years ago

                On the other hand, the rest of us don't have to pay $600k for $80k worth of house. All about priorities and whether you like to surf.

                1. RannedPall   11 years ago

                  My priorities are in n out and a fixed property tax rate 😉

              2. Agammamon   11 years ago

                I live in southern Arizona and every once in a while I think 'it'd be nice to build a snowman, like Calvin and Hobbes art'.

                Then I remember the price to be paid for that luxury.

            3. Juice   11 years ago

              DC has mild winters but in the summers it is capital H Hot.

              I love it when people say this. It gets into the 90s for a couple of weeks. Big deal. It's not even all that humid.

          2. John   11 years ago

            I actually like the weather. The summers are only hot if you have never been through the real ones they get in the South. And the winters are only cold if you have never been through a real one in the upper Midwest. You get four seasons of 5 intensity. I like that. And the wind doesn't blow much, which is nice.

            1. some guy   11 years ago

              VA gets a taste of every kind of disaster, but no more. A little bit of ice a snow. A few tornados. The occasional tropical storm. Enough thunderstorms to keep everything green through the summer. Everything is in moderation.

            2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

              It's humid and gross.

              1. John   11 years ago

                If you have never been to a place like Charleston or New Orleans that actually is humid and gross, sure.

                1. amelia   11 years ago

                  Don't forget the squirrel-sized cockroaches that roam the sidewalks at night in SC and LA. They offset the somewhat lower temps after the sun goes down.

              2. Paul.   11 years ago

                I know, and then there's the weather.

              3. Juice   11 years ago

                It's humid and gross.

                DC is not that humid. It rarely cracks 70%. It's usually 30-50%. In the winter it's dry as hell. Or it seems that way because I have to bathe in lotion or my entire body feels like it's going to crack open.

    4. some guy   11 years ago

      Isn't virginia essentially a suburb of DC

      Only the parts near large bodies of water.

      filled with all the petty bureaucrats

      Name a state that isn't.

      And we're shocked that it's a regulatory hellhole?

      Virginia's hate for fun things predates this country.

    5. Byte Me   11 years ago

      Paul: Being from the Old Dominion, I cant ell you that it very much is. After all, we did just elect an outward socialist (who doesn't even know much about our state constitution)as governor.

  5. Swiss Servator, KALT!   11 years ago

    FREEDOM!

    /William Wallace, about to down a half price usquebaugh

  6. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

    "Two for one appletinis at Douchebar tonight" remains a verboten tweet

    Everything negative I have ever said about KMW, I take back.

    1. John   11 years ago

      She only knows it so well because she lives it. Something tells me KMW has guzzled her share of appletinies at the local Douchebar, which there is one on every block in Washington.

      1. Kaptious Kristen   11 years ago

        This is why I was very, very upset when Tiffany Tavern closed. As far as I can tell, there are no more dives in Alexandria. And Murphy's doesn't count.

        1. John   11 years ago

          I have been to my share of dive bars. They don't do it for me much either. Most of them act like serving shit drinks and bad food somehow adds to the "atmosphere".

          I can think of very few legitimate good casual bars that I like. Most of them are fucking ancient and out west or in a couple of cases in New York and a few other cities. But they are rare and they usually have to be really old and just right. And are usually the product of their environment. For example, no place east of the Mississippi has a decent beer joint. They don't exist back here. But nowhere west has an even passable fake Irish pup.

          1. kinnath   11 years ago

            robc is trying to remedy part of that 😉

          2. RannedPall   11 years ago

            If you're ever out west in Southern California, head to the congregation ale house. So many beer choices, and they open at 11am! Get hammered before lunch.

            1. John   11 years ago

              I will remember that. The older I get, the more I like to drink in a bar in the late morning and afternoon.

            2. Mad Scientist   11 years ago

              Get hammered before lunch.

              You wait that long?

              1. RannedPall   11 years ago

                You're assuming I'm up before 10:45am.

                1. some guy   11 years ago
        2. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

          Murphy's has really gone down hill since the IRA went off the radar.

    2. amelia   11 years ago

      Yeah, this made me LOL, which is rather rare.

  7. Dave Krueger   11 years ago

    If I were a judge instead of an engineer, all the exceptions hidden in the wording of the 1st Amendment would magically become visible to me, right?

    Go ahead and tell me how announcing happy hour equates to yelling "fire!" in a crowded theater. I dare ya.

    * Assuming the crowded theater argument ever had a single molecule of merit in the first place...

