Poll: Only 17 Percent of Americans Support the War in Afghanistan


According to a CNN/ORC International survey released today, only 17 percent of Americans support the war in Afghanistan and most Americans want the troops there home before the December 2014 deadline. The war may be the most unpopular in American history.
From CNN:
Just 17% of those questioned say they support the 12-year-long war, down from 52% in December 2008. Opposition to the conflict now stands at 82%, up from 46% five years ago.
"Those numbers show the war in Afghanistan with far less support than other conflicts," CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said. "Opposition to the Iraq war never got higher than 69% in CNN polling while U.S. troops were in that country, and while the Vietnam War was in progress, no more than six in 10 ever told Gallup's interviewers that war was a mistake."
The CNN/ORC International poll is the latest poll suggesting that Americans are becoming increasingly disillusioned with an interventionist foreign policy. Earlier this month, the Pew Research Center released its poll examining how American's view the United States' place in the world. For the first time in the history of the poll (almost fifty years), more than half of the respondents agreed with the statement, "The U.S. should mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own."

Not only do more than half of Americans as a whole support being less involved abroad, more than half of Republicans and Independents also believe that the U.S. should mind its own business:
About half of independents (55%) and Republicans (53%) and 46% of Democrats say the United States should mind its own business internationally. In 2002, following the 9/11 attacks, 27% of independents, 22% of Republicans and 40% of Democrats wanted the United States to mind its own business internationally.
That most Americans are fed up with the war in Afghanistan and want the U.S. to mind its own business is good news for non-interventionist Republicans such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).
It is good news that most Americans oppose an interventionist foreign policy and that the vast majority do not support the longest war in U.S. history. Unfortunately, foreign policy is only one of the issues on which the opinions of American lawmakers differ from those of the American public.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You know who else wanted to cut and run from Afghanistan?
Soviet Russia? Faster than America did, if I recall correctly.
Gorbachev?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyR-_OqC5SQ
Can't see how this can be Godwinned since Bushitler stayed the course. Though not as thoroughly as the man who ran on 'fighting the right war' whom replaced him.
Lord Elphinstone?
Durand?
Dr. Watson?
I wonder what percentage of Americans could find Afghanistan on a globe...
Afghanistan where empires go to die.
The Mongols didn't seem to have a problem with it.
Oh, yeah? Where is the Mongolian empire now?
Being held at bay by NSA surveillance programs.
Where is the Mongolian empire now?
Waiting to pounce.
Building up a giant cache of goods.
So they can supplies us all.
Fine. Be that way.
Afghanistan where western empires go to die.
Persia?
Nope. Alexander the Great and The British both had their way with the place. Both withdrew because they didn't need to; they were not pushed out.
The 'Graveyard of Empires' line is a lie.
I wouldn't say the British "had their way with the place." In the first Anglo-Afghan War, they were indeed pushed out, and 1 guy out of an army of 4,500 men survived. They were able to achieve most of their goals in the Second War, although Afghanistan maintained independence, and the British lost 10,000 men in the conflict. The Third War was a minor tactical victory for the British, but largely a strategic Afghan win, and the British suffered more casualties. Any way you slice it, I don't think that qualifies as "having their way with the place."
As for Alexander the Great, he never gave up Afghanistan (then known as "Bactria"). He acquired it by conquering the Persian Empire, of which Bactria was a province. It became part of the Seleucid Empire after his death. Eventually, a Seleucid governor of the province declared independence during a time of Seleucid weakness, to form the Greco-Bactrian kingdom.
By my count, Afghanistan has been part of somebody's empire for longer than its been independent. By centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan
Yeah, I wasn't saying that Afghanistan has never been subdued, or anything like that, just that Cytotoxic's assertions aren't really accurate
I wonder what percentage of Americans actually know that the war is still going on.
Is it bad that this video made me cry for joy like a little girl?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdxhDHcF5Fc
"The war may be the most unpopular in American history."
I doubt that.
Just because the NYTs likes it doesn't mean everyone in America does.
If I had a time machine, I would check the War of 1812....that did not seem to go over well.
I know a few sailors and soldiers who were deployed there and they're against it, too. When the people executing the mission don't believe in it, how effective can it possibly be?
Depends on what you were doing there - the folks working with the Afghan Gov't and their cops are especially bitter.
My only regrets - The Afghans that bought in with us will all be dead or fled.... and I wish we could put Hekmatyar Gulbuddin's head on a pike on the way out.
What you guys don't get is that just because we stop stepping into the affairs of other countries doesn't mean that everyone in the world will love us and we'll never be attacked again.
/HitAndRunpublicans
What you don't understand is that foreign policy is not a popularity contest and getting attacked has nothing to do with whether or not people love us.
Yeah, what this country needs is a firm grasp of the concept of the punitive expedition.
Its the nation-building that gets us in trouble. If we would (a) not get militarily engaged with any nation that hasn't attacked us, and (b) kick the everloving shit out of any nation that does attack us, "proportionality" be damned, followed by (c) going home, we wouldn't get into these quagmires.
No it doesn't mean we'll never get attacked again, but a noninterventionist foreign policy does substantially cut the odds of such an attack.
Sometimes man you jsut have to rol lwith it, thats all dude.
http://www.BeinAnon.tk