Court Strips Immunity from Sheriff in Maryland Lawsuit
$1.1 million verdict for retaliation against deputy allegedly forced to falsify a report
The Maryland sheriff who fired a deputy for releasing documents showing he was forced to falsify a police report is not entitled to immunity, the 4th Circuit ruled, affirming a $1.1 million jury award.
James "Troy" Durham had worked as a deputy sheriff in the Somerset County Maryland, Sheriff's Office (SCSO) for twenty years when, in 2008, he used pepper spray and physical force to arrest a man fleeing from a state trooper.
Durham later prepared a report on the incident stating that he hit the suspect twice on the suspect's face in self defense, and "delivered two knee blows to the left side of the suspect's body" to overcome his resistance.
The next day, Durham's supervisor asked him if he needed to go to the hospital, suggesting that he must require medical attention as a result of the incident. Durham said he did not need to go to the hospital.
Four days later, his supervisor ordered Durham to charge the suspect with assaulting him and resisting arrest, but Durham declined to do so after speaking with other supervisory officers.
Less than 24 hours later, Durham was escorted into an interrogation room by two detectives who aggressively questioned him about his report.
The detectives refused to allow him to call his attorney, and told Durham that if he did not revise his original police report, he would be charged internally and criminally with assault on the suspect.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So who pays the $1.1 million. Was the Sheriff found personally liable or will the county being paying?
just before I looked at the draft of $7749, I accept ...that...my friends brother woz actualey erning money parttime from there computar.. there moms best frend has been doing this for under 6 months and recently repayed the depts on there apartment and purchased a gorgeous audi. navigate to this website.....
========================
http://W???W?W.FB??4???9.C???oM
========================
The taxpayer is ALWAYS to be blamed in these kinds of situations, do NOT fret...