    1. John   11 years ago

      First, "yelling fire in a crowded theater" is not a crime. Doing something, like maybe yelling fire or setting off a firecracker that causes people harm is the crime, not yelling.

      From that one fiction has arisen so much harm. People always say that the government can regulate commercial speech because of fraud. Fraudulent speech is not protected they say. Bullshit, Fraudulent speech is protected. What is not protected is the fraudulent acts that result from that speech. So sure, say whatever you want even if it is meant to defraud someone. That is not a crime. But when that speech results in you taking money from someone under false pretenses, that is a crime. It is a subtle difference but it is a difference. And no one gets that. Instead they think fraud laws are prohibiting speech and thus use them as a precedent to rape commercial speech.

      1. BakedPenguin   11 years ago

        What is not protected is the fraudulent acts that result from that speech.

        Unless you're currently President.

        1. The Knarf Yenrab   11 years ago

          Quis custodiet ipsos custodes, it's good to be king, when the president does it that means it's not illegal, etc.

      2. Apatheist ?_??   11 years ago

        Anybody who brings up the "fire in a crowded theater" bullshit should be immediately ignored. Not only is it an argument from authority but its a bad authority. That case law was overturned because they were using the logic to throw people in jail for advocating against the draft. Socialists no less! Whenever I hear a progressive bring that up I want to punch them in the face.

        1. John   11 years ago

          And as I explain, the logic doesn't even work. Really all they have is "commercial speech is different because of profits or we say so".

          Commercial speech is the way you make your living. Thanks to these assholes you have more freedom to watch and make porn than you do to make a living. Yeah, that makes sense.

        2. Zeb   11 years ago

          It was never even case law either. No one has ever been convicted of a crime for shouting "fire" in a crowded theatre.

      3. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        So you are saying that "Yeah, this box is totally full of gold" is protected, but then actually taking the money for it is the crime?

        1. John   11 years ago

          Yes. If I don't ever actually take your money, how is it a crime? If it is, then isn't pretty much any lie a crime?

          1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

            I'm down with this argument.

          2. R C Dean   11 years ago

            Exactly. There's no fraud without harm. If I just give you my box of not-gold, not harm, no fraud. If I take your money in exchange for my box of not-gold, harm and thus, fraud.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      To be fair, I'd presume their reasoning is that under the 21st Amendment, the states have the right to control the manufacture and sale of alcohol.

      1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Which they aren't doing in this specific aspect. They are controlling what people are saying about the sale of alcohol.

  8. Ryan60657   11 years ago

    No Happy Hour allowed at all in Illinois.

    1. RannedPall   11 years ago

      So? At least you have your guns, bitter clinger.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   11 years ago

        Ontario establishments, as far as I know, are allowed to have happy hour but they cannot advertise or tell their customers that there is a happy hour on.

        It's moronic to say the least.

    2. GILMORE   11 years ago

      REAP THE ENDLESS MISERY OF TOTAL-HOUR EQUALITY, WHERE NO HOURS ARE FAVORED ABOVE ANY OTHER

  9. MP   11 years ago

    NH pushed last call back one whole hour. The energy wasted on debating it was phenomenal. Particular since the whole concept of "last call" is just a stupid arbitrary THAT'S ENOUGH FOR YOU from the Nanny's. Especially in light of the research out the UK that showed that tighter hours led to higher binge drinking.

    1. KDN   11 years ago

      Especially in light of the research out the UK that showed that tighter hours led to higher binge drinking.

      I'm curious to know what the market-clearing closing time is. Here in NJ the standard Saturday closing time is 2 AM and there's a lot of pressure to beat the clock by about 1, 1:30. But if you go across the river to NYC most people go home before the lights go on at 4 AM and the need to binge in order to polish off the night isn't so pronounced. State-enforced closing times are bullshit regardless, but I think it's an interesting question.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        Well, England had 11 o'clock closing time for a long long time. Which meant that every night at 11 the streets were full of drunk people who had spent the last several hours trying to get as much drinking in as possible.

    2. Juice   11 years ago

      I like the way it is in New Orleans. There is no last call (unless you want it).

  10. Lmbouton   11 years ago

    I can't believe that this was even a thing to begin with. But at least we can drink at 6AM...

  11. Bo Cara Esq.   11 years ago

    Alcohol laws are some of the most absurd laws of all. I noticed the other day that despite copious beer commercials during a football game, in none of them was a person actually depicted drinking the beverage, and a friend told me it is illegal to show that. So the beverage can be shown, people can be shown lifting a glass or putting one down after drinking, magical properties and parties can be extolled as coming from the beer, but we can not have someone shown drinking it, that way lies chaos!

