Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Economics

Hidden Debt Crisis

Off books, off balance

Brian Doherty | From the November 2013 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The official U.S. debt has exploded in recent years, from $5 trillion in 2007 to an estimated $12 trillion by the end of 2013. Potentially worse for the U.S. economy, though, are future obligations that are not part of the official debt count. According to a new National Bureau of Economic Research study by James D. Hamilton, an economist from the University of California, San Diego, these so-called "off-balance-sheet" commitments amounted to $70 trillion in 2012-six times the size of the official debt.

Included in that potentially crippling number are government programs supporting or guaranteeing housing, education loans, bank deposit insurance, Federal Reserve holdings, Social Security and Medicare promises, and civil service and military retirement obligations. (Hamilton specifically excludes private pension guarantees, veterans' medical benefits, and flood insurance, though those may also prove costly.)

Hamilton notes that off-balance-sheet obligations can hurt the government's balance sheet in real time: Losses at savings and loans in the 1980s, for example, "ended up dwarfing the capabilities of the now-defunct Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation to honor its promise to guarantee depositors" and likely resulted in $124 billion in federal payouts. Hamilton figures that housing and education, and obligations to the elderly and sick, seem most likely to haunt us with future real costs.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Cacophonous World

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

EconomicsNational DebtDebt
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (4)

Latest

Trump Says He Hates Socialism. So Why Is He Acting Like a Socialist?

John Stossel | 11.12.2025 12:30 AM

The Perils of Viewing Psilocybin Strictly As a Psychiatric Medication

Jacob Sullum | 11.12.2025 12:01 AM

Candace Owens Can't Present Serious Evidence for Her Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories

Robby Soave | 11.11.2025 6:05 PM

Trump Pardons Mountain Runner Michelino Sunseri, Who Was Prosecuted for Using an Unapproved Trail

Jacob Sullum | 11.11.2025 5:50 PM

The 50-Year Mortgage: Completely Fine or a Total Flop?

Christian Britschgi | 11.11.2025 11:15 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300