Bankrupt San Bernardino Spends $1 Million on Police Raises

In our November Reason magazine feature, "How to Break an American City," we highlighted the dysfunctional fiscal policies driving municipalities into the poorhouse. I made note of a specific policy in the city charter for San Bernardino, California, which was approved to enter bankruptcy earlier this year.
San Bernardino's charter requires that the city tie the wages of its public safety employees to the averages of those paid in nearby cities with similar population sizes. Unfortunately, San Bernardino is the poorest of those cities, meaning it is legally bound to pay its police and firefighters much more than its market can bear. As a result, even while making its case for bankruptcy months ago, the City Council voted to increase some police salaries. They did so again just last week.
Courtesy of CalPensions and Public CEO:
Following the city charter, a reluctant San Bernardino city council last week approved a police pay raise costing about $1 million, the second $1 million police salary increase since the city filed for bankruptcy last year.
The four council members who voted for the 3 percent pay hike all criticized a city charter provision linking San Bernardino to the average police pay in 10 other cities, most much wealthier with higher per-capita income.
When a pay hike was approved last March, the city attorney, James Penman, and a councilman, Robert Jenkins, argued competitive pay attracts quality officers to combat a high crime rate. Penman was recalled last month, and Jenkins was not re-elected.
"I think most residents are puzzled and outraged that we are compelled during bankruptcy to provide substantial pay increases," a newly elected councilman, Jim Mulvihill, said last week. "Not only that, it's not any negotiation within our community."
Several groups pushed to repeal the charter provision after the bankruptcy. But the city council chose not to put a repeal measure on the ballot last month, citing short timelines and ballot costs, the San Bernardino Sun reported.
Read the whole story here.
Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.
Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But the city council chose not to put a repeal measure on the ballot last month, citing short timelines and ballot costs, plus convincing arguments made by the police as they pulled each councilperson over multiple times to show them pictures of their kids at school, the San Bernardino Sun reported.
I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,... http://PERFECT23.COM
Yeah, I'm sure those ballot costs are really astronomical, you know, compared to the extra $1 million in salary expenses next year.
-San Bernardino's charter requires that the city tie the wages of its public safety employees to the averages of those paid in nearby cities with similar population sizes.
Wow. If teacher's unions are the sirloin we have to pay for, then public safety employees unions are Delmonicos.
More like hams and butts.
..."But the city council chose not to put a repeal measure on the ballot last month, citing short timelines and ballot costs,"...
Yes, I'm sure the ballot costs figured heavily in this, along with such minor issues as the number of union votes involved.
If you have the time, go google CA public salaries. I think SacBee has a web site where you can look up salaries by department. Don't know if it includes city salaries, but I remember lots of CHIP officers in there making over $200K/yr.
OT: speaking of police.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new.....e-cop.html
lol, stupid corrupt cops.
http://www.PrivacyTru.tk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4TBRcVe4mY