    1. kinnath   11 years ago

      I can't find it on youtube, but there was a commercial in the 70s or 80s showing several people sitting around a table with a bottle of beer on the table. A guy in a gorilla costume walks in; sits down at the table; then guzzles the bottle of beer -- Specifically to thwart this law.

    2. some guy   11 years ago

      You can even show the amber liquid flowing from a bottle as long no mouths receive it.

      1. Zeb   11 years ago

        So, butt-chugging is OK?

  12. GILMORE   11 years ago

    "Two for one appletinis at Douchebar tonight" remains a verboten tweet"

    ok = Count how many things are wrong with this sentence.

    I get... at least 4. No, 5.

  13. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

    OT: Wasn't there some regular here a while back who went by "24AheadDotCom," pal of Dave Weigel maybe? Looks like he is trolling National Review lately, unless it is someone else.

    1. John   11 years ago

      Is that Donderoo or Lonewacko? Or are Donerdoo and Lonewacko the same guy? I forget. But yes, he was a xenophobic Rockwell type.

      1. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

        Donderooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

        1. GILMORE   11 years ago

          Ahh, the call of the wild Eric Dondero, The One True Libertarian

          (cue star spangled banner, fireworks, image of Giulianis face superimposed with a crying bald eagle and marines raising the flag over iwo jima)

          24ahead.com however, is the great LONEWACKO himself. How could you people possibly forget him! LoneWacko, nee, OrangeLineSpecial, nee, something about the Kochtopus (before the progressives started using it!).

          ... and 24ahead.com, that was his new, somewhat less blatantly psychotically racist anti-immigration site.

          http://24ahead.com/s/question-authority

          I will admit, I don't know if he has ever in fact asked a politician a tough question and posted the answer on youtube. Ever. But he's trying.

          1. tarran   11 years ago

            24ahead.com however, is the great LONEWACKO himself. How could you people possibly forget him! LoneWacko, nee, OrangeLineSpecial, nee, something about the Kochtopus (before the progressives started using it!)

            Never forget the Lonewacko

            1. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

              Good Lord, that is funny.

            2. GILMORE   11 years ago

              Oh, shit... where are the original files?? I see it links to Dhex (Mike O'c) website = did he have those? I *wants*

              I love that he graced the page with the apropos threat to sue, and someone translated it into Spanish. PRICELESS

              1. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

                That threat was the best part for me, until I saw it translated into Spanish.

          2. Auric Demonocles   11 years ago

            Did you ever volunteer on a Libertarian campaign?

            1. tarran   11 years ago

              I demand your cell phone number so I can challenge you to a fight! I'm tougher than you because I got busted down from E-6 to E-4 for fighting while I was a combat storekeeper in the Navy!

          3. Zeb   11 years ago

            Didn't some regular get banned for a while for posting Lonewhacko's personal info on here?

          4. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

            I will admit, I don't know if he has ever in fact asked a politician a tough question and posted the answer on youtube. Ever. But he's trying.

            Hell, even I have managed that one, with Kane no less. Still not as popular as Barney Miller clips.

      2. Fluffy   11 years ago

        Dondero wasn't a Rockwell guy, he was a Giuliani guy.

        I think it's either Lonewacko or American.

        1. John   11 years ago

          I mistyped. I meant Rothbard type. And now that I remember Donderoo and Lonewacko were not the same. 24ahead.com is Lonewacko and he was a total Rothbardite xenophobe.

          1. The Knarf Yenrab   11 years ago

            Rothbard become more socon-style political and less philosophical the older he got. It's unfair to him & his legacy to call him xenophobic when he spent the first 60 years of his life calling people like Ed Clark onto the carpet for supporting restrictions on immigration.

            1. John   11 years ago

              But he renounced all of that went closed boarders. You can't ignore that.

              1. The Knarf Yenrab   11 years ago

                The older he got, the more pugnacious and political he got. There's no denying he traded theory and political modeling for attempts to inject a little libertarianism into the American political system.

                But he's famous for his writings as a young man, and those are uniformly anti-state and open border, so I'm going to object to having him called a xenophobe when 95% of his writings are in support of property rights and freedom to contract.

        2. GILMORE   11 years ago

          No, American is no Lonewacko. Similar interests, completely different M.O.

