Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Shut It All Down

Peter Suderman | From the January 2014 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | cc
(cc)

As congressional Republicans and Democrats squabbled over budget deficits and government shutdowns in Clinton-era Washington, Contributing Editor Carolyn Lochhead took both sides to task. In "Child's Play" (February 1996), Lochhead wrote "Republicans say they will save America's children, while Clinton claims that he will save America's values." Both, according to Lochhead, were wrong.

"Even if the two sides agree on an honest seven-year plan [to balance the budget] before the 1996 election," she wrote, "it will represent at best only a modest step toward forestalling a problem that will leave American children and American values alike wrecked on the shoals of today's potent elderly voting bloc." The Republican proposal would lead to a balanced budget in the near term, but it would leave the country's long-term finances in deep trouble, starting around 2010. "That's when the 76 million-strong baby boom generation begins to retire and sign up for benefits in the big entitlement programs that now drive the federal budget: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and civil service and military retirement."

In October 2013, fiscal disputes in Congress once again led to a shutdown showdown. The proximate cause for the impasse was a Republican charge to defund the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. ObamaCare, but it arrived against the backdrop of worsening federal entitlement finances.

The 2013 Social Security Trustees report found an unfunded liability of $23.1 trillion-almost twice the total federal debt. And in August the Congressional Budget Office's long-term fiscal outlook warned that America's federal finances were on an unsustainable path. Rising spending on entitlements, particularly health entitlements, were the largest problem area.

Looming entitlement shortfalls are both "substantial" and "quite certain," the entitlements' trustees wrote, and "elected officials will best serve the interests of the public if financial corrections are enacted at the earliest practicable time."

Despite the shutdown, few significant fixes were forthcoming. A laundry list of Republican demands barely broached the subject, and even a proposal by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the chairman of the House Budget Committee, to alter Medicare financing would only have tinkered around the edges. Indeed, GOP legislators seemed unable to decide what they wanted out of the conflict. "We have to get something out of this," Republican Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana said. "And I don't know what that even is."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Your New Robot Overlords

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyEconomicsCongressObamacareGovernment Shutdown
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (5)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JWW   12 years ago

    The crazy part is that while Republicans are bringing to the table weak and ineffective solutions to these problems, the Democrats are fanatically trying to increase spending on EVERYTHING. They're acting like just printing all the money we need is actually a sane policy.

    1. OneOut   11 years ago

      Krugman tells them it's the right thing to do.

  2. alaamiah   11 years ago

    Emergency Management Agency, which is responsible

  3. Moving   11 years ago

    Editor Carolyn Lochhead took both sides to task. In "Child's Play" (February 1996), Lochhead

  4. baryan   6 years ago

    I essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long term! "a great deal obliged to you for giving American explicit this remarkable opportunity to earn more money from domestic. This in addition coins has adjusted my lifestyles in such quite a few manners by which, supply you!". go to this website online domestic media tech tab for extra element thank you......
    http://www.geosalary.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

California Enacts Sweeping Exemption to Development-Killing Environmental Law

Christian Britschgi | 7.1.2025 1:10 PM

Senate Votes 99–1 To Remove AI Moratorium from 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 

Jack Nicastro | 7.1.2025 12:27 PM

Why the 'Current Policy' Baseline Is a Massive Gimmick That Effectively Kills the Filibuster

Eric Boehm | 7.1.2025 12:00 PM

New Jersey Towns Face Setback in Lawsuit Against State's Affordable Housing Mandate

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 11:45 AM

Why the NFLPA Kept Damning Collusion Evidence From Its Own Players

Jason Russell | 7.1.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!