          Lonewacko seemed to be almost schizophrenic in his paranoia out the MexicanGovernment accumulating politicalpower through massiveimmigration. Conspiratorial at heart. He seemed to believe that *he's* the most Libertarian person alive, because only HE truly appreciates that AuthoritarianRegimes would gainpower through OpenBorders, etc, etc. And that through our glibness we would open the nation up to the despoliation of the great unwashed brown hordes clamoring to overrun our lands...

          He even goes so far as to try and spread this idea that WE HAVE FAILED HIM in our false ideology =

          http://www.urbandictionary.com.....headDotCom

          In fact, I'd almost say he was less Racist than American (who has kind of an 'Evolution' schtick he is fond of)...although paranoid in the extreme. Like his Mexican nanny had molested him.

      3. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

        Not sure about those, but he seems to have a sock puppet called "louisianalag" answering for him too.

      4. tarran   11 years ago

        Dude! Please neither Lonewacko nor Dondero were Lew Rockwell types.

        Dondero hated the Lew Rockwell types for trying to cede Mexico to Al Queda and thus expose the US to Al Queda Scud Missile attacks (no he really argued this).

        Lonewacko hated the Lew Rockwell types (some of them anyway) for arguing for open borders.

        Every now and then you say something real stupid... this is one of those times. 🙂

        1. John   11 years ago

          That or I mistype a hell of a lot. I meant Rothbard. Not Rockwell, whoever he is.

          1. tarran   11 years ago

            Dude! Stop digging!

            Lew Rockwell is Peikoff to Rothbard's Ayn Rand. Rockwell is a doctrinaire Rothbardian!

            1. John   11 years ago

              Last I heard Rothbard changed his opinion on open boarders and objected to them before his death. It was kind of big deal when it happened. Lonewacko was in line with that.

              1. tarran   11 years ago

                Rothbard's argument was a highly technical one (and an easily taken down one IMHO) that used the State as corporation model and posited land owners forming some cartel that refused to sell land or conduct business with outsiders.

                Rothbard was a huge fan of international trade.

                Lonewacko's was an isolationist who fretted about foreign hordes outbreeding us.

                To equate the two is a specious as calling you a neoconfederate because you and Tom Dilorenzo are both opposed to affirmative action.

        2. Austrian Anarchy   11 years ago

          This 24ahead troll assumes everybody who mentions Reason is an open borders type and he seems against that. Hard to tell, he writes like he is banging his ass on a keyboard.

          1. John   11 years ago

            That is Lonewacko. And his troll act was to make every single thread about immigration and how the Reasonites really hate liberty since they want to invite in a bunch of Mexicans who will vote in socialism. There wasn't a single topic that he would not link back to that.

            1. GILMORE   11 years ago

              +1 increased politicalpower for the Mexicangovernment

      5. Jordan   11 years ago

        Lonewacko. Not the same as Donderooooooooooooo.

  14. Dweebston   11 years ago

    Odd that the knowledge of countless hundreds of thousands of prisoners serving time for consuming unauthorized chemicals lingers like a dull ache in my forehad, but nothing ignites arrhythmic pounding rage in my head like indiscrete flexing of power by petty city councilors and state legislators.

    Except maybe dronemurdering wedding parties. That hits a bit harder.

    Public floggings all around.

    1. Fluffy   11 years ago

      The judicial system is vast and impersonal but petty administration is personal and direct.

  15. Rich   11 years ago

    BUT bars still can't advertise what those drink specials are, only that they exist.

    Like sentencing guidelines?

  16. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Any Brit H&R readers here?? I am surprised I've never asked this.

    I lived in London for 2 years, and there was wild discrepancy and variance about what the @)#($+@ rules really were even in different neighborhoods. I had one guy tell me discounting drinks was illegal (full stop); another that you could do it, but only at certain times/holidays, and others who just said 'fuck it' and did what they wanted but only communicated via word of mouth.

    I generally didn't pay much attention because I was drunk at the time.

    1. RannedPall   11 years ago

      Drunk the entire two years? Eh, when in Britannia.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        I remember a few brief, horrifying moments of sobriety. It was raining.

    2. some guy   11 years ago

      Go to Texas sometime. The laws vary even without counties/cities. You can be at a bar where almost anything goes, then cross the street into a "dry" section.

      1. Juice   11 years ago

        That totally boggled my mind the first time I experienced it.

  17. GILMORE   11 years ago

    That made less sense than the original sentence.

    (slow clap)

  18. Irish   11 years ago

    God you're an idiot.

  19. Jordan   11 years ago

    U wot m8